This has nothing to do with children

bill718

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2016
1,154
2,156
1,940
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.
 
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.


AS ALWAYS............

Tantrums from the lunatic left.....
200.gif


AND NO FACTS TO BACK IT UP!!!
 
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.

It is well established that conservatives, in general, are much more generous about donating to worthy causes, to help the needy, than LIbErals are. You on the left wrong seem to think that you can claim credit for being charitable, not by giving anything that is rightfully your own to give, but based on what you can get government to steal from others to support whatever causes you profess to support.
 
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.
As is the usual case, this type of gaslighting misdirects what they think others think.

The stance on abortion is about life. The most innocent life there is. Full stop.

We all care about children after they are born. We just don't agree with the left's solutions to the problem.

Which is just another gaslighting effort on the left's part. They see a problem and don't really offer a reasonable solution. However, what they DO is tell people that if you don't believe in OUR solution, you don't care.

This is pure disinformation on the OP's part.
 
We still need to have a discussion on a few things such as when a growing human becomes a person and when they get rights. Because a premature baby can live out side of a mothers body. I know some claim they are a clump of cells but no matter what you do those cells are still human. They will not become a cat or a dog or anything else.
From the moment that RvW was made law the left did what it always does and pushed for crazier and crazie. If 6 weeks is fine then 15. Then 6 months. Then day of delivery.
There is the whole ”my body my decision“. where does the father fit in? If no right to be part of the decision then why expect things like child support? He has no say.
Then we need to have the discussion on all the things like WIC and section 8. Do we allow women to continue to use these for more then one child? Five? Ten? Should there be a cutoff point? Again should the fathers be involved?
 
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.
This ridiculous bullshit needs to be put to rest. You child shredders should stop lying because we all know that there are PLENTY of childcare provisions after we stop you from killing the children. Housing and food are provided. Medical care is available. You just want an excuse to murder in the womb. And don't try to hoodwink us about all your concern. It's all about the money for baby parts industry that you support so vehemently...
Stop the deadly Democrats. Abort them...
 
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.
It seems that leftists' favorite hobbies all center around children: murdering children, sexualizing children, grooming children, emasculating or defeminizing them as the case may be, traumatizing them, confusing them. . . .
 
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.
not at all. It has to do with murder being illegal, and self responsibility needing to be a way of life even for your ilk.
 
Killing babies has nothing to do with children? WTF? Democrats refused to concede that the partial birth abortion procedure was infanticide and Clinton vetoed the bill that would have ended it. These are full term babies who have their brains sucked out. Former governor (D) Va. suggested that newborn babies would be made comfortable while parents and doctors decided what to do with them presumably drowning them like unwanted puppies.
 
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.
It does, don't be a liar. Sorry to interrupt your hook up culture.

This is why guys like you are for abortion, you're afraid of this:
 
It seems that leftists' favorite hobbies all center around children: murdering children, sexualizing children, grooming children, emasculating or defeminizing them as the case may be, traumatizing them, confusing them. . . .
Yep because full grown adults tell them no.......
 
When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children?
So your position is, "if the parent has difficulty or is incapable of providing the type of life that you feel is proper, then that child has no further right to life?" Yep, that could be construed as pre-meditated MURDER.
 
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.
/——-/ BWHAHAHAHA BWHAHAHAHA You libtards understand ProLife the way a pig understands the designated hitter rule.
 
It is well established that conservatives, in general, are much more generous about donating to worthy causes,
Um no. That's just some BS conservatives make up.

I do get that you probably don't realize you're pushing a lie, given the degree of your brainwashing. The cult said it, so you believe it.

So how do they lie?

First, by pretending that donating to your social/political club -- your church -- is charitable giving.

And second, by some statistical trickery which is too involved for a quick post.
 
Um no. That's just some BS conservatives make up.

I do get that you probably don't realize you're pushing a lie, given the degree of your brainwashing. The cult said it, so you believe it.

So how do they lie?

First, by pretending that donating to your social/political club -- your church -- is charitable giving.

And second, by some statistical trickery which is too involved for a quick post.
 
Don't let the right wing hoodwink you. Their stance on abortion has nothing to do with children, if it did these (so called) pro-lifers would be just as concerned with the rights of these children once their took their first breath of oxygen. When did any of these (so called) pro-lifers cast their vote to help impoverished, malnourished, or abused children? No way - they cry socialism! This whole (so called) pro-life charade has everything to do with keeping a block of voters in the GOP corner so they can win elections. Unborn children are just a political tool to them.
You are guilting people who are tired of paying for other people who are irresponsible. So, your answer is to blame others and make them the bad guy. The Village is in charge and has been. The Village lives for the now and does not save for the bad times.
 
This ridiculous bullshit needs to be put to rest. You child shredders should stop lying because we all know that there are PLENTY of childcare provisions after we stop you from killing the children. Housing and food are provided. Medical care is available. You just want an excuse to murder in the womb. And don't try to hoodwink us about all your concern. It's all about the money for baby parts industry that you support so vehemently...
Stop the deadly Democrats. Abort them...
Impressive post................sheeezzz.....You just aborted the OP....Bet you don't feel guilty about that one....lolol
 

Forum List

Back
Top