Yep. Their consistent dishonesty and not utilizing due process in their weaponization of government against political opponents pretty much is a declaration of immunity from that.
I know and you know he wasn't referring to the MSM though.
No, but in fact, that is who it does apply to.
He was simply saying in his own Trumpish way that the Constitution inadvertently was protecting a false and fraudulent election. And, if the election was false and fraudulent--many millions of Americans still believe it was--the Constitution indeed did do that.
I can't disagree. And the problem is that for decades now, the Marxist left has been infiltrating as much of the media and other sources of general message as they can including all popular search engines. So not only can media be as dishonest as it chooses with impunity, the search engines mostly remove or suppress all sources that would expose that.
Ironic that BlindBoo supports your position.
Hey, he's just following a trend you set. Nice try though.
I'm assuming--okay I hope--this is sarcasm?
But that is not even close to the reality of the 2020 election. There has never been any proof presented in the courts that hinted at the massive multi-state fraud that Benedict Donald claims. If you want to throw out the law and order and the courts then you are advocating for a lawless society.
Contrary to known reality
www.ap.org
At the end of the day it is not the First Amendment that is the problem but a corrupted legal system that no longer enforces libel and slander laws and an electorate that mostly doesn't seem to notice or care how much information is disallowed or suppressed.
Dems set the trend. Don't be surprised when their opponents start playing their game.Dang those Dems!
Nothing in your post contradicts what I said.But that is not even close to the reality of the 2020 election. There has never been any proof presented in the courts that hinted at the massive multi-state fraud that Benedict Donald claims. If you want to throw out the law and order and the courts then you are advocating for a lawless society.
Contrary to known reality
The recent findings from the AP-NORC survey show that a significant chunk of Trump’s supporters might be more inclined to believe what he says about the upcoming election results than they are to trust government certifications of election results.
About two-thirds of Republicans trust Trump’s campaign at least a moderate amount to provide accurate information about the results of the 2024 election, while only about half say the same about the official certifications of results, the survey found. By contrast, about 9 in 10 Democrats trust the government certification at least a moderate amount, and an overwhelming majority, 82%, also have at least a moderate amount of trust in Harris and her campaign.
Most Americans — around 7 in 10 — trust the government certifications of election results at least a moderate amount, according to the survey. Majorities also trust national and local TV news networks, as well as local or national newspapers, to provide accurate information about the outcome of this year’s presidential election.
AP-NORC/USAFacts poll: Republicans are more likely to trust Trump than official election results | The Associated Press
CHICAGO (AP) — For Christopher Pugh, the 2020 election was a turning point. He already distrusted the government. But as he watched Fox
See Post #26Dang those Dems!
What is ironic about it? The Amendment allows the press to be a bias as they want. Our history of nasty ass campaigning goes back to the first election after George Washington stepped down. No where in the constitution does it say that the press is considered or has to be the arbiter of absolute truth and honesty. That's freedom for you. You are free to believe whatever the fuck you want to believe. Buyer beware.
