Time To Get Serious About Language Learning?

They already know
Before they go to school
Some do, some don't.

And the key factor is how much and to what degree.

Wife and I have collectively about 13 grand-kids ranging in ages from recent H.S. grads to just starting the K-12 cycle. Yeah, they tend to be somewhat more computer savvy than we oldsters, but still, there are nuances to be learned.

Coming from someone who studied COBOL, FORTRAN, and other earliest programing languages in the age when a huge mainframe didn't have the computation power of most wrist watches today.
 
My experience is anything but limited.



Wrong, because it is limited to YOUR experience.

You are an insignificant part of the human race.

There are far more experiences out there.
 
NO. If anything we need t stop teaching foreign languages in schools. Especially when so many kids graduate as barely capable of reading/writing ENGLISH. We also need to stop accommodating individuals who don’t speak/read/write a English. It’s not the official language of this country (it should be); but it’s the most prevalent language across the country.
 
Foreign language instruction in the US starts late and is not emphasized as much as many other subjects. Should we as a nation (more accurately, as many local school districts) change this emphasis? Every year, more and more jobs in the US are advertised as requiring at least bilingualism, and more of the higher paying jobs involve working and communicating with people in and from all over the world. Employment aside, there are many well-established social and cognitive benefits from learning other languages than one's first. Should we require a much higher standard of proficiency and/or acquisition of two or more languages as part of graduation requirements from high school?
The lib public teachers are not even teaching many kids to read and wrote in English, nor do many of the students graduate

But now the groomers want more billions to teach urdu or farsi?

Get serious
 

Forum List

Back
Top