They don't want to investigate?

[Luckyone]

Many of them are, but the law says they all have to go, and if we are to be a nation of laws, they all have to go.

Obama ignored the law.

Biden ignored the law.

Trump is enforcing the law.

Ask yourself, if Obama and Biden didn't like the law, why didn't they try to change it? The answer is, despite being disturbed by some of the hardships some of the illegals go through, the polls show the American people want those who are undocumented to be deported.

Enforcing the law? don't make me laugh. He has done (proven) that he is doing the exact opposite!

AI Overview

Donald Trump has been the subject of numerous accusations, investigations, and lawsuits, both civil and criminal, related to breaking laws and constitutional norms
. The outcomes of these cases have varied, resulting in a criminal conviction, civil judgments of liability, and the dismissal of some criminal charges.
Below is a list of things Trump has done where he was found to have broken the law or was the subject of formal legal charges and findings:

Criminal Conviction

• Falsifying Business Records: A New York jury convicted Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in May 2024. The charges stemmed from a scheme to conceal hush-money payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential election by recording them as legal expenses in Trump Organization records. He received an unconditional discharge as his sentence in January 2025, meaning no jail time or fines, but the conviction remains on his record and is being appealed.

Civil Judgments

• Business Fraud: In a civil lawsuit brought by the New York Attorney General, Trump and his associates were found liable for a years-long scheme in which they fraudulently reported property values to secure favorable loan terms and lower insurance costs. He was ordered to pay over $364 million in penalties plus interest, a judgment he is appealing.
• Sexual Abuse and Defamation: In two separate civil lawsuits, a New York jury found Trump liable for the sexual abuse of E. Jean Carroll in the 1990s and for defaming her when he denied the allegations. He was ordered to pay a total of $88.3 million in damages across the two cases, an amount he has posted bond for while appealing.
• Trump University Fraud: Trump settled a lawsuit for $25 million with former students of his real estate seminar program, Trump University, who accused him of fraud.
• Charity Misuse: The New York Attorney General filed a lawsuit resulting in a finding that the Trump Foundation engaged in "persistently illegal conduct" and "willful self-dealing transactions". This case was settled, leading to the dissolution of the foundation and an order for Trump to pay $2 million in damages.

Criminal Charges (Cases Dismissed or Dropped)

• Mishandling Classified Documents: A federal grand jury in Florida indicted Trump on 40 criminal counts related to his retention of sensitive government documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate and obstruction of government efforts to retrieve them. The case was dismissed by a Trump-appointed judge in July 2024 on constitutional grounds related to the Special Counsel's appointment, and the charges were formally dropped after his re-election due to Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president.
• Election Subversion (Federal): A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., indicted Trump on four criminal charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, culminating in the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack. This case was also dismissed after Trump's re-election based on the Justice Department policy.
• Election Racketeering (Georgia): Trump and several co-defendants were charged in a wide-ranging racketeering case in Fulton County, Georgia, for an alleged conspiracy to overturn the state's 2020 election results. This case was eventually dropped in November 2025 after the prosecutor was disqualified and no replacement was found.

Other Accusations of Unlawful Conduct

• Emoluments Clause Violations: Multiple lawsuits alleged Trump violated the Constitution's emoluments clauses by receiving payments from foreign and domestic governments through his businesses while in office.
• Obstruction of Justice (Mueller Report): The Mueller Report outlined multiple instances where Trump arguably obstructed justice during the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election; however, the Justice Department maintained a policy against indicting a sitting president.
• Abuse of Power (First Impeachment): Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to his efforts to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into his political rival.
• Incitement of Insurrection (Second Impeachment): Trump was impeached a second time for "incitement of insurrection" related to the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

 

[Luckyone]

Top DOJ officials quit after their division refused to probe Minnesota ICE shooting​

At least six leaders of a Justice Department unit that investigates police killings have resigned in protest over the administration’s handling of the fatal shooting of a motorist in Minneapolis by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer, according to three people briefed on the departures.

Top leaders of the criminal section of the Civil Rights Division have left their jobs to register their frustration with the department after the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon decided not to investigate the ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good last week. The criminal section of the division would normally investigate any fatal shooting by a law enforcement officer and specializes in probing potential or alleged abuse or improper use of force by law enforcement.

The departures – including that of the chief of the section, as well as the principal deputy chief, deputy chief and acting deputy chief – represent the most significant mass resignation at the Justice Department since February. At that time, five leaders and supervisors of the department’s Public Integrity Section, which investigates public officials for possible corruption, resigned rather than comply with an appointee of President Donald Trump’s orders to dismiss the bribery case against then-New York mayor Eric Adams.

