This Is What Happened At The Pentagon On 9/11

[PredFan]

Say what you want about Ollie, you can claim he's dumber than dirt if you want to but he knows that terrorists flew a plane into the Pentagon so that puts him at an intelligence level above you.

 

[Mad Scientist]

BTW, I was a Sergeant because i was the best fucking Sergeant in the Army. I would have made a terrible general.

That's why you made it all the way to E-9!

 

[Truthseeker420]

BTW, I was a Sergeant because i was the best fucking Sergeant in the Army. I would have made a terrible general.

You were lucky not to have exceeded your level of competence -- the way most American generals have.
.

I love Gomer Ollies arrogance he was the best sergeant in the army.

since he does nothing but lie all the time here,more than likely,he was the worst.

Gomer should have been demoted to private the very next day after getting the promotion.More than likely he was -remember he never tells the truth in his posts,and is just clinging to the fact he got to be a sergeant for one day till they realised they made a mistake and demoted him to private.

Gomer Ollie !

 

[SFC Ollie]

Say what you want about Ollie, you can claim he's dumber than dirt if you want to but he knows that terrorists flew a plane into the Pentagon so that puts him at an intelligence level above you.

Dirt is at a more intelligent level than Shitforbrains911.......

 

[SFC Ollie]

BTW, I was a Sergeant because i was the best fucking Sergeant in the Army. I would have made a terrible general.

That's why you made it all the way to E-9!

E7, SFC, Sergeant First Class, Platoon Sergeant, any way you want to say it. But most people know this.......

 

[Gamolon]

You're sending people to a site that's 6 years old?! No wonder you still believe this crap. There has been SO much more research done into this since this garbage was posted.

Gamolon apparently is incapable of dealing rationally with the content and facts of my postings, so he is reduced to attacking the date on which certain information was posted.

The problem is numan is that you are using information and data that has been proven to be incomplete and incorrect.

Let's start with this little gem. I'll post a link to where this came from and a partial explanation. You can go from there.

FLT 77 Flight Recorder Data - Pilots for Truth - Page 9 - JREF Forum

At 1.5 DME based on heading and an exact 1.5 NM from DCA and if you use the RAD ALT, giving you 400 MSL, and an impact of 40 MSL, you have to loose 360 feet in 3.57 seonds and you only have to do 100.67 feet per second to impact the Pentagon. The last stick input by the terrorist pilot would guarantee descent in excess of 101 feet per second, it was the biggest stick input for going down inputted by the terrorist as the data stops. Earlier his biggest input resulted in excess of 6060 feet per minute descent rate; this input was bigger.

If you take/understand the fact the DME could have been 1.65 DME and stored as 1.5 DME at the time the RAD ALT said 273 feet, you add the local feet o 129 and have 402, you only need about 70 feet per second to impact the Pentagon.

I think it would help the credibility of your "expert" if he were able to spell.

It would also help if his comments were not gibberish.

It's gibberish because you're too stupid to understand the reason why it's important.

It is interesting that the "expert" you counterpose to a large research group of professional pilots is an anonymous poster in a forum of comments on a well-known propaganda site.

Of course, we may expect that these unnamed posters are equally to be trusted as all the people who post on this august message board.
.

"Counterpose"? And you make comments about other people's spelling?!



Just so I understand this correctly, you clearly don't get why the information from P4T is complete garbage right?

 

[Gamolon]

Many comments here indicate that some idolaters of the Official Wacko Conspiracy Theory are either disingenuous or mentally impaired.

The Boeing 757 which hypothetically hit the Pentagon had a length over half that of a football field. The fusilage was 13 feet in diameter, but as can be seen in the diagram above, the engines hung below the level of the fusilage. The lawn was unscarred by the plane, and there were 7-foot high reels of cable which had been untouched below the flight-path of the supposed plane.

Your diagram shows the jet (engines, wings, etc.) clearing the cable reels, so what's the problem?

Also, why would the wheels be down? They weren't trying to land the plane.

 

[numan]

'

Idolaters of the Official Wacko Conspiracy Theory seem not to be able to retain in their memory what has gone before on this thread -- at least, if it contradicts the dogmas of their cult.

As can be seen in the two photos above (already posted here), using the cable reels as a reference point, the impact hole is very low on the building -- much too low for the low-hanging engines not to impact the lawn or to knock over the 7-foot reels of cable (which were 20-30 feet from the building).
________________________________

P.S. -- Gamolon, apparently your vocabulary is very limited if you do not recognize the word "counterpose" as a verb in the English language. If you consult a dictionary, your ignorance, at least in this one area, will be lessened.
.

 

[Gamolon]

As can be seen in the two photos above (already posted here), using the cable reels as a reference point, the impact hole is very low on the building -- much too low for the low-hanging engines not to impact the lawn or to knock over the 7-foot reels of cable (which were 20-30 feet from the building).

Your picture shows the jet engines clearing the cable reels dumbass!

 

[numan]

'

What it shows is that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon -- and your own rational deficiencies, of course.

.

 

[SFC Ollie]

I am yet to see one clear photo showing this infamous entry hole. Every one I've seen the actual hole is obscured by smoke, fire, and water. Not to mention circles and arrows that idiots place on them to show me what I can't see.

What I do know for fact is that those cable reels were moved, no way they were left sitting like that outside the Pentagon.
What I know for a fact is that no missile could take down 5 light poles.
What I know for a fact is that no missile could move that generator before striking the building.
What I know for a fact is that no missile parts were found but plenty of 757 parts were.
What I know for fact is that the DNA of the passengers from that 757 were covered.

What I don't know is where this hole is behind all that smoke, fire, and water.

 

[daws101]

'

What it shows is that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon -- and your own rational deficiencies, of course.

.

best case of total denial ever!

 

[Gamolon]

'

What it shows is that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon -- and your own rational deficiencies, of course.

.

Is this how you debate numan? Pathetic...

You provide an animated gif that you ADMIT is not accurate yet continue to say it's "clear" as to what it shows.

You provide a picture that's supposed to show that the jet HIT the cable reels, yet in reality, it shows the engines CLEARING the cable reels.

You are provided a link with information as to WHY the P4T idiots are wrong in all their assumptions, yet complain that it's gibberish because YOU yourself are too stupid and lazy to figure it out.

That;s how the "truth movement works" isn't it numan?

Please do continue to post. Every time you do it helps to prove you have no understanding of anything related to 9/11 and just parrot whatever supports your beliefs, even if it's wrong.

 

[numan]

I am yet to see one clear photo showing this infamous entry hole. Every one I've seen the actual hole is obscured by smoke, fire, and water. Not to mention circles and arrows that idiots place on them to show me what I can't see.

What I do know for fact is that those cable reels were moved, no way they were left sitting like that outside the Pentagon.
What I know for a fact is that no missile could take down 5 light poles.
What I know for a fact is that no missile could move that generator before striking the building.
What I know for a fact is that no missile parts were found but plenty of 757 parts were.
What I know for fact is that the DNA of the passengers from that 757 were covered.

What I don't know is where this hole is behind all that smoke, fire, and water.

Compared to the gross and deliberate misrepresentations of Gamolon, your points are almost rational, Ollie! However....

The position and size of the original entry hole has been referenced by many reputable news sources (not the U.S. government and its running dogs, of course!!). You need only refer back to posting #1788 above to see where the entry hole was -- compare the two pictures, and use the cable reels as reference points.

Writing that the cable reels were "moved" is nonsense. They are massively heavy, and the pictures were taken in the first minutes after the missile attack.

You are right -- the missile could not have taken down the light poles; that would have to be done by other means -- explosives, perhaps? -- or pre-positioned poles lying on the ground, possibly covered up in such a way that they could be quickly revealed?

The generator was not moved; you can see it quite clearly in many pictures taken during those first few minutes. Some are posted here on previous pages.

You do not know anything for a fact if it is based on information provided by the U.S. government. They lie all the time, even about small matters -- heaven knows what they are capable of lying about and misrepresenting in a major security agency coup like this one!!
.

 

[SFC Ollie]

I am yet to see one clear photo showing this infamous entry hole. Every one I've seen the actual hole is obscured by smoke, fire, and water. Not to mention circles and arrows that idiots place on them to show me what I can't see.

