I have a master's in history with a concentration on Hitler in the 20th century, you have a master's in garbage propaganda. fascism is right wing dictatorship with a love of corporations and aristocrats. Communism is left wing dictatorship which owns all business and industry.
Only a million? Hardly anything to moan about.
HARD RIGHT
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.mises.org
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
CCanada like every other modern country but us has a living wage healthcare daycare paid parental leave cheap college and training great infrastructure and vacations and ID card to end illegal immigration and they tax the rich more like their fair share. No lie dumbbell.
Hitler was a right-wing autocrat who snuck into power pretending his party had a socialist bent and then abandoning any pretense after achieving power.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Hitler was a right-wing autocrat who snuck into power pretending his party had a socialist bent and then abandoning any pretense after achieving power.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Serving-up brown-shirted Kool-Aid the same way your Orange Baboon-God serves up red-hatted Kool-Aid... Make AmericaWhiteGreat Again.
You clowns aren't fooling anybody with a functioning brain over the age of 10...
Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Everything I post is true, accurate and correct.....and documented.
Like this:
http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.
"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story
. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. The next footage was the Nazi attempt to do exactly the same thing: in German, "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"
a. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris
. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)
Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)
a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.
The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.
Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Everything I post is true, accurate and correct.....and documented.
Like this:
http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
"The Soviet Story," an award winning documentary clarifying the close and personal attachments of Hitler's Nazis and Stalin's Communists.
"Soviet Story" is the most powerful antidote yet to the sanitisation of the past. The film is gripping, audacious and uncompromising. [...] The main aim of the film is to show the close connections—philosophical, political and organisational—between the Nazi and Soviet systems." Telling the Soviet story
. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. The next footage was the Nazi attempt to do exactly the same thing: in German, "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"
a. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris
. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.(Article provided in the film)
Shortly thereafter the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika. (18:30)
a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.
The film goes on to show a series of Nazi and Russian propaganda posters....except for the language, almost identical.
Hitler was a right-wing autocrat.
Rump is an apolitical power-hungry sociopath con-man feigning right-wing attributes in order to obtain and retain political power.
You have been played, over and over again to an extent of suspended disbelief and blind cultism that it's become an embarrassment to deal with you-and-yours.
The rest of America looks at you clowns and is reminded of the old P.T. Barnum meme... "Suckers? There's one born every minute."
...and now your party in 2021.
His many posts to the contrary would argue that point-
Yeah, all those HARD RIGHT people at the NYT, who editorially licked Mussolini's boots.
Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him.Absolute garbage. Hitler loved corporate aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. And socialism as a party is always democratic. Only English speaking conservative morons conflate Communism and socialists. France Italy Spain Scandinavia Russia etc etc have all had communist and socialist parties at the same time and the difference is democracy. Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is a right wing dictatorship. Everything you get from right-wing propaganda is garbage. You are so baffled by b******* You actually believe Trump is a genius or something. He is an apolitical dunce who watched Fox etc for 10 years and became a total brainwashed functional moron I guess. Hard to tell with the world's greatest Con Man.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
View attachment 490047
Who the **** is heather?Heather loved corporations and aristocrats as long as they weren't Jewish or against him. You are an idiot. The greatest generation is spinning in their graves listening to your crap.No he didn't, turd. Hitler purged everyone who wasn't a NAZI. When he gained power, Stalin started arresting communists and executing them or sent them to the gulag.
Wrong again.
'
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.
1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.
2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?
3. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed. The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
4. . What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
You're pretty much of a dunce, huh?
Hitler broke away from the Socialists in 1926.. In 1933 he use the Enabling Act to purge Socialists, Communists, Democrats and Jews from government. Later he began arresting them and putting them in Dachau or killing them.
Betweem1918 and 1932 the biggest part in Germany was the German Democratic Socialist party.
Left arguments about Hitler being "right wing" have all been debunked 10,000 times.
