Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is no legal concept of a platform. Every internet company receives the same protections as Twitter, like Parler for example. It’s not corporate welfare, it’s necessary for the existence of any social media platform.Twitter receives special protections as a platform when, in fact, it's a publisher. But since they serve the party, they are rewarded. And you guys complain about "corporate welfare". LOL.
So why do you like communism?What a good little conformist YOU are!
You're a batshit crazy nutcase.
What is it about right wing FuckBois that their knee jerk reaction to having their lies exposed is to declare the person who debunks their bullshit as “crazy”.
While offering NOTHING to prove their ridiculous twaddle. Communists everywhere. Democrats are communists. Run for your lives!!!
The truth is that crime is very high in low income urban communities. I’m not arguing with the facts about crime statistics.This entire thread is based on a meandering nonsensical emotional outburst...
The root problem is that leftists like you are unwilling to acknowledge the truth and, when you dislike the FACTS that are presented, you call us names, etc. You simply CANNOT accept that your ideology was shared by guys like Mussolini. I'm trying to help you to SEE the truth and you respond with insults. That's not my problem.
“Were”? Or are?incorrect. they were alllowed obviously to moderate porn, and illegal activity, but nothing else.
incorrect. they were alllowed obviously to moderate porn
are..sorry misspoke.“Were”? Or are?incorrect. they were alllowed obviously to moderate porn, and illegal activity, but nothing else.
No, they’re allowed to moderate whatever they see fit. As is any other internet site.
Nope. Removing content does not make them speaker or publisher under any circumstances. In order to do so, they’d have to change the content in such a way as to alter the meaning of it, which is not something they do.are..sorry misspoke.“Were”? Or are?incorrect. they were alllowed obviously to moderate porn, and illegal activity, but nothing else.
No, they’re allowed to moderate whatever they see fit. As is any other internet site.
They are not allowed to censor in such a way that they become a speaker or publisher of content. Tweeter has done that by censoring anything that harms their party
The truth is that crime is very high in low income urban communities.
the partnership between tweeter and the biden admin is pure fascismincorrect. they were alllowed obviously to moderate porn
Twitter is a bastion of pornography, not that I care, frankly. What I despise is that they are unwilling for truth to be told and actively suppress it while spreading fascist propaganda far and wide.
you can certainly become a publisher or speaker when you censor certain information and allow other information to go forwardNope. Removing content does not make them speaker or publisher under any circumstances. In order to do so, they’d have to change the content in such a way as to alter the meaning of it, which is not something they do.are..sorry misspoke.“Were”? Or are?incorrect. they were alllowed obviously to moderate porn, and illegal activity, but nothing else.
No, they’re allowed to moderate whatever they see fit. As is any other internet site.
They are not allowed to censor in such a way that they become a speaker or publisher of content. Tweeter has done that by censoring anything that harms their party
No, they’re allowed to moderate whatever they see fit.
the partnership between tweeter and the biden admin is pure fascism
That's the leftist collectivist mentality. Nationalism mere support the proposition that the interests of your country come before the interests of other countries. That's exactly what George Washington and Abraham Lincoln believed.You’ve described nationalism, which received quite the makeover under Trump.They don't believe in "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"; they believe that you are a subject of the state and that you are inherently obligated to serve the interests of the state rather than your own interests.
Nope. Removing content does not make them speaker or publisher under any circumstances.
That's exactly what George Washington and Abraham Lincoln believed.
Removing content does not make them...publisher
No, that’s what the fascist democrat party tells you to think. You just made the OP’s point!The right's version of acceptable individualism is that you are free to be what you want to be as long as it is white, protestant, republican and straight.
So let me get this straight. The Democratic Party isn’t doing anything about black crime because they don’t want black people to stop voting for them?Black America in particular needs a DRAMATIC cultural makeover. However, the party you support received 88% of the black vote in last year's presidential election. The party loves the status-quo and so they're not going to say or do anything that might change that dynamic, regardless of the numbers of murdered black folks.
It would ordinarily but not when it comes to internet companies.Legally speaking, that is the definition of a "publisher". LOL.
too much nationalism always seems to end in disaster.
