- Thread starter
- #81
well you said this earlier....."But I note that conservatives/libertarians/moderates can discuss the pros and cons of Rush intelligently and without rancor. And I find that refreshing over the inevitable insults and hate speech from the haters.".....all i was guilty of was saying that many righties are no different and do the same thing.....its called a conversation....I am what you would call a 'rightie' and I am nowhere near alone in criticizing what Maddow says without attacking her personally.i see plenty of them right here.....apparently you dont pay enough attention to what they post...Then you don't listen to enough 'righties.'
Just a few points.
--I am what you would call a 'rightie' and I am nowhere near alone in criticizing what Maddow says without attacking her personally.
--So again you don't pay enough attention to what they post. I have zero problem with anybody who criticizes what Rush says--Lord knows I have criticized what he says when I think he is out of line or wrong over the years--but I don't respect anybody who debates via deliberate dishonesty, 'proof texting', and/or insults.
--This thread is not about Rachel Maddow but is about Rush Limbaugh's 30 years of unprecedented success.
--And anytime somebody defends their position with a 'they do it too' argument, well, that's just pretty pathetic.
well good for you...but there are a whole bunch here who have and will do if she is mentioned.....
And anytime somebody defends their position with a 'they do it too' argument, well, that's just pretty pathetic
i have no position on the woman,i cant watch her,i was just telling you that the right does the same thing as the left does.....no doubt the ones doing the personal attacks are the far right and left...thats what they are good at....but the right does the same type of shit....
Yes, some on the right do the same type of shit and that is just as offensive to me as it is when the left does it.
But again, that is not what this thread is about and I would appreciate those participating to respect that. There are hundreds of other USMB theads to do that in.
And I hear that kind of 'conversation' in that context as 'making excuses for your side's bad conduct and/or a deliberate attempt to derail a thread. The 'they or you do it too' is a really lame tactic in that regard. I will accept that was not your intent and I will agree that some on the right are guilty of that kind of hateful and useless rhetoric. I don't like it any better when they do it than I do when the left does it.
The difference between the right and left, however, is that most on the right can make a counter argument to a point made without being personally insulting. I find very very few on the left who can or will do that. To them tearing down the person is a valid argument. As I see it, that is the worst kind of argument.
I can appreciate those who don't like Rush's personality, his sense of humor, his type of satire, his delivery style, and/or the content of his program. If he was universally appreciated, nobody would be able to compete for any market share whatsoever during his program. Such is not the case. (He nevertheless will be #1 in his time slot anywhere in the country which is pretty impressive.)
And if you listen to Rush with an open mind, you may or may not agree with him, but he is mostly attacking what people say and do. Take 'feminazis' for instance--tongue in cheek, there are only about 10 of them in the world according to Rush--who are characterized and skewered by him for their rhetoric, what they do, what they promote, what they want to accomplish. He is not demeaning or criticizing them for being women or even feminists.
But instead of accurately rebutting what he is arguing if they disagree, the haters will attack Rush for the use of the word, for being misogynistic, for being fat, for being a drug addict, for being a failure, for being a draft dodger, for hate speech, for being an egotistical patriarchal blowhard. In so doing, they fail to make their own case and instead are themselves engaging in hate speech.
Which Rush is pretty good at pointing out.

Last edited: