“They Would Have Died Without The Virus

OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
104,732
Reaction score
39,400
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
1.Several recent studies have revealed how truly stupid Democrat sheep are. After one failed hoax after another, these easily led dolts bought the Wuhan Red Death scam like it was on sale.

a. Masks are simply an outward signal that you neither read the literature, nor think for yourself.

b. Rather than give the mortality rate for the Chinavirus, the Democrat war room gave the number of ‘infected.’.

c. You never realized that ‘infected’ is a severely inflated number, unrelated to death, or even symptoms.

d. You never realized that the symptoms of the virus are identical to that of the seasonal flu.

e. Recent study that indicated that the number of deaths from the usual causes, being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia, just happens to be the number attributed to covid.




2. Now we find that those who actually died supposedly from the Wuhan are nearly all sick people who had DNRs, and would have died anyway.

“Study Finds 89% of Patients Who Died From COVID-19 Had a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order

Following the retraction of a Johns Hopkins study that showed overall deaths in the United States had not really increased with the COVID-19, researchers have produced another analysis that is interesting to note. In a retrospective study of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in New Jersey, 89% had a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order before admission.

The significance of DNR status as an independent risk factor for mortality has not been documented previously in COVID19 patients. The present study analyzed data of 1270 patients with COVID-19, who were admitted to our institutions during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Jersey. DNR patients had higher hazard ratios for risk of death and lower survival outcomes compared to non-DNR patients. The association between DNR status and poor clinical outcomes remained independently significant after adjustment for important clinical factors, including age, gender, COVID-19 symptoms at the time of admission and comorbidities.

A physician issues a DNR in consultation with a patient and his loved ones. This generally follows a prognosis in clinical practice where medical estimates determine the patient has a terminal condition.



This study is notable because it indicates that many patients who died in these hospitals were quite ill to begin with. If this trend held in larger samples of the national population, at least one prediction made by Imperial College researcher Neil Ferguson may bear out. When he revised his statistics, he told officials in the U.K. that a significant portion of COVID-19 deaths in the country would likely have happened within the next six to twelve months without the virus:

“We don’t know what the level of excess deaths will be in this epidemic,” Ferguson said. In other words, we don’t know the extent to which COVID-19 will increase annual deaths above the level that otherwise would have been expected. “By the end of the year, what proportion of those people who’ve died from COVID-19 would have died anyhow?” Ferguson asked. “It might be as much as half to two-thirds of the deaths we’re seeing from COVID-19, because it’s affecting people who are either at the end of their lives or in poor health conditions. So I think these considerations are very valid.”



When will you learn: when you mix science and politics, all you get is politics.
“They Would Have Died Without The Virus"

No, they friggin wouldn't, and how the hell would you know? Did you personally scrutinise each and every Covid victim's medical history?
Flu death rates in the US over the last 12 years vary between 12000 & 60,000 not 250,000 in ten months.
You and people like you who spread misinformation are the reason Covid death rates in the US are the highest in the world. YOU ARE KILLING PEOPLE!

I understand that facts, truth, reality mean nothing to one of your sort.

You need not prove it each and every day.




There is no such "250,000 Wuhan deaths."


CDC states that only 6% of that number are Chinavirus deaths.

Your masters guessed you'd be this easy to fool, as you are a fool, and so they simply named the usual causes as Wuhan Red Death caused.

Recent study that indicated that the number of deaths from the usual causes, being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia, just happens to be the number attributed to covid.
 

Oz and the Orchestra

Platinum Member
Joined
May 25, 2020
Messages
2,237
Reaction score
1,115
Points
918
Location
Lake District England
1.Several recent studies have revealed how truly stupid Democrat sheep are. After one failed hoax after another, these easily led dolts bought the Wuhan Red Death scam like it was on sale.

a. Masks are simply an outward signal that you neither read the literature, nor think for yourself.

b. Rather than give the mortality rate for the Chinavirus, the Democrat war room gave the number of ‘infected.’.

c. You never realized that ‘infected’ is a severely inflated number, unrelated to death, or even symptoms.

d. You never realized that the symptoms of the virus are identical to that of the seasonal flu.

e. Recent study that indicated that the number of deaths from the usual causes, being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia, just happens to be the number attributed to covid.




