Things To Come

Dick Foster

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
5,922
Reaction score
2,212
Points
350
Location
The People's Republic of the Californicated
also to defend the Constitution against the Democrat Party.
They have failed.
More or less. In the Progressive Era, the very fabric of the Constitution changed.
The constitution hasn't changed except for amendments passed along the way. What has changed are the drooling left wing assholes in this country who used to be for the nation and our constitution have become tools of the communist movement. Some knowing others too stupid and clueless to know that they're being used.
 

PK1

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
3,690
Reaction score
369
Points
140
Another RNC supporting org trying to bash its opposition with one-sided propaganda ... Putin-style.
LOL!
.

Perhaps there is only one side to the story, you dolt.


I notice you couldn't provide any "other side."


If you can't.....you've put your hoof in your mouth......again.
No, you dolt, there are many sides to non-propaganda discussions.
I am not a Democrat, but even I can read the Demo Party platform:

.
 

Tipsycatlover

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Messages
39,004
Reaction score
9,980
Points
1,370
I disagree. It's a done deal. The Marxists and radicals have already taken over the democrats.


The post doesn't say that that is not the case.....currently.


The point is that a crushing defeat changed the Labour Party.....and the hope is that the same in November will wash and scrub the Democrat/Socialist one.

The current Democrat Party is closer to the views of Lee Harvey Oswald than those of John F. Kennedy.
The post doesn't say it's been done because it is the strategy by which it is being done.
 

MarcATL

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
24,077
Reaction score
4,276
Points
280
LoLing @ Townhall & DailyCaller "articles."

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC
 

norwegen

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,425
Reaction score
1,655
Points
280
Location
Ormond Beach, FL
also to defend the Constitution against the Democrat Party.
They have failed.
More or less. In the Progressive Era, the very fabric of the Constitution changed.
The constitution hasn't changed except for amendments passed along the way. What has changed are the drooling left wing assholes in this country who used to be for the nation and our constitution have become tools of the communist movement. Some knowing others too stupid and clueless to know that they're being used.
The Progressive Era has corrupted the Constitution in some measure.

The Constitution was drafted to form - or constitute - the government. In the early 1900s, it began to regulate not only the government, but also the people. The prohibition and income tax amendments regulate the people. Even voting "rights" amendments and the popular election of senators extend unintended functions to the people.

Prohibition was repealed, but nonetheless the veneer of the Constitution was cracked. The federal government is no longer subject to regulation; instead, it regulates the people.
 

alang1216

Pragmatist
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
10,029
Reaction score
889
Points
245
Location
Virginia
There was a time when the Democrat Party was an American party, infused with the heritage and values of this great nation. No longer.

But that may be about to change.



Where things stand now in the Democrat Party:

"MARXISTS AND EXTREME RADICALS SEEK TO TAKE OVER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

  • DNC chairman Tom Perez said Democratic Socialists of America member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “represents the future of our party.”
  • DSA chapter chairs have agreed that “communism is good.”
  • One DSA caucus calls its members “revolutionary Marxists.”
A far-left group behind rising Democratic star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is rife with Marxists and other far-left radicals.
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which includes Ocasio-Cortez, is creeping its way into the mainstream of American politics.

What Perez didn’t mention is that the group behind “the future” of the Democratic Party is teeming with radicals openly dedicated to dismantling and overturning the economic and social foundations of the United States."
Marxists And Extreme Radicals Seek To Take Over The Democratic Party



It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics


"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White


“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.” White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.



Democrats’ refusal to call out Ilhan Omar’s anti-semitism is just appalling

What’s hard is bringing a resolution to the House floor condemning a representative’s bigotry when you don’t want to and you’re afraid of making people mad, even though what we’re talking about here is Jew-hatred. We’re talking about a member of Congress attacking a small minority group.

Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, said she believed Omar’s remarks “were not intentionally anti-Semitic.”
https://nypost.com/2019/03/06/democ...-ilhan-omars-anti-semitism-is-just-appalling/




But the handwriting is on the wall…..and it’s in English!




