Time to drop a brick of epistemology on a table full of vibes. - Climate change

Okay. Scientists all over the world are lying.
I didn't say that. The only ones who are fudging their research are those who know how to get paid and how to advance.
Explain to me what's really happening, in detail. I want to hear your version.
Why? I already have, you are in denial.
 
I didn't say that. The only ones who are fudging their research are those who know how to get paid and how to advance.

Why? I already have, you are in denial.
There isn't a scientific institution on Earth that takes the position that AGW isn't real. There are very few actual scientists that take that position, and none of them are doing research that shows something to the contrary. They just misinterpret other peoples' work and mysteriously get paid my big oil. Lol

And you eat it up because you're not actually interested in anything but having your conclusions reinforced.
 
There isn't a scientific institution on Earth that takes the position that AGW isn't real. There are very few actual scientists that take that position, and none of them are doing research that shows something to the contrary. They just misinterpret other peoples' work and mysteriously get paid my big oil. Lol
And this is what I am talking about. Clearly you demonstrate that you have no understanding of who funds, "scientific institutions."

There wasn't a single medical institution that did not support forcing everyone to get the jab during the scamdemic . . . .what of it?

Intelligent folks now know how this grift is played.
 
And this is what I am talking about. Clearly you demonstrate that you have no understanding of who funds, "scientific institutions."

There wasn't a single medical institution that did not support forcing everyone to get the jab during the scamdemic . . . .what of it?

Intelligent folks now know how this grift is played.
You're arrogant, not stupid.
 
And this is what I am talking about. Clearly you demonstrate that you have no understanding of who funds, "scientific institutions."

There wasn't a single medical institution that did not support forcing everyone to get the jab during the scamdemic . . . .what of it?

Intelligent folks now know how this grift is played.
A religious fundie.
 
There isn't a scientific institution on Earth that takes the position that AGW isn't real. There are very few actual scientists that take that position, and none of them are doing research that shows something to the contrary. They just misinterpret other peoples' work and mysteriously get paid my big oil. Lol

And you eat it up because you're not actually interested in anything but having your conclusions reinforced.

There isn't a scientific institution on Earth that takes the position that AGW isn't real.

So what?

If deciding we caused a bit of warming is all they did, that would be fine.

Politicians using their "findings" and deciding to spend trillions and totally manipulate the
economy is where we run into a problem. Doomsday scenarios, because it will be a little warmer,
is where we have a problem.
 
There isn't a scientific institution on Earth that takes the position that AGW isn't real.

So what?

If deciding we caused a bit of warming is all they did, that would be fine.

Politicians using their "findings" and deciding to spend trillions and totally manipulate the
economy is where we run into a problem. Doomsday scenarios, because it will be a little warmer,
is where we have a problem.
I don't have a position on the policy. I'm strictly talking about science. Disagreeing with policy isn't a reason to not be realistic about science.
 
You're arrogant, not stupid.
Perhaps. But I can confidently say I'd rather be arrogant, than humble and naive TBH.


1771113491783.webp

1771113517973.webp

1771113597786.webp
 

Attachments

  • 1771113539501.webp
    1771113539501.webp
    10.6 KB · Views: 6
A religious fundie.
I do have to cut him some slack. He is much younger than most of the board I believe.




When we were in school, they did not propagandize us with theories and try to pass them off as necessarily true, or indeed factual accounts, spinning paradigms out of thin air.

Hell, natural selection and Darwinian evolution have far more evidence to its veracity, but even in science classes, most schools stepped lightly on that topic.



Not this topic. Since the early 2000's kids are indoctrinated into the AGW scam as if it is a religion in the public schools.

It took me forever, years and years, to deprogram my kid. I'm not sure he is completely deprogrammed, as that generation (Z and millennials,) and the social media they consume tend to be an echo chamber repeating the NWO propaganda.
 
I do have to cut him some slack. He is much younger than most of the board I believe.




When we were in school, they did not propagandize us with theories and try to pass them off as necessarily true, or indeed factual accounts, spinning paradigms out of thin air.

Hell, natural selection and Darwinian evolution have far more evidence to its veracity, but even in science classes, most schools stepped lightly on that topic.



Not this topic. Since the early 2000's kids are indoctrinated into the AGW scam as if it is a religion in the public schools.

It took me forever, years and years, to deprogram my kid. I'm not sure he is completely deprogrammed, as that generation (Z and millennials,) and the social media they consume tend to be an echo chamber repeating the NWO propaganda.
I have made scientific arguments and have backed them with sources. Pretending otherwise is just... dishonest.
 
I have made scientific arguments and have backed them with sources. Pretending otherwise is just... dishonest.
No you haven't...You've made appeals to authority and backed them with tired boilerplate from the warmer orthodoxy.

Pretending otherwise is just....dishonest.
 
15th post
You just connected climate science to transgender issues with zero logical throughline. That's not an argument. That's a worldview leaking. You're telling me what side you belong to, not what you think. You didn't make a claim. You made a mood.

This is a category error.

The trans comparison is about social classification and identity. Climate science is about thermodynamics and radiative forcing. One is sociology and the other is physics. Treating them as the same thing is like saying “gravity is fake because fashion trends exist.”
Tell me more about the Global Warming ship full of goobers.
Goober. That got trapped in icy seas and had to have an icebreaker come rescue their retardation.
It was after that when global warming became "Climate Change"
Yeah, the weather changes there, cupcake. It seems you have a keen eye for the obvious. :rolleyes-41:
 
No you haven't...You've made appeals to authority and backed them with tired boilerplate from the warmer orthodoxy.

Pretending otherwise is just....dishonest.
I think you're an ideologue in denial. None of this science is actually controversial in settings where people understand what they're talking about.
 
Taxing people for the weather changing takes some serious chutzpah on the part of those that try to do that.
It's not like they can do anything about it.
They can't, and if you think they can, you're retarded.
 
Taxing people for the weather changing takes some serious chutzpah on the part of those that try to do that.
It's not like they can do anything about it.
They can't, and if you think they can, you're retarded.
I've made zero policy suggestions. I'm simply defending physics.
 
Back
Top Bottom