2. Now we find that those who actually died supposedly from the Wuhan are nearly all sick people who had DNRs, and would have died anyway.

“Study Finds 89% of Patients Who Died From COVID-19 Had a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order

Following the retraction of a Johns Hopkins study that showed overall deaths in the United States had not really increased with the COVID-19, researchers have produced another analysis that is interesting to note. In a retrospective study of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in New Jersey, 89% had a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order before admission.

The significance of DNR status as an independent risk factor for mortality has not been documented previously in COVID19 patients. The present study analyzed data of 1270 patients with COVID-19, who were admitted to our institutions during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Jersey. DNR patients had higher hazard ratios for risk of death and lower survival outcomes compared to non-DNR patients. The association between DNR status and poor clinical outcomes remained independently significant after adjustment for important clinical factors, including age, gender, COVID-19 symptoms at the time of admission and comorbidities.

A physician issues a DNR in consultation with a patient and his loved ones. This generally follows a prognosis in clinical practice where medical estimates determine the patient has a terminal condition.



This study is notable because it indicates that many patients who died in these hospitals were quite ill to begin with. If this trend held in larger samples of the national population, at least one prediction made by Imperial College researcher Neil Ferguson may bear out. When he revised his statistics, he told officials in the U.K. that a significant portion of COVID-19 deaths in the country would likely have happened within the next six to twelve months without the virus:

“We don’t know what the level of excess deaths will be in this epidemic,” Ferguson said. In other words, we don’t know the extent to which COVID-19 will increase annual deaths above the level that otherwise would have been expected. “By the end of the year, what proportion of those people who’ve died from COVID-19 would have died anyhow?” Ferguson asked. “It might be as much as half to two-thirds of the deaths we’re seeing from COVID-19, because it’s affecting people who are either at the end of their lives or in poor health conditions. So I think these considerations are very valid.”



When will you learn: when you mix science and politics, all you get is politics.
“They Would Have Died Without The Virus"

No, they friggin wouldn't, and how the hell would you know? Did you personally scrutinise each and every Covid victim's medical history?
Flu death rates in the US over the last 12 years vary between 12000 & 60,000 not 250,000 in ten months.
You and people like you who spread misinformation are the reason Covid death rates in the US are the highest in the world. YOU ARE KILLING PEOPLE!

I understand that facts, truth, reality mean nothing to one of your sort.

You need not prove it each and every day.




There is no such "250,000 Wuhan deaths."


CDC states that only 6% of that number are Chinavirus deaths.

Your masters guessed you'd be this easy to fool, as you are a fool, and so they simply named the usual causes as Wuhan Red Death caused.

Recent study that indicated that the number of deaths from the usual causes, being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia, just happens to be the number attributed to covid.
So this international conspiracy has been organised by who and for what reason?
Capitalist govs don't normally pay people to stay at home and not work losing trillions of dollars. So why have these governments across the world taken this course of action?

The UK economy has shrunk by 10%. the worst for 300 years. Businesses are going bust in record numbers. The amount of debt will exceed the world wars borrowing. Why would a conservative gov do that to its economy?
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
104,732
Reaction score
39,400
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
1.Several recent studies have revealed how truly stupid Democrat sheep are. After one failed hoax after another, these easily led dolts bought the Wuhan Red Death scam like it was on sale.

a. Masks are simply an outward signal that you neither read the literature, nor think for yourself.

b. Rather than give the mortality rate for the Chinavirus, the Democrat war room gave the number of ‘infected.’.

c. You never realized that ‘infected’ is a severely inflated number, unrelated to death, or even symptoms.

d. You never realized that the symptoms of the virus are identical to that of the seasonal flu.

e. Recent study that indicated that the number of deaths from the usual causes, being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia, just happens to be the number attributed to covid.




2. Now we find that those who actually died supposedly from the Wuhan are nearly all sick people who had DNRs, and would have died anyway.

“Study Finds 89% of Patients Who Died From COVID-19 Had a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order

Following the retraction of a Johns Hopkins study that showed overall deaths in the United States had not really increased with the COVID-19, researchers have produced another analysis that is interesting to note. In a retrospective study of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in New Jersey, 89% had a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order before admission.

