This Pisses Me Off!!

-Cp

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2004
2,911
362
48
Earth
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20041110-123424-5467r.htm

Bush revives bid to legalize illegal aliens


By Bill Sammon
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


President Bush yesterday moved aggressively to resurrect his plan to relax rules against illegal immigration, a move bound to anger conservatives just days after they helped re-elect him.

The president met privately in the Oval Office with Sen. John McCain to discuss jump-starting a stalled White House initiative that would grant legal status to millions of immigrants who broke the law to enter the United States.

The Arizona Republican is one of the Senate's most outspoken supporters of expanding guest-worker programs and has introduced his own bill to offer a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.

"We are formulating plans for the legislative agenda for next year," said White House political strategist Karl Rove. "And immigration will be on that agenda."
He added: "The president had a meeting this morning to discuss with a significant member of the Senate the prospect of immigration reform. And he's going to make it an important item."

While the president was huddling with Mr. McCain, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell was pushing the plan during a visit to Mexico City.

"The president remains committed to comprehensive immigration reform as a high priority in his second term," he told a meeting of the U.S.-Mexico Binational Commission. "We will work closely with our Congress to achieve this goal."

But key opponents in Congress said Mr. Bush's proposal isn't going anywhere.
"An amnesty by any other name is still an amnesty, regardless of what the White House wants to call it," said Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican and chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus.

"Their amnesty plan was dead on arrival when they sent it to the Congress in January, and if they send the same pig with lipstick back to Congress next January, it will suffer the same fate," he said.

With the House and Senate already clashing over border security and deportation provisions in the pending intelligence overhaul bill, some Capitol Hill aides said it's almost impossible that Congress could agree on a broader immigration proposal.

Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), said he "suddenly went from calm to stressed out" after learning of the president's renewed push for immigration relaxation. He predicted the plan would continue to meet vigorous opposition from House Republicans.

"If the House wouldn't deliver this bill before the guy's election, when he claimed he needed it for the Hispanic vote, why would they deliver it after the election, when their constituents overwhelmingly oppose it?" he said. "Why would House leaders follow the president over a cliff?"

White House officials insisted the move was not "payback" to Hispanic voters who supported Mr. Bush in greater numbers last week than in 2000. Although the president first proposed relaxing immigration shortly after taking office, he mothballed the idea after September 11, 2001, and downplayed it on the campaign trail.

"The president has long believed that reforming our immigration system is a high priority," White House deputy press secretary Claire Buchan said yesterday.

Mr. Stein said Mr. Bush is already a "lame duck president" whose proposal "has no credibility." He expressed astonishment that the president resurrected the plan before pushing other second-term agenda items, like tax simplification or Social Security privatization.

"There's a sense of obstinacy in the face of overwhelming evidence that it's a losing approach," he said. "I mean, the definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing, expecting a different result."

Though most members of Congress agree on the need for a guest-worker program to fill unwanted jobs, House Republican leaders, including Majority Leader Tom DeLay, Texas Republican, have panned other parts of the president's proposal as an amnesty.

Mr. Bush has not sent immigration legislation to Congress, though seven bills have been introduced by members of the House and Senate, according to Numbers USA, an organization that lobbies for stricter immigration controls.
They range from a proposal to give legal status to fewer than 1 million agricultural workers to a bill that could legalize most of the estimated 10 million illegal immigrants currently living in the United States. But none of the bills has passed even one chamber.

Mr. McCain is sponsoring a bill, along with Reps. Jim Kolbe and Jeff Flake, both Arizona Republicans, that would go further than the president's principles by explicitly allowing those now here illegally to enter a guest-worker program and eventually apply for permanent residence.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said the president wants to "provide a more humane treatment" of illegal aliens from Mexico.
"America has always been a welcoming society, and this is a program that will match willing workers with willing employers," he said. "It will promote compassion for workers who right now have no protection."

He added of Mr. Bush: "It's something that he intends to work with members on to get moving again in the second term. It's something he believes very strongly in." Mr. Powell yesterday insisted that security is an important part of his boss's proposal.

"We must also be innovative in our efforts to stop those who abuse the openness of our societies along the border, who would use this openness to harm our citizens through trafficking in drugs, or trafficking in human beings, or by committing acts of terrorism," Mr. Powell said.

Some on Capitol Hill said Mr. Bush may be emboldened by the fact that he didn't appear to lose support among conservatives in this year's election, and several Republicans who did support guest-worker programs defeated primary challengers, including Mr. Flake, Mr. Kolbe and Rep. Christopher B. Cannon, Utah Republican.

"I think a lot of members around the country saw those results and realized that voters are more interested in a serious solution to this problem," said Mr. Flake's spokesman, Matthew Specht. "So I think that certainly improves the chances for reform next year."

In a 90-minute interview Sept. 22 with editors and reporters of The Washington Times, Mr. Rove said a Bush victory would "be an opportunity" for the president's guest-worker proposal for immigrants, although he declined to call it a "mandate," as he did on such issues as Social Security reform and tax cuts.
 
