Those of you who oppose Trumps solution to the Iran problem post your solutions here

[my2¢]

Solution I have is to quit sticking our nose into other country's business.

 

[Winco]

Yeah, but did you believe him? If you say he was lying, then he has good reason to go back and do it again, yes?

True,

I and the non-cult Americans would just LOVE some TRUTH to be spoken by POTUS. It rarely happens (the Truth).

 

[Lisa558]

So we are back to being world police?

It feels like MAGA and American first is in the midst of a bait and switch.

The only thing that you mentioned that affects Americans is a nuclear threat, but Trump said that was taken care of last year and anyone who disagreed was attacked and ridiculed by people like you.

You answered my question: if it had been up to you, you would have let Hitler slaughter 9 million Jews and 6 million other “undesirables.”

The only time you leftists seem to object to the conduct of any country is when it’s the one little Jewish one, and you can spread antisemitic propaganda.

 

[Lisa558]

Solution I have is to quit sticking our nose into other country's business.

And another one who would be fine if another Hitler sprung up and started sending 10 million people to slaughter.

Ain’t our business.

 

[BS Filter]

Stupid.

Iran has no freiends.

Trying to make Trump’s starting a war into a domestic partisan issue is dishonest, parochial, and irrelevant.

Trying to claim Trump started a war is TDS in full bloom.

 

[the watcher]

First, DC and the country would have to be overthrown by a dictatorial, oppressive Muslim theocracy bent on destroying all aspects of western culture — even if that means destroying the world.
Then you can apply your analogy.

First, DC and the country would have to be overthrown by a dictatorial, oppressive _____________theocracy bent on destroying all aspects of ___________culture — even if that means destroying the world. You can fill in the blanks a couple of ways.

 

[Marener]

You answered my question: if it had been up to you, you would have let Hitler slaughter 9 million Jews and 6 million other “undesirables.”

We did let Hitler slaughter 9 million Jews and millions of other “undesirables”.

We didn’t enter the war until we were forced to. Until we were attacked by Japan and until Germany declared war on us.

The only time you leftists seem to object to the conduct of any country is when it’s the one little Jewish one, and you can spread antisemitic propaganda.

We all knew about Iran slaughtering 10,000 of their own people months ago and there was no upheaval in public sentiment wanting to go to war with Iran because of it. If this was just a left versus right problem, then we would have seen something. Even now, the right is sharply divided on this issue.

The whole brand of “America first” doesn’t fit well with your framing that we need to go to war with Iran to protect the Iranians.

Personally, I’m getting Déjà vu. The more you talk, the more this sounds similar to the case for war with Iraq. Was that the right thing to do?

 

[BS Filter]

Iran does noot have an offensive nuclear weapons plan.

If I were leading Iran, I would rectify that asap. Nuclear Iran would put an end to American and Isreali brinksmanship.

Trump should never have let Netanyahu con him into doing Isreal’s bidding.

And the best outcome would be abandoning this war. it’s already out of control.

And the Trump regieme has no plan.

Oh yeah, Iran doesn't have an offensive nuclear weapons plan. Yeah, that's why their enriching is taking place 70 feet underground. Propaganda parrot.

 

[my2¢]

And another one who would be fine if another Hitler sprung up and started sending 10 million people to slaughter.

Ain’t our business.

And another one in which it is all centered on the holocaust even while there are current atrocities taking place elsewhere the world.

 

[Churchill]

OMFG! This leftist is so deluded that he wanted the Islamic Terror Regime to get a nuke!

I’m incredulous that Americans can be so stupid.

So Israel can have nuclear weapons to threaten every neighbor but no neighbor is allowed to have one?

 

[Lisa558]

And another one in which it is all centered on the holocaust even while there are current atrocities taking place elsewhere the world.

Yes, and a major atrocity is what the Iranian Terrorist Regime was doing. We put a stop to that.

And the Holocaust was an example of what happens when people like you get their way to let tyrants murder their way across an entire region, and threaten to do more.

 

[Churchill]

And another one who would be fine if another Hitler sprung up and started sending 10 million people to slaughter.

Yep, that's Christian Europeans for you, and you thought Muslims were bad!

 

[BS Filter]

And another one in which it is all centered on the holocaust even while there are current atrocities taking place elsewhere the world.

There are always atrocities in the world. However, taking out this regime is in everyone's best interests.

 

[Churchill]

There are always atrocities in the world. However, taking out this regime is in everyone's best interests.

Sure, that's why only Israel and the US are attacking the regime, the rest of the world doesn't give a flying f**k and never did really.

 

[Lisa558]

There are always atrocities in the world. However, taking out this regime is in everyone's best interests.

What these leftists were hoping was that the Islamic Terror Regime would drop a nuke on the Jewish country in the near future, and they’re mad it won’t happen now.

We’ve all seen how they side with the Islamic terrorists over Jews.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

First, DC and the country would have to be overthrown by a dictatorial, oppressive _____________theocracy bent on destroying all aspects of ___________culture — even if that means destroying the world. You can fill in the blanks a couple of ways.

No. Muslim only.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

the rest of the world doesn't give a flying f**k and never did really.

Speak for yourself.

 

[Churchill]

What these leftists were hoping was that the Islamic Terror Regime would drop a nuke on the Jewish country in the near future, and they’re mad it won’t happen now.

Why would Iran do that?

We’ve all seen how they side with the Islamic terrorists over Jews.

We’ve all seen how they side with the Zionist terrorists over Arabs.

 

[my2¢]

There are always atrocities in the world. However, taking out this regime is in everyone's best interests.

Quite apparently more so for some than others.

 

[BS Filter]

Sure, that's why only Israel and the US are attacking the regime, the rest of the world doesn't give a flying f**k and never did really.

Only an uninformed idiot would say that. Your hatred of civilization must be very attractive to terrorists. How many are you supporting?