The significance of DNR status as an independent risk factor for mortality has not been documented previously in COVID19 patients. The present study analyzed data of 1270 patients with COVID-19, who were admitted to our institutions during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Jersey. DNR patients had higher hazard ratios for risk of death and lower survival outcomes compared to non-DNR patients. The association between DNR status and poor clinical outcomes remained independently significant after adjustment for important clinical factors, including age, gender, COVID-19 symptoms at the time of admission and comorbidities.

A physician issues a DNR in consultation with a patient and his loved ones. This generally follows a prognosis in clinical practice where medical estimates determine the patient has a terminal condition.



This study is notable because it indicates that many patients who died in these hospitals were quite ill to begin with. If this trend held in larger samples of the national population, at least one prediction made by Imperial College researcher Neil Ferguson may bear out. When he revised his statistics, he told officials in the U.K. that a significant portion of COVID-19 deaths in the country would likely have happened within the next six to twelve months without the virus:

“We don’t know what the level of excess deaths will be in this epidemic,” Ferguson said. In other words, we don’t know the extent to which COVID-19 will increase annual deaths above the level that otherwise would have been expected. “By the end of the year, what proportion of those people who’ve died from COVID-19 would have died anyhow?” Ferguson asked. “It might be as much as half to two-thirds of the deaths we’re seeing from COVID-19, because it’s affecting people who are either at the end of their lives or in poor health conditions. So I think these considerations are very valid.”



When will you learn: when you mix science and politics, all you get is politics.
“They Would Have Died Without The Virus"

No, they friggin wouldn't, and how the hell would you know? Did you personally scrutinise each and every Covid victim's medical history?
Flu death rates in the US over the last 12 years vary between 12000 & 60,000 not 250,000 in ten months.
You and people like you who spread misinformation are the reason Covid death rates in the US are the highest in the world. YOU ARE KILLING PEOPLE!

I understand that facts, truth, reality mean nothing to one of your sort.

You need not prove it each and every day.




There is no such "250,000 Wuhan deaths."


CDC states that only 6% of that number are Chinavirus deaths.

Your masters guessed you'd be this easy to fool, as you are a fool, and so they simply named the usual causes as Wuhan Red Death caused.

Recent study that indicated that the number of deaths from the usual causes, being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia, just happens to be the number attributed to covid.
So this international conspiracy has been organised by who and for what reason?
Capitalist govs don't normally pay people to stay at home and not work losing trillions of dollars. So why have these governments across the world taken this course of action?

The UK economy has shrunk by 10%. the worst for 300 years. Businesses are going bust in record numbers. The amount of debt will exceed the world wars borrowing. Why would a conservative gov do that to its economy?


"So this international conspiracy has been organised by who and for what reason? "



2. Faced with an elected official who has America’s interest at heart, and the possible loss of their sinecures and paths for the unworthy to wealth, Trump had to be removed from the scene. Toward that end, one after another plot, ploy, scam and set of lies was employed by Democrat/Liberal/Deep State assembly. Perhaps you remember some of them:

First collusion, collusion, collusion failed …Russia, Russia, Russia failed….Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed….Racist, Racist, Racist failed…Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed….Recession, Recession, Recession failed….Emoluments, …25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, General Flynn perjury trap, one after another lead balloons.

Failed....all of 'em, but like a successful movie franchise, the believers couldn't wait for another one to be unvailed.

And one, finally, sent the poison dart home.




3. Give the Devil his due, as the so apt phrase goes…..a great deal of planning and coordination went into this one. How vast that coordination might be, let’s not forget that, unlike the previous three administrations, Trump’s was the first to stand in the way of Communist China’s plans for world domination. As we see in the story of the current aspirant to the presidency, and the proof of the Biden’s monetary arrangements with the Maoists, the coordination to end the Trump presidency might be an international one.

4. Although the wisest among us never fully bought the scandemic as a reality, it must be admitted that it worked like a charm with the less than observant. Even now, with the data proving that the Wuhan Red Death is an iteration of the seasonal flu…..the symptoms of both are identical….neck-and-knee benders are wearing their acquiescence around their mouths as the absurd and ineffective masks.

But….it is an accurate representation of their agreement never to speak disagreement with their masters.




