Time To Open One's Eyes.

[PoliticalChic]

6. "Four members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the Democratic Socialists of America: Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.; Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.; Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y.; and Cori Bush, D-Mo. In the wake of the protests all over Cuba, the organization put out a statement of solidarity with the Cuban Revolution. The socialists in Congress, who have praised the repressive Cuban government in the past, have remained largely quiet.

President Joe Biden reportedly gave careful consideration to Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif., as a potential running mate in 2020. Bass spent part of the 1970s working in Fidel Castro’s Cuba, and when Castro died, she said, “The passing of the Comandante en Jefe is a great loss to the people of Cuba.”

Given this history of American Democrats’ praise for Cuba’s communist regime, it’s not surprising that the Biden administration’s first reaction to the protests in Cuba was to pretend that the whole thing was about COVID-19."

What the Protests in Cuba Tell Us About the Left's Agenda for America - The Daily Signal

As the American left argues openly for socialism, it's helpful to keep in mind just how dreadfully those policies have failed—and just how viciously

www.dailysignal.com

Now....follow carefully:

If you vote to empower communists, Marxists, Nazis.....

....even if you do so on the Democrat line......



.....you're a communist, Marxist, and Nazi.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The United States has been a socialist country since its founding. Your system of public schools, libraries, fire departments and police forces, are all "socialist" programs. So are government funded highways, hospitals, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, food stamps and Section 8 housing.

Of course that's wrong.


Here's your remedial lesson.



The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
“free markets, free voices, free people”

Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Democrats
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.



They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

 

[PoliticalChic]

We can always see what commies are up to by looking at what they are accusing righties of doing.

Everything that one posts is a lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Above, the author, Patel, does not bring up the Jeffersonian separation of church and state, and interlligence is exactly why Putin has said religion is absolutely necessary. Patel projects malediction on ‘state-based atheism’ of the communists while conveniently leaving out christian nationalist expansionism and the militance of its evangelism. It’s not a coincidence that Puppet POSPOTUS and his sleep-up are now trafficking untested genuflectors across the Mexican border and depositing them in Florida: 1 in 5 cases of C-19.

"...does not bring up the Jeffersonian separation of church and state,..."


There never was any such Jeffersonian statement nor belief.

As for the famous “separation of church and state,” the phrase appears in no federal document. In fact, at the time of ratification of the Constitution, ten of the thirteen colonies had some provision recognizing Christianity as either the official, or the recommended religion in their state constitutions.

From the 1790 Massachusetts Constitution, written by John Adams, includes: [the] good order and preservation of civil government essentially depend(s) upon piety, religion, and morality…by the institution of public worship of God and of the public instruction in piety, religion, and morality…”Constitution of Massachusetts - Wikipedia


North Carolina Constitution, article 32, 1776: “That no person who shall deny the being of God, or the truth of the Protestant religion, or the divine authority of either the Old or New Testaments, or who shall hold religious principles incompatible with the freedom and safety of the State, shall b e capable of holding any office, or place of trust or profit, in the civil department, within this State.”
Constitution of North Carolina, 1776



So, the Founders intention was to be sure that the federal government didn’t do the same, and mandate a national religion. And when Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists in 1802, it was to reassure them the federal government could not interfere in their religious observations, i.e., there is “a wall of separation between church and state.”
A one-way wall that stops government but allow each the liberty of their religious belieffs.


He wasn’t speaking of religion contaminating the government, but of the government contaminating religious observance.



It was FDR's Supreme Court pick, KKKer Hugo Black who inserted the lie into our jurisprudence.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why did the Fascist go to war with the Socialists in Spain?

Proxy war between the political brothers, Hitler and Stalin.

You really know nothing, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I guess you've given up on yesterday's false and misleading claims and moved onto a fresh pile of bullshit.

You keep claiming that there is no difference between socialism and communism, and that's a lie. Furthermore, you keep comparing the American Democratic party with left wing authoritarian communism, and falsely claiming that the USA will end up like Cuba under Castro under the Democrats.

This is the 2021 list of the Best Countries in the World to live in. The USA is currently No. 20. When Trump took office in 2017, the same listing had the USA as #7 in the world. Under Donald Trump and the Republicans, the USA dropped 13 places in 4 years.