“Labor Party Apologizes to British Jewry”
.
Quite a bit of hyperbole but if what you say about the Dems and the DSA, the question should be "Why are they popular?". I'd submit it is in response to radicals on the Right taking the GOP out of the mainstream.

Dems flirtation with Socialism is a reaction to the growing economic chasm between the rich and poor and the perceived excesses of Wall Street. A large number of Americans don't see their economic future as very bright and they don't believe the GOP's business as usual is the solution. A majority of GOP tax breaks go to the rich and corporations, the GOP fights minimum wage laws, the GOP supports removing environmental rules to favor businesses.

Dems efforts to include minorities, racial, religious, and sexual, all very popular with a wide swath of Americans are a reaction to the GOP working to exclude and marginalize them. The GOP is set against gay marriage, Islam, voting rights, etc.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
94,255
Reaction score
28,274
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Another RNC supporting org trying to bash its opposition with one-sided propaganda ... Putin-style.
LOL!
.

Perhaps there is only one side to the story, you dolt.


I notice you couldn't provide any "other side."


If you can't.....you've put your hoof in your mouth......again.
No, you dolt, there are many sides to non-propaganda discussions.
I am not a Democrat, but even I can read the Demo Party platform:

.

The platform?????


The platform is meaningless.....it's what they advance that counts.
They write the platform only for morons like you.




6. The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.

One wonders, if she were still alive, what her views of this Democrat Party would be.





7. The Labour Party is undergoing a reformation

“Labor Party Apologizes to British Jewry”



A big Democrat loss in November presages a similar reformation here.
 

Gdjjr

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
4,334
Reaction score
1,220
Points
145
Location
Texas
Your worst post yet.

'Anti-Semite' and 'acolyte' are hardly antitheses.

English is my second language.....too bad you don't have a first one.
Your opinion is noted- did I say they were an antitheses Miss Linguist? Too bad your reading skills are blinded by your acolyte feelings of superiority-

I said, quite simply, what I see- anti- semite being a sin worse than murder and acolyte being perfectly excusable- but, I don't see the distinction of why. Can you, in your erudite fashion point it out for me, the not-approved by you education level "dolt"? Or will you just keep deflecting with bias or partisan crap?
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
94,255
Reaction score
28,274
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
also to defend the Constitution against the Democrat Party.
They have failed.
More or less. In the Progressive Era, the very fabric of the Constitution changed.
The constitution hasn't changed except for amendments passed along the way. What has changed are the drooling left wing assholes in this country who used to be for the nation and our constitution have become tools of the communist movement. Some knowing others too stupid and clueless to know that they're being used.
The Progressive Era has corrupted the Constitution in some measure.

The Constitution was drafted to form - or constitute - the government. In the early 1900s, it began to regulate not only the government, but also the people. The prohibition and income tax amendments regulate the people. Even voting "rights" amendments and the popular election of senators extend unintended functions to the people.

Prohibition was repealed, but nonetheless the veneer of the Constitution was cracked. The federal government is no longer subject to regulation; instead, it regulates the people.


The Constitution was a distillation of the views of Madison, Jefferson and Fanklin.

Progressivism is from the views of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
94,255
Reaction score
28,274
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
There was a time when the Democrat Party was an American party, infused with the heritage and values of this great nation. No longer.

But that may be about to change.



Where things stand now in the Democrat Party:

"MARXISTS AND EXTREME RADICALS SEEK TO TAKE OVER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

  • DNC chairman Tom Perez said Democratic Socialists of America member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “represents the future of our party.”
  • DSA chapter chairs have agreed that “communism is good.”
  • One DSA caucus calls its members “revolutionary Marxists.”
A far-left group behind rising Democratic star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is rife with Marxists and other far-left radicals.
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which includes Ocasio-Cortez, is creeping its way into the mainstream of American politics.

What Perez didn’t mention is that the group behind “the future” of the Democratic Party is teeming with radicals openly dedicated to dismantling and overturning the economic and social foundations of the United States."
Marxists And Extreme Radicals Seek To Take Over The Democratic Party



It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics


"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White


“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.” White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.



