"There's a GIANT "Anomaly" Buried Under The Moon"

[toobfreak]

Why the Moon might be Hollow and Artifical First, it's just too big.

Not at all. It is just the right size to fit predictions.

""It's too big to have been captured by the Earth.

It wasn't captured by the Earth.

Second, it just so happens to be the same apparent size as the Sun causing total eclipses of the Sun and Moon.

Coincidence (for now). The Moon has been slowly moving out from the Earth since its creation. When formed, it was huge in the sky. Lunar tides were like tsunamis. Dynamic breaking from tidal interaction over billions of years is slowly slowing the Moon down causing it to move away from us each year by about 1.5" further. Enjoy the line up while you can.

Third, like many of the Libs here, the Moon is not very dense.

The Moon was formed by necessity from the lightest materials while the densest elements sunk back into the Earth's core.

Fourth, it rings like a bell when you drop things on it.

Not surprising when you consider the materials and temperature at which they were fused. The Moon isn't artificial or hollow, you don't "hear" a ring from the Moon, it is measured. The Earth has a ring too at a different resonant frequency. I've seen slabs of steel a foot thick and 18 feet long that ring as clear and sweet as a chime bell if you whack them with a wrench.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why the Moon might be Hollow and Artifical First, it's just too big.

Not at all. It is just the right size to fit predictions.

""It's too big to have been captured by the Earth.

It wasn't captured by the Earth.

Second, it just so happens to be the same apparent size as the Sun causing total eclipses of the Sun and Moon.

Coincidence (for now). The Moon has been slowly moving out from the Earth since its creation. When formed, it was huge in the sky. Lunar tides were like tsunamis. Dynamic breaking from tidal interaction over billions of years is slowly slowing the Moon down causing it to move away from us each year by about 1.5" further. Enjoy the line up while you can.

Third, like many of the Libs here, the Moon is not very dense.

The Moon was formed by necessity from the lightest materials while the densest elements sunk back into the Earth's core.

Fourth, it rings like a bell when you drop things on it.

Not surprising when you consider the materials and temperature at which they were fused. The Moon isn't artificial or hollow, you don't "hear" a ring from the Moon, it is measured. The Earth has a ring too at a different resonant frequency. I've seen slabs of steel a foot thick and 18 feet long that ring as clear and sweet as a chime bell if you whack them with a wrench.

Size is Just Right? LOL

The surface of the Moon is comprised of some of the densest material in existence. "A new map of the moon has uncovered a trove of areas rich in precious titanium ore, with some lunar rocks harboring 10 times as much of the stuff as rocks here on Earth do"

Carl Sagan said it best, "a natural satellite cannot be a hollow object." And he was right, of course

 

[toobfreak]

Why the Moon might be Hollow and Artifical First, it's just too big.

Not at all. It is just the right size to fit predictions.

""It's too big to have been captured by the Earth.

It wasn't captured by the Earth.

Second, it just so happens to be the same apparent size as the Sun causing total eclipses of the Sun and Moon.

Coincidence (for now). The Moon has been slowly moving out from the Earth since its creation. When formed, it was huge in the sky. Lunar tides were like tsunamis. Dynamic breaking from tidal interaction over billions of years is slowly slowing the Moon down causing it to move away from us each year by about 1.5" further. Enjoy the line up while you can.

Third, like many of the Libs here, the Moon is not very dense.

The Moon was formed by necessity from the lightest materials while the densest elements sunk back into the Earth's core.

Fourth, it rings like a bell when you drop things on it.

Not surprising when you consider the materials and temperature at which they were fused. The Moon isn't artificial or hollow, you don't "hear" a ring from the Moon, it is measured. The Earth has a ring too at a different resonant frequency. I've seen slabs of steel a foot thick and 18 feet long that ring as clear and sweet as a chime bell if you whack them with a wrench.

Size is Just Right? LOL

That's right. The Moon just barely covers the Sun enough for 2 minutes or so to allow us to still see the prominences, which remain uncovered. But the Moon is far smaller than the Earth's shadow during a lunar eclipse. But if you want to think there was some deliberate, intelligent design to the Moon's size and the chance coincidence that we are living in the last few hundred million years before the Moon is too far away to totally cover it at all, you go right ahead believing it, and go right ahead in providing your "proof" of your moonnbat theories.

The surface of the Moon is comprised of some of the densest material in existence.

