Time to put up or shut up.

[eots]

total nonsense..

Wrong, YOU claim we need a new investigation because for one thing , the one conducted had investigators, destroy, hide, remove or ignore evidence. Provide us some evidence to back up your claim.

Well I and the FORMER LEAD FIRE INVESTIGATOR for NIST and leading NASA scientist and the 6th man to walk on the moon...etc etc

and there is no question that the remaining steel..the evidence ..was quickly destroyed overseas...NIST claims not only no molten steel but no reports of molten steel.. we know this is untrue..NIST says no reports or recording of explosions,, we know this is untrue

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Wrong, YOU claim we need a new investigation because for one thing , the one conducted had investigators, destroy, hide, remove or ignore evidence. Provide us some evidence to back up your claim.

Well I and the FORMER LEAD FIRE INVESTIGATOR for NIST and leading NASA scientist and the 6th man to walk on the moon...etc etc

and there is no question that the remaining steel..the evidence ..was quickly destroyed overseas...NIST claims not only no molten steel but no reports of molten steel.. we know this is untrue..NIST says no reports or recording of explosions,, we know this is untrue

No WE do not. There is no ral evidence of explosives except your claims people heard them. Guess what? The sound of the supports snapping from the weight crashing down on them will cause that. which you would know if you were not so busy making other false claims.

Once again do a little research and let us know the minimum number of floors required to have explosives bring the 3 buildings down on themselves. Then explain how those floors were hidden from view long enough to do construction on them , lace them with explosives AND how the electronic detonators were shielded from random electronics in use in the buildings.

Explain to us how a building raging in fire had none of the floors laced with explosives on fire, or how those explosives survived 8 hours of fire with out prematurely going off. How after 8 hours of fires without going off the electronics on said explosives worked still?

WHO hijacked the aircraft? That is what got the ball rolling.

What happened in Pennsylvania? What happened at the Pentagon? All are part and parcel of this. IF as you claim the buildings were laced with explosives in New York what is your theory on what happened to the other 2 planes? You can not ignore them.

 

[candycorn]

Well I and the FORMER LEAD FIRE INVESTIGATOR for NIST and leading NASA scientist and the 6th man to walk on the moon...etc etc

and there is no question that the remaining steel..the evidence ..was quickly destroyed overseas...NIST claims not only no molten steel but no reports of molten steel.. we know this is untrue..NIST says no reports or recording of explosions,, we know this is untrue

No WE do not. There is no ral evidence of explosives except your claims people heard them. Guess what? The sound of the supports snapping from the weight crashing down on them will cause that. which you would know if you were not so busy making other false claims.

Once again do a little research and let us know the minimum number of floors required to have explosives bring the 3 buildings down on themselves. Then explain how those floors were hidden from view long enough to do construction on them , lace them with explosives AND how the electronic detonators were shielded from random electronics in use in the buildings.

Explain to us how a building raging in fire had none of the floors laced with explosives on fire, or how those explosives survived 8 hours of fire with out prematurely going off. How after 8 hours of fires without going off the electronics on said explosives worked still?

WHO hijacked the aircraft? That is what got the ball rolling.

What happened in Pennsylvania? What happened at the Pentagon? All are part and parcel of this. IF as you claim the buildings were laced with explosives in New York what is your theory on what happened to the other 2 planes? You can not ignore them.

Obviously you're kicking his ass; you may also want to mention this dichotomy:

SOMEONE according to the twoofers....went through the trouble of planting explosives clandestinely through out the 110 stories of WTC1, the 110 stories of WTC2, the 47 stories of WTC7, planted debris (if not bombs) at the Pentagon in Arlington, VA, arranged for an other aircraft to be shot down over Pennsylvania or, at the very least, planted aircraft wreckage all over Somerset County PA. Then paid investigators, first responders, witnesses, and mortuary personnel from at least three different jurisdictions in three states to keep quiet. Allegedly to give us the right to invade Iraq.

Yet at no point did any of these evil geniuses dare plant a single WMD in Iraq when the only jurisdiction that would exist is the ones that the US military would be in full control of from stem to stern? I guess they left that part out of their planning?

