Those of you who oppose Trumps solution to the Iran problem post your solutions here

But….but…but….Orange man….but….but
I agree, one can't let these radical leftist anti government nutjobs protest violently and threaten law enforcement, who after all are just doing their job.

1772573712389.webp
 
How ironic that the very leftists screaming “Trump is Hitler!” are angry that he took out a wannabe Hitler who has killed 35,000 of his own people in the last couple of months, is threatening Israel with annihilation, and has created death and destruction for 45 years.
 
When you people stop blaming the Jews for everything, which is essentially what you just did.
Folks aren't blaming "jews for everything." They are blaming the rogue pariah government of Israel.

You won't get much productive conversation if you keep equating the two.


. . . and even the Trump administration admitted that this war was forced by the Israeli government.






 
Folks aren't blaming "jews for everything." They are blaming the rogue pariah government of Israel.

You won't get much productive conversation if you keep equating the two.


. . . and even the Trump administration admitted that this war was forced by the Israeli government.






How much does it cost to have these prepaid canned responses at your fingertips?
 
The homicidal regime of the mullahs is a result of CIA meddling in the country since the day it was chartered.

Problem>reaction>solution

There is no solution when the forever war is the desired result.


Agreed. The numbers of Americans they claim to attribute to the current regime pales in comparison to the number inflicted by our puppet psychopath whom we gave WMDs to.

 
Frankly who has won a war there since WW2? Even Israel. They think they win and then three years later they are fighting again.
 
Some Grok knowledge:

The smallest nuclear weapon ever built and deployed (in terms of physical size, mass, and yield) was the US W54 nuclear warhead, developed in the late 1950s and fielded during the Cold War from around 1961 to the early 1970s.


This compact implosion-type fission device used plutonium-239 and holds the record as the smallest confirmed nuclear weapon to enter service.



Key specifications of the W54 (core warhead):


  • Diameter: Approximately 10.9–11 inches (about 276–280 mm) in the lightest configurations, up to ~12 inches (305 mm) in some packaged versions.
  • Length: Approximately 15.7–16 inches (about 399–406 mm) for the core, extending to ~18 inches (457 mm) in some packaged forms like the B54/SADM variant.
  • Weight: As low as ~51 pounds (23 kg) for the bare warhead in some configurations; around 50.9–58.5 pounds (23–26.5 kg) depending on the exact mod (e.g., Mod 0 or B54 Mod 1 SADM versions weighed ~58.5 lb / 26.5 kg including casing and fuzing).

Context and deployments:


  • It was used in systems like the Davy Crockett (M-388 projectile), a recoilless gun-launched tactical nuclear "bazooka" for battlefield use. The full projectile (including the warhead) was about 30–31 inches (76–79 cm) long, ~11 inches (28 cm) in diameter at the widest point, and weighed ~76 pounds (34 kg) total.
  • Another version was the man-portable Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM), designed for special forces to carry in a backpack, sabotage targets like bridges or tunnels, and detonate via timer or remote. The complete packaged device was roughly 12 inches in diameter × 18 inches long and weighed ~58–70 pounds (26–32 kg) depending on the mod.

Its explosive yield was variable but extremely low for a nuclear device: typically 10–20 tons of TNT equivalent (0.01–0.02 kilotons) in the smallest settings, up to around 250–1,000 tons in higher settings—still orders of magnitude below strategic bombs like Hiroshima (~15 kt).


No smaller confirmed nuclear weapon (by physical dimensions or deployable package) has been publicly acknowledged or declassified from any nation. Theoretical minimum sizes for fission devices are constrained by physics (critical mass requirements for plutonium or uranium), but the W54 represents the practical smallest ever fielded. Modern nuclear warheads are generally larger due to safety features, delivery systems, and higher yields.



For scale: Imagine something roughly the size of a large watermelon or a small carry-on suitcase—small enough for one or two people to carry, yet still capable of devastating a localized area with nuclear effects (blast, heat, and radiation).


Sorry, guys, but I wouldn't want to be anywhere near that when it went off.
How about you?
You wanna take a chance when Muhammed slips that into your shopping mall and lights it off?
You might blow up a building, but you are not taking out a shopping mall. Two people carrying a suitcase into a shopping mall and then dying of radiation poisoning before they set it off is not a good plan!

Why do you think this weapon was never deployed or used? How many years of research did it take to develop a warhead that was small enough to be carried? How much shielding is required to keep it from being detected? How much does that shielding weigh?

The Iranians are about as far along in the development of uranium bombs as we were in 1942. This weapon used plutonium. They can't even do that!

The sky is not falling! I just wanted to put that out there for you Chicken Littles out there. Iran should have no nukes, but they are about 2 decades behind and a few reactors short to be able to produce anything like this.
 
15th post
Every independent agency out there says Iran was YEARS away from nukes.

Even Trump himself said he had obliterated their nuke program.
Oh, its even worse than that, his own government told him they were far from obtaining one, he just ignores what doesn't suit him, then tells his people to get with the program.

1772577232263.webp


1772577288211.webp

 
You won't get much productive conversation if you keep equating the two.
There is no equating the 2. Iran has vowed to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. They have been killing our people since 79

I dont give 2 ***** what they have to say.

I call it payback.

Where is your concern for the slaughter of the Iranians who protested the Mullahs?

And WHAT DO WE GAIN BY WAITING.

You want them to have even mote weapons when it happens?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom