They Are Only Deporting Criminals-LIE!

[airplanemechanic]

That’s a fascist comment.

The fact that you think that tells me I'm right.

 

[konradv]

The fact that you think that tells me I'm right.

It tells me you’re a fascist dupe.

 

[Harry Dresden]

You’re standing up for him. That’s what matters. I’m here to attack, not defend.

yea im standing up for him....when your other ball drops konrad maybe you will be man enough to answer questions...

 

[BackAgain]

It is an attack when they’re threatened with impeachment.

No. It’s not. It’s a contention that they have violated their oaths, you idiot.

 

[protectionist]

800,000 Canadians live in the U.S., the exact number who maintain only Canadian citizenship is not definitively known.

Send those Canadians back home to Canada.......Right?

If they're here illegally, then of course they should be sent back.

 

[BackAgain]

To whatever extent they are concentrating initially on illegal aliens who commit additional crimes while here, that’s a solid plan. But who the fuck ever claimed that they’re going after only illegal aliens who have committed new crimes while here?

You can tell this is an IQ2 thread. It’s retarded and based on a lie.

 

[konradv]

No. It’s not. It’s a contention that they have violated their oaths, you idiot.

Death threats against judges have spiked due to Trump’s fascist rhetoric.

 

[BackAgain]

Death threats against judges have spiked due to Trump’s fascist rhetoric.

What a silly thing to say. Are you always this illogical and vapid.

Rhetorical question. Of course you are.

 

[MisterBeale]

"Undocumented" = Illegal.

"No criminal record" is irrelevant to the fact that he has no right being here.

Not to the point of them adding up to 3X of the two guys who've been regularly and consistently at the top.

It would appear so.

 

[konradv]

What a silly thing to say. Are you always this illogical and vapid.

Rhetorical question. Of course you are.

Face facts. Threats have gone up:

Sharp Spike in Threats to Judges- WaPo

 

[BackAgain]

Face facts. Threats have gone up:

Sharp Spike in Threats to Judges- WaPo

Face facts. Asshole libturds threaten people all the time and you’re absolutely silent about that, Konnie.

Also, maybe this will help you and somehow your fellow retards follow along:

a President has a right and even a duty to criticize the judiciary for overstepping their Constitutional bounds especially relative to the separation of powers. That doesn’t make him responsible for any increase in any alleged “threats” against judges, you douche.

 

[konradv]

Face facts. Asshole libturds threaten people all the time and you’re absolutely silent about that, Konnie.

Also, maybe this will help you and somehow your fellow retards follow along:

a President has a right and even a duty to criticize the judiciary for overstepping their Constitutional bounds especially relative to the separation of powers. That doesn’t make him responsible for any increase in any alleged “threats” against judges, you douche.

You’re making excuses for fascists and I’m not buying your knee jerk “you too” rationale.

 

[BackAgain]

You’re making excuses for fascists and I’m not buying your knee jerk “you too” rationale.

You’re evading fascist Democrap responsibility: typical shitlib behavior.

 

[80zephyr]

And deporting people who are here legally and even US citizens.

It’s not like anyone is getting arrested, put on trial, investigated or convicted of anything.

They’re just being rounded up and deported. No hearing, no judge.

Bullshit.

 

[konradv]

You’re evading fascist Democrap responsibility: typical shitlib behavior.

Your evading responsibility for complicity in the fascist takeover of America.

 

[BackAgain]

Your evading responsibility for complicity in the fascist takeover of America.

Not at all. There is no such thing as a fascist takeover here, you stupid hack.

 

[longly]

You’re making excuses for fascists and I’m not buying your knee jerk “you too” rationale.

He is correct the president leads a co-equal branch of government. No single judge has the power to obstruct the president’s programs; only the Supreme Court has the authority to challenge the president. It seems that you desire a king or ruler to deliver the results you want, but that is not how the system works. The president is not subordinate to a single district court judge, as the Supreme Court ultimately decides all matters involving the separation of powers.

 

[konradv]

He is correct the president leads a co-equal branch of government. No single judge has the power to obstruct the president’s programs; only the Supreme Court has the authority to challenge the president. It seems that you desire a king or ruler to deliver the results you want, but that is not how the system works. The president is not subordinate to a single district court judge, as the Supreme Court ultimately decides all matters involving the separation of powers.

The president is not subordinate, but neither are the courts. A judge has every right to enjoin a president and should be able to do so without fear of retaliation. Trump calling for impeachments and giving dog whistles against judges to his most deranged supporters is fascistic.

 

[konradv]

Not at all. There is no such thing as a fascist takeover here, you stupid hack.

The unitary executive theory is fascistic on the face of it.

 

[Leo123]

The president is not subordinate, but neither are the courts. A judge has every right to enjoin a president and should be able to do so without fear of retaliation. Trump calling for impeachments and giving dog whistles against judges to his most deranged supporters is fascistic.

No, the courts don't have 'every right' to enjoin a POTUS. That's ridiculous. Trump can 'trumpet' what he wants. He has no power to indict or charge anyone. The courts can try to 'enjoin' all they want but they do not have endless 'rights.' That would be essentially anarchy. You just hate Trump Just admit it because you have no cogent argument here.