 

[Terral]

Hi Retired Guy:

I do not believe a single troofer has told us what they believe happened on 9-11.

Every word out of your mouth is based upon what the Retired idiot 'does not' believe. My post on What Happened On 9/11 is here if you want to 'quote >>' and debunk something ...

This Is What Happened At The Pentagon

WTC 7 Controlled Demolition

Flight 93 Never Crashed In The Empty Shanksville Field

All they do is list all the paranoid delusional theories without ever telling us which one they believe.

No sir. The Retired idiot has been shown 'the' 911Truth time and time again, but you choose to believe the Bush/Rove/Cheney/Rumsfeld Conspiracy Theory that 19 Bearded Jihadist Radicals are responsible for the 9/11 Attacks. I have challenged you to start your own Topic (make my day) proving the Official Cover Story LIE about 9/11, but nobody here has the courage to even try. ;0)

Time to either announce what you believe happened or cease and desist with linking to every single crack pot claim out there.

The stupidest claim out there is the Official Story LIE told by George Bush, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld that 'you' support every day with your Official Story STUPIDITY.

This is where 'you' say a real 100-ton Jetliner crashed outside Shanksville, but all we see is an EMPTY HOLE like the one in your EMPTY HEAD. Now the Retired idiot can show us 'your' pictures of UA93 crashed anywhere, which this guy will never even attempt to do; because NO PICTURES EXIST. Period. The Retired Guy just swallows Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld LIES hook, line and sinker and then thinks everyone else is supposed to be STUPID like him ...

Lose any argument point you may have or come clean.

The Official Story idiots (like you = DUPES) continue telling 911LIES, when you cannot prove that AA77 crashed anywhere!

You say a real 100-ton Jetliner (AA77 specifically) crashed into this standing Pentagon E-ring Wall at 530 miles per hour!!! Go right ahead and try to point out any signs of your missing jetliner that includes a 60-ton titanium frame, two 6-ton Rolls-Royce Engines, massive wing and tail sections, indestructible landing gear, more than 200 seats and cargo.

Just 220 feet away we have the standing C-ring Wall that should be knocked down from your 530 MPH jetliner, but all we have is a little hole. Go right ahead and explain how this explains 'your' 100-ton Jetliner!!!!

The B-ring wall stands untouched on the right side of this picture and we see no signs of ANY jetliner at all. NONE. The Retired idiot wants us to believe that his fantasy 100-ton Jetliner vaporized into thin air in the 220 feet that spans the distance between the outer E-ring wall and the C-ring wall of the Pentagon; when that is very much IMPOSSIBLE.

You know what the majority of us believe. Time to stop the shotgun delusional approach and each of you tell us what you think happened.

Anyone who believes UA93 crashed into that empty field, and that AA77 crashed into the Pentagon, is doing so because George Bush said so and NOT because of any evidence at all.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6ZdGCS_QCg&feature=sub]Jesse Ventura Puts Up On The Pentagon[/ame]

Those of you endorsing Official 911 Cover Story lies are helping the real inside-job murderers of innocent Americans, which makes you accessories after the fact and accomplices in the ongoing 911 Cover-up Operation.

GL with that at the Judgment,

Terral

 

[candycorn]

Hi Retired Guy:

Usual stuff

Gotta love the guy who uses himself as a source.--NOT!

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Hi Retired Guy:

I do not believe a single troofer has told us what they believe happened on 9-11.

Every word out of your mouth is based upon what the Retired idiot 'does not' believe. My post on What Happened On 9/11 is here if you want to 'quote >>' and debunk something ...

This Is What Happened At The Pentagon

WTC 7 Controlled Demolition

Flight 93 Never Crashed In The Empty Shanksville Field

All they do is list all the paranoid delusional theories without ever telling us which one they believe.