What I do know for fact is that those cable reels were moved, no way they were left sitting like that outside the Pentagon.
What I know for a fact is that no missile could take down 5 light poles.
What I know for a fact is that no missile could move that generator before striking the building.
What I know for a fact is that no missile parts were found but plenty of 757 parts were.
What I know for fact is that the DNA of the passengers from that 757 were covered.

What I don't know is where this hole is behind all that smoke, fire, and water.

Compared to the gross and deliberate misrepresentations of Gamolon, your points are almost rational, Ollie! However....

The position and size of the original entry hole has been referenced by many reputable news sources (not the U.S. government and its running dogs, of course!!). You need only refer back to posting #1788 above to see where the entry hole was -- compare the two pictures, and use the cable reels as reference points.

Writing that the cable reels were "moved" is nonsense. They are massively heavy, and the pictures were taken in the first minutes after the missile attack.

You are right -- the missile could not have taken down the light poles; that would have to be done by other means -- explosives, perhaps? -- or pre-positioned poles lying on the ground, possibly covered up in such a way that they could be quickly revealed?

The generator was not moved; you can see it quite clearly in many pictures taken during those first few minutes. Some are posted here on previous pages.

You do not know anything for a fact if it is based on information provided by the U.S. government. They lie all the time, even about small matters -- heaven knows what they are capable of lying about and misrepresenting in a major security agency coup like this one!!
.

The plane has been described as hitting between the first and second floor. Therefore the engines would not have hit the cable reels but the blast of all that fuel exploding from the impact. And yes you can see that the generator was indeed moved. The light poles were most definitely taken down by the plane. As so many dozens of eyewitnesses reported. Not one of them saw anyone planting evidence.
But of course you want to believe that anything the Government confirms is a lie so you go on. we understand, you're one of those special kind of stupid kids.........

 

[member]

"Greetings to All: The Pentagon was attacked on 9/11 by a rogue element inside the U.S. military using a plan that almost failed at the very beginning. The inside-job bad guys used a....."

"And again you dumb shit, where is the evidence of explosives, Where are the plane, crew and passengers from the flight that according to you must have disappeared ?"

please don't get too upset (anymore).....at jerks like "them." DUDS..... just humor him...yeah there was no hijacked plane--and no people existed on said plane either....


he/she has nothing better to do. "persona stupida"

 

[Gamolon]

The position and size of the original entry hole has been referenced by many reputable news sources (not the U.S. government and its running dogs, of course!!). You need only refer back to posting #1788 above to see where the entry hole was -- compare the two pictures, and use the cable reels as reference points.

You can avoid it all you want numan. You're a coward and just can't admit you're full of crap. Everyone can see it.

The picture YOU posted as evidence of your position/claim clearly shows the jet engines CLEARING the reels.

.

Continue to avoid the mistakes and contradictions you have recently posted. It makes you look like a moron.

 

[member]

"You have never answered what happened to all the people on the plane. Where did 100 people go? Why were there body parts and personal effects of people on the plane found in the Pentagon?"

"Hi Toro..."


- 9/11 Was An Inside Job!!! Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and Ashcroft ran the 9/11 investigation 'and' created whatever evidence needed to make 'their' Cover Story make sense.


- This is a picture of the West Wedge Wall at Column Line 14 where Bush says a real 100-Ton Jetliner crashed going 530 miles per hour. Look at the massive cable spools blocking the path to the 18-feet 3-inch entry hole.


- Note the two unbroken windows above and to the left of the little entry hole. No 100-Ton Jetliner crashed here, which means any evidence from a phantom AA77 was PLANTED by the inside-job terrorists that sat in the White House for eight long years.


- Do these Navy and Army personnel look ready to save anyone from a crashed Jetliner? No. Why? That never happened!!! I cannot help the fact that you guys are stupid and believe anything coming from the mouths of liars and murderers of innocent Americans . . .

still no nuffin'...nuffin' of substance....

 

[SFC Ollie]

Because they have nothing of substance......

 

[member]

"Hey Terral,I just tried to watch that Michael kelly video the second one and its not working.They deleted it.thats what youtube always does with these 9/11 videos.Go figure,they allow you to post videos of porn there but they delete 9/11 videos all the time.
what a free country this is huh?"

​

FREE ! you bet.















not