A new spate of Justice Department officials quit because their section didn't want to probe Renee Good's shooting​

At least six leaders of the Civil Rights Division resigned because the section's head, Harmeet Dhillon, decided not to investigate shooting of Renee Good.

www.ms.now

Between resignations, firings, and hacks being hired the DoJ has been gutted. Dhillon being one of the hacks. How can you not investigate a high profile case like this? Easy, you work for trump's DoJ.

Here is a recent evaluation video of what happened. Use it, as it proves your OP to be true!

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/16/us/video/ac360dereklum

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Falsifying Business Records: A New York jury convicted Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in May 2024. The charges stemmed from a scheme to conceal hush-money payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential election by recording them as legal expenses in Trump Organization records. He received an unconditional discharge as his sentence in January 2025, meaning no jail time or fines, but the conviction remains on his record and is being appealed.

Right. 34 tickets for jaywalking, one for each step to cross the street.

 

[hadit]

But it mattered enough to reply to me for pointing out the fatuous nature of your analogy. Better luck next time.

Amusing things are sometimes worth a comment. But, hey, you do you. If it makes you feel better thinking you hurt my feelings, go for it. I hear it helps when the voices get too loud.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Enforcing the law? don't make me laugh. He has done (proven) that he is doing the exact opposite!

AI Overview

Donald Trump has been the subject of numerous accusations, investigations, and lawsuits, both civil and criminal, related to breaking laws and constitutional norms
. The outcomes of these cases have varied, resulting in a criminal conviction, civil judgments of liability, and the dismissal of some criminal charges.
Below is a list of things Trump has done where he was found to have broken the law or was the subject of formal legal charges and findings:

Criminal Conviction

• Falsifying Business Records: A New York jury convicted Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in May 2024. The charges stemmed from a scheme to conceal hush-money payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential election by recording them as legal expenses in Trump Organization records. He received an unconditional discharge as his sentence in January 2025, meaning no jail time or fines, but the conviction remains on his record and is being appealed.

Civil Judgments

• Business Fraud: In a civil lawsuit brought by the New York Attorney General, Trump and his associates were found liable for a years-long scheme in which they fraudulently reported property values to secure favorable loan terms and lower insurance costs. He was ordered to pay over $364 million in penalties plus interest, a judgment he is appealing.
• Sexual Abuse and Defamation: In two separate civil lawsuits, a New York jury found Trump liable for the sexual abuse of E. Jean Carroll in the 1990s and for defaming her when he denied the allegations. He was ordered to pay a total of $88.3 million in damages across the two cases, an amount he has posted bond for while appealing.
• Trump University Fraud: Trump settled a lawsuit for $25 million with former students of his real estate seminar program, Trump University, who accused him of fraud.
• Charity Misuse: The New York Attorney General filed a lawsuit resulting in a finding that the Trump Foundation engaged in "persistently illegal conduct" and "willful self-dealing transactions". This case was settled, leading to the dissolution of the foundation and an order for Trump to pay $2 million in damages.

Criminal Charges (Cases Dismissed or Dropped)

• Mishandling Classified Documents: A federal grand jury in Florida indicted Trump on 40 criminal counts related to his retention of sensitive government documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate and obstruction of government efforts to retrieve them. The case was dismissed by a Trump-appointed judge in July 2024 on constitutional grounds related to the Special Counsel's appointment, and the charges were formally dropped after his re-election due to Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president.
• Election Subversion (Federal): A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., indicted Trump on four criminal charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, culminating in the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack. This case was also dismissed after Trump's re-election based on the Justice Department policy.
• Election Racketeering (Georgia): Trump and several co-defendants were charged in a wide-ranging racketeering case in Fulton County, Georgia, for an alleged conspiracy to overturn the state's 2020 election results. This case was eventually dropped in November 2025 after the prosecutor was disqualified and no replacement was found.

Other Accusations of Unlawful Conduct

• Emoluments Clause Violations: Multiple lawsuits alleged Trump violated the Constitution's emoluments clauses by receiving payments from foreign and domestic governments through his businesses while in office.
• Obstruction of Justice (Mueller Report): The Mueller Report outlined multiple instances where Trump arguably obstructed justice during the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election; however, the Justice Department maintained a policy against indicting a sitting president.
• Abuse of Power (First Impeachment): Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to his efforts to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into his political rival.
• Incitement of Insurrection (Second Impeachment): Trump was impeached a second time for "incitement of insurrection" related to the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

All of which is irrelevant to the fact President Trump is enforcing our immigration laws which Obama and Biden ignored.