Democrats’ refusal to call out Ilhan Omar’s anti-semitism is just appalling

What’s hard is bringing a resolution to the House floor condemning a representative’s bigotry when you don’t want to and you’re afraid of making people mad, even though what we’re talking about here is Jew-hatred. We’re talking about a member of Congress attacking a small minority group.

Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, said she believed Omar’s remarks “were not intentionally anti-Semitic.”
https://nypost.com/2019/03/06/democ...-ilhan-omars-anti-semitism-is-just-appalling/




But the handwriting is on the wall…..and it’s in English!




“Labor Party Apologizes to British Jewry”
.
Quite a bit of hyperbole but if what you say about the Dems and the DSA, the question should be "Why are they popular?". I'd submit it is in response to radicals on the Right taking the GOP out of the mainstream.

Dems flirtation with Socialism is a reaction to the growing economic chasm between the rich and poor and the perceived excesses of Wall Street. A large number of Americans don't see their economic future as very bright and they don't believe the GOP's business as usual is the solution. A majority of GOP tax breaks go to the rich and corporations, the GOP fights minimum wage laws, the GOP supports removing environmental rules to favor businesses.

Dems efforts to include minorities, racial, religious, and sexual, all very popular with a wide swath of Americans are a reaction to the GOP working to exclude and marginalize them. The GOP is set against gay marriage, Islam, voting rights, etc.


The Democrat Party stands for the same principles and ideas of the Communist Party.


5 Things Marx Wanted to Abolish (Besides Private Property)
1. The Family

2. Individuality

3. Eternal Truths

4. Nations

5. The Past




These were listed as the aims of the communist party, (CPUSA) after the war, and, to an almost 100% extent, they the same as today's Liberals/Progressives/Democrats.





1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.



2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.



3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.









4. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.



5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.



6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.









7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.



8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."









9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."













10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.



11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.



13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce



Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?





I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals








10 planks of Communist manifesto

 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
94,255
Reaction score
28,274
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Your worst post yet.

'Anti-Semite' and 'acolyte' are hardly antitheses.

English is my second language.....too bad you don't have a first one.
Your opinion is noted- did I say they were an antitheses Miss Linguist? Too bad your reading skills are blinded by your acolyte feelings of superiority-

I said, quite simply, what I see- anti- semite being a sin worse than murder and acolyte being perfectly excusable- but, I don't see the distinction of why. Can you, in your erudite fashion point it out for me, the not-approved by you education level "dolt"? Or will you just keep deflecting with bias or partisan crap?

Do you even know what 'acolyte' means?????

I'm not a Janissary of evil...I'm in upper management.
 

norwegen

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,425
Reaction score
1,655
Points
280
Location
Ormond Beach, FL
also to defend the Constitution against the Democrat Party.
They have failed.
More or less. In the Progressive Era, the very fabric of the Constitution changed.
The constitution hasn't changed except for amendments passed along the way. What has changed are the drooling left wing assholes in this country who used to be for the nation and our constitution have become tools of the communist movement. Some knowing others too stupid and clueless to know that they're being used.
The Progressive Era has corrupted the Constitution in some measure.

The Constitution was drafted to form - or constitute - the government. In the early 1900s, it began to regulate not only the government, but also the people. The prohibition and income tax amendments regulate the people. Even voting "rights" amendments and the popular election of senators extend unintended functions to the people.

Prohibition was repealed, but nonetheless the veneer of the Constitution was cracked. The federal government is no longer subject to regulation; instead, it regulates the people.


The Constitution was a distillation of the views of Madison, Jefferson and Fanklin.

Progressivism is from the views of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.
Progressivism has been the most debilitating virus this country has ever seen.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
94,255
Reaction score
28,274
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
also to defend the Constitution against the Democrat Party.
They have failed.
More or less. In the Progressive Era, the very fabric of the Constitution changed.
The constitution hasn't changed except for amendments passed along the way. What has changed are the drooling left wing assholes in this country who used to be for the nation and our constitution have become tools of the communist movement. Some knowing others too stupid and clueless to know that they're being used.
The Progressive Era has corrupted the Constitution in some measure.