All of the countries currently ahead of the USA are left wing social democracies.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/quality-of-life-rankings

https://www.usnews.com/media/best-countries/overall-rankings-2017.pdf

Under Donald Trump, the USA is turning into a South American banana republic. But keep telling us what a great job he did. And how bad those of us living in the rest of the world have it compared to Americans. And what a great President he was.

"You keep claiming that there is no difference between socialism and communism, and that's a lie."

The only difference is the number of bullets.

OK>>>I'll educate you again.

Here's your lesson.....you may ignore it as your masters have trained you to do:

Chesly Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution"
http://library.mises.org/books/Ches...r Revolution from Roosevelt to Eisenhower.pdf

1. The Communists and their Marxist cousins, the Socialists, have worked for revolution since the advent of the New Deal twenty-one years ago by infiltrating government offices, , labor unions, schools and colleges, churches, radio and television, the movies, the publishing business.


2. In an article on socialism in the Encyclopedia Britannica, Prof. G. D. H. Cole, a leading theoretician and historian of the British Labor Party, declares:
The distinction between socialism as distinguished by various Labor and Socialist parties of Europe and the New World, and communism, as represented by the Russians and minority parties in other countries is one of tactics-and-strategy rather than one of objective. Communism is indeed only socialism pursued by revolutionary means and making its revolutionary method a canon of faith...."

In The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels stated that communist ends can be attained "only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions."



How lucky for the Democrat Party that dolts as uneducated and easily duped, as you are, are still around.

 

[Moonglow]

6. "Four members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the Democratic Socialists of America: Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.; Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.; Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y.; and Cori Bush, D-Mo. In the wake of the protests all over Cuba, the organization put out a statement of solidarity with the Cuban Revolution. The socialists in Congress, who have praised the repressive Cuban government in the past, have remained largely quiet.

President Joe Biden reportedly gave careful consideration to Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif., as a potential running mate in 2020. Bass spent part of the 1970s working in Fidel Castro’s Cuba, and when Castro died, she said, “The passing of the Comandante en Jefe is a great loss to the people of Cuba.”

Given this history of American Democrats’ praise for Cuba’s communist regime, it’s not surprising that the Biden administration’s first reaction to the protests in Cuba was to pretend that the whole thing was about COVID-19."

What the Protests in Cuba Tell Us About the Left's Agenda for America - The Daily Signal

As the American left argues openly for socialism, it's helpful to keep in mind just how dreadfully those policies have failed—and just how viciously

www.dailysignal.com

Now....follow carefully:

If you vote to empower communists, Marxists, Nazis.....

....even if you do so on the Democrat line......



.....you're a communist, Marxist, and Nazi.


View attachment 514541

You mean that some Democrats praise the Cuban govt, yet the mass majority do not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

LOL..."first some facts, for context", then no facts is classic monkey.

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.

Good thing you signed up, and not a moment too soon.

You have so very much to learn.


Begin with this:

American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ....

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223

 

[Moonglow]

"You keep claiming that there is no difference between socialism and communism, and that's a lie."

The only difference is the number of bullets.

OK>>>I'll educate you again.

Here's your lesson.....you may ignore it as your masters have trained you to do:

Chesly Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution"
http://library.mises.org/books/Chesly Manly/The Twenty-Year Revolution from Roosevelt to Eisenhower.pdf

1. The Communists and their Marxist cousins, the Socialists, have worked for revolution since the advent of the New Deal twenty-one years ago by infiltrating government offices, , labor unions, schools and colleges, churches, radio and television, the movies, the publishing business.


2. In an article on socialism in the Encyclopedia Britannica, Prof. G. D. H. Cole, a leading theoretician and historian of the British Labor Party, declares:
The distinction between socialism as distinguished by various Labor and Socialist parties of Europe and the New World, and communism, as represented by the Russians and minority parties in other countries is one of tactics-and-strategy rather than one of objective. Communism is indeed only socialism pursued by revolutionary means and making its revolutionary method a canon of faith...."

In The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels stated that communist ends can be attained "only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions."



How lucky for the Democrat Party that dolts as uneducated and easily duped, as you are, are still around.

Amazing how Marx used the mercantile/colonialist/imperialist form of capitalism for Marxism? He just changed a few words...

