These are the people responsible for Charlie Kirk's political assassination.

anti defamation league? Haha haha
Democrats lie about everything. Their right-wing violence is Muslims and deviants. The entire democratic ideology has to be hanged, burned, then buried in unhallowed ground.
G0h6DTlWAAAMVak.webp
 
And I claimed violence was owned by the right. Unlike you, I didn't narrow my argument to riots only.

Try to keep up!
Well, let's check the record, shall we?

Here's a quote from you:

"It is clear that the rioting belongs to the right."

I'll just leave that right there for all to contemplate as you try to figure out how to deny that.
 
Which means you didn't answer. Try again. What socioeconomic conditions did you fall prey to that resulted in you becoming a conservative?

Your first not answer was indeed funny where you tried to claim that watching conservatives destroy the economy was a reason to become a conservative. You are too afraid to be honest and instead gave a nonsense not answer.
Nope, I said there were more than socioeconomic factors that make conservatism attractive to the rational human being, and you insisting on limiting it only to those factors you think give you an attack vector is not an honest question. And I would like to see the quote where you thought I "tried to claim that watching conservatives destroy the economy was a reason to become a conservative". Post it here.
 
Nope, I said there were more than socioeconomic factors that make conservatism attractive to the rational human being, and you insisting on limiting it only to those factors you think give you an attack vector is not an honest question. And I would like to see the quote where you thought I "tried to claim that watching conservatives destroy the economy was a reason to become a conservative". Post it here.
Yeup, you mentioned employment in your first not answer to my question. Anyone that would be employed would have the rational mind to understand that conservatives destroyed the global economy in 2008. You tried and failed to argue that watching conservatives destroy the economy was a reason to be a conservative. Which is nonsensical and only done because you are too afraid to answer my question.

So try again. What socioeconomic conditions did you fall prey to that resulted in you becoming a conservative?
 
Well, let's check the record, shall we?

Here's a quote from you:

"It is clear that the rioting belongs to the right."

I'll just leave that right there for all to contemplate as you try to figure out how to deny that.
Yes, let us check the record:

"You are specifically asking about rioting because it fits your talking points the best. Whereas, in reality, the overall amount of violence and political violence is done by republicans and conservatives. And yes, I am an adult that can see through your transparent ploys." - Me.

Can you read?
 
Which brings us to the actual question. Which is why you value political alliances over prosecuting criminals?

No, it doesn't bring us to anything else.
You made the INCREDIBLY absurd claim that the right has been more politically violent than the left.

Have you ever lived in Portland or Seattle? I have, and I've witnessed with my own eyes numerous times the violence of the left.

Jan 6th, was what, ten hours long? I've seen these people in the streets for sometimes months at a time, getting loud and violent.

Look at it this way. The left are the losers, and losers are always the ones who become the most violent.

America is a capitalist nation, and conservatives have been successful under that system for countless decades. They want it preserved, so they are MUCH less likely to strike back against it.
The left on the other hand are the ones who want 'change', so violence eventually becomes part of the playbook.

If you wish to be taken seriously you really need to acknowledge these facts, instead of attempting to argue against them.
 
Has everyone else noticed that conservatives narrowly define political violence to only mean rioting?
They define it to mean whatever their propaganda masters want it to mean. All the protests over police conduct in the past few decades is conflated with the various riots over the same conflict between police and black communities. Democrats mostly supported the protesters and vehemently, and verbally opposed the violence. But the Faux Not News talking points still prevail in the Faux Not News Media Sphere.

Are we getting close to a lawless society, where unsubstantiated accusations are enough for the Miller types to engage in lawless retaliation?

They're already using the military to blow up civilian speed boats, even though we have interdiction methods for catching and punishing smugglers.
 
No, it doesn't bring us to anything else.
You made the INCREDIBLY absurd claim that the right has been more politically violent than the left.

Have you ever lived in Portland or Seattle? I have, and I've witnessed with my own eyes numerous times the violence of the left.

Jan 6th, was what, ten hours long? I've seen these people in the streets for sometimes months at a time, getting loud and violent.

Look at it this way. The left are the losers, and losers are always the ones who become the most violent.

America is a capitalist nation, and conservatives have been successful under that system for countless decades. They want it preserved, so they are MUCH less likely to strike back against it.
The left on the other hand are the ones who want 'change', so violence eventually becomes part of the playbook.

If you wish to be taken seriously you really need to acknowledge these facts, instead of attempting to argue against them.
Try again. Why do you value political alliances over prosecuting criminals?
 
Yeup, you mentioned employment in your first not answer to my question. Anyone that would be employed would have the rational mind to understand that conservatives destroyed the global economy in 2008. You tried and failed to argue that watching conservatives destroy the economy was a reason to be a conservative. Which is nonsensical and only done because you are too afraid to answer my question.

So try again. What socioeconomic conditions did you fall prey to that resulted in you becoming a conservative?
I referenced entering the work force because that was when I achieved the ability to think rationally for myself based on the reality around me. Please try to keep up.
 
Yes, let us check the record:

"You are specifically asking about rioting because it fits your talking points the best. Whereas, in reality, the overall amount of violence and political violence is done by republicans and conservatives. And yes, I am an adult that can see through your transparent ploys." - Me.

Can you read?
Oh, I see. You want to ignore what you wrote in favor of something else you wrote. I also have written multiple things, but adults understand what applies.
 
15th post
Except I can. Easily.

The rest of that is you admitting that I am the only adult here and not you. Good job! I'm proud of you.
but you agree with me you haven't. I'm all about embarrassing demofks, I'll use your games.
 
Which murder do you an issue with? Who is still alive?
anti defamation league. only demofks play blame games, so without evidence you agree you have none to make such statments.
 
Democrats lie about everything. Their right-wing violence is Muslims and deviants. The entire democratic ideology has to be hanged, burned, then buried in unhallowed ground.
View attachment 1162427
they are demofk. cashless bail, fail to them. violence in the streets, demofk, all about them. Still waiting on one republican anything.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom