This tenet of fascism is a value shared by modern leftists

[progressive hunter]

incorrect. they were alllowed obviously to moderate porn, and illegal activity, but nothing else.

“Were”? Or are?

No, they’re allowed to moderate whatever they see fit. As is any other internet site.

are..sorry misspoke.

They are not allowed to censor in such a way that they become a speaker or publisher of content. Tweeter has done that by censoring anything that harms their party

Nope. Removing content does not make them speaker or publisher under any circumstances. In order to do so, they’d have to change the content in such a way as to alter the meaning of it, which is not something they do.

color me surprised youre wrong again,,,

 

[K9Buck]

So let me get this straight. The Democratic Party isn’t doing anything about black crime because they don’t want black people to stop voting for them?

You’ve stopped with facts and have wandered into nonsense.

What has the party done over the past 50+ years to help black people and what do they have to show for it?

 

[progressive hunter]

Legally speaking, that is the definition of a "publisher". LOL.

It would ordinarily but not when it comes to internet companies.

so youre saying CNN isnt an internet company??

man youre a stupid fuck,, not really youre just a liar,,

 

[InspectorDetector]

Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State...

- Benito Mussolini

We see countless examples of the party and/or the government screwing poor and middle-class Americans and leftists are either mute about it or deflect, blame Trump, etc. I often tell leftists that their love, loyalty, and devotion are to the party and NOT to average Americans. Very seldom, if ever, do they respond and disagree with that statement.

For the modern leftist, NOTHING matters more than the party/state, which is one-in-the-same under the Democratic (fascist) oligarchy.

Some of you will question as to why the left does this or that. It's simple. Anything that advances the party, they support, and I mean ANYTHING. One can see the staggering amount of crime, lies, and corruption taking place in the federal government but you won't see a leftist complain or even acknowledge any of it because their love, loyalty, and devotion are to serving the party and, in particular, the party elites.

So, yes, leftists agree with Mussolini in that the left only cares about individuals and individual "rights" so long as their interests coincide with the interests of the party/state.

For instance, acknowledging and discussing the 50+ years of catastrophic black murder rates in Democratic ghettos is strictly verboten because the discussion of mountains of dead, black, bodies is contrary to the interests of the party/state. Therefore, murders of poor blacks continue unabated because their interests in life do not outweigh the party's/state's interests of retaining and increasing their power and wealth.

There are countless more examples, but you get the point. For the leftist, the party/state is everything and nothing else matters.

I have said this for years and the fascist liberals usually come out of the woodwork to "educate" me on the tenants of fascism. Funny thing, the tenants of fascism fit the liberal democrats to a tee........but you'll never get to understand that.

 

[K9Buck]

A little nationalism is fine. Too much nationalism spoils the broth.

Is this an example of "too much nationalism"?

 

[K9Buck]

the tenants of fascism fit the liberal democrats to a tee........but you'll never get to understand that.

Yes sir. You are correct on both counts.

 

[K9Buck]

There is no legal concept of a platform.

Wow.

 

[colfax_m]

Nope. Removing content does not make them speaker or publisher under any circumstances.

Well, they censored, suspended, and put all sorts of "warning" messages on the Twitter account of the fucking PRESIDENT of the U.S. LOL.

Here's the reality, my friend. You don't give a damn about equal application of the law, fairness, or truth. You are, essentially, a RADICAL leftist and, as I've said, NOTHING else matters to you except for the party.

The law in question here applies to every internet company. It’s not special treatment. Equal application of the law isn’t the issue.

 

[colfax_m]

There is no legal concept of a platform.

Wow.

It’s true. It’s a term we use but not a legal one. The issue is whether they’re a publisher or not.

 

[colfax_m]

A little nationalism is fine. Too much nationalism spoils the broth.

Is this an example of "too much nationalism"?

View attachment 473638

Looks like a soccer game, so no, not too much nationalism.

Lebensraum is.

 

[K9Buck]

Lebensraum is.

I'd called it imperialism, not nationalism.

 

[progressive hunter]

There is no legal concept of a platform.

Wow.

It’s true. It’s a term we use but not a legal one. The issue is whether they’re a publisher or not.

and if they control the content they are a publisher,,

 

[K9Buck]

Looks like a soccer game, so no, not too much nationalism.

You don't consider it "nationalist" to paint oneself with their nation's colors and cheer wildly for the nation's national team?

 

[K9Buck]

and if they control the content they are a publisher,,

Perfectly said.

 

[colfax_m]

Looks like a soccer game, so no, not too much nationalism.

You don't consider it "nationalist" to paint oneself with their nation's colors and cheer wildly for the nation's national team?

No, because it’s harmless sport.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Looks like a soccer game, so no, not too much nationalism.

You don't consider it "nationalist" to paint oneself with their nation's colors and cheer wildly for the nation's national team?

No, because it’s harmless sport.

The sport is the metaphor for the nationalism.

 

[colfax_m]

and if they control the content they are a publisher,,

Perfectly said.

Except it’s completely backwards. The law was specifically written to allow internet companies to control content without taking on liabilities of a publisher.

 

[K9Buck]

No, because it’s harmless sport.

It's a form of nationalism and there's nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Abraham Lincoln's nationalism?

 

[progressive hunter]

and if they control the content they are a publisher,,

Perfectly said.

Except it’s completely backwards. The law was specifically written to allow internet companies to control content without taking on liabilities of a publisher.

we talked about you lying about the facts on this,,,

the law was to protect the provider from law suits for libel or slander,,, not to control the content that makes them a publisher,,,

 

[colfax_m]

No, because it’s harmless sport.

It's a form of nationalism and there's nothing wrong with it.

How do you feel about Abraham Lincoln's nationalism?

Yes, that expression of nationalism is harmless. Other expressions of nationalism are not so harmless.