Third Assassin Wanted to Kill Trump Over “White Privilege”

Not really true.

For instance, let's compare murder rates in industrialized countries.


USA -
6.383 per 100,00021,594 total murders

Awesome. Now let's look at the rest of the G-7

Canada
2.273874

France
1.5601,010


Germany
0.823686

Italy
0.545322

Japan
0.233289
United Kingdom (and Scotland, which is counted separately for some reason.)
1.148684
0.96753

you see the problem, buddy?
“Homicide rates may be under reported for political reasons”

Yea, that is a problem. Your data source is corrupted.
 
Why wouldn't they be? Once you've made crazy acceptable, it's not a long leap to say "He isn't crazy enough for me!"



Wow, you really are giving them a lot of credit. Besides the fact that Crooks registered as a Republican back in 2021, I doubt he could have had a plan that went back that far.

More likely, the guy was just another eccentric loner.

Hinkley was a right-winger.
Oswald was a far left-winger
Giteau was a disgruntled Republican office seeker.
No, he wasn't you loon.
 
Naw, man, you guys did when you passed up a dozen or so perfectly sane Republicans to nominate Cheeto Hitler.
There ya go, double down on losing. Keep Throwing your temper tantrums.. in a thread where yet another radical leftist (your side) made plans to murder a presidential candidate.

You take that opportunity to chastise Trump.

Yikes, you’ll never get over this loss, and it was a loss for you. A rejection of your awful race, trans, policy, immigrant ideologies.
 
There ya go, double down on losing. Keep Throwing your temper tantrums.. in a thread where yet another radical leftist (your side) made plans to murder a presidential candidate.

You take that opportunity to chastise Trump.

Yikes, you’ll never get over this loss, and it was a loss for you. A rejection of your awful race, trans, policy, immigrant ideologies.

Yikes, within a year, Trump will be less popular than Covid-19. Buyer's remorse is already setting in.
 
Oh, I agree, Biden was a poor advocate for the great work he was doing.

Trump has an ability to spin bullshit into what his followers think is gold, but eventually, people figure it out.

He kicked your sorry old ass, didn't he?
 
How’d your election predictions go?

Oh, that’s right… they weren’t even close

Actually, I said all along that it was going to be close. I didn't realize how misogynistic the country was that it would cut off it's nose to spite it's face.

He kicked your sorry old ass, didn't he?

49.9% isn't a mandate.
 
Clearly Tater was the beneficiary of the insertion of millions of fake ballots in the 2020.

Where did all of those millions of supposed elecotrate go in 2024?

That's an easy one, and quite transparent, after the results of the 2024. They never were.

And that still needs to be gotten to the bottom of rather than just forgetting about it.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I said all along that it was going to be close. I didn't realize how misogynistic the country was that it would cut off it's nose to spite it's face.
LMAO. More temper tantrums. Go ahead, blame the voting public for being evil. I hope your DNC leaders do so as well. It’s amazing to watch how out of touch you are.
49.9% isn't a mandate.
It is. He won the popular vote by a lot, all swing states, and gained everywhere.

You guys used to throw around that Hilary won the popular vote and that it meant something. She only won like 48% of the vote. So suddenly, you change your goal posts I see
 
LMAO. More temper tantrums. Go ahead, blame the voting public for being evil. I hope your DNC leaders do so as well. It’s amazing to watch how out of touch you are.

he didn't win it by "A Lot". His margin was only 1.58%. it was actually the smallest margin anyone "won" the popular vote by Al Gore in 2000. Hillary won the PV by a larger margin.

Discounting brain farts where the EV chose the winner over popular vote, the only guys who won by less of a margin were Richard Nixon in 1968, JFK in 1960, and James Polk in 1844.




It is. He won the popular vote by a lot, all swing states, and gained everywhere.

He won the popular vote by 1.58%. That's not a lot.
 
he didn't win it by "A Lot". His margin was only 1.58%. it was actually the smallest margin anyone "won" the popular vote by Al Gore in 2000. Hillary won the PV by a larger margin.

Discounting brain farts where the EV chose the winner over popular vote, the only guys who won by less of a margin were Richard Nixon in 1968, JFK in 1960, and James Polk in 1844.






He won the popular vote by 1.58%. That's not a lot.
A. The popular vote doesn’t decide the election, I’m simply referring to your sides’ spins and talking points.. and how you change them based on who you’re talking about and what the situation is.. shamelessly.

B. It was a pretty dominating win by nearly all metrics. At least 2-3% wins in most swing states, gained in every state.. even the kooky leftist ones.

You’re trying to downplay it, but you and your policies and ideology were rejected.
 
A. The popular vote doesn’t decide the election, I’m simply referring to your sides’ spins and talking points.. and how you change them based on who you’re talking about and what the situation is.. shamelessly.

Okay, yes, we all know we have a fucked up system developed by slave rapists to pick presidents that no other country uses. But you claimed Trump "won by a lot', when in fact, he won by one of the slimmest margins in history.

B. It was a pretty dominating win by nearly all metrics. At least 2-3% wins in most swing states, gained in every state.. even the kooky leftist ones.

No, guy, it wasn't dominating at all, especially given the fact that he had an opponent who was pretty much hobbled out of the gate.
 
Okay, yes, we all know we have a fucked up system developed by slave rapists to pick presidents that no other country uses.
.. because we have a better system than other countries, and your characterization of the EC is nothing but empty woke insecurities. You don’t like that it harms your sides ability to gain power so you try to call it names, none of which are true. There is a very well-thought out and effective reason for the EC. You probably never bothered to wonder why it’s there, you just hate it because Democrats have a tougher time winning it.
But you claimed Trump "won by a lot', when in fact, he won by one of the slimmest margins in history.
It was dominating. It’s okay, you can cry on my shoulder.
No, guy, it wasn't dominating at all, especially given the fact that he had an opponent who was pretty much hobbled out of the gate.
And here’s where you just crap out all of your credibility.. you were all up Harris’s ass the entire lead up, and now you’re like “well it’s no wonder she lost!”…. Nobody buys it, and it makes your words completely hollow based on precedent
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom