These are the people responsible for Charlie Kirk's political assassination.

And we are in agreement that you can't provide the violent words. You're fking goofy.
Not my fault that you and two other conservatives try and fail to whitewash the J6 attack on the Capitol and thus you are promoting political violence in doing so. You are signaling to your fellow conservatives that such an attack is permissible and should be repeated. You won't do anything to stop them and you won't do anything to punish the aggressors. You are complicit.
 
What speech do you consider dehumanizing? How about "fascist". "Hitler". Is that dehumanizing?
Once again, why does it matter what may or may not be my specific standard?

The principled question here is, do YOU vow to stop the dehumanization in whatever way you understand it to be?
 
Once again, why does it matter what may or may not be my specific standard?

The principle question here is, do YOU vow to stop the dehumanization in whatever way you understand it to be?
Conservatives are pathologically incapable of taking personal responsibility.
 
Not my fault that you and two other conservatives try and fail to whitewash the J6 attack on the Capitol and thus you are promoting political violence in doing so. You are signaling to your fellow conservatives that such an attack is permissible and should be repeated. You won't do anything to stop them and you won't do anything to punish the aggressors. You are complicit.
Your brain just slid off the treadmill and got squashed by a weightlifter.
 
Your brain just slid off the treadmill and got squashed by a weightlifter.
Thanks for admitting that I was right. You are okay with and promote political violence. You won't act to prevent future actions because that would mean holding your own political tribe accountable.
 
I am 100% willing to meet your request of clicking the link i proposed, copying the methodology at the bottom of the page and posting for your lazy ass when you post data to back up your OP - Show me that liberal speech is more violent.

Nostradumbass:

View attachment 1162387
I accept your concession, and laugh at your diversion attempt.:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Thanks for admitting that I was right. You are okay with and promote political violence. You won't act to prevent future actions because that would mean holding your own political tribe accountable.
Still waiting for you to provide a quote of Charlie Kirk encouraging violence.
 
Thanks for admitting that I was right.
Yep, your head did just that, slid off the treadmill and squashed by weights
You are okay with and promote political violence. You won't act to prevent future actions because that would mean holding your own political tribe accountable.
I’m all in putting mentally ill fks like you away to save humanity
 
You should not be using that quote from Burke.

Which means the slander and propaganda has existed primarily among republicans slandering Democrats, by your own admission.
Hahaha you don’t know law
 
15th post
Why is posting accurate data considered to be bashing republicans?
Because because that is the argument being made by the loon poster "The proportion of politically motivated murders are very one sided toward the GOP'
Doesn't that mean that republicans get triggered by data? Wouldn't that be sad for them?
Nah, we generally ignore characterizations of "right wing" as they are invariably wrong.
 
Because because that is the argument being made by the loon poster "The proportion of politically motivated murders are very one sided toward the GOP'

Nah, we generally ignore characterizations of "right wing" as they are invariably wrong.
So yes, you do get triggered by hard data. Which is funny to watch.
 
Back
Top Bottom