Scientists have samples of the lunar crust and take measurements of properties of the Moon's surface. The crust consists of 43% oxygen, 20% silicon, 19% magnesium, 10% iron, 3% calcium, 3% aluminum, and trace amounts of other elements including 0.42% chromium, 0.18% titanium, 0.12% manganese, and smaller amounts of uranium, thorium, potassium, hydrogen and other elements.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

They already said it is most likely the leftover contents of the massive meteor that caused the basin.
Soo..not really a big deal

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why the Moon might be Hollow and Artifical First, it's just too big.

Not at all. It is just the right size to fit predictions.

""It's too big to have been captured by the Earth.

It wasn't captured by the Earth.

Second, it just so happens to be the same apparent size as the Sun causing total eclipses of the Sun and Moon.

Coincidence (for now). The Moon has been slowly moving out from the Earth since its creation. When formed, it was huge in the sky. Lunar tides were like tsunamis. Dynamic breaking from tidal interaction over billions of years is slowly slowing the Moon down causing it to move away from us each year by about 1.5" further. Enjoy the line up while you can.

Third, like many of the Libs here, the Moon is not very dense.

The Moon was formed by necessity from the lightest materials while the densest elements sunk back into the Earth's core.

Fourth, it rings like a bell when you drop things on it.

Not surprising when you consider the materials and temperature at which they were fused. The Moon isn't artificial or hollow, you don't "hear" a ring from the Moon, it is measured. The Earth has a ring too at a different resonant frequency. I've seen slabs of steel a foot thick and 18 feet long that ring as clear and sweet as a chime bell if you whack them with a wrench.

Size is Just Right? LOL

That's right. The Moon just barely covers the Sun enough for 2 minutes or so to allow us to still see the prominences, which remain uncovered. But the Moon is far smaller than the Earth's shadow during a lunar eclipse. But if you want to think there was some deliberate, intelligent design to the Moon's size and the chance coincidence that we are living in the last few hundred million years before the Moon is too far away to totally cover it at all, you go right ahead believing it, and go right ahead in providing your "proof" of your moonnbat theories.

The surface of the Moon is comprised of some of the densest material in existence.

Scientists have samples of the lunar crust and take measurements of properties of the Moon's surface. The crust consists of 43% oxygen, 20% silicon, 19% magnesium, 10% iron, 3% calcium, 3% aluminum, and trace amounts of other elements including 0.42% chromium, 0.18% titanium, 0.12% manganese, and smaller amounts of uranium, thorium, potassium, hydrogen and other elements.

Yes, the only convincing explanation is that the Moon was placed in its current orbit by some Creator who mistakenly said to himself, "I'll make it so freaking obvious that this Moon is artificial that even the dumbest species in the known Universe cannot miss it"

 

[toobfreak]

Why the Moon might be Hollow and Artifical First, it's just too big.

Not at all. It is just the right size to fit predictions.

""It's too big to have been captured by the Earth.

It wasn't captured by the Earth.

Second, it just so happens to be the same apparent size as the Sun causing total eclipses of the Sun and Moon.

Coincidence (for now). The Moon has been slowly moving out from the Earth since its creation. When formed, it was huge in the sky. Lunar tides were like tsunamis. Dynamic breaking from tidal interaction over billions of years is slowly slowing the Moon down causing it to move away from us each year by about 1.5" further. Enjoy the line up while you can.

Third, like many of the Libs here, the Moon is not very dense.

The Moon was formed by necessity from the lightest materials while the densest elements sunk back into the Earth's core.

Fourth, it rings like a bell when you drop things on it.

Not surprising when you consider the materials and temperature at which they were fused. The Moon isn't artificial or hollow, you don't "hear" a ring from the Moon, it is measured. The Earth has a ring too at a different resonant frequency. I've seen slabs of steel a foot thick and 18 feet long that ring as clear and sweet as a chime bell if you whack them with a wrench.

Size is Just Right? LOL

That's right. The Moon just barely covers the Sun enough for 2 minutes or so to allow us to still see the prominences, which remain uncovered. But the Moon is far smaller than the Earth's shadow during a lunar eclipse. But if you want to think there was some deliberate, intelligent design to the Moon's size and the chance coincidence that we are living in the last few hundred million years before the Moon is too far away to totally cover it at all, you go right ahead believing it, and go right ahead in providing your "proof" of your moonnbat theories.