 

[Luckyone]

All of which is irrelevant to the fact President Trump is enforcing our immigration laws which Obama and Biden ignored.

First of all, enforcing the immigration laws is important but not to the tune of it being among the top 10 things worrying and affecting Americans, meaning that Trump doing that well, is not a big priority among everything else he should be doing.

Secondly and even more important, Biden the **** up but realized his mistake and corrected it toward the end of his term. This means that "enforcing the immigration laws" was already being done when Trump took office. All Trump did, was enforce the laws in a very aggressive way that brought problems to Americans that should not have happened

Here for your viewing and research

President Biden has enforced immigration laws and deported illegal aliens throughout his term, but the intensity and method of enforcement increased significantly in May and June 2023 (following the end of Title 42) and peaked after an executive order on June 4, 2024. While the administration initially focused on prioritizing certain types of deportations, it later shifted toward higher rates of removal, resulting in a 10-year high in deportations by the end of fiscal year 2024.

 

[Correll]

Incredible? Not really. trump is failing on multiple fronts. Ones he promised to fix.

Grocery prices see biggest spike since 2022 in December​

https://www.axios.com/2026/01/13/inflation-cpi-grocery-prices

The public doesn't like his immigration policies, his policy towards Greenland, or Venezuela, or Gaza, of killing people in boats, or tariffs, or defunding medical research, or attacks on law firms and universities, or threats against free speech, or his pardons, or firing members of the DoJ for participating in investigations of his crimes, or dozens of other things.

You addressed none of my points. YOu are shit talking like a monkey in a cage throwing poop at the zoo keepers.

 

[Correll]

I see. Well, at least I know the degree of delusional thinking I'm dealing with now. I suppose the fantastical belief we are at war with each other, thinking we're on the cusp of civil war, makes it easier for you to justify the use of the military. Something Dotard is extremely eager to do. Inciting violence being part of his plan.

We clearly are on the path towards civil war. There is serious talk of use of the Insurrection Act.

Good was protesting ICE.

She was not protesting.. She was obstructing, at the very least a felony, and given teh context, imo, really, insurrection.

Like thousands of American citizens are doing every day.

Correct. Thousands are engaged in organized resistance to the duly elected federal adminstration. At least, mass criminality, and more likely, mass insurrection.

She wasn't part of an army nor was she a soldier or part of a revolution.

She clearly thought of herself as a revolutionary. She imagined her actions and her possible death, as part of the "Revolution", and clearly as a standard leftard like yourself, had some view of the future, where a leftard revolution of one form or another, "radically transformed" America into a far more "progressive" and "diverse" nation.

As millions of Americans have, like me, she took to the streets to oppose this government's actions.

Correct. Not "protest" but OPPOSE. That is not a first amendment protected speech, that is mass insurrection.

 

[Correll]

....nobody is looking at "real possibility" of civil war except cockoo for coco puffs nutbags like you.

There is no will, no real reason and no capacity.

Buddy, considering the violence in the streets, your denial is clearly just shit talk.

 

[AntonToo]

Buddy, considering the violence in the streets, your denial is clearly just shit talk.

..."violence in the streets" whatever the hell you think of it, is not a civil war make.

You need actual armed opposition with leadership and means to take on Federal Army.

There is none and you sound nuts.

 

[Correll]

..."violence in the streets" whatever the hell you think of it, is not a civil war make.

You need actual armed opposition with leadership and means to take on Federal Army.

There is none and you sound nuts.

Funny. I've never heard ANY leftards argue that the 1/6 rioters where NOT an insurrection, because they were NOT armed.

Yet, here you are, arguing that these rioters, are NOT a insurrection, because they are not armed.

How strange.

It is almost like the shit you leftards spew, is just shit that don't mean nuthin.

 

[AntonToo]

Funny. I've never heard ANY leftards argue that the 1/6 rioters where NOT an insurrection, because they were NOT armed.

Yet, here you are, arguing that these rioters, are NOT a insurrection, because they are not armed.

How strange.

It is almost like the shit you leftards spew, is just shit that don't mean nuthin.

I’ve never called January 6th a civil war or insurrection, I called it what it irrefutably was - a criminal attack on Congress to halt certification of the 2020 election.

Take your what-abouts and shove them you know where.

 

[Correll]

I’ve never called January 6th a civil war or insurrection, I called it what it irrefutably was - a criminal attack on Congress to halt certification of the 2020 election.

