ELITEofWarman8
King of Swissland
So, in your view, disturbing and altering evidence is equivalent to "collecting evidence"?Looks like they are collecting evidence of a crashed airliner
Quite a novel view of correct forensic procedure.
Illegal, too.
But it's the USA, right? If it looks good on television, it's legal !!
.
Wow, you are really brainwashed with your conspiracy buddies eh?
So, in your view, disturbing and altering evidence is equivalent to "collecting evidence"?Looks like they are collecting evidence of a crashed airliner
Quite a novel view of correct forensic procedure.
Illegal, too.
But it's the USA, right? If it looks good on television, it's legal !!
.
thats agent rightwinger for ya.rightwinger missed it that the government in the 70's concluded the warren commission was wrong,that there was a second shooter involved,anytime you bring that fact up,he ignores it like i never posted it,and always comes back and just says oswald was the lone assassin.comedy gold.
like you said,rightwinger seems to not be able to comprehend that you cant destroy and remove evidence at a crime scene,that thats illegal.none of the Bush dupes seem to be able to comprehend that little fact.lol.
What you said made no logical sense.