The surface of the Moon is comprised of some of the densest material in existence.

Scientists have samples of the lunar crust and take measurements of properties of the Moon's surface. The crust consists of 43% oxygen, 20% silicon, 19% magnesium, 10% iron, 3% calcium, 3% aluminum, and trace amounts of other elements including 0.42% chromium, 0.18% titanium, 0.12% manganese, and smaller amounts of uranium, thorium, potassium, hydrogen and other elements.

Yes, the only convincing explanation is that the Moon was placed in its current orbit by some Creator who mistakenly said to himself, "I'll make it so freaking obvious that this Moon is artificial that even the dumbest species in the known Universe cannot miss it"

By that very same reasoning, do you also have convincing proof the Earth is flat? Look out the freeking window, it's OBVIOUS!

 

[rightwinger]

Actually, I didn't hear or know what context Trump was speaking in, but we have fragments of Mars here on Earth and when the Mars-sized impactor hit the Earth about 4 billion years ago (Theia, which created the Moon), material was thrown off to Mars. Indeed, when the Chicxulub impactor hit Yucatan, material was thrown out to the Mars orbit. I have no idea how Trump meant or his exact words but as a non-scientist, Trump may well have been in his general rights to say there was a connection between the Moon and Mars.

At least Trump knows we only have 50 states.

Trump has a big brain
I’m sure he has expertise in Mars/Lunar theory and can explain in great detail how the moon is actually a part of Mars

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Actually, I didn't hear or know what context Trump was speaking in, but we have fragments of Mars here on Earth and when the Mars-sized impactor hit the Earth about 4 billion years ago (Theia, which created the Moon), material was thrown off to Mars. Indeed, when the Chicxulub impactor hit Yucatan, material was thrown out to the Mars orbit. I have no idea how Trump meant or his exact words but as a non-scientist, Trump may well have been in his general rights to say there was a connection between the Moon and Mars.

At least Trump knows we only have 50 states.

Trump has a big brain
I’m sure he has expertise in Mars/Lunar theory and can explain in great detail how the moon is actually a part of Mars

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why the Moon might be Hollow and Artifical First, it's just too big.

Not at all. It is just the right size to fit predictions.

""It's too big to have been captured by the Earth.

It wasn't captured by the Earth.

Second, it just so happens to be the same apparent size as the Sun causing total eclipses of the Sun and Moon.

Coincidence (for now). The Moon has been slowly moving out from the Earth since its creation. When formed, it was huge in the sky. Lunar tides were like tsunamis. Dynamic breaking from tidal interaction over billions of years is slowly slowing the Moon down causing it to move away from us each year by about 1.5" further. Enjoy the line up while you can.

Third, like many of the Libs here, the Moon is not very dense.

The Moon was formed by necessity from the lightest materials while the densest elements sunk back into the Earth's core.

Fourth, it rings like a bell when you drop things on it.

Not surprising when you consider the materials and temperature at which they were fused. The Moon isn't artificial or hollow, you don't "hear" a ring from the Moon, it is measured. The Earth has a ring too at a different resonant frequency. I've seen slabs of steel a foot thick and 18 feet long that ring as clear and sweet as a chime bell if you whack them with a wrench.

Size is Just Right? LOL

That's right. The Moon just barely covers the Sun enough for 2 minutes or so to allow us to still see the prominences, which remain uncovered. But the Moon is far smaller than the Earth's shadow during a lunar eclipse. But if you want to think there was some deliberate, intelligent design to the Moon's size and the chance coincidence that we are living in the last few hundred million years before the Moon is too far away to totally cover it at all, you go right ahead believing it, and go right ahead in providing your "proof" of your moonnbat theories.

The surface of the Moon is comprised of some of the densest material in existence.

Scientists have samples of the lunar crust and take measurements of properties of the Moon's surface. The crust consists of 43% oxygen, 20% silicon, 19% magnesium, 10% iron, 3% calcium, 3% aluminum, and trace amounts of other elements including 0.42% chromium, 0.18% titanium, 0.12% manganese, and smaller amounts of uranium, thorium, potassium, hydrogen and other elements.

Yes, the only convincing explanation is that the Moon was placed in its current orbit by some Creator who mistakenly said to himself, "I'll make it so freaking obvious that this Moon is artificial that even the dumbest species in the known Universe cannot miss it"

By that very same reasoning, do you also have convincing proof the Earth is flat? Look out the freeking window, it's OBVIOUS!

