Those Peaceful Indians Until Whitey Showed Up

It's a fact that "indigenous first nation" people were brutal and waged war on each other. It's the basic human condition, not a value judgment.
giphy (1).gif
 
IM2 ancestors were basic hunter gathers that got sold into slavery by another black tribe that captured them.
Those tribes sold defective products. IM2's ancestral genetic waste should have been eaten by large cats or left to the vultures. Modern African soil was robbed of the nitrogen, and modern American DNA is polluted by his sort.
 
Or is it minorities trying to explain away their cultural failures? Or is it ALL humans have faults and that isn't race specific?
BINGO.gif

win.gif


The thing is that with racist bed wetters you have elitist white sociopaths that hold all the power of the democrook party. They view common white people with at least as much contempt as any other klansman held catholics, jews, africans and other euroweenie immigrants. The democrook party is the party of division and always has been. If not for deliberate ignorance on behalf of parasites like IM2 we could overcome the efforts of elitist sociopaths, but then fucksticks like him would have to find actual problems that need to be solved which might require effort and results. Leftist sociopaths will NEVER seek to resolve racial issues, reduce poverty, improve education, clean up environmental damage, secure the borders, reduce terrorism and crime in general or have an efficient cost effective medical industry.


The longer these problems exist, the longer they can exploit them.


.
 
Whether they were peaceful or not is a subject for discussion. But it's just a horrible travesty that those evil warlike Europeans came across the ocean to interrupt those indigenous people's daily ways of life. We must return the lands to their rightful owners so they can stack mighty heaps of the skulls of their sacrificed murdered victims. Who are we with our ancient and outdated Christian values, to tell those people how to live? Christian values like love, forgiveness, and a God who doesn't want to see us rip each other's still-beating hearts out of each other, to be sacrificed murdered in the name of some Monkey god.

How dare we?

:laughing0301:
Exactly. How dare we let them kill each other? Only we have a Christian duty to kill them - using guns, smallpox, whatever...
 
Your government:
“The Native Americans did not kill anything they could not use.”

Pure Leftard bullshit.
You just cherry-picked one line to make your case, didn't you? Either that or you do not know how to read. Which is it?

That line was used in a para that talks about their hunting behavior...
People of today have just begun to think about this. The Native Americans have always had a deep respect for the land. There was a love of every form of life. The Native Americans did not kill anything they could not use. They never killed an animal or a fish for the sport of it. Fishing and hunting were a way to survive
 
If Native Americans were killing each then it was Good, Moral and Jesus Approved that White, Christian Europeans cross the ocean to kill them as well. Is that what this tread is trying to say?
 
Great book on the Comanche and life on the Texas frontier. No tribe was as brutal as the Comanche and no nation in history could match their abilities on horseback.
  1. 81hoAsZuDtL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
 
Regardless of how those white Europeans were, neither native American indigenous people or Africans built great cities, roads, political systems, huge cathedrals and buildings, markets, industries, factories, and universities. You wuz no Kangs.

While we were building those things, you people were sill wallowing in mud huts and cannibalizing each other. It was only because of we "peaceful white Europeans" that you tribal people finally acquired amenities like toilets, electricity, and running water.. Otherwise, you'd still be a loosely-knit group of warring tribes, trying to kill each other and steal each other's women.

You're very welcome sir. :04:
So, people only deserve the right to existence and self-determination if they produce first?

Because it seems like you're saying that not everyone has been endowed by their Creator with the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, just those who live up to your standards, and everyone else deserves to be taken over by those who do—for their own good, of course.
 
So, people only deserve the right to existence and self-determination if they produce first?

Because it seems like you're saying that not everyone has been endowed by their Creator with the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, just those who live up to your standards, and everyone else deserves to be taken over by those who do—for their own good, of course.

I was referring to the past, not today. Congress did not extend citizenship to all Native Americans until 1924.
 
I was referring to the past, not today. Congress did not extend citizenship to all Native Americans until 1924.
Except that it doesn't limit itself to just citizens. The entire nation is built upon the belief that all people have unalienable rights, bestowed by our Creator. The Constitution made us the first nation in the history of the world to be built around that idea, and it is at the core of why we are exceptional at all.

And yet, you said that some people have to earn those rights, by being a productive or properly organized society. Until then, according to how I read what you wrote, they are not entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and deserved to be conquered by those who earned their elevated space.

If I'm wrong, tell me why.
 
Except that it doesn't limit itself to just citizens. The entire nation is built upon the belief that all people have unalienable rights, bestowed by our Creator. The Constitution made us the first nation in the history of the world to be built around that idea, and it is at the core of why we are exceptional at all.

And yet, you said that some people have to earn those rights, by being a productive or properly organized society. Until then, according to how I read what you wrote, they are not entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and deserved to be conquered by those who earned their elevated space.

If I'm wrong, tell me why.

Our constitutional rights don't apply to African natives living in mud huts hundreds or thousands of years ago. Nor do they apply to anyone who's not an American citizen. They can either go fuck themselves or put those in their own constitutions.
 
Our constitutional rights don't apply to African natives living in mud huts hundreds or thousands of years ago. Nor do they apply to anyone who's not an American citizen. They can either go fuck themselves or put those in their own constitutions.
Good thing the Constitution disagrees with you.
 
Who the hell said they were peaceful? :eusa_eh:

Until the 1970s, virtually all archaeologists and anthropologists claimed that the ancient Maya were a peaceful people who never engaged in large-scale warfare, that war was virtually unknown among them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top