"This great American system, these roads and bridges- you didn't do that,somebody..."

[Harry Dresden]

I agree, but democrats are extremists - they're responsible for just about every injustice committed.

KKK, slavery, internment camps - democrat, democrat, democrat...

Of course you have neo-cons, however they never legislated their bigotry - and there aren't many left today, not like they lasted very long anyways.

SOME are Nicky,not all.....and so are some "Republicans".....

Every progressive is an extremist....

But in the post you replied to I was talking about Dems pre-LBJ....

everyone of them?.....how so?....what makes them so extreme?........

 

[bripat9643]

So Nick. Do you really think it was the "welfare vote' that put Obama into office?
How many are on welfare you think? And of that number, how many vote you think?

Are you under the impression that tens of millions of welfare recipients are voting?

I know you repubs are looking to blame whoever for what ever. But welfare recipients as the root of all evil. A little over the top don't you think?

It was the vote of people who thought Obama was going to pay for their gas and pay their mortgages that put Obama in office.

 

[Mr.Nick]

SOME are Nicky,not all.....and so are some "Republicans".....

Every progressive is an extremist....

But in the post you replied to I was talking about Dems pre-LBJ....

everyone of them?.....how so?....what makes them so extreme?........

They don't consult the Bill of Rights - that's why.

The Bill of Rights is only convenient when they want something, but they will have no problem pissing on the document when it comes to the First and Second Amendments oh unless it comes to their right to burn a flag or occupy a park and harass people just to name a couple examples..

 

[Mr.Nick]

I love progressives.....

Progressives: "I have the right to shit in the street, squat in a park and use my baby as a human shield" Mr. Nick: "you're a ******" progressives: "that's hate speech - you belong in jail."

Progressives have zero respect for the Bill of Rights.

 

[Harry Dresden]

No one - no party is perfect - republicans are just closer to perfect than democrats..... This is coming from a staunch libertarian to boot...

thats because you side mostly with what they like.....im sure someone like Zeke would say....."Democrats are just closer to perfect than Republicans"......

Really - go read the Bill of Rights...

Of course when I cite that document for being the law of the land progressives say "that's an old fashioned document - we need progress."

Bill of Rights have Jack to do what you said Nick....you can be a "perfect" person and still think the Bill of Rights should be "improved" or "tweaked" .......but then "Perfect" people may not need a Bill of Rights.....because being perfect,they may not need something written down telling them what they can or cant do....they already know.....they are perfect after all....

 

[Harry Dresden]

Every progressive is an extremist....

But in the post you replied to I was talking about Dems pre-LBJ....

everyone of them?.....how so?....what makes them so extreme?........

They don't consult the Bill of Rights - that's why.

The Bill of Rights is only convenient when they want something, but they will have no problem pissing on the document when it comes to the First and Second Amendments oh unless it comes to their right to burn a flag or occupy a park and harass people just to name a couple examples..

im sorry Nicky i work with a "Progressive" who would stick his gun in your face and shoot your head off if you tried to take them....but then again i guess some would say that makes him "Extreme"......so you may be right.....

 

[Mr.Nick]

thats because you side mostly with what they like.....im sure someone like Zeke would say....."Democrats are just closer to perfect than Republicans"......

Really - go read the Bill of Rights...

Of course when I cite that document for being the law of the land progressives say "that's an old fashioned document - we need progress."

Bill of Rights have Jack to do what you said Nick....you can be a "perfect" person and still think the Bill of Rights should be "improved" or "tweaked" .......but then "Perfect" people may not need a Bill of Rights.....because being perfect,they may not need something written down telling them what they can or cant do....they already know.....they are perfect after all....

You cant "tweak" the Bill of Rights.......

That's where you're flawed.

Legislators would have to repeal one of those Amendments to "tweak" them.

Clearly you have zero understanding of the legislation process...

However I'm sure progressives would love limited speech - **** they only support the fairness doctrine... Or in other words progressive talk on TV and radio 24-7-365...

Progressives are what the founders feared and protected us against with the Bill of Rights.

Progressives are no less authoritarian than the Church of England during the 18th century... People fled here - they fled their homelands from authoritarian rule - now progressives are creating the same sociopolitical environment many ran from...

"Progress" is nothing more than eating individual liberty...

But I suppose one would need to understand and appreciate liberty to understand her, and understand individualism in general....

 

[Mr.Nick]

everyone of them?.....how so?....what makes them so extreme?........

They don't consult the Bill of Rights - that's why.

The Bill of Rights is only convenient when they want something, but they will have no problem pissing on the document when it comes to the First and Second Amendments oh unless it comes to their right to burn a flag or occupy a park and harass people just to name a couple examples..

im sorry Nicky i work with a "Progressive" who would stick his gun in your face and shoot your head off if you tried to take them....but then again i guess some would say that makes him "Extreme"......so you may be right.....

I'm sure your little friend would also advocate strict gun control to boot..

I'm sure your friend doesn't comprehend the concept to the Second Amendment, but I bet he enjoys his .22 while he says no to the AR-15

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Yup.

Now some right wing LIBERTARIAN radicals call that socialism and object to public roads.

