Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I have a master's in history with a concentration on Hitler in the 20th century, you have a master's in garbage propaganda. fascism is right wing dictatorship with a love of corporations and aristocrats. Communism is left wing dictatorship which owns all business and industry.Heather loved corporations and aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. You are an idiot. The greatest generation is spinning in their graves listening to your crap.
Your ignorance and stupidity is unmatched.
Only a million? Hardly anything to moan about.You are so much like a million other people It's almost like they make you in some factory from the same set of molds. To truly respect individualism you have to respect it even when someone is not exactly like you are.It's a reaction- a learned trick- think Pavlov's dogs- a reaction is automatic- a response requires thinking. While humans have the capacity to think through a situation, not many do- and those on the right are not exactly a shining example of thought- in this particular instance, your assertion is correct though.This is the typical, leftist, nonsensical, untruthful, rhetorical "response".
HARD RIGHTFascism was embraced by hard right Italian conservatives.
Oh, you cited a historical statement, alright......Watch this, dope: A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925. Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.
But you failed to comprehend that it was proven blatantly false by history, as the true nature of German "National Socialism" manifested itself as "socialist in name only" and in actuality the vicious tool of racial supremacists and industrial magnates and the wealthy, designed to bamboozle and hoodwink the burghers and trick them into fighting for The Cause while throwing them a few economic table-scraps from time to time. Typical right-wing bull$hit artists. Bastards. Villainous scum.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.mises.org
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
What a load of crap propaganda, hater dupe of the greedy idiot GOP mega Rich brainwashers. They already have everything that Bernie Sanders and AOC and Democrats want in Canada and every other modern country. Really scary dumbass. It's called fair capitalism for achange. Also known as socialism everywhere but GOP base idiot world.Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State...
- Benito Mussolini
We see countless examples of the party and/or the government screwing poor and middle-class Americans and leftists are either mute about it or deflect, blame Trump, etc. I often tell leftists that their love, loyalty, and devotion are to the party and NOT to average Americans. Very seldom, if ever, do they respond and disagree with that statement.
For the modern leftist, NOTHING matters more than the party/state, which is one-in-the-same under the Democratic (fascist) oligarchy.
Some of you will question as to why the left does this or that. It's simple. Anything that advances the party, they support, and I mean ANYTHING. One can see the staggering amount of crime, lies, and corruption taking place in the federal government but you won't see a leftist complain or even acknowledge any of it because their love, loyalty, and devotion are to serving the party and, in particular, the party elites.
So, yes, leftists agree with Mussolini in that the left only cares about individuals and individual "rights" so long as their interests coincide with the interests of the party/state.
For instance, acknowledging and discussing the 50+ years of catastrophic black murder rates in Democratic ghettos is strictly verboten because the discussion of mountains of dead, black, bodies is contrary to the interests of the party/state. Therefore, murders of poor blacks continue unabated because their interests in life do not outweigh the party's/state's interests of retaining and increasing their power and wealth.
There are countless more examples, but you get the point. For the leftist, the party/state is everything and nothing else matters.
CCanada like every other modern country but us has a living wage healthcare daycare paid parental leave cheap college and training great infrastructure and vacations and ID card to end illegal immigration and they tax the rich more like their fair share. No lie dumbbell.What a load of crap propaganda, hater dupe of the greedy idiot GOP mega Rich brainwashers. They already have everything that Bernie Sanders and AOC and Democrats want in Canada and every other modern country. Really scary dumbass. It's called fair capitalism for achange. Also known as socialism everywhere but GOP base idiot world.Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State...
- Benito Mussolini
We see countless examples of the party and/or the government screwing poor and middle-class Americans and leftists are either mute about it or deflect, blame Trump, etc. I often tell leftists that their love, loyalty, and devotion are to the party and NOT to average Americans. Very seldom, if ever, do they respond and disagree with that statement.
For the modern leftist, NOTHING matters more than the party/state, which is one-in-the-same under the Democratic (fascist) oligarchy.
Some of you will question as to why the left does this or that. It's simple. Anything that advances the party, they support, and I mean ANYTHING. One can see the staggering amount of crime, lies, and corruption taking place in the federal government but you won't see a leftist complain or even acknowledge any of it because their love, loyalty, and devotion are to serving the party and, in particular, the party elites.
So, yes, leftists agree with Mussolini in that the left only cares about individuals and individual "rights" so long as their interests coincide with the interests of the party/state.
For instance, acknowledging and discussing the 50+ years of catastrophic black murder rates in Democratic ghettos is strictly verboten because the discussion of mountains of dead, black, bodies is contrary to the interests of the party/state. Therefore, murders of poor blacks continue unabated because their interests in life do not outweigh the party's/state's interests of retaining and increasing their power and wealth.