5. Answer these queries and bumping into the truth is nearly unavoidable:

What are your chances of dying from the Chinavirus?

What is the reason for masks?

Why is the number trumpeted always ‘positive tests’ rather than mortality rates?

Why is the mortality rate attributed to the Wuhan the same as the number subtracted from the usual causes of death: heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

Why is it that nearly all of those who actually die, had ‘do not resuscitate’ affidavits?



Of course.....if you attempt to answer the above, your Democrat masters will punish you.
 
Last edited:

Winco

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2019
Messages
2,611
Reaction score
1,233
Points
210
The amount of Cray Cray ^^^^^^ Spewed from your ever lying mouth is beyond comprehension. Wow.

Trump wasn’t “taken down” by some organization looking to destroy him.
Trump successfully did that all him himself
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
104,732
Reaction score
39,400
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
The amount of Cray Cray ^^^^^^ Spewed from your ever lying mouth is beyond comprehension. Wow.

Trump wasn’t “taken down” by some organization looking to destroy him.
Trump successfully did that all him himself
"Trump wasn’t “taken down” by some organization looking to destroy him.
Trump successfully did that all him himself"


Let's check:



“Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

CAMPAIGN 2020

Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Published

7 hours ago

on

Nov 22, 2020

By

Richard Moorhead



Top of Form​
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”






=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....










This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."


Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com















https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.6.6.pdf



Computer expert: impossible that machine processed this many votes in this short time.




Is a sworn affidavit evidence?

An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, your affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless you testify.




What Is An Affidavit And When Are They Used? | LegalNature







AFFIDAVIT OF MAYRA ROMERA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Mayra Romera, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

.1 am a registered Democrat. 4.1 was interested in the election process in this country and wanted to be an observer in the Georgia recount process. 5. On Monday, November 16, 2020, I presented myself to Cobb County Poll Precinct located at 2245 Callaway Road SW, Marietta, OA. I was able to be on the floor observing the recount process in Room C. I observed the poll workers not calling out verbally the names on each ballot. They simply passed each ballot to each other in silence. 6. It was of particular interest to me that hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made (all within the circle), only observed selections in black ink, and all happened to be selections for Biden. 7. It was also of particular interest to me to see that signatures were not being verified and there were no corresponding envelopes seen in site.

… , I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process. [SIGNATURE AND OATH






AFFIDAVIT OF CQNSETTA S. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SMOTTON FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Consetta S, Johnson, declare imder penalty of pequiy that the following is true and correct;

. I was a volunteer audit monitor at the Jim R. Miller Park for the recount process on November 16,2020. 3. As a floor monitor, I could see by the markings that the ballots being audited were absentee ballots. 4. I witnessed two poll workers placing already separated paper machine receipt ballots with barcodes in the Trump tray, placing them in to the Biden tray. 5. I also witnessed the same two poll workers putting the already separated paper receipt ballots in the 'No Vote" and "Jorgensen" tray, and removing them and putting them inside the Biden tray. 6. They then took out all of the ballots out of the Biden tray and stacked them on the table, writing on the count ballot sheet. A copy of the video reflecting this is attached as Exhibit




AFFIDAVIT OF DEBRA J. FISHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF^S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER I, Debra J. Fisher, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

On November 16,2020 I witnessed the various issues on military and overseas ballots. 3. All military and overseas ballots I reviewed were very clean. No bubbles were colored outside of the line. Not one ballot used an "x" or check mark. The ballots I observed were marked in black ink and were for Biden. Not one ballot had a selection crossed out to change the vote selection. 4. I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. 5. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. 6. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot. This did not occur on any of the Trump ballots I observed. 7. Ballots were rejected because people chose 2 or more candidates. I found it odd that none of this happened with the military ballots. {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4 8. The military ballots did not have one specific precinct code on them. Instead, they had multiple precincts printed on it (a "combo"), I challenged this as when this is done, you do not know what precinct the voter is registered in. 9. Based on my observations above and the fact that signatures on the ballots were not being verified, I believe the military ballots are highly suspicious of fraud. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct. [SIGNATURE AND OATH ON NEXT PAGE] {00584029.} Ex. K to TRO Motion: Fisher Affidavit Case 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Document 6-11 Filed 11/17




Sooooo.....you're lying again, huh?
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top