Time to attack iran

[rhodescholar]

You've never been insulted, baited, or trolled by me, despite committing all three offenses yourself.

You have been a troll in a shitload of my threads, and the fact that you are in my sig itself is telling of the fact that honest debate is of no interest to you whatsoever...

 

[rhodescholar]

I see. Never mind then, go ahead and bomb the shit out of them. We don't need those people with their fingers on the nuclear button.

Assuming you are not a sock puppet, you will learn quickly that sunni man, shogun and a few others are mentally deranged and just troll in/out of threads, while a few others like KK couch their trolling marginally better, but do little more than troll.

 

[goldcatt]

Wow, nobody's ever accused me of being a sock puppet before. I believe I'll sit back and watch this one. No offense to anyone involved, but your feud is none of my business and I don't know y'all well enough to take a side.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

You've never been insulted, baited, or trolled by me, despite committing all three offenses yourself.

You have been a troll in a shitload of my threads, and the fact that you are in my sig itself is telling of the fact that honest debate is of no interest to you whatsoever...

Actually it was in my thread about the head of the IAEA saying there was no evidence Iran was seeking nuclear weapons where you began your little campaign against me.

Yes, me being in your signature is evidence that honest debate is of no interest to me.

 

[del]

Wow, nobody's ever accused me of being a sock puppet before. I believe I'll sit back and watch this one. No offense to anyone involved, but your feud is none of my business and I don't know y'all well enough to take a side.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Khatami was not re-elected because he had already served two consecutive terms.

 

[goldcatt]

Khatami was not re-elected because he had already served two consecutive terms.

True. But it has been argued that the about-face from a clerical reformist to a non-clerical hardliner was due to Khatami's "failure". If another reformist had been installed, the domestic reforms begun under Khatami would have continued and we might well have seen a peaceful evolution of the IR similar to that slowly happening in China. We'll never know of course, but it's an interesting and IMO worthy argument.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Khatami was not re-elected because he had already served two consecutive terms.

True. But it has been argued that the about-face from a clerical reformist to a non-clerical hardliner was due to Khatami's "failure". If another reformist had been installed, the domestic reforms begun under Khatami would have continued and we might well have seen a peaceful evolution of the IR similar to that slowly happening in China. We'll never know of course, but it's an interesting and IMO worthy argument.

yeah, i read your post, and it was very good. i agree very much.

rhodescholar mentioned the "not re-elected stuff". i could not help but try to correct him.

 

[rhodescholar]

Wow, nobody's ever accused me of being a sock puppet before. I believe I'll sit back and watch this one. No offense to anyone involved, but your feud is none of my business and I don't know y'all well enough to take a side.

Can't get into it, but a douchebag was fucking with the forums last week using many puppet accounts, so I am now VERY cautious with new users... sorry about that, but that's what things have come to here...

 

[goldcatt]

Khatami was not re-elected because he had already served two consecutive terms.

True. But it has been argued that the about-face from a clerical reformist to a non-clerical hardliner was due to Khatami's "failure". If another reformist had been installed, the domestic reforms begun under Khatami would have continued and we might well have seen a peaceful evolution of the IR similar to that slowly happening in China. We'll never know of course, but it's an interesting and IMO worthy argument.

yeah, i read your post, and it was very good. i agree very much.

rhodescholar mentioned the "not re-elected stuff". i could not help but try to correct him.

No comment at this time. I am Switzerland.

 

[L.K.Eder]

True. But it has been argued that the about-face from a clerical reformist to a non-clerical hardliner was due to Khatami's "failure". If another reformist had been installed, the domestic reforms begun under Khatami would have continued and we might well have seen a peaceful evolution of the IR similar to that slowly happening in China. We'll never know of course, but it's an interesting and IMO worthy argument.

yeah, i read your post, and it was very good. i agree very much.

rhodescholar mentioned the "not re-elected stuff". i could not help but try to correct him.

No comment at this time. I am Switzerland.

cool, then we are neighbors.

 

[rhodescholar]

Actually it was in my thread about the head of the IAEA saying there was no evidence Iran was seeking nuclear weapons where you began your little campaign against me.Yes, me being in your signature is evidence that honest debate is of no interest to me.

