considering none of the tar sands from the keystone pipeline would actually be used domestically, your argument fails.
and the pipeline itself was not rejected, the proposed route through Nebraska was rejected by the people of Nebraska as well. they are free to propose a new route and apply again. you act like this was vetoed and has no chance of every happening again.
Not true. You do not know what tomorrow will bring. The Pipeline was rejected. It was planned by Obama that way. You know the EPA went against the recommendation of the State Department to block it. Yeah, let's spend another 10 Years studying it, before anything is done. You are playing bait and switch, the only ones being fooled are the Kool-Aid drinkers.
it was rejected by Obama the same way the pipeline west through the rockies was rejected by Canada. for environmental concerns. why doesnt canada just build their pipeline west to the pacific, this is a much shorter route than going all the way across the states.
so now the right is gonna use the what if arguments? i thought the right didnt think is what ifs?
No Oil to be used from Keystone in the States
Key Facts on Keystone XL | Tar Sands Action
Do Republicans Realize That Keystone Pipeline Won
also, here is the latest on the new route by TransCanada, guess you were wrong afterall.
The Associated Press: TransCanada executive: New Keystone route in weeks
The State Department, backed by President Barack Obama, recently rejected the longer project, saying TransCanada needed to find a route that would avoid the Sandhills and the Ogallala Aquifer, a key water source for eight states. At the time, Obama encouraged TransCanada to pursue the southern portion of the pipeline that would, in the short term, relieve a bottleneck of crude at Midwestern refineries.