I think they're nuts but at least I admire their consistency.

It was the taxpayer, private business owner that built the bridges and interstates not govt.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Yup.

Now some right wing LIBERTARIAN radicals call that socialism and object to public roads.

I think they're nuts but at least I admire their consistency.

It was the taxpayer, private business owner that built the bridges and interstates not govt.

Where do they think the money came from, and the civil engineers who designed them?

 

[Harry Dresden]

Really - go read the Bill of Rights...

Of course when I cite that document for being the law of the land progressives say "that's an old fashioned document - we need progress."

Bill of Rights have Jack to do what you said Nick....you can be a "perfect" person and still think the Bill of Rights should be "improved" or "tweaked" .......but then "Perfect" people may not need a Bill of Rights.....because being perfect,they may not need something written down telling them what they can or cant do....they already know.....they are perfect after all....

You cant "tweak" the Bill of Rights.......

That's where you're flawed.

Legislators would have to repeal one of those Amendments to "tweak" them.

Clearly you have zero understanding of the legislation process...

However I'm sure progressives would love limited speech - **** they only support the fairness doctrine... Or in other words progressive talk on TV and radio 24-7-365...

Progressives are what the founders feared and protected us against with the Bill of Rights.

Progressives are no less authoritarian than the Church of England during the 18th century... People fled here - they fled their homelands from authoritarian rule - now progressives are creating the same sociopolitical environment many ran from...

"Progress" is nothing more than eating individual liberty...

But I suppose one would need to understand and appreciate liberty to understand her, and understand individualism in general....

You cant "tweak" the Bill of Rights.......
That's where you're flawed.

did i say you could?.....OR did i say ....you can be a "perfect" person and still think the Bill of Rights should be "improved" or "tweaked" ......

Clearly you have zero understanding of the legislation process...

and clearly you have Zero understanding of WORDS....your not as smart as you seem to think you are Nicky....

 

[Listening]

else did that."

Try getting it right, gd it...

We've only got six threads on this already.

We got it right. We read what he said.

Let's merge this thread into the master "Lump Of S**t" thread which is where all your stuff should go.

 

[Harry Dresden]

They don't consult the Bill of Rights - that's why.

The Bill of Rights is only convenient when they want something, but they will have no problem pissing on the document when it comes to the First and Second Amendments oh unless it comes to their right to burn a flag or occupy a park and harass people just to name a couple examples..

im sorry Nicky i work with a "Progressive" who would stick his gun in your face and shoot your head off if you tried to take them....but then again i guess some would say that makes him "Extreme"......so you may be right.....

I'm sure your little friend would also advocate strict gun control to boot..

I'm sure your friend doesn't comprehend the concept to the Second Amendment, but I bet he enjoys his .22 while he says no to the AR-15

since he has a virtual arsenal in his vault......i think once again....your wrong.....and he feels everyone should have guns.....even a little kid like you Nicky....and he belongs to a "gun club" that wears military gear.....like i said before Nicky....your not as smart as you seem to think you are.....

 

[onecut39]

How does that make the poster a 'dummy'?

Shall we count the ways?

 

[onecut39]

Yup.

Now some right wing LIBERTARIAN radicals call that socialism and object to public roads.

I think they're nuts but at least I admire their consistency.

It was the taxpayer, private business owner that built the bridges and interstates not govt.

Who planned the roads? Who obtained the right of way? Who hired the contractors? Who established the specifications?

The entire infrastructure was planned and instituted by government, usually, although not always with voter approval.

All you wingnuts are simply railing against taxes. Take the taxes away and you have no infrastructure. no law, no schools, police, fire, courts or military.

All you would have are a bunch of braying jackasses wondering why the gobmint didn't do anything.

 

[there4eyeM]

How many candidates were in the race with Lincoln (the first successful Republican candidate and definitely a newcomer)?

For extra credit, what percentage did Lincoln get?

And for extra extra credit, what percentage of qualified voters (exclusively white male, naturally) voted that year?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Yup.

Now some right wing LIBERTARIAN radicals call that socialism and object to public roads.

I think they're nuts but at least I admire their consistency.

It was the taxpayer, private business owner that built the bridges and interstates not govt.

Who planned the roads? Who obtained the right of way? Who hired the contractors? Who established the specifications?

The entire infrastructure was planned and instituted by government, usually, although not always with voter approval.

All you wingnuts are simply railing against taxes. Take the taxes away and you have no infrastructure. no law, no schools, police, fire, courts or military.

All you would have are a bunch of braying jackasses wondering why the gobmint didn't do anything.

"Who planned the roads? Who obtained the right of way? Who hired the contractors? Who established the specifications?"


None of that would have been possible without taxpayer dollars. Next.

 

[Full-Auto]

else did that."

Try getting it right, gd it...

That is why we pay a fuel tax. The same tax businesses pay.


Fail...

 

[there4eyeM]

More or fewer than two parties, both have worked in America.

 

[Pho_King]

else did that."

Try getting it right, gd it...

So, who would that "somebody else " be? And why did obammy specifically exclude business owners from the ranks of the "somebody elses" that built the infrastructure?