 

[BlindBoo]

Proxy war between the political brothers, Hitler and Stalin.

You really know nothing, huh?

Political brothers do not go to war with each other except in political revisionist history land.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The United States has been a socialist country since its founding. Your system of public schools, libraries, fire departments and police forces, are all "socialist" programs. So are government funded highways, hospitals, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, food stamps and Section 8 housing.

"The United States has been a socialist country since its founding."

And now for the facts.


Socialism was held in such disrepute that the Communist John Dewey had the Socialist Party change its name to ....

....wait for it.....


...."Liberal Party."

How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels​

by Jim Peron​

1. Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
2. The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
   1. Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
3. [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
4. In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and Newargued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
   1. But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
5. Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planningsaid: “Dewey was the first to argue that the world ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
   1. The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
6. Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
7. [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. o-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism.

http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm

Democracy & free markets vs socialism​

www.freerepublic.com

http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2

 

[PoliticalChic]

Political brothers do not go to war with each other except in political revisionist history land.

You're a moron and a liar.

Happens all the time in history.


Stalin and Hitler were allies until June 21, 1941


Hitler didn't have the supplies nor resources he needed, so August 23, 1939, Soviet Russia' Foreign Minister Molotov signs the Nazi-Soviet Non-aggression Pact while German Foreign Minister Von Ribbentrop and Soviet leader Josef Stalin look on, while standing under a portrait of Lenin –materials to be provided in later economic agreements.

a. "1939- At the same time, Stalin helps supply the German war effort, providing the Nazi regime with oil, wood, copper, manganese ore, rubber, grain, and other resources under a trade agreement between the two nations. Stalin views the war against Germany as a conflict "between two groups of capitalist countries", saying there is "nothing wrong in their having a good fight and weakening each other." Website no longer available | Heroes and killers of the 20th century

September 1, 1939, Hitler attacked Poland....on September 17, Stalin attacks from the East. The Soviet radio transmitter in Minsk guided the Nazi bombers attacking Polish cities. Newsreel footage showed the Red Army in Nazi helmets, marching side by side with the SS. One photo shows the hammer and sickle along side the swastika.

 

[Dragonlady]

Socialist nations have always had billionaires and millionaires that do what they have to do to keep their money...like suck up to the power structure and being obedient...kind of like Jack Dorsey and Zuckerberg....

The problem for the USA is that the millionaires and billionaires are now sucking up 80% of the wealth of YOUR nation, destroying the working class, and shrinking the middle class, as more and more Americans fall into poverty, because of the economic crashes which hit the working classes the hardest.

Yours is the only first world country where worker's wages are supported by "earned income credits" and other social programs, which are used by big corporations to boost profits to the shareholders. Middle class taxpayers were subsidizing Walmart to the tune of $2500 per year, per taxpayer, for worker wages, even if you never set foot in a Walmart.

In Trump's first year in office, the USA was #7 on the Best Places in the World to Live list. This year, it's #21. ALL of the countries above your ranking, both in 2017 and today, are socialist democracies, except Singapore which is #19 to your #20.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The problem for the USA is that the millionaires and billionaires are now sucking up 80% of the wealth of YOUR nation, destroying the working class, and shrinking the middle class, as more and more Americans fall into poverty, because of the economic crashes which hit the working classes the hardest.

Yours is the only first world country where worker's wages are supported by "earned income credits" and other social programs, which are used by big corporations to boost profits to the shareholders. Middle class taxpayers were subsidizing Walmart to the tune of $2500 per year, per taxpayer, for worker wages, even if you never set foot in a Walmart.

In Trump's first year in office, the USA was #7 on the Best Places in the World to Live list. This year, it's #21. ALL of the countries above your ranking, both in 2017 and today, are socialist democracies, except Singapore which is #19 to your #20.

Isn't this your country???
Proud of it????


Ontario: Math Is “Subjective” And “Used to Normalize Racism and Marginalization of Non-Eurocentric Mathematical Knowledges”

Ontario: Math Is 'Subjective' And “Used to Normalize Racism and Marginalization of Non-Eurocentric Mathematical Knowledges”

Ontario Grade 9 curriculum: 'a decolonial, anti-racist approach to mathematics education makes visible its historical roots and social constructions.'

legalinsurrection.com

Free Speech Is Dead in Canada: The Persecution of ...