No sir. The Retired idiot has been shown 'the' 911Truth time and time again, but you choose to believe the Bush/Rove/Cheney/Rumsfeld Conspiracy Theory that 19 Bearded Jihadist Radicals are responsible for the 9/11 Attacks. I have challenged you to start your own Topic (make my day) proving the Official Cover Story LIE about 9/11, but nobody here has the courage to even try. ;0)



The stupidest claim out there is the Official Story LIE told by George Bush, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld that 'you' support every day with your Official Story STUPIDITY.

This is where 'you' say a real 100-ton Jetliner crashed outside Shanksville, but all we see is an EMPTY HOLE like the one in your EMPTY HEAD. Now the Retired idiot can show us 'your' pictures of UA93 crashed anywhere, which this guy will never even attempt to do; because NO PICTURES EXIST. Period. The Retired Guy just swallows Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld LIES hook, line and sinker and then thinks everyone else is supposed to be STUPID like him ...

Lose any argument point you may have or come clean.

The Official Story idiots (like you = DUPES) continue telling 911LIES, when you cannot prove that AA77 crashed anywhere!

You say a real 100-ton Jetliner (AA77 specifically) crashed into this standing Pentagon E-ring Wall at 530 miles per hour!!! Go right ahead and try to point out any signs of your missing jetliner that includes a 60-ton titanium frame, two 6-ton Rolls-Royce Engines, massive wing and tail sections, indestructible landing gear, more than 200 seats and cargo.

Just 220 feet away we have the standing C-ring Wall that should be knocked down from your 530 MPH jetliner, but all we have is a little hole. Go right ahead and explain how this explains 'your' 100-ton Jetliner!!!!

The B-ring wall stands untouched on the right side of this picture and we see no signs of ANY jetliner at all. NONE. The Retired idiot wants us to believe that his fantasy 100-ton Jetliner vaporized into thin air in the 220 feet that spans the distance between the outer E-ring wall and the C-ring wall of the Pentagon; when that is very much IMPOSSIBLE.

You know what the majority of us believe. Time to stop the shotgun delusional approach and each of you tell us what you think happened.

Anyone who believes UA93 crashed into that empty field, and that AA77 crashed into the Pentagon, is doing so because George Bush said so and NOT because of any evidence at all.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6ZdGCS_QCg&feature=sub]Jesse Ventura Puts Up On The Pentagon[/ame]

Those of you endorsing Official 911 Cover Story lies are helping the real inside-job murderers of innocent Americans, which makes you accessories after the fact and accomplices in the ongoing 911 Cover-up Operation.

GL with that at the Judgment,

Terral

In every thread you have made all these ictures have been discussed and you have been shown for the fool you are. In fact so much so you quit posting for months. Remind us ohh enlightened one? How many millions died from your H1N1 mutation outbreak?

 

[SFC Ollie]

Terral is as normal totally nutzo. Doesn't matter how many photos of real evidence he is shown he can't see them.

Terral, it is not up to any of us to prove that the 911 CR is right. It's your problem trying to prove it's wrong. Something you have not done.

Do play again sometime.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

So how is it Barry Jenkins gives one version of what happened, yet everyone else gives a very DIFFERENT version, including the guy he was with?

As for your claim he was killed off, how utterly typical of the truthtard paranoid delusions. If the government really went after conspiracy theorists, Alex Jones and others would be long dead and buried due to various medical anomalies.

They're still talking about that one guy whose testimony sort of validates them? Vs all the firefighters who made statements like "the building is leaning" or "It just didn't look right" or " there was a noticeable bulge"... And still no audio of any explosion that could be taken as controlled demolition.