There are countless more examples, but you get the point. For the leftist, the party/state is everything and nothing else matters.
Either you're lying or you're moving to Canada.....which is it?
I'll help you pack.
CCanada like every other modern country but us has a living wage healthcare daycare paid parental leave cheap college and training great infrastructure and vacations and ID card to end illegal immigration and they tax the rich more like their fair share. No lie dumbbell.What a load of crap propaganda, hater dupe of the greedy idiot GOP mega Rich brainwashers. They already have everything that Bernie Sanders and AOC and Democrats want in Canada and every other modern country. Really scary dumbass. It's called fair capitalism for achange. Also known as socialism everywhere but GOP base idiot world.Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State...
- Benito Mussolini
We see countless examples of the party and/or the government screwing poor and middle-class Americans and leftists are either mute about it or deflect, blame Trump, etc. I often tell leftists that their love, loyalty, and devotion are to the party and NOT to average Americans. Very seldom, if ever, do they respond and disagree with that statement.
For the modern leftist, NOTHING matters more than the party/state, which is one-in-the-same under the Democratic (fascist) oligarchy.
Some of you will question as to why the left does this or that. It's simple. Anything that advances the party, they support, and I mean ANYTHING. One can see the staggering amount of crime, lies, and corruption taking place in the federal government but you won't see a leftist complain or even acknowledge any of it because their love, loyalty, and devotion are to serving the party and, in particular, the party elites.
So, yes, leftists agree with Mussolini in that the left only cares about individuals and individual "rights" so long as their interests coincide with the interests of the party/state.
For instance, acknowledging and discussing the 50+ years of catastrophic black murder rates in Democratic ghettos is strictly verboten because the discussion of mountains of dead, black, bodies is contrary to the interests of the party/state. Therefore, murders of poor blacks continue unabated because their interests in life do not outweigh the party's/state's interests of retaining and increasing their power and wealth.
There are countless more examples, but you get the point. For the leftist, the party/state is everything and nothing else matters.
Either you're lying or you're moving to Canada.....which is it?
I'll help you pack.
"uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby."
Hitler was a right-wing autocrat who snuck into power pretending his party had a socialist bent and then abandoning any pretense after achieving power.Oh, you cited a historical statement, alright......Watch this, dope: A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925. Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.
But you failed to comprehend that it was proven blatantly false by history, as the true nature of German "National Socialism" manifested itself as "socialist in name only" and in actuality the vicious tool of racial supremacists and industrial magnates and the wealthy, designed to bamboozle and hoodwink the burghers and trick them into fighting for The Cause while throwing them a few economic table-scraps from time to time. Typical right-wing bull$hit artists. Bastards. Villainous scum.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Hitler was a right-wing autocrat who snuck into power pretending his party had a socialist bent and then abandoning any pretense after achieving power.Oh, you cited a historical statement, alright......Watch this, dope: A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925. Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.
But you failed to comprehend that it was proven blatantly false by history, as the true nature of German "National Socialism" manifested itself as "socialist in name only" and in actuality the vicious tool of racial supremacists and industrial magnates and the wealthy, designed to bamboozle and hoodwink the burghers and trick them into fighting for The Cause while throwing them a few economic table-scraps from time to time. Typical right-wing bull$hit artists. Bastards. Villainous scum.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Serving-up brown-shirted Kool-Aid the same way your Orange Baboon-God serves up red-hatted Kool-Aid... Make AmericaWhiteGreat Again.
You clowns aren't fooling anybody with a functioning brain over the age of 10...
Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.Oh, you cited a historical statement, alright......Watch this, dope: A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925. Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.
But you failed to comprehend that it was proven blatantly false by history, as the true nature of German "National Socialism" manifested itself as "socialist in name only" and in actuality the vicious tool of racial supremacists and industrial magnates and the wealthy, designed to bamboozle and hoodwink the burghers and trick them into fighting for The Cause while throwing them a few economic table-scraps from time to time. Typical right-wing bull$hit artists. Bastards. Villainous scum.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.Oh, you cited a historical statement, alright......Watch this, dope: A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925. Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.
But you failed to comprehend that it was proven blatantly false by history, as the true nature of German "National Socialism" manifested itself as "socialist in name only" and in actuality the vicious tool of racial supremacists and industrial magnates and the wealthy, designed to bamboozle and hoodwink the burghers and trick them into fighting for The Cause while throwing them a few economic table-scraps from time to time. Typical right-wing bull$hit artists. Bastards. Villainous scum.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.Oh, you cited a historical statement, alright......Watch this, dope: A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925. Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.
