there is no police brutality problem
- Thread starter harmonica
- Start date
So you don't think there would be a rise in crime if the police were disbanded? You telling me that you're that much of an idiot....really?I know it doeshahhahahah
1. so if someone attacks you, and you have a pistol, you will let them beat the crap out of you???--because MBrown attacked the cop
..unarmed does not mean not a threat
2. EGarner was resisting---it's his fault
3. you provided no link --let's see it
4. blacks commit murder at 4 times the rate/rape 2 times the rate/crime higher rates--so it appears blacks are being killed at a LOWER rate regarding the crime they commit = interaction with cops
-----if you don't commit crime--guess what !!!!!??? you usually don't come into contact with the police = they CAN'T KILL YOU
5. the big one--you did not refute the OP that brutality is not a problem = 5 times the RATE--not PER YEAR
booom and booom baby!!!
''''16 black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest.''''
''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer.''''
All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides
The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…nypost.com
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Do you think that makes you sound smart?
...it's an airtight OP
And the OP is an excellent argument for disbanding and defunding Police. Billions of interactions take place between men and women. Millions of consensual sexual encounters. Only a tiny fraction of those encounters are non consensual. So Rape is a statistically insignificant crime. We do not need special units within the police to investigate these statistically insignificant criminal activity.
hundreds of millions of people interact with their banks. Millions do so every day. A Bank Robbery is such a rare occurrence that when compared with the total number of bank visitors it is insignificant. Obviously we do not have a bank robbery problem.
Your statistical model essentially demonstrates that no criminal activity is significant. We can close the prisons and disband the police with no real repercussions. Even if crime doubled. It would still be insignificant. Statistically speaking.
You certainly have removed all doubt about your lack of intellect. But, keep going...it's entertainment.
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,567
- 290
You certainly did say it even of you are too fucking stupid to know it.
You cited a pile of worthless stats about how these killings are a low percentage. Why? So people should not care about the George Floyds?
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,567
- 290
You stupid fuck, they would be replaced.So you don't think there would be a rise in crime if the police were disbanded? You telling me that you're that much of an idiot....really?I know it doeshahhahahah
1. so if someone attacks you, and you have a pistol, you will let them beat the crap out of you???--because MBrown attacked the cop
..unarmed does not mean not a threat
2. EGarner was resisting---it's his fault
3. you provided no link --let's see it
4. blacks commit murder at 4 times the rate/rape 2 times the rate/crime higher rates--so it appears blacks are being killed at a LOWER rate regarding the crime they commit = interaction with cops
-----if you don't commit crime--guess what !!!!!??? you usually don't come into contact with the police = they CAN'T KILL YOU
5. the big one--you did not refute the OP that brutality is not a problem = 5 times the RATE--not PER YEAR
booom and booom baby!!!
''''16 black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest.''''
''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer.''''
All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides
The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Do you think that makes you sound smart?
...it's an airtight OP
And the OP is an excellent argument for disbanding and defunding Police. Billions of interactions take place between men and women. Millions of consensual sexual encounters. Only a tiny fraction of those encounters are non consensual. So Rape is a statistically insignificant crime. We do not need special units within the police to investigate these statistically insignificant criminal activity.
hundreds of millions of people interact with their banks. Millions do so every day. A Bank Robbery is such a rare occurrence that when compared with the total number of bank visitors it is insignificant. Obviously we do not have a bank robbery problem.
Your statistical model essentially demonstrates that no criminal activity is significant. We can close the prisons and disband the police with no real repercussions. Even if crime doubled. It would still be insignificant. Statistically speaking.
You certainly have removed all doubt about your lack of intellect. But, keep going...it's entertainment.
You people keep proving just how fucking stupid Trump supporters rerally are.
SavannahMann
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2016
- 14,540
- 6,819
- 365
that's GENIUS--comparing going to the bank with criminalsI know it doeshahhahahah
1. so if someone attacks you, and you have a pistol, you will let them beat the crap out of you???--because MBrown attacked the cop
..unarmed does not mean not a threat
2. EGarner was resisting---it's his fault
3. you provided no link --let's see it
4. blacks commit murder at 4 times the rate/rape 2 times the rate/crime higher rates--so it appears blacks are being killed at a LOWER rate regarding the crime they commit = interaction with cops
-----if you don't commit crime--guess what !!!!!??? you usually don't come into contact with the police = they CAN'T KILL YOU
5. the big one--you did not refute the OP that brutality is not a problem = 5 times the RATE--not PER YEAR
booom and booom baby!!!
''''16 black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest.''''
''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer.''''
All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides
The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Do you think that makