Time to restore law in the U.S.

[P@triot]

Yes, promoting the general welfare, knows no bounds.

Really? So if President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

I've schooled you on this over a dozen times already. The "General Welfare" is explicitly restricted to the federal governments 18 enumerated powers.

Nobody takes the right wing seriously.

Snowflake - you didn't answer the question. If President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

 

[P@triot]

Thank God President Trump and the Republicans are restoring law and order in the U.S. once again...

She gives illegal alien food and water—then things get scary

 

[P@triot]

But the real heart of the legislation is what Democrats say is the guilt by association — and giving the government the right to criminally prosecute and seize the assets of everyone who planned a protest and everyone who participated. And what’s worse, said Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, is that the person who may have broken a window, triggering the claim there was a riot, might actually not be a member of the group but someone from the other side.

The Dumbocrats know all about that tactic - uh? No wonder they are concerned about it - they created it and they do it. Remember when they sent people to Tea Party rallies with t-shirts that said "I hate n*ggers"? Except that their faces were captured in pictures and some of their associates came forward with screen shots of their devout loyalty to the Dumbocrats on Facebook? Oops.

Or how about all of the homosexual left-wing hatriots who have faked crimes against themselves and filed fake police reports?

We have a justice system junior. And while you left-wing hatriots refuse to use it (and corrupt it whenever you can), is conservatives will properly investigate and will properly execute due process. So what are you worried about?

according to that legislation, it doesn't matter.

According to your reading comprehension - you need to return to the 2nd grade. Immediately.

 

[P@triot]

Mr. Trump is for the drug war; that is worse.

Worse than the rape of a 14-year old girl?!? You are seriously disturbed.

you are worse, for trampling natural rights.

The "natural right" to rape a 14-year old girl?!?

virgin chicks were safer in Sodom, than in other town.

So for the third time now you are supporting the "right" to rape women?

 

[P@triot]

i can tell y'all are just trolls, because y'all have, nothing but fallacy instead of valid arguments.

You can't be talking to me - because I've obliterated you with "valid arguments". Most of all - I've obliterated you with facts. You just keep repeating bizarre false narratives.

 

[P@triot]

Not everyone can come here legally because we don't have a market friendly visa.

We have legal immigration, visas, work visas, H1B1's, etc. You're lying in every post and you're completely out of excuses. We're enforcing the law again as it should be. You'll just have to accept it or learn to deal with it.

 

[P@triot]

Promote the general welfare is in our Constitution.

So if President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that? It would be 100% constitutional and you would support it without question?

 

[Geaux4it]

Why should these illegal wetbacks get special treatment?

Because Timmy believes that the law does not apply to left-wingers.

I agree. To the left, entitlements have no bounds.

It started when they got trophies in their youth for being #6 on the bench warmers club

In mature terms today, they get ponies, balloons and cry rooms

-Geaux

Yes, promoting the general welfare, knows no bounds. We have a defense clause, not an offense clause nor a general warfare clause. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Wow.. How do you define 'General Welfare' by your definition. I seem to recall it to be something different than you describe

-Geaux

Promote the general welfare is in our Constitution. Promoting the common defense is not. Is that, comparison and contrast, easier for you?

Lets try again. Define general welfare as you understand it. I'm not familiar with how you interpret it

-Geaux

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, promoting the general welfare, knows no bounds.

Really? So if President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

I've schooled you on this over a dozen times already. The "General Welfare" is explicitly restricted to the federal governments 18 enumerated powers.

Nobody takes the right wing seriously.

Snowflake - you didn't answer the question. If President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

We have a Constitution. I don't take the right wing seriously about the law or economics.

Why not use a dictionary for welfare like y'all do for socialism.

 

[danielpalos]

Because Timmy believes that the law does not apply to left-wingers.

I agree. To the left, entitlements have no bounds.

It started when they got trophies in their youth for being #6 on the bench warmers club

In mature terms today, they get ponies, balloons and cry rooms

-Geaux

Yes, promoting the general welfare, knows no bounds. We have a defense clause, not an offense clause nor a general warfare clause. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Wow.. How do you define 'General Welfare' by your definition. I seem to recall it to be something different than you describe

-Geaux

Promote the general welfare is in our Constitution. Promoting the common defense is not. Is that, comparison and contrast, easier for you?

Lets try again. Define general welfare as you understand it. I'm not familiar with how you interpret it

-Geaux

It is about the term, promote. It is Only used for the general welfare not the common defense.

can you define, provide, but not promote, the common defense?

 

[danielpalos]

Mr. Trump is for the drug war; that is worse.

Worse than the rape of a 14-year old girl?!? You are seriously disturbed.

you are worse, for trampling natural rights.

The "natural right" to rape a 14-year old girl?!?

virgin chicks were safer in Sodom, than in other town.

So for the third time now you are supporting the "right" to rape women?

snowflake, even virgin women were safer in Sodom, than with you.

 

[danielpalos]

i can tell y'all are just trolls, because y'all have, nothing but fallacy instead of valid arguments.

You can't be talking to me - because I've obliterated you with "valid arguments". Most of all - I've obliterated you with facts. You just keep repeating bizarre false narratives.

You only have fallacy, not any form of valid argument.

 

[danielpalos]

Not everyone can come here legally because we don't have a market friendly visa.

We have legal immigration, visas, work visas, H1B1's, etc. You're lying in every post and you're completely out of excuses. We're enforcing the law again as it should be. You'll just have to accept it or learn to deal with it.

You are simply clueless and Causeless. We don't have a market friendly visa or we would not have an illegal problem.

 

[P@triot]

Yes, promoting the general welfare, knows no bounds.

Really? So if President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

I've schooled you on this over a dozen times already. The "General Welfare" is explicitly restricted to the federal governments 18 enumerated powers.

Nobody takes the right wing seriously.

Snowflake - you didn't answer the question. If President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

We have a Constitution.

Yes. Yes we do. And according to you - the "General Welfare" clause grants the federal government unlimited power. According to you, if the federal government deems it "for the general welfare", they can do it.

Well...we all know that nothing would be better for the "general welfare" than the elimination of Dumbocrats who are anti-American, anti-constitution, communists. So by your own words, if President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that. How stupid do you feel right now?

 

[P@triot]

Not everyone can come here legally because we don't have a market friendly visa.

We have legal immigration, visas, work visas, H1B1's, etc. You're lying in every post and you're completely out of excuses. We're enforcing the law again as it should be. You'll just have to accept it or learn to deal with it.

You are simply clueless and Causeless. We don't have a market friendly visa or we would not have an illegal problem.

You just obliterated with facts again. And every time that happens, you cry like a 4-year old "you're stupid"! We have legal immigration, visas, work visas, H1B1's, etc. You're lying in every post and you're completely out of excuses. We're enforcing the law again as it should be. You'll just have to accept it or learn to deal with it.

 

[P@triot]

Worse than the rape of a 14-year old girl?!? You are seriously disturbed.

you are worse, for trampling natural rights.

The "natural right" to rape a 14-year old girl?!?

virgin chicks were safer in Sodom, than in other town.

So for the third time now you are supporting the "right" to rape women?

snowflake, even virgin women were safer in Sodom, than with you.

Hey....you're the one supporting the rape of a 14-year old girl and advocating for more of it. Sick bastard.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, promoting the general welfare, knows no bounds.

Really? So if President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

I've schooled you on this over a dozen times already. The "General Welfare" is explicitly restricted to the federal governments 18 enumerated powers.

Nobody takes the right wing seriously.

Snowflake - you didn't answer the question. If President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

We have a Constitution.

Yes. Yes we do. And according to you - the "General Welfare" clause grants the federal government unlimited power. According to you, if the federal government deems it "for the general welfare", they can do it.

Well...we all know that nothing would be better for the "general welfare" than the elimination of Dumbocrats who are anti-American, anti-constitution, communists. So by your own words, if President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that. How stupid do you feel right now?

Only the truly "stupid" have only diversion instead of a better argument at lower cost.

Why not use a dictionary for welfare like y'all do for socialism.

 

[danielpalos]

Not everyone can come here legally because we don't have a market friendly visa.

We have legal immigration, visas, work visas, H1B1's, etc. You're lying in every post and you're completely out of excuses. We're enforcing the law again as it should be. You'll just have to accept it or learn to deal with it.

You are simply clueless and Causeless. We don't have a market friendly visa or we would not have an illegal problem.

You just obliterated with facts again. And every time that happens, you cry like a 4-year old "you're stupid"! We have legal immigration, visas, work visas, H1B1's, etc. You're lying in every post and you're completely out of excuses. We're enforcing the law again as it should be. You'll just have to accept it or learn to deal with it.

the right wing is too, cognitively dissonant to recognize any facts. right wing fantasy is all they have.

we don't have a market friendly visa or we would not have an illegal problem. it really is that simple, except to the right wing.

 

[danielpalos]

you are worse, for trampling natural rights.

The "natural right" to rape a 14-year old girl?!?

virgin chicks were safer in Sodom, than in other town.

So for the third time now you are supporting the "right" to rape women?

snowflake, even virgin women were safer in Sodom, than with you.

Hey....you're the one supporting the rape of a 14-year old girl and advocating for more of it. Sick bastard.

dude; we only need, Ten simple Commandments, not immigration laws; whose fault is that?

 

[P@triot]

Really? So if President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

I've schooled you on this over a dozen times already. The "General Welfare" is explicitly restricted to the federal governments 18 enumerated powers.

Nobody takes the right wing seriously.

Snowflake - you didn't answer the question. If President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that?

We have a Constitution.

Yes. Yes we do. And according to you - the "General Welfare" clause grants the federal government unlimited power. According to you, if the federal government deems it "for the general welfare", they can do it.

Well...we all know that nothing would be better for the "general welfare" than the elimination of Dumbocrats who are anti-American, anti-constitution, communists. So by your own words, if President Trump decides tomorrow that it "promotes the general welfare" to execute all left-wing hatriots (which it really would), the federal government can absolutely do that. How stupid do you feel right now?

Only the truly "stupid" have only diversion instead of a better argument at lower cost.

Exactly! So why do you keep using diversion? Go on record right here and now that the "General Welfare" clause grants the federal government unlimited power - including killing all Dumbocrats if it is deemed good for the "general welfare" or amdit you lied about the "General Welfare" clause.