Take your what-abouts and shove them you know where.

Good for you.

You ever call out every or even ANY, OTHER leftard on their stupidly calling it an insurrection,

or did you let it pass, because after all, all you leftards know that the shit you say, is just shit that don't mean nuthin?

 

[AntonToo]

Good for you.

You ever call out every or even ANY, OTHER leftard on their stupidly calling it an insurrection,

or did you let it pass, because after all, all you leftards know that the shit you say, is just shit that don't mean nuthin?

Call it whatever you want, the substance was that it was a historic, criminal act to subvert the elections result…and that degenerate named Trump welcomed it and pardoned them all as soon as he got back in office.

 

[blackhawk]

This more the same people who screamed murder at the top of their lungs before the body was cold.

 

[Rambunctious]

Top DOJ officials quit after their division refused to probe Minnesota ICE shooting​

At least six leaders of a Justice Department unit that investigates police killings have resigned in protest over the administration’s handling of the fatal shooting of a motorist in Minneapolis by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer, according to three people briefed on the departures.

Top leaders of the criminal section of the Civil Rights Division have left their jobs to register their frustration with the department after the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon decided not to investigate the ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good last week. The criminal section of the division would normally investigate any fatal shooting by a law enforcement officer and specializes in probing potential or alleged abuse or improper use of force by law enforcement.

The departures – including that of the chief of the section, as well as the principal deputy chief, deputy chief and acting deputy chief – represent the most significant mass resignation at the Justice Department since February. At that time, five leaders and supervisors of the department’s Public Integrity Section, which investigates public officials for possible corruption, resigned rather than comply with an appointee of President Donald Trump’s orders to dismiss the bribery case against then-New York mayor Eric Adams.

A new spate of Justice Department officials quit because their section didn't want to probe Renee Good's shooting​

At least six leaders of the Civil Rights Division resigned because the section's head, Harmeet Dhillon, decided not to investigate shooting of Renee Good.

www.ms.now

Between resignations, firings, and hacks being hired the DoJ has been gutted. Dhillon being one of the hacks. How can you not investigate a high profile case like this? Easy, you work for trump's DoJ.

More self swamp draining... now fill their jobs with MAGA lawyers.....

 

[Correll]

Call it whatever you want, the substance was that it was a historic, criminal act to subvert the elections result…and that degenerate named Trump welcomed it and pardoned them all as soon as he got back in office.

So, in reality, you were making a distinciton, without a difference, to avoid addressing my point,

ie that the claim that the insurrection is unarmed, does not mean it is not an insurrection.

You are a dishonest piece of shit.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Call it whatever you want, the substance was that it was a historic, criminal act to subvert the elections result…and that degenerate named Trump welcomed it and pardoned them all as soon as he got back in office.

Have members of Congress ever objected to a result?​

Yes. Since the 1887 passage of the Electoral Count Act, there have been three years in which members of Congress have submitted objections. In 1969, an objection was raised against the North Carolina vote due to the instance of a faithless elector, which was rejected 58-33 in the Senate and 228-170 in the House. In 2005 an objection was raised to the Ohio vote due to reported voting irregularities. This objection was rejected 74-1 in the Senate and 267-31 in the House.<a href="Can members of Congress object to Electoral College results? (2024)">[2]</a>

In 2021, members submitted objections for six states. Two objections were formally presented by a Senate and House member:

• Arizona: The Senate voted against sustaining the objection to Arizona's electoral votes by a vote of 6-93. The House voted against sustaining this objection by a vote of 121-303.
• Pennsylvania: The Senate voted against sustaining the objection to Pennsylvania's electoral votes by a vote of 7-92. The House voted against sustaining the objection by a vote of 138-282.

Four states were counted following incomplete objections presented by a U.S. House member without a U.S. senator:

• Georgia
• Michigan
• Nevada
• Wisconsin

Can members of Congress object to Electoral College results? (2024)

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

 

[AntonToo]

Have members of Congress ever objected to a result?

The problem is not objections, problem is that the objections were bullshit that couldn't stand up in any court and people involved in the scheme to overturn election were criminally prosecuted, including Trump.

It's been 5 years since, time to get with the facts.

 

[Hollie]

"according to three people briefed on the departures." LOL

"A Justice Department official did not dispute the departures but said the officials had requested early retirement prior to the Minnesota shooting, adding that 'any suggestion to the contrary is false.'”

Oh dear, Berg is a quivering, sloppy mess stomping his feet on the floor. “I cut and pasted half the contents of the web for nothing”