But you failed to comprehend that it was proven blatantly false by history, as the true nature of German "National Socialism" manifested itself as "socialist in name only" and in actuality the vicious tool of racial supremacists and industrial magnates and the wealthy, designed to bamboozle and hoodwink the burghers and trick them into fighting for The Cause while throwing them a few economic table-scraps from time to time. Typical right-wing bull$hit artists. Bastards. Villainous scum.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Everything I post is true, accurate and correct.....and documented.
Like this:
http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.
"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story
. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. The next footage was the Nazi attempt to do exactly the same thing: in German, "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"
a. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris
. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)
Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)
a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.
The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.
Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.Oh, you cited a historical statement, alright......Watch this, dope: A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925. Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.
But you failed to comprehend that it was proven blatantly false by history, as the true nature of German "National Socialism" manifested itself as "socialist in name only" and in actuality the vicious tool of racial supremacists and industrial magnates and the wealthy, designed to bamboozle and hoodwink the burghers and trick them into fighting for The Cause while throwing them a few economic table-scraps from time to time. Typical right-wing bull$hit artists. Bastards. Villainous scum.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Everything I post is true, accurate and correct.....and documented.
Like this:
http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.
"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story
. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. The next footage was the Nazi attempt to do exactly the same thing: in German, "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"
a. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris
. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)
Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)
a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.
The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.
Hitler was a right-wing autocrat.
Rump is an apolitical power-hungry sociopath con-man feigning right-wing attributes in order to obtain and retain political power.
You have been played, over and over again to an extent of suspended disbelief and blind cultism that it's become an embarrassment to deal with you-and-yours.
The rest of America looks at you clowns and is reminded of the old P.T. Barnum meme... "Suckers? There's one born every minute."
...and now your party in 2021.Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State...
- Benito Mussolini
We see countless examples of the party and/or the government screwing poor and middle-class Americans and leftists are either mute about it or deflect, blame Trump, etc. I often tell leftists that their love, loyalty, and devotion are to the party and NOT to average Americans. Very seldom, if ever, do they respond and disagree with that statement.
For the modern leftist, NOTHING matters more than the party/state, which is one-in-the-same under the Democratic (fascist) oligarchy.
Some of you will question as to why the left does this or that. It's simple. Anything that advances the party, they support, and I mean ANYTHING. One can see the staggering amount of crime, lies, and corruption taking place in the federal government but you won't see a leftist complain or even acknowledge any of it because their love, loyalty, and devotion are to serving the party and, in particular, the party elites.
So, yes, leftists agree with Mussolini in that the left only cares about individuals and individual "rights" so long as their interests coincide with the interests of the party/state.
For instance, acknowledging and discussing the 50+ years of catastrophic black murder rates in Democratic ghettos is strictly verboten because the discussion of mountains of dead, black, bodies is contrary to the interests of the party/state. Therefore, murders of poor blacks continue unabated because their interests in life do not outweigh the party's/state's interests of retaining and increasing their power and wealth.
There are countless more examples, but you get the point. For the leftist, the party/state is everything and nothing else matters.
Fascism was embraced by hard right Italian conservatives.
You lie, I prove you're lying, and you simply repeat the lie
His many posts to the contrary would argue that point-You are the conformist. You support conforming to the needs of the party/state. You are not interested in individual rights unless those "rights" coincide with the interests of the party/state.
Yeah, all those HARD RIGHT people at the NYT, who editorially licked Mussolini's boots.HARD RIGHTFascism was embraced by hard right Italian conservatives.
Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him.Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.Oh, you cited a historical statement, alright......Watch this, dope: A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925. Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.
But you failed to comprehend that it was proven blatantly false by history, as the true nature of German "National Socialism" manifested itself as "socialist in name only" and in actuality the vicious tool of racial supremacists and industrial magnates and the wealthy, designed to bamboozle and hoodwink the burghers and trick them into fighting for The Cause while throwing them a few economic table-scraps from time to time. Typical right-wing bull$hit artists. Bastards. Villainous scum.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Who the fuck is heather?Heather loved corporations and aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. You are an idiot. The greatest generation is spinning in their graves listening to your crap.No he didn't, turd. Hitler purged everyone who wasn't a NAZI. When he gained power, Stalin started arresting communists and executing them or sent them to the gulag.Oh, you cited a historical statement, alright......Watch this, dope: A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925. Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.
But you failed to comprehend that it was proven blatantly false by history, as the true nature of German "National Socialism" manifested itself as "socialist in name only" and in actuality the vicious tool of racial supremacists and industrial magnates and the wealthy, designed to bamboozle and hoodwink the burghers and trick them into fighting for The Cause while throwing them a few economic table-scraps from time to time. Typical right-wing bull$hit artists. Bastards. Villainous scum.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
Left arguments about Hitler being "right wing" have all been debunked 10,000 times.