Whatever.

Cling to your beliefs.

 

[toobfreak]

Yes, the only convincing explanation is that the Moon was placed in its current orbit by some Creator who mistakenly said to himself, "I'll make it so freaking obvious that this Moon is artificial that even the dumbest species in the known Universe cannot miss it"

So... the only SENSIBLE explanation for the Moon is the Almighty, all-powerful, infallible, all-knowing Lord and creator of the universe MADE A MISTAKE in his assumptions in placing it there?

But the only way for us to KNOW it is "artificial" and really just a big, hollow, empty metal ball 2,200 miles in diameter was for the dumbest species to learn to fly to the Moon so we could drop tools on it and hear it ring?

And God created this giant, hollow, empty ball to key us into the mysteries of the universe when he simply could have just come here and said: "Hey?"

And God is such a tricky little devil he creates a gravity anomaly for the just discovered metal rock under the biggest creator whose gravity to cause the sag of the crust to dip 1/2 mile just happens to perfectly equate to that of the gravitational pull of a solid lunar body?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yes, the only convincing explanation is that the Moon was placed in its current orbit by some Creator who mistakenly said to himself, "I'll make it so freaking obvious that this Moon is artificial that even the dumbest species in the known Universe cannot miss it"

So... the only SENSIBLE explanation for the Moon is the Almighty, all-powerful, infallible, all-knowing Lord and creator of the universe MADE A MISTAKE in his assumptions in placing it there?

But the only way for us to KNOW it is "artificial" and really just a big, hollow, empty metal ball 2,200 miles in diameter was for the dumbest species to learn to fly to the Moon so we could drop tools on it and hear it ring?

No his mistake was overestimating our intelligence

 

[toobfreak]

Yes, the only convincing explanation is that the Moon was placed in its current orbit by some Creator who mistakenly said to himself, "I'll make it so freaking obvious that this Moon is artificial that even the dumbest species in the known Universe cannot miss it"

So... the only SENSIBLE explanation for the Moon is the Almighty, all-powerful, infallible, all-knowing Lord and creator of the universe MADE A MISTAKE in his assumptions in placing it there?

But the only way for us to KNOW it is "artificial" and really just a big, hollow, empty metal ball 2,200 miles in diameter was for the dumbest species to learn to fly to the Moon so we could drop tools on it and hear it ring?

No his mistake was overestimating our intelligence

So God is imperfect? Or man, his creation just too dumb?

That is TWO errors God has made.

Apparently YOU caught on to God's secret messages, though. All is not quite lost. You must obviously be part of the 2200 mile high club.

 

[toobfreak]

Does the Moon ring like a bell?

Because of the structure of the Moon.

The “like a bell” thing is poetic license, not literal truth.

Between 1972 and 1977, seismometers installed on the Moon by the Apollo missions recorded moonquakes. The Moon was described as "ringing like a bell" during some of those quakes, specifically the shallow ones. This phrase was brought to popular attention in March 1970, in an article in Popular Science. When Apollo 12 deliberately crashed the Ascent Stage of its Lunar Module onto the Moon’s surface, it was claimed that the Moon rang like a bell for an hour, leading to arguments that it must be hollow like a bell. Lunar seismology experiments since then have shown that the lunar body has shallow moonquakes that act differently from quakes on Earth, due to differences in texture, type and density of the planetary strata, but there is no evidence of any large empty space inside the body.

Is the Moon hollow?

The Hollow Moon hypothesis, or Spaceship Moon hypothesis, proposes that Earth's Moon is either wholly hollow or otherwise contains a substantial interior space. No scientific evidence exists to support the idea; seismic observations and other data collected since spacecraft began to orbit or land on the Moon indicate that it has a thin crust, extensive mantle and small, dense core, although overall it is much less dense than Earth.

The Hollow Moon concept is similar to the better-known Hollow Earth hypothesis, which was a recurring plot device in pre-spaceflight science fiction. The first discussion of a hollow Earth was by scientist Edmond Halley in 1692, while the first publication to mention a hollow Moon was not until H. G. Wells' 1901 novel The First Men in the Moon.

Hollow Moon - Wikipedia

 

[Asclepias]

Now isn't that interesting and confirmed by NASA!

Probably the wrapper all that cheese came in.