Free Speech Is Dead in Canada: The Persecution of Christian Activist Bill Whatcott

Canada has enforced prohibitions on speech for some time. Since 2003, one dared not speak critically of "sexual orientation." In 2013, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled that earlier flyers by

 

[BlindBoo]

You're a moron and a liar.

Blowing it out your posterior again, you ignorant buffoon.

"Stalin views the war against Germany as a conflict "between two groups of capitalist countries"

 

[Dragonlady]

"The United States has been a socialist country since its founding."

And now for the facts.


Socialism was held in such disrepute that the Communist John Dewey had the Socialist Party change its name to ....

....wait for it.....


...."Liberal Party."

How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels​

by Jim Peron​

1. Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
2. The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
   1. Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
3. [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
4. In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and Newargued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
   1. But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
5. Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planningsaid: “Dewey was the first to argue that the world ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
   1. The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
6. Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
7. [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. o-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism.

http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm

Democracy & free markets vs socialism​

www.freerepublic.com

http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2

Blogs, townhall.com, and a social media forum, that's quite the list of impressive sources there. The mere fact you can't even find a legitimate source to support the codswallop you've posted demonstrates in spades how feeble and weak your points are.

Free market capitalism suppresses wages, increases prices, and increases poverty, wage and wealth disparity, and results has failed utterly to provide a high standard of living for workers in any of the nations where it's been tried. Furthermore, it leads to political instability and suppression of workers' rights, and authoritarianism to maintain it. (See the history of South America in the 1970's).

Well regulated capitalism in social democracies, with government management of public utilities and the health care system, have resulted in lower costs, higher wages, and more benefits and rights for workers while providing ample rewards for investors and innovators.

Arguments for Well-Regulated Capitalism, and Implications for Global Ethics, Food, Environment, Climate Change, and Beyond | Ethics & International Affairs | Cambridge Core

Arguments for Well-Regulated Capitalism, and Implications for Global Ethics, Food, Environment, Climate Change, and Beyond - Volume 35 Issue 1

www.cambridge.org

Arguments for Well-Regulated Capitalism, and Implications for Global Ethics, Food, Environment, Climate Change, and beyond

www.researchwithrutgers.com

 

[Dragonlady]

Isn't this your country???
Proud of it????


Ontario: Math Is “Subjective” And “Used to Normalize Racism and Marginalization of Non-Eurocentric Mathematical Knowledges”

Ontario: Math Is 'Subjective' And “Used to Normalize Racism and Marginalization of Non-Eurocentric Mathematical Knowledges”

Ontario Grade 9 curriculum: 'a decolonial, anti-racist approach to mathematics education makes visible its historical roots and social constructions.'

legalinsurrection.com

Free Speech Is Dead in Canada: The Persecution of ...

Free Speech Is Dead in Canada: The Persecution of Christian Activist Bill Whatcott

Canada has enforced prohibitions on speech for some time. Since 2003, one dared not speak critically of "sexual orientation." In 2013, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled that earlier flyers by

Once again, you can't rebut my arguments or debate the topic YOU posted, and you resort to attacks having NOTHING to do with the topic. YOU'RE TROLLING YOUR OWN THREAD.

Why don't you try responding to my posts???????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Blowing it out your posterior again, you ignorant buffoon.

"Stalin views the war against Germany as a conflict "between two groups of capitalist countries"

1. Always include the source of your quote, as I do.

2. Stalin was far smarter than you....or FDR......and almost as good a liar as you are.


3. One wonder how stupid you must be to miss the actual title of the Nazi Party....."Socialist."
How about the USSR....the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics


4. Next time, take your shoe off before you insert it in your mouth.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Once again, you can't rebut my arguments or debate the topic YOU posted, and you resort to attacks having NOTHING to do with the topic. YOU'RE TROLLING YOUR OWN THREAD.

Why don't you try responding to my posts???????

You mentioned my country....to lie about it.

I simply put you in your place by revealing what yours is.


Glad it hurt.

 

[Tax Man]

You mentioned my country....to lie about it.

I simply put you in your place by revealing what yours is.


Glad it hurt.

So the liar got caught and had to lie to get out! If you ever had anything to say that was not a lie no one would believe you.