Since when does the building leaning instead collapse in freefall into its own footprint? Use your logic.....it's BASIC.

stop fighting the videos, hard evidence, and witness testimony. Physics DO NOT allow for a leaning/tilting/melting building to fall at freefall speeds. STOP overlooking THIS FACT. THIS FACT of 2.25 seconds ADMITTED by NIST, 100% ADMITS and PROVES to controlled demolition. HOW and WHY do you over look this?

as I said,they always run off with their tail between their legs when challenged to refute videos.I have a list of like 65 from them at this one site and EVERYTIME I ask them to comment on them and refute them and explain whats wrong with them,they wont,they run off.they dont get it that thats not how you debate,by not watching videos someone shows you and not bothering to refute whats said on it when they ask you to.

if they were in a court, as they know,if they acted like that THERE as they do here,The judge would say-are you going to say anything? the jury is waiting for your argument on that video,you are not saying anything.they know it,we know it. "rolls on floor laughing. they ignore the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years.their logic is doesnt matter what physicts,engineers,architects,firefighters trained in demolitions,or what demolition experts say,if the government and media said it happened that way,then its automatically true,thats the logic of the trolls here. "rolls on floor laughing."

 

[candycorn]

They're still talking about that one guy whose testimony sort of validates them? Vs all the firefighters who made statements like "the building is leaning" or "It just didn't look right" or " there was a noticeable bulge"... And still no audio of any explosion that could be taken as controlled demolition.

Since when does the building leaning instead collapse in freefall into its own footprint? Use your logic.....it's BASIC.

stop fighting the videos, hard evidence, and witness testimony. Physics DO NOT allow for a leaning/tilting/melting building to fall at freefall speeds. STOP overlooking THIS FACT. THIS FACT of 2.25 seconds ADMITTED by NIST, 100% ADMITS and PROVES to controlled demolition. HOW and WHY do you over look this?

as I said,they always run off with their tail between their legs when challenged to refute videos.I have a list of like 65 from them at this one site ...

if they were in a court,

Nobody gives a shit about your 65 videos.

Good Idea, take your evidence to court; see what happens. You'll be bitchslapped yet again.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

you make far too many assumptions ...a real investigation is how we would find the answers to these questions in a open investigation with full discloser that fully examines the science and physic and remaining evidence , first determine the cause of death ...then the method

they already had that investigation, no evidence to support your insane hypothesis was found

The investigation was held. Now unless you EOTS, can provide evidnce that the official investigation withheld the finding of det cord, explosive residue, electronic trigger devices, evidence of explosions on columns and supports. You haven't a leg to stand on.

Again assuming the explosives were used then YOU are claiming that HUNDREDS of city, County, State and Federal Investigators at 3 separate sites all conspired together either before or after the fact to LIE about what they found. To publish a fake transcript of what happened. To hide and remove evidence contrary to their findings.

Someone besides the investigators would have had to removed the evidence so that adds dozens of more people in the know.

Back to the aircraft.... who hijacked them? If you are going to say Arab Terrorists and that the Government just used them, then you need to provide evidence that SOMEONE in the Government actually KNEW intimate details of the terrorists plans and movements. This too would require dozens of agents and analysts from at least one if not more Government agencies. It would require the cooperation of Senior officials in said agency, it would require that someone outside the Agency knew and was involved.

Further this agency would somehow have to convince hundreds of CIVILIANS to hide evidence of explosives, lie about explosives, smuggle evidence out of the investigation sites, etc etc.

Further the agency in question would need to involve the senior management of all 3 buildings, police, security and maintenance in all 3 buildings. They would need authority to shut down floors ( something you have failed to provide evidence that this occurred) to post their own guards and to control the flow of all the non involved civilians and officials that worked in all 3 buildings.

Now then, what happened to the Pennsylvania flight?

What happened at the Pentagon?

Yeah another warren commission white wash investigation was held,thats the ONLY kind of investigation it was.There were many ommissions and distortions and witness testimonys ignored and all took place behind closed doors and many commission members THEMSELVES have said it wasnt a real investigation,get with the program and stop seeing only what you WANT to see.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

you make far too many assumptions ...a real investigation is how we would find the answers to these questions in a open investigation with full discloser that fully examines the science and physic and remaining evidence , first determine the cause of death ...then the method

they already had that investigation, no evidence to support your insane hypothesis was found

they ignored it.. omitted it, distorted it ,destroyed it and never explored it based on lies about no such testimony existing...they have zero evidence for the NIST theory other than a computer model

you just handed Retireds ass to him on platter and gave him and the other OCTA's their usual ass beatings.Thats just what I got done saying before i saw this post of yours.

