Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 60,881
- 25,499
- 2,173
The right celebrated killing anti-government protestors in Minneapolis.
Those of you who oppose Trumps solution to the Iran problem post your solutions here
- Thread starter Hafar1014
- Start date
Churchill
Gold Member
Yes I know, I was paraphrasing Lisa's remark, sarcasm.
Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
Your knowledge of nuclear weapons and their yields is underwhelming.
OldFlame
Diamond Member
- Aug 5, 2020
- 12,598
- 10,185
- 2,138
Baal is an ancient middle eastern god that rivaled YHWH. Just b/c elites like the Rothschilds still worship Baal, does not mean that the average Jewish person does. They are innocent of the crimes of the Epstein club IMO.
So you're comparing a group standing in front of the bull on Wall Street to the worshippers of Baal, that sacrificed animals to their god? And you expect to be taken with even a smidgen of seriousness? You're fuxxing crazy.
OldFlame
Diamond Member
- Aug 5, 2020
- 12,598
- 10,185
- 2,138
Who should control the world's oil supplies, the life blood of modern humanity?
Tell us your perfect solution.
- Sep 16, 2012
- 75,388
- 72,454
- 3,605
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 160,699
- 87,124
- 2,645
Prayers that everyone comes home safe
Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
Do you know how much that weapon weighed? Do you know how much radiation that soldier is being exposed to if that were a real warhead, (which I seriously doubt) ?Do you know how small the yield is on that weapon?
No, you don't. Go take a class! I don't have the time nor crayons to explain why nukes are heavy!
Churchill
Gold Member
You have a couple of those in your garage Harfass?
Did you get them from this Israeli spy?
Jonathan Pollard - Wikipedia
What is the world coming to, can't even trust your "friends" these days, sad.
But still you guys generously send them cash handouts and bombs as many Americans struggle to make end meet, just never did make sense to me, but silly old me.
Last edited:
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 160,699
- 87,124
- 2,645
Some Grok knowledge:
The smallest nuclear weapon ever built and deployed (in terms of physical size, mass, and yield) was the US W54 nuclear warhead, developed in the late 1950s and fielded during the Cold War from around 1961 to the early 1970s.
This compact implosion-type fission device used plutonium-239 and holds the record as the smallest confirmed nuclear weapon to enter service.
Its explosive yield was variable but extremely low for a nuclear device: typically 10–20 tons of TNT equivalent (0.01–0.02 kilotons) in the smallest settings, up to around 250–1,000 tons in higher settings—still orders of magnitude below strategic bombs like Hiroshima (~15 kt).
No smaller confirmed nuclear weapon (by physical dimensions or deployable package) has been publicly acknowledged or declassified from any nation. Theoretical minimum sizes for fission devices are constrained by physics (critical mass requirements for plutonium or uranium), but the W54 represents the practical smallest ever fielded. Modern nuclear warheads are generally larger due to safety features, delivery systems, and higher yields.
For scale: Imagine something roughly the size of a large watermelon or a small carry-on suitcase—small enough for one or two people to carry, yet still capable of devastating a localized area with nuclear effects (blast, heat, and radiation).
Sorry, guys, but I wouldn't want to be anywhere near that when it went off.
How about you?
You wanna take a chance when Muhammed slips that into your shopping mall and lights it off?
The smallest nuclear weapon ever built and deployed (in terms of physical size, mass, and yield) was the US W54 nuclear warhead, developed in the late 1950s and fielded during the Cold War from around 1961 to the early 1970s.
This compact implosion-type fission device used plutonium-239 and holds the record as the smallest confirmed nuclear weapon to enter service.
Key specifications of the W54 (core warhead):
- Diameter: Approximately 10.9–11 inches (about 276–280 mm) in the lightest configurations, up to ~12 inches (305 mm) in some packaged versions.
- Length: Approximately 15.7–16 inches (about 399–406 mm) for the core, extending to ~18 inches (457 mm) in some packaged forms like the B54/SADM variant.
- Weight: As low as ~51 pounds (23 kg) for the bare warhead in some configurations; around 50.9–58.5 pounds (23–26.5 kg) depending on the exact mod (e.g., Mod 0 or B54 Mod 1 SADM versions weighed ~58.5 lb / 26.5 kg including casing and fuzing).
Context and deployments:
- It was used in systems like the Davy Crockett (M-388 projectile), a recoilless gun-launched tactical nuclear "bazooka" for battlefield use. The full projectile (including the warhead) was about 30–31 inches (76–79 cm) long, ~11 inches (28 cm) in diameter at the widest point, and weighed ~76 pounds (34 kg) total.
- Another version was the man-portable Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM), designed for special forces to carry in a backpack, sabotage targets like bridges or tunnels, and detonate via timer or remote. The complete packaged device was roughly 12 inches in diameter × 18 inches long and weighed ~58–70 pounds (26–32 kg) depending on the mod.
Its explosive yield was variable but extremely low for a nuclear device: typically 10–20 tons of TNT equivalent (0.01–0.02 kilotons) in the smallest settings, up to around 250–1,000 tons in higher settings—still orders of magnitude below strategic bombs like Hiroshima (~15 kt).
No smaller confirmed nuclear weapon (by physical dimensions or deployable package) has been publicly acknowledged or declassified from any nation. Theoretical minimum sizes for fission devices are constrained by physics (critical mass requirements for plutonium or uranium), but the W54 represents the practical smallest ever fielded. Modern nuclear warheads are generally larger due to safety features, delivery systems, and higher yields.
For scale: Imagine something roughly the size of a large watermelon or a small carry-on suitcase—small enough for one or two people to carry, yet still capable of devastating a localized area with nuclear effects (blast, heat, and radiation).
Sorry, guys, but I wouldn't want to be anywhere near that when it went off.
How about you?
You wanna take a chance when Muhammed slips that into your shopping mall and lights it off?
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 160,699
- 87,124
- 2,645
I think that most major cities have radiological sensors in place to catch these. The problem is that the Mossad branch of the CIA will let them in anyway
You gonna trust all the towel heads who have invaded your country?You have a couple of those in your garage Harfass?
Did you get them from this Israeli spy?
Jonathan Pollard - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
View attachment 1226318
What is the world coming to, can't even trust your "friends" these days, sad.
View attachment 1226321
WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 39,307
- 27,942
- 2,915
Guess what paid slave. It doesn’t scare us
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 160,699
- 87,124
- 2,645
And by "Iran" you mean CIA and Mossad
So many conspiracies, so little time!
WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 39,307
- 27,942
- 2,915
But….but…but….Orange man….but….but
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Epstein files - way, way too many coincidences for this not to be anything but bad -Dusti Rhea Duke- Started by frigidweirdo
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
Daytona Beach shooting and how it relates to politics….Your thoughts?- Started by BrokeLoser
- Replies: 1
-
