Actually you weren't even close.Thanks for the clarification, I was pretty sure I got it right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually you weren't even close.Thanks for the clarification, I was pretty sure I got it right.
Why? Any criminal with the means to get one already can.Would you restrict ownership of miniguns?
![]()
Which is why I have firearms.An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
And a fully-automatic rifle, and/or a belt-fed machine gun.Just the ones that limit what any light infantry ought to have. Which today would be semi-automatic firearms with high capacity magazines.
That's already off of the table. Unless you want a pre-1986 one. Which pretty much all are now investments instead of tools.And a fully-automatic rifle, and/or a belt-fed machine gun.
AI OverviewJust the ones that limit what any light infantry ought to have. Which today would be semi-automatic firearms with high capacity magazines.
I like the way you are thinking. Unfortunately though, we are limited to semi-automatic firearms with high capacity magazines WHICH IS THE MININUM STANDARD FOR A LIGHT INFANTRYMAN.AI Overview
Learn more
U.S. Army Light Infantry primarily utilizes lightweight, mobile equipment for rapid deployment and engagement in various terrains, including rifles, machine guns, mortars, and anti-armor weapons. They carry all their essential gear on foot, emphasizing individual soldier skills and fitness.
Key Weapons and Equipment:
- Rifles:
The M4 carbine (a fully automatic military rifle) and its variants are standard, providing a balance of firepower and maneuverability.
- Machine Guns:
The M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) provides sustained fire support, while the M240B serves as a more powerful, belt-fed machine gun.
- Anti-Armor:
FGM-148 Javelin is a common anti-armor missile, while the M72 Light Anti-Armor Weapon (LAW) offers a more portable option.
- Mortars:
The 60mm mortar (M224) provides indirect fire support at close range, while the M252 mortar offers longer-range support.
Congrats, you've joined the 1%. Not wealth but those on the fringe.Why? Any criminal with the means to get one already can.
Which is diametrically opposite of the 1% fringe you belong to.Congrats, you've joined the 1%. Not wealth but those on the fringe.
Does 'unfortunately' mean all the equipment I listed should be available to the public?I like the way you are thinking. Unfortunately though, we are limited to semi-automatic firearms with high capacity magazines WHICH IS THE MININUM STANDARD FOR A LIGHT INFANTRYMAN.
I thought TX was still part of the US?Which is diametrically opposite of the 1% fringe you belong to.
A pound of cure.Which is why I have firearms.
No. It doesn't mean that. It was a joke. You were just too wound up to pick up on it. The reality is not EVERY infantryman has all of those things. But at a minimum he would have a semi-automatic weapon with a high capacity magazine. Which I am ALMOST certain you would like to ban and confiscate.Does 'unfortunately' mean all the equipment I listed should be available to the public?
Prove me wrong.Congrats, you've joined the 1%. Not wealth but those on the fringe.
Call it whatever you like. You are on the wrong side of this argument.A pound of cure.
Do you know why LEO and soldiers discharge their weapons in anger? There is only one correct answer and it's the same answer I would give if I had to use my firearm in anger.A pound of cure.
Like most on the Right, your sense of humor is very poor. And no, I don't want to ban any weapons. You're welcome to have a fully automatic weapon if you are willing to have it infringed by some training, registration, and probably by some insurance.No. It doesn't mean that. It was a joke. You were just too wound up to pick up on it. The reality is not EVERY infantryman has all of those things. But at a minimum he would have a semi-automatic weapon with a high capacity magazine. Which I am ALMOST certain you would like to ban and confiscate.
Criminal use? Hardly likely, but it would have been an asset in the hands of Stephen Paddock, the 2017 Las Vegas shooter.Prove me wrong.
Unless you're claiming-with a straight face-that a huge, heavy weapon that costs more than a new car and needs a vehicle mount is something a criminal might use.
Me and the majority of Americans.Call it whatever you like. You are on the wrong side of this argument.
Criminal use? Hardly likely, but it would have been an asset in the hands of Stephen Paddock, the 2017 Las Vegas shooter.