This is disgusting

[BackAgain]

You geniuses can’t figure out that these policies exist because kids are afraid of their parents and their bigotry.

You assholes can’t figure out that society doesn’t choose to transfer parental authority over to agents of the state.

 

[The5thHorseman]

^ horseshit is incoherent all the time.

The "state" does so on an hourly basis.

It determines custody, guardianship, and can deem "fitness".

Now hack up a bunch of bitter twaddle.

 

[BackAgain]

The "state" does so on an hourly basis.

It determines custody, guardianship, and can deem "fitness".

Now hack up a bunch of bitter twaddle.

Nah. You’re too incoherent to bother with.

But the state allows certain professionals to act as in parentis loci for limited purposes under specified particular conditions. The actual raising of children and making life-decisions over them isn’t on the list.

Hurry back with more of your silly babble.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Nah. You’re too incoherent to bother with.

But the state allows certain professionals to act as in parentis loci for limited purposes under specified particular conditions. The actual raising of children and making life-decisions over them isn’t on the list.

Hurry back with more of your silly babble.

I could post volumes of you "not bothering with".

You must be the worst lawyer in your strip mall..

Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment, holding that the family is not beyond regulation in the public interest, as against a claim of religious liberty. Among other things, the Court said:

"* * * neither rights of religion nor rights of parenthood are beyond limitation. Acting to guard the general interest in youth's well being, the state as parens patriae may restrict the parent's control by requiring school attendance, regulating or prohibiting the child's labor, and in many other ways. Its authority is not nullified merely because the parent grounds his claim to control the child's course of conduct on religion or conscience. Thus, he cannot claim freedom from compulsory vaccination for the child more than for himself on religious grounds. The right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or death. People v. Pierson, 176 N.Y. 201, 68 N.E. 243, 63 L.R.A. 187. The catalogue need not be lengthened. It is sufficient to show what indeed appellant hardly disputes, that the state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child's welfare; and that this includes, to some extent, matters of conscience and religious conviction." (Footnotes omitted) 321 U.S. at 166-167, 64 S.Ct at 442.

"* * * Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it does not follow they are free, in identical circumstances, to make martyrs of their children before they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can make that choice for themselves." 321 U.S. at 170, 64 S. Ct. at 444.

Jehovah's Witnesses in State of Wash. v. King County Hosp., 278 F. Supp. 488 (W.D. Wash. 1967)

 

[martybegan]

She doesn't...she lives in Texas....where another ass.ole is playing politics with her privacy.


Hackneyed, uninformed, Reich wing media cliche after hackneyed uninformed Reich wing media cliche...

Then why live in Texas?

Standard SJW lefty trope response.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Then why live in Texas?

Standard SJW lefty trope response.

She went to college there...U of T chem e was a top 3. Then Samsung hired her.

She hates the state politics, the weather, and will leave.

You're an azzhole.

 

[Unkotare]

She doesn't...she lives in Texas....where another ass.ole is playing politics with her privacy.

....

Are ALL laws pertaining to murder "playing politics with privacy"?

 

[hadit]

What kind of country do we live in when it is okay for teachers to lie to parents? We need to restore sanity before it is too late.

Not only okay, but required.

 

[Blaster]

Not only okay, but required.

Whatever happened to honesty and integrity?

 

[The5thHorseman]

Are ALL laws pertaining to murder "playing politics with privacy"?

No one said anything about murder.

 

[martybegan]

You're a dead end loser..

You are a 5th rate troll twat, and a poor one at that.

Go play in traffic.

 

[The5thHorseman]

You are a 5th rate troll twat, and a poor one at that.

Go play in traffic.

Just slammed your rube skull against the curb..

Do you have a daughter?

 

[Unkotare]

No one said anything about murder.

Kinda seems like you did.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Kinda seems like you did.

Kinda seems?

To whom?

Do they matter?

 

[BackAgain]

I could post volumes of you "not bothering with".

You must be the worst lawyer in your strip mall..

Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment, holding that the family is not beyond regulation in the public interest, as against a claim of religious liberty. Among other things, the Court said:​

​

​

"* * * Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it does not follow they are free, in identical circumstances, to make martyrs of their children before they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can make that choice for themselves." 321 U.S. at 170, 64 S. Ct. at 444.

Jehovah's Witnesses in State of Wash. v. King County Hosp., 278 F. Supp. 488 (W.D. Wash. 1967)

Man, you are a dullard, horseshit.

Just because a family is not always beyond the reach of government doesn’t mean that parents are obliged in all circumstances to bend their knee to usurpations BY the government.

Parental decisions over a child’s immature “decision” about things like sex change surgery at such young ages isn’t akin (n any way) to making “martyrs” of their children.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Man, you are a dullard, horseshit.

Just because a family is not always beyond the reach of government doesn’t mean that parents are obliged in all circumstances to bend their knee to usurpations BY the government.

Parental decisions over a child’s immature “decision” about things like sex change surgery at such young ages isn’t akin (n any way) to making “martyrs” of their children.

You should first acknowledge that you were hilariously wrong.

Your prattle is irrelevant as it is clearly uninformed.

 

[BackAgain]

You should first acknowledge that you were hilariously wrong.

Your prattle is irrelevant as it is clearly uninformed.

I have been and still am right.

Lots of very ignorant dabblers such as you clutch onto citations which have little or nothing to do with the actual matter under discussion.

Do yourself a favor. Take a few years off to study logic. Also, in a semi-related vein, look up “inapposite.”

 

[Bob Blaylock]

No one said anything about murder.

That's exactly what abortion is.

That you will not call it for what it is does not change the fact that murder is, in fact, exactly what you are defending.

 

[presonorek]

Lawyer up!!!

Fuck lawyers. You can lose without them.

 

[The5thHorseman]

I have been and still am right.

Lots of very ignorant dabblers such as you clutch onto citations which have little or nothing to do with the actual matter under discussion.

Do yourself a favor. Take a few years off to study logic. Also, in a semi-related vein, look up “inapposite.”

I can smell "bluff".