The Constitution was drafted to form - or constitute - the government. In the early 1900s, it began to regulate not only the government, but also the people. The prohibition and income tax amendments regulate the people. Even voting "rights" amendments and the popular election of senators extend unintended functions to the people.

Prohibition was repealed, but nonetheless the veneer of the Constitution was cracked. The federal government is no longer subject to regulation; instead, it regulates the people.


The Constitution was a distillation of the views of Madison, Jefferson and Fanklin.

Progressivism is from the views of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.
Progressivism has been the most debilitating virus this country has ever seen.


The deepest question is how they got so many fools to swallow it!



1586184281490.png
 

Gdjjr

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
4,334
Reaction score
1,220
Points
145
Location
Texas
Quite a bit of hyperbole but if what you say about the Dems and the DSA, the question should be "Why are they popular?". I'd submit it is in response to radicals on the Right taking the GOP out of the mainstream.

Dems flirtation with Socialism is a reaction to the growing economic chasm between the rich and poor and the perceived excesses of Wall Street. A large number of Americans don't see their economic future as very bright and they don't believe the GOP's business as usual is the solution. A majority of GOP tax breaks go to the rich and corporations, the GOP fights minimum wage laws, the GOP supports removing environmental rules to favor businesses.

Dems efforts to include minorities, racial, religious, and sexual, all very popular with a wide swath of Americans are a reaction to the GOP working to exclude and marginalize them. The GOP is set against gay marriage, Islam, voting rights, etc.
Rhetoric is rhetoric- Republicans lower taxes, Democrats raise taxes- it is that simple- that one complains (publicly) about the other is blatantly hypocritical- neither side gives a rats ass about what voters want- they play to their base, (publicly), to hopefully increase the number of tools they have and hoping to gain the other side more enemies, either of which offers the same results- division of voters for retention of ill perceived (and taken) authority-

It's been said. doing the same thing over and over expecting different results is crazy- yet, here we are decades into a duopoly arguing about which one is best- LOL

duopoly is defined as; a situation in which two suppliers dominate the market for a commodity or service.

Notice the word dominate? For decades- the results speak for themselves. Most voters are dumber than a box of rocks.
 

norwegen

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,425
Reaction score
1,655
Points
280
Location
Ormond Beach, FL
also to defend the Constitution against the Democrat Party.
They have failed.
More or less. In the Progressive Era, the very fabric of the Constitution changed.
The constitution hasn't changed except for amendments passed along the way. What has changed are the drooling left wing assholes in this country who used to be for the nation and our constitution have become tools of the communist movement. Some knowing others too stupid and clueless to know that they're being used.
The Progressive Era has corrupted the Constitution in some measure.

The Constitution was drafted to form - or constitute - the government. In the early 1900s, it began to regulate not only the government, but also the people. The prohibition and income tax amendments regulate the people. Even voting "rights" amendments and the popular election of senators extend unintended functions to the people.

Prohibition was repealed, but nonetheless the veneer of the Constitution was cracked. The federal government is no longer subject to regulation; instead, it regulates the people.


The Constitution was a distillation of the views of Madison, Jefferson and Fanklin.

Progressivism is from the views of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.
Progressivism has been the most debilitating virus this country has ever seen.


The deepest question is how they got so many fools to swallow it!



View attachment 319808
You answered your own question.

Fools swallowed it.
 

Gdjjr

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
4,334
Reaction score
1,220
Points
145
Location
Texas
I'm not a Janissary of evil...I'm in upper management.
BFD- yes I know what acolyte means. Do you, Miss Linguist?

a person assisting the celebrant in a religious service or procession.
  • an assistant or follower.
Political bias seems to be your religion. You service a partisan feeling. The procession you follow speaks for itself- you follow and praise in acolyte fashion- you're an assistant AND a follower of a belief which your religiously preach about,often multiple times daily.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Top