Tim Walz: “There is no guarantee to free speech”.

[toobfreak]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

So they used states to ban church during Covid.

or abridging the freedom of speech,

Unless you ask about the 2020 election or Hunter's laptop.

or of the press;

Good one! So they say anything they want about Trump no matter how untrue.

or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

So long as it isn't to protest the 2020 election.
Of course, what Tim meant is that they will just hire private agencies to limit your free speech for them.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Nonsense reply.

Because you're too fckn stupid to understand. It's a Constitutional right, dipwad

 

[westwall]

It's irresponsible. You wanna run your mouth? There's consequences.

For you too. You try and stop someone from speaking, and you too are in danger.

 

[westwall]

Nonsense reply.

Most of yours are.

 

[Mac-7]

They have to be utterly ignorant.

Freedom of speech is such a bedrock LIBERAL ideal as to be an essential aspect of being a liberal at all.

Libs used freedom of speech in the 1960s to gain positions of authority

Positions which they now use to limit free speech

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Because you're too fckn stupid to understand. It's a Constitutional right, dipwad

Seems you're too fucking stupid to understand accountability.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

For you too. You try and stop someone from speaking, and you too are in danger.

The Second protects the First. My grandpa told me that years ago... now I understand it

 

[westwall]

That's basically what I said.

No, you claimed you have a right to not hear offensive speech. You don't.

But you can certainly walk out of hearing range.

You have no right to prevent someone else from speaking.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[westwall]

Seems you're too fucking stupid to understand accountability.

You aren't talking about accountability.

 

[MisterBeale]

You don't get to say whatever the fuck you want with no consequence.

Definition of NOM DE PLUME

a name that a writer uses instead of his or her real name : pseudonym, pen name… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

21 Famous Authors and Their Pen Names​

21 Famous Authors and Their Pen Names - The eNotes Blog

For centuries, writers have created pen names to publish their literary works. Adopting a pseudonym grants writers the ability to conceal their true identity for personal, political, and ethical reasons. Some of our literary world’s most beloved, bestselling authors have […]

blog.enotes.com

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Definition of NOM DE PLUME

a name that a writer uses instead of his or her real name : pseudonym, pen name… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

21 Famous Authors and Their Pen Names​

21 Famous Authors and Their Pen Names - The eNotes Blog

For centuries, writers have created pen names to publish their literary works. Adopting a pseudonym grants writers the ability to conceal their true identity for personal, political, and ethical reasons. Some of our literary world’s most beloved, bestselling authors have […]

blog.enotes.com

Stumbles has bumbles badly

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

No, you claimed you have a right to not hear offensive speech. You don't.

But you can certainly walk out of hearing range.

You have no right to prevent someone else from speaking.

If you're in my place of business, I don't have to listen to you. Furthermore, I can have you trespassed and removed.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If you're in my place of business, I don't have to listen to you. Furthermore, I can have you trespassed and removed.

Weak rebuttal. Keep trying

 

[Foxfyre]

Has any Democrat ever read the Constitution? It’s clear neither Harris or Walz has.

Walz joins Kamala, Hillary, Schiff, Kerry and many others who are saying the same thing. The Biden/Harris DOJ has double downed on Obama weaponizing the government against free speech and pretty much all calling themselves Democrats have been just fine with that. Defended it even.

If the Democrats retain control of the White House it will get much worse. And if the Democrats ever regain control of the White House and Congress, you can be pretty sure they will enlarge the Supreme Court and pack it with leftists who will do their bidding.

And then the First and Second Amendments as well as pretty much the entire U.S. Constitution will be rendered moot.

 

[Hum Dinger]

O.K., MAGGOTS...

Try to remember what your second-grade teacher tried to teach you...

"With rights come responsibilities"

"If you are not responsible in the use of your rights, you are not entitled to those rights..."

Or in the words of the Conservative Justice Scalia :

"Like most rights, the right...is not unlimited."

The MAGGOTS have been abusing their right to free speech for a very long time.

They deserve to have that right revoked when necessary.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

O.K., MAGGOTS...

Try to remember what your second-grade teacher tried to teach you...

"With rights come responsibilities"

"If you are not responsible in the use of your rights, you are not entitled to those rights..."

Or in the words of the Conservative Justice Scalia :

"Like most rights, the right...is not unlimited."

The MAGGOTS have been abusing their right to free speech for a very long time.

They deserve to have that right revoked when necessary.

The First Amendment belies you

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Weak rebuttal. Keep trying

Fuck you. Keep trying.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Walz joins Kamala, Hillary, Schiff, Kerry and many others who are saying the same thing. The Biden/Harris DOJ has double downed on Obama weaponizing the government against free speech and pretty much all calling themselves Democrats have been just fine with that. Defended it even.

If the Democrats retain control of the White House it will get much worse. And if the Democrats ever regain control of the White House and Congress, you can be pretty sure they will enlarge the Supreme Court and pack it with leftists who will do their bidding.

And then the First and Second Amendments as well as pretty much the entire U.S. Constitution will be rendered moot.

No one wants to make either moot. This is your projection.

 

[MisterBeale]

If you're in my place of business, I don't have to listen to you. Furthermore, I can have you trespassed and removed.

But that is an entirely different argument and discussion. Try to understand what the OP posted and is saying. Waltz is WRONG about our Constitutional rights, vis-à-vis the government.


This is what is being debated here. . . .

"Governor Tim Walz: NO RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH if the government decides it is misinformation or hateful"

Tim Walz Is DEAD WRONG—Hate Speech, Misinfo Are PROTECTED Speech: Robby Soave​

Oct 3, 2024



What you are now doing, is deflecting from the initial observation, by distorting the conversation into an argument that is not being made. That is a straw man fallacy.