-Cp said:
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20041110-123424-5467r.htm

Bush revives bid to legalize illegal aliens


By Bill Sammon
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


President Bush yesterday moved aggressively to resurrect his plan to relax rules against illegal immigration, a move bound to anger conservatives just days after they helped re-elect him.

The president met privately in the Oval Office with Sen. John McCain to discuss jump-starting a stalled White House initiative that would grant legal status to millions of immigrants who broke the law to enter the United States.

The Arizona Republican is one of the Senate's most outspoken supporters of expanding guest-worker programs and has introduced his own bill to offer a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
Which part?
amnesty
lame duck
republican opposition
 
-Cp said:
Giving amnesty to ANY illegal alien pisses me off..


The largest objection that I have to that is the fact that many people from those countries wait their turn to legally enter the country. This is simply spitting in the face of those who endured hardship in order to enter the country legally.

I can't believe that we couldn't at least make them go back and register to enter the country. Show respect for those that follow the law by actually backing up the law with enforcement rather than simply legitimizing those that broke the law to get here.
 
no1tovote4 said:
The largest objection that I have to that is the fact that many people from those countries wait their turn to legally enter the country. This is simply spitting in the face of those who endured hardship in order to enter the country legally.

I can't believe that we couldn't at least make them go back and register to enter the country. Show respect for those that follow the law by actually backing up the law with enforcement rather than simply legitimizing those that broke the law to get here.

EXACTLY!!
 
I can see the concern about this. But I also see the positive sides.

There is a BIGGER problem with the Mexicans crossing, than with any other country. There are so many illegals, that it is not cost effective to try to deport everyone. They will only flood back. Then you have to spend money to deport them again. Then they flood back in. It's a lose-lose situation.

The biggest problem with illegal aliens is the fact they are usually paid under the table, in cash. If I read it correctly, Bush's plan is to make them pay a fine, and they are to register here as a guest worker. This means they have a TIN, and when they get paid, they pay into all the taxes that residents pay into. They have 3 years to file to become legal. If after 3 years, this is not done, then they can file an extension for another 3 years, and pay another fine. If after those 3 years, they did not apply to become a US citizen, they are booted out, and are no longer able to work here.

Which would you rather have? The US spending our tax dollars, deporting people numerous times? Or, the immigrants paying into the system like the rest of us?

I don't like the idea of just 'forgive and forget'...but as long as these people are here, not breaking the law (other than the immigrant one), and just trying to earn a living to support their families, then let's start incorporating them into the system. This would not just go for the Mexicans. I am sure this applies to all illegal aliens. At least Bush has an idea that will help take in money without raising taxes, rather than spending more money that we don't have. I have yet to hear a better, more cost effective plan.
 
In the article, it stated that there were appx 10 million illegals.

Let's play with some numbers.

Say the fine is $500 to initially pay, to apply for guest worker status, to work toward becoming a citizen.

$500 x 10,000,000 = $5,000,000,000 in possible income.

If the fine was $2000

$2000 x 10,000,000 = $20,000,000,000 in possible income.

Then you add in all the tax dollars paid yearly into the tax system by the possible 10 million immigrants, and that looks like a big dent in the current deficit.
 
-Cp said:
Giving amnesty to ANY illegal alien pisses me off..


yeah, it sucks, but the problem has to be dealt with.

look at it from a financial standpoint...what would our deficit look like if these people, who mostly come here to earn a living, start a business, etc, and just support a family, paid into the tax system as they would under Bush's plan?

The problem with BOTH sides (Dems and Reps) is all they see is 'amnesty' in this bill. They are not looking at what this bill puts forth as a long term solution to a huge problem that no one else seems to be presenting a better, more cost effective solution to.
 
fuzzykitten99 said:
Which would you rather have? The US spending our tax dollars, deporting people numerous times? Or, the immigrants paying into the system like the rest of us?

If I had any Rep power I'd have given you some for pointing that out. Very astute, sir.
 
no1tovote4 said:
The largest objection that I have to that is the fact that many people from those countries wait their turn to legally enter the country. This is simply spitting in the face of those who endured hardship in order to enter the country legally.

I can't believe that we couldn't at least make them go back and register to enter the country. Show respect for those that follow the law by actually backing up the law with enforcement rather than simply legitimizing those that broke the law to get here.



Precisely. The message we are sending to the people who did it right and played by the rules is that they are idiots.
 
Both Bush and Kerry were talking about this during the election, so no matter who won this subject was going to come up.
 
fuzzykitten99 said:
Which would you rather have? The US spending our tax dollars, deporting people numerous times? Or, the immigrants paying into the system like the rest of us?

First off, you're "assuming" that the *ILLEGAL* aliens, NOT "immigrants", will even HONOR any such fines, laws, or any other type of new rules. Why should they? They're here *ILLEGALY*, and now the American government is going soft on them. What incentive do they have to "report in" to sign up for any of this new stuff? I'll tell ya, NONE! If no one is bothering to hunt them down and deport them, why the hell should they "tell on themselves" that they're here illegaly, so that now THEY'D HAVE TO PAY TAXES AND WOULD BE TRACKED?! You'd be asking a CRIMINAL to play straight when they have NO reason to.

