Tim Walz: “There is no guarantee to free speech”.

[Frankenstein]

Yes, you would most likely be unwelcome.

Oh really, how would you know, because i am straight and would come in with my wife

 

[Mac-7]

I am talking ACTUAL liberal political philosophy and not the actions of those who call themselves liberal

Dusty old definitions of liberalism are pretty useless when modern liberals act the way they do

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Your posting history says otherwise, but you do you.

These children were nurtured on participation awards and safe spaces. The notion of becoming a responsible adult frightens them, so they look to an all powerful state to assume the role of parent.

They WANT to be told what to think.

 

[Frankenstein]

Like so many of our libs, Timmy Walz doesn’t grasp much about our Constitution. And what he does grasp, he fights against.

It's because he is in such awe of the Chinese government

 

[martybegan]

You don't get to say whatever the fuck you want with no consequence.

So someone who professes that a man can't become a woman should be punished?

 

[martybegan]

It's irresponsible. You wanna run your mouth? There's consequences.

There should be consequences for saying life begins at conception and abortion should be banned?

 

[CrazyTrader55]

Has any Democrat ever read the Constitution? It’s clear neither Harris or Walz has.

Damn straight he's dangerous.

 

[Foxfyre]

I'm not okay with either. I'm not a democrat. You're entire response is moot.

Why? What makes my response moot or in any way incorrect?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Oh really, how would you know, because i am straight and would come in with my wife

I don't care about any of that.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Why? What makes my response moot or in any way incorrect?

Because you:

1. Attribute censorship and gun confiscation to me, for reasons.
2. Think I care what democrats are 'okay' with.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The First Amendment says otherwise

False Advertising from the 18th Century

All the tyranny that the rulers have been getting away with proves that the Constitution doesn't protect us, the people, from anything.

The Second protects the First. My grandpa told me that years ago... now I understand it

A government document doesn't protect you from hoplophobes; only your gun protects you from them.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

You do not have the right to be free from exposure to "misinformation".

The Hired Media Have Unanimously Elected Miss Information as Their Homecoming Queen

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The notion of becoming a responsible adult frightens them, so they look to an all powerful state to assume the role of parent.

They WANT to be told what to think.

Same Goes for the Eweniversity, Which Is for Teenagers Who Are Afraid to Grow Up

 

[Foxfyre]

Because you:

1. Attribute censorship and gun confiscation to me, for reasons.
2. Think I care what democrats are 'okay' with.

Your Post #39

No one wants to make either moot. This is your projection.

My response to to that in my Post #42:
"Ending free speech and confiscating guns from law abiding citizens makes both the First and Second Amendments moot. That's a fact. And most Democrats are okay with both."

All the people I specifically mentioned advocating that in the previous post are Democrats. I was rebutting your post directed to me.

What part of that includes you? A little over sensitive/defensive are we? If not guilty?

 

[Nostra]

View attachment 1027128

He called it.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

It all makes sense when you realize the true nature of the job Harris/Waltz are seeking.

Their job is to weaken us from within until they bring us to our knees. At that point, their bosses can step in and (as they like to call it) "build back better"

 

[eagle1462010]

Has any Democrat ever read the Constitution? It’s clear neither Harris or Walz has.

The path of Europe.

The path of Venezuala.

Its what these fuckers are.

 

[DStar777]

You don't get to say whatever the fuck you want with no consequence.

Tim Walz wants the govt to censor "misinformation".. is that Constitutional??

 

[Nostra]

Tim Walz wants the govt to censor "misinformation".. is that Constitutional??

Nope.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Your Post #39


My response to to that in my Post #42:
"Ending free speech and confiscating guns from law abiding citizens makes both the First and Second Amendments moot. That's a fact. And most Democrats are okay with both."

All the people I specifically mentioned advocating that in the previous post are Democrats. I was rebutting your post directed to me.

What part of that includes you? A little over sensitive/defensive are we? If not guilty?

Why would I feel guilty?