Sure. All the plain evidence is fake news. No worries.You cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship between the low rate of firearms-related crime and the gun control laws in those countries.
That is, you cannot demonstrate "they work".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sure. All the plain evidence is fake news. No worries.You cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship between the low rate of firearms-related crime and the gun control laws in those countries.
That is, you cannot demonstrate "they work".
No one is taking your guns away, no one is removing guns from society. Where did you get that dumbass idea from? The citizens in more than 175 countries have guns, it's just that, they like to see better regulation and control to lower gun deaths. Firearm regulation does not remove guns and it does not stop gun violence or deaths, it reduces. Did that get into your skull or did fly through one ear and out the other because there was nothing to stop it?Bullshit. As I explained repeatedly, if you took all our guns away, the criminals will always have theirs.
Useful firearm regulation will remove/reduce guns. Specifically, the number of handguns and military style semi automatics in private hands.Firearm regulation does not remove guns and it does not stop gun violence or deaths, it reduces.
Abatis is one large bag of wind full of bullshit. . . . I am glad I do not live in you world.
No one is taking your guns away, no one is removing guns from society. Where did you get that dumbass idea from? The citizens in more than 175 countries have guns, it's just that, they like to see better regulation and control to lower gun deaths. Firearm regulation does not remove guns and it does not stop gun violence or deaths, it reduces. Did that get into your skull or did fly through one ear and out the other because there was nothing to stop it?
Vehicle regulation reduces accidents, injuries and deaths, it does not stop accidents, injuries and deaths. Do you fucking get it?
You cannot demonstrate the necessary relationships you claim, above.Notwithstanding our own ammosexuals' self delusions, because firearms are more rigidly controlled in NZ, thereby reducing firearms in circulation available to be obtained by criminals, the rates of firearm crime and firearm homicide in NZ are fractions of that of the US.
As they are similarly in other developed nations possessing both criminals and more rigid firearms controls.
Democrats routinely run on the promise of more and more and more gun control.They like to pretend that the gooberment is going take yer guns away.
Look at you, unable to understand correlation does not prove causation.Sure. All the plain evidence is fake news. No worries.
For any sort of dent in firearm crime or firearm homicide rates the number of firearms in circulation/private hands- specifically handguns and military style semi automatics- will have to be reduced. A buyback scheme seems to be the best road to achieve that.They like to pretend that the gooberment is going take yer guns away.
You cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, what you propose.Useful firearm regulation will remove/reduce guns. Specifically, the number of handguns and military style semi automatics in private hands.
Sure. All the studies are fake news. No worries. Denial is a necessary part of ammosexuality.Look at you, unable to understand correlation does not prove causation.
Demonstrate the necessary relationship you claim.
Except for all the examples of other developed nations. But I understand those are fake news.You cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or the efficacy of, what you propose.
Thank you for the admission that you cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship you claim.Sure. All the studies are fake news. No worries. Denial is a necessary part of ammosexuality.
Thank you for the admission that you cannot demonstrate the necessity or efficacy you claim.Except for all the examples of other developed nations. But I understand those are fake news.
That's ok, I enjoyed your reprise of the tobacco lobbyists' shtick, where completely obvious connections were disingenuously dismissed.Thank you for the admission that you cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship you claim.
You made a claim, onus is in you to back it up.That's ok, I enjoyed your reprise of the tobacco lobbyists' shtick.
The other developed nations demonstrate the relationship I claim. If you want to dismiss that as irrelevant I for one will not be at all surprised.You made a claim, onus is in you to back it up.
And you know you cannot.
Disagree?
Demonstrate the necessary relationship you claim.
The other developed nations demonstrate the relationship I claim.
No. You claim their gun laws reduce their gun-related crime rates.
That's the necessary relationship I challenged you to demonstrate, and you know you cannot.
Disagree?
Demonstrate the necessary relationship you claim.
Thank you for the admission that you cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship you claim.