Standing on a street corner screaming the same line over and over again, and refusing to discuss it is a sign of trolling...you repeated the same line in the thread - and others - over and over. That is trolling/polluting threads.

The fact that you fucking openly admit you did it is a sign of either unbelievable stupidity, or total retardation...

 

[rhodescholar]

KK thinks that she can scream "there is no evidence iran has nuclear weapons" - and that just closes the case right there.

Noone is allowed to question it, nor mention that iran is blocking inspections.

As we all know, once KK says something is true, there is no need - or allowance - for anyone to debate it...

 

[Dr Grump]

Just keep your nose out of other peoples' business...if you can..

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Actually it was in my thread about the head of the IAEA saying there was no evidence Iran was seeking nuclear weapons where you began your little campaign against me.Yes, me being in your signature is evidence that honest debate is of no interest to me.

Standing on a street corner screaming the same line over and over again, and refusing to discuss it is a sign of trolling...you repeated the same line in the thread - and others - over and over. That is trolling/polluting threads.

The fact that you fucking openly admit you did it is a sign of either unbelievable stupidity, or total retardation...

Well you've yet to refute the point that the head of the IAEA said there was no evidence, so the point still remains.

 

[rhodescholar]

Well you've yet to refute the point that the head of the IAEA said there was no evidence, so the point still remains.

I will admit the IAEA said he had no evidence when you admit iran is blocking IAEA inspections...

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

KK thinks that she can scream "there is no evidence iran has nuclear weapons" - and that just closes the case right there.

Noone is allowed to question it, nor mention that iran is blocking inspections.

As we all know, once KK says something is true, there is no need - or allowance - for anyone to debate it...

Well I'm not screaming anything, and it's the head of the IAEA that said there's no evidence not me.

Also, I'm a "He" not a "She." The name "Kevin" should have been a dead giveaway.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Well you've yet to refute the point that the head of the IAEA said there was no evidence, so the point still remains.

I will admit the IAEA said he had no evidence when you admit iran is blocking IAEA inspections...

Well you see, I don't care whether you admit it or not. The fact remains either way.

 

[rdean]

Republicans are so funny. They love bogeymen. They still believe that Saddam was behind 9/11. Here is Bush in his own words saying that Saddam wasn't behind 9/11 and he never said Saddam was. Only, how did Americans get that idea if it wasn't from Bush?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTstzb7qSI4]YouTube - Bush protects Iraqi Christians[/ame]

Now, you have those on the "white" wing who want to "invade" Iran. We can't even rebuild Iraq. Iran is building "nuclear" bombs which I guess they are going to "truck" into this country. You could say, "Give diplomacy a try", but look at the "white" wingnuts on this site. They rant and scream. Invade! Blow them up! Get 'em before it's 'too late'!"

Somehow, they believe that putting a nuclear bomb together takes a glow in the dark watch, a bit of string, a couple of coat hangers, some spit, and wallah! A nuclear bomb a la "McGiver".

Well, all I can say is "praise the heavens" that we have someone with "reason" in the White House.

Yea, Iranians are "technological". Nearly every month one of their planes crash.

Look up "road safety":

Iran has highest rate of fatal road accidents in the world
Tehran, April 6, IRNA -- Iran ranks first worldwide in terms of having highest number of road accidents leading to 38,000 deaths and injuries per year, said Deputy Health Minister Mohammed-Esmaeel Akbari here on Tuesday.

Their school system is even worse. When the clerics took over they rewrote the school books replace "mysticism" with science, exactly the same way the church wants to do here. As if "magical" design was something "real" that could explain how microbes develop resistance to penicillin.

This is the "dangerous technologically advanced country" that will be sending out nuclear weapons by the truck load? Oh sorry, by camel cart?

I think the real danger is that they might blow themselves up.

Could you imagine if Americans were still listening to the "white" wingnuts? This is why they are so afraid of science. They think you could build nuclear reactors like gas stations.

 

[rhodescholar]

Well you see, I don't care whether you admit it or not. The fact remains either way.

And the fact remains that iran is blocking inspections, TROLL ASSHOLE.

And you wonder why you're considered the House Idiot....keep screaming your one liner, see if that fires up the Rep points for ya, moron...