 

[candycorn]

they already had that investigation, no evidence to support your insane hypothesis was found

The investigation was held. Now unless you EOTS, can provide evidnce that the official investigation withheld the finding of det cord, explosive residue, electronic trigger devices, evidence of explosions on columns and supports. You haven't a leg to stand on.

Again assuming the explosives were used then YOU are claiming that HUNDREDS of city, County, State and Federal Investigators at 3 separate sites all conspired together either before or after the fact to LIE about what they found. To publish a fake transcript of what happened. To hide and remove evidence contrary to their findings.

Someone besides the investigators would have had to removed the evidence so that adds dozens of more people in the know.

Back to the aircraft.... who hijacked them? If you are going to say Arab Terrorists and that the Government just used them, then you need to provide evidence that SOMEONE in the Government actually KNEW intimate details of the terrorists plans and movements. This too would require dozens of agents and analysts from at least one if not more Government agencies. It would require the cooperation of Senior officials in said agency, it would require that someone outside the Agency knew and was involved.

Further this agency would somehow have to convince hundreds of CIVILIANS to hide evidence of explosives, lie about explosives, smuggle evidence out of the investigation sites, etc etc.

Further the agency in question would need to involve the senior management of all 3 buildings, police, security and maintenance in all 3 buildings. They would need authority to shut down floors ( something you have failed to provide evidence that this occurred) to post their own guards and to control the flow of all the non involved civilians and officials that worked in all 3 buildings.

Now then, what happened to the Pennsylvania flight?

What happened at the Pentagon?

Yeah another warren commission white wash investigation was held,thats the ONLY kind of investigation it was.There were many ommissions and distortions and witness testimonys ignored and all took place behind closed doors and many commission members THEMSELVES have said it wasnt a real investigation,get with the program and stop seeing only what you WANT to see.

You want some cheese with your whine beeotch?

Everything was investigated by the FBI, local police, internal security, then the Commission did their own investigation after Congressional hearings. Nothing was missed. The only thing missing is anything between your ears dingus.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I see your back so soon for your usual ass beatings candytroll.they sure pay you agents well no doubt,no way would you keep coming back constantly for these beatings for free as we both know.lol.

 

[candycorn]

I see your back so soon for your usual ass beatings candytroll.

Try adding something to the discussion other than Carbon Dioxide this time, beeotch.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

candycorn-yes you are right 9/11.They pay me well for my ass beatings I get here everyday and at other message boards as well.Like you said,I would never take these ass beatings I get everywhere for free.only for money from my handlers.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

candycorn-yes you are right 9/11.They pay me well for my ass beatings I get here everyday and at other message boards as well.Like you said,I would never take these ass beatings I get everywhere for free.only for money from my handlers.

thanks for being truthful for once candycorn.

 

[candycorn]

candycorn-yes you are right

You're pathetic on so many levels.

 

[candycorn]

they already had that investigation, no evidence to support your insane hypothesis was found

they ignored it.. omitted it, distorted it ,destroyed it and never explored it based on lies about no such testimony existing...they have zero evidence for the NIST theory other than a computer model

you just handed Retireds ass to him on platter and gave him and the other OCTA's their usual ass beatings.Thats just what I got done saying before i saw this post of yours.

The lady with the screaming kids wants to use the computer...you'd better get going. LOL.

Bing Maps

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Hey candyfag,how many other sites have you trolled today? everybody knows you spend hours on end going to dozens of other message boards everywhere posting hours on end all day and all night long doing what your handlers pay you to do.

 

[candycorn]

Hey candyfag,how many other sites have you trolled today? everybody knows you spend hours on end going to dozens of other message boards everywhere posting hours on end all day and all night long doing what your handlers pay you to do.

Gee, you seem obsessed with me. Happens all the time. Times almost up cletus. Maybe Santa will bring you your own computer this year and you won't have to go to the library. Only if someone could tolerate you long enough to get you a gift.

Any word on what took down the light poles? No? Very well, carry on beeotch!