It's a stupid idea, and like others have stated, it's a slap in the face to all immigrants to this country that play by the rules.

Illegal aliens from mexico cost America WAY more than they contribute. We should hunt the wet backs down, deport their illegal asses back to mexico, and then put the damn ARMY on the border to ensure they don't come back, and shoot the bastards if they try.

There's a right and a wrong way to do things, and this bull shit Bush and McCain are cooking up is WRONG, and really pisses me off!
 
Pale Rider said:
First off, you're "assuming" that the *ILLEGAL* aliens, NOT "immigrants", will even HONOR any such fines, laws, or any other type of new rules. Why should they? They're here *ILLEGALY*, and now the American government is going soft on them. What incentive do they have to "report in" to sign up for any of this new stuff? I'll tell ya, NONE! If no one is bothering to hunt them down and deport them, why the hell should they "tell on themselves" that they're here illegaly, so that now THEY'D HAVE TO PAY TAXES AND WOULD BE TRACKED?! You'd be asking a CRIMINAL to play straight when they have NO reason to.

It's a stupid idea, and like others have stated, it's a slap in the face to all immigrants to this country that play by the rules.

Illegal aliens from mexico cost America WAY more than they contribute. We should hunt the wet backs down, deport their illegal asses back to mexico, and then put the damn ARMY on the border to ensure they don't come back, and shoot the bastards if they try.

There's a right and a wrong way to do things, and this bull shit Bush and McCain are cooking up is WRONG, and really pisses me off!

Actually deporting those who do no wish to comply would probably convince many to come clean, if they risked being sent back.

If you don't like the plan, then you come up with a BETTER, more cost-effective solution...we can't afford to keep deporting the same 10 million people over and over. It just isn't possible. We don't have the resources to repeat this. You keep saying this is BS. Ok, that's what you fell. Fine. But please enlighten us as to what YOU think would be better, realistically. Yes, deporting them sounds like the best plan, but what's to keep them from flooding over again? The only thing, really, is to put up a wall, like in Germany. But the liberals will never let that happen. So until it does, how do you station the military across the border, which is hundreds of miles?

Again, without COSTING us any more funds, what do you propose we do then? the problem has to be dealt with.

The only other thing I can think of is to teach the Mexicans how to work their land, and maybe show their government how they can entice people to stay in mexico. Our country wasn't found as it is today. Mexico can do the same thing if they are willing to try. Mexico has so many natural resources, they just need to learn to use them.
 
fuzzykitten99 said:
Actually deporting those who do no wish to comply would probably convince many to come clean, if they risked being sent back.

If you don't like the plan, then you come up with a BETTER, more cost-effective solution...we can't afford to keep deporting the same 10 million people over and over. It just isn't possible. We don't have the resources to repeat this. You keep saying this is BS. Ok, that's what you fell. Fine. But please enlighten us as to what YOU think would be better, realistically. Yes, deporting them sounds like the best plan, but what's to keep them from flooding over again? The only thing, really, is to put up a wall, like in Germany. But the liberals will never let that happen. So until it does, how do you station the military across the border, which is hundreds of miles?

Again, without COSTING us any more funds, what do you propose we do then? the problem has to be dealt with.

The only other thing I can think of is to teach the Mexicans how to work their land, and maybe show their government how they can entice people to stay in mexico. Our country wasn't found as it is today. Mexico can do the same thing if they are willing to try. Mexico has so many natural resources, they just need to learn to use them.

Actually, I would argue that NOT deporting them back to mexico costs us more money than it does TO deport them. Illegal aliens, in specific mexicans, cost America hundreds of thousands and even millions each year, mainly to the border states. I used to live in Phoenix Arizona until just recently, and there's web sites that support the fact that illegal mexicans costs Arizona WAY more than whatever one may argue they contribute. So yes, deport them back to mexico, and then put the Army on the border. You'll only need them where it's easy to cross. The other parts can be monitored by remote air craft and towers. Much of the dessert between mexico and Arizona and New Mexico, it's too hot and dry to cross there. Some try, many who do die of heat exhaustion and dehydration. We CAN STOP THEM on the border. It's "DO-ABLE". And we'd save MILLIONS doing it. So, I don't by this "we can't ship them back" story. It's nonsense.

But you are right about mexico having lots of natural resources, that actually are of yet to be exploited. They have a year round growing season, furtile soil, and oil, and lets not forget whatever other industry including shipping that comes with as much ocean coast line they have. I attribute mexico's problems with people wanting to get the hell out of there to the country's corrupt government. Fox is a crock and should go. And the way President Bush kisses his ass makes me sick.

All in all, I say we can't afford NOT TO deport the illegals. Come right back... only if we "LET" them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top