Humanity
Gold Member
- Jul 17, 2014
- 5,089
- 361
- 130
Places where Jews live must no longer be thought of as illegal.
So, you want the illegal settlements to be recognized as legal?
Do you think that is something that will happen unilaterally?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Places where Jews live must no longer be thought of as illegal.
peace, justice and freedom starts with mutual recognition.
peace, justice and freedom starts with mutual recognition.
Absolutely right!
But... You want illegal settlements to be recognized as legal to the detriment of others... That doesn't sound like a balanced "mutual recognition".
You will need to remove the zionist regime.I want the presence of Jews NOT to be an obstacle to peace.
Right, sure, of course.The presence of Arabs in Israel is not an obstacle to peace.
And they wont be after the zionists are removed from power.So the presence of Jews in a would-be Arab Palestine should not be an obstacle to peace.
And it wouldn't be.A Jew-free space should no more be a prerequisite for peace than an Arab-free space.
Perhaps it will be one state after the zionist regime is gone. THAT is balanced mutual recognition.The Jewish State has non-Jews. The Arab Palestinian State will have non-Arabs. So what? THAT is balanced mutual recognition.
The racial colonies are flagrant violations of international law and only exist because the world has not grown the balls to do something besides vote at the UN.As it is now, all this talk about "illegal settlements" (which only applies to Jews) is just an excuse to create (actually maintain 'clean') Jew-free spaces. (You know, like the rest of the Middle East.)
As it is now, all this talk about "illegal settlements" (which only applies to Jews) is just an excuse to create (actually maintain 'clean') Jew-free spaces. (You know, like the rest of the Middle East.)
As it is now, all this talk about "illegal settlements" (which only applies to Jews) is just an excuse to create (actually maintain 'clean') Jew-free spaces. (You know, like the rest of the Middle East.)
Oh come on Shusha...
It only applies to Jews because???
Answers on a postcard...
As it is now, all this talk about "illegal settlements" (which only applies to Jews) is just an excuse to create (actually maintain 'clean') Jew-free spaces. (You know, like the rest of the Middle East.)
Oh come on Shusha...
It only applies to Jews because???
Answers on a postcard...
Really? Come on now. You aren't going to try to tell me that only Jews build illegally, are you?
As it is now, all this talk about "illegal settlements" (which only applies to Jews) is just an excuse to create (actually maintain 'clean') Jew-free spaces. (You know, like the rest of the Middle East.)
Oh come on Shusha...
It only applies to Jews because???
Answers on a postcard...
Really? Come on now. You aren't going to try to tell me that only Jews build illegally, are you?
Well, I suppose that depends if you want to take my post of of context or not doesn't it.
I mean to say, my neighbour built illegally, do you want to throw that into the mix as well or shall we stick with illegal settlements built by Israelis as was posted?
Can anyone define "P-e-a-c-e"?
Can anyone define "P-e-a-c-e"?
People, really I'm not cynical here.
It can help us together, because we're a small group, discussing separate issues with each other for years and ...without having a clear definition of mutual GOALS.
We at least have to clearly understand how each of us sees th situation AFTER the solution, from all sides - to know what is the average, middle ground.![]()
Places where Jews live must no longer be thought of as illegal.
So, you want the illegal settlements to be recognized as legal?
Do you think that is something that will happen unilaterally?
Places where Jews live must no longer be thought of as illegal.
So, you want the illegal settlements to be recognized as legal?
Do you think that is something that will happen unilaterally?
I think everything about "boundaries" should STILL be on the table. In fact, I believe "boundaries" for a Pali homeland MIGHT EXTEND outside of current Israel as well for a REAL solution. Through land swaps with Jordan to get rid of their god awful Pali refugee camps inside of Jordan in exchange for some small parcels EAST of the Jordan river being donated to the Pali homeland.. Same deal with the awful conditions that Lebanon has to support with their "unwanted" Pali population. So a bigger picture of "borders" would open up opportunities for the ENTIRE neighborhood. Even Egypt might buy in to some extent for "peace" and getting rid of their radical islamist problems in the Sinai..
Palestine doesn't HAVE to be contiguous.. It could look more like a collection of City States that are connected by avenues for commerce and trade. A Palestine as such would be on a tremendous "trade route" for the entire Levant. Including seaports at Gaza/Sinai and room for growth on the banks of the Jordan.
But, Israel must exist on top of where Palestinians existed for centuries?Palestine doesn't HAVE to be contiguous
Lies never make it true nor lead to peace.Well, no. Israel must exist in the place where the Jewish people have lived for 3000 years and is their homeland.
Once you get THAT -- peace is not so hard after all.
Places where Jews live must no longer be thought of as illegal.
So, you want the illegal settlements to be recognized as legal?
Do you think that is something that will happen unilaterally?
I think everything about "boundaries" should STILL be on the table. In fact, I believe "boundaries" for a Pali homeland MIGHT EXTEND outside of current Israel as well for a REAL solution. Through land swaps with Jordan to get rid of their god awful Pali refugee camps inside of Jordan in exchange for some small parcels EAST of the Jordan river being donated to the Pali homeland.. Same deal with the awful conditions that Lebanon has to support with their "unwanted" Pali population. So a bigger picture of "borders" would open up opportunities for the ENTIRE neighborhood. Even Egypt might buy in to some extent for "peace" and getting rid of their radical islamist problems in the Sinai..
Palestine doesn't HAVE to be contiguous.. It could look more like a collection of City States that are connected by avenues for commerce and trade. A Palestine as such would be on a tremendous "trade route" for the entire Levant. Including seaports at Gaza/Sinai and room for growth on the banks of the Jordan.
Tinmore will never go for city-states, because he'd compare them to the Bantustans of South Africa, instead of Athens, Sparta and Thebes. It depends on how you look at it.
Lies never make it true nor lead to peace.
Jews being there and the Jewish people have lived for 3000 years are two different things and irrelevant either way.
The zionists came from another continent, they piggybacked off biblical beliefs and they stole the homes and the land of others.