WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 39,307
- 27,942
- 2,915
Correct identification of what you are responding to name calling of me. Keep up Tim SchitzStupid name calling without justification or substance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Correct identification of what you are responding to name calling of me. Keep up Tim SchitzStupid name calling without justification or substance.
I agree, one can't let these radical leftist anti government nutjobs protest violently and threaten law enforcement, who after all are just doing their job.But….but…but….Orange man….but….but
Folks aren't blaming "jews for everything." They are blaming the rogue pariah government of Israel.When you people stop blaming the Jews for everything, which is essentially what you just did.
No, it quite clearly is not. Otherwise, Iran would stop launching attacks and surrender.This was an EVIL ISLAMIC REGIME. It’s gone,
How much does it cost to have these prepaid canned responses at your fingertips?Folks aren't blaming "jews for everything." They are blaming the rogue pariah government of Israel.
You won't get much productive conversation if you keep equating the two.
. . . and even the Trump administration admitted that this war was forced by the Israeli government.
![]()
Fury as Marco Rubio admits Israel forced US into war with Iran
After learning that Israel would strike Iran , posing an 'imminent threat' to US soldiers in the region due to retaliatory strikes, the US chose to 'act preemptively,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said.www.dailymail.co.uk
![]()
Rubio Admits That America Is Fighting Israel’s War
Israel’s plan to strike Iran would put American lives at risk, Rubio said. Rather than confronting Israel, the U.S. joined their war.theintercept.com
![]()
Marco Rubio: Planned Israeli strike forced US to launch Iran war | The Jerusalem Post
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi responded to Rubio's statements, saying that the US has "entered a war of choice on behalf of Israel."www.jpost.com
![]()
Rubio cites planned Israeli attack as a key reason US launched strikes against Iran
Top diplomat says US understood its assets would be hit by Iran in retaliation for preemptive Israeli strike, though Jerusalem seen as unlikely to have acted without Trump's blessingwww.timesofisrael.com
![]()
US strikes on Iran triggered by Israel’s plan to launch attack, Rubio says
Democrats disturbed by rationale that Trump ordered pre-emptive strikes out of concern about Tehran retaliationwww.theguardian.com
![]()
Rubio claims US knew Israel would attack Iran, acted to protect American troops from ‘imminent threat’
WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Marco Rubio said President Trump attacked Iran over the weekend because he knew Israel was going to launch a military strike and worried about retaliation again…nypost.com
The homicidal regime of the mullahs is a result of CIA meddling in the country since the day it was chartered.
Problem>reaction>solution
There is no solution when the forever war is the desired result.
So many conspiracies, so little time!![]()
And Saddam Hussein was America's proxy.ISIS is an Iranian proxy
I believe that Hamas sucks. Severely.Like the beheaded babies Hamas threw into ovens on Oct 7
If you believe everything you're told by the media....
I'm posting HIllary's solution:
You might blow up a building, but you are not taking out a shopping mall. Two people carrying a suitcase into a shopping mall and then dying of radiation poisoning before they set it off is not a good plan!Some Grok knowledge:
The smallest nuclear weapon ever built and deployed (in terms of physical size, mass, and yield) was the US W54 nuclear warhead, developed in the late 1950s and fielded during the Cold War from around 1961 to the early 1970s.
This compact implosion-type fission device used plutonium-239 and holds the record as the smallest confirmed nuclear weapon to enter service.
Key specifications of the W54 (core warhead):
- Diameter: Approximately 10.9–11 inches (about 276–280 mm) in the lightest configurations, up to ~12 inches (305 mm) in some packaged versions.
- Length: Approximately 15.7–16 inches (about 399–406 mm) for the core, extending to ~18 inches (457 mm) in some packaged forms like the B54/SADM variant.
- Weight: As low as ~51 pounds (23 kg) for the bare warhead in some configurations; around 50.9–58.5 pounds (23–26.5 kg) depending on the exact mod (e.g., Mod 0 or B54 Mod 1 SADM versions weighed ~58.5 lb / 26.5 kg including casing and fuzing).
Context and deployments:
- It was used in systems like the Davy Crockett (M-388 projectile), a recoilless gun-launched tactical nuclear "bazooka" for battlefield use. The full projectile (including the warhead) was about 30–31 inches (76–79 cm) long, ~11 inches (28 cm) in diameter at the widest point, and weighed ~76 pounds (34 kg) total.
- Another version was the man-portable Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM), designed for special forces to carry in a backpack, sabotage targets like bridges or tunnels, and detonate via timer or remote. The complete packaged device was roughly 12 inches in diameter × 18 inches long and weighed ~58–70 pounds (26–32 kg) depending on the mod.
Its explosive yield was variable but extremely low for a nuclear device: typically 10–20 tons of TNT equivalent (0.01–0.02 kilotons) in the smallest settings, up to around 250–1,000 tons in higher settings—still orders of magnitude below strategic bombs like Hiroshima (~15 kt).
No smaller confirmed nuclear weapon (by physical dimensions or deployable package) has been publicly acknowledged or declassified from any nation. Theoretical minimum sizes for fission devices are constrained by physics (critical mass requirements for plutonium or uranium), but the W54 represents the practical smallest ever fielded. Modern nuclear warheads are generally larger due to safety features, delivery systems, and higher yields.
For scale: Imagine something roughly the size of a large watermelon or a small carry-on suitcase—small enough for one or two people to carry, yet still capable of devastating a localized area with nuclear effects (blast, heat, and radiation).
Sorry, guys, but I wouldn't want to be anywhere near that when it went off.
How about you?
You wanna take a chance when Muhammed slips that into your shopping mall and lights it off?
The only way to win is to not play. We should get all our stuff out of the entire region. We have had how many wars there now?
+2When a schizophrenic says he covets the Nobel Peace Prize and changes a Cabinet position to the Department of WAR, that should be a huge clue the megalomaniac is groping about for a target.
Oh, its even worse than that, his own government told him they were far from obtaining one, he just ignores what doesn't suit him, then tells his people to get with the program.Every independent agency out there says Iran was YEARS away from nukes.
Even Trump himself said he had obliterated their nuke program.
There is no equating the 2. Iran has vowed to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. They have been killing our people since 79You won't get much productive conversation if you keep equating the two.
When Israel is to blame ... what choice is there?The easy lazy way out is to blame Israel.
What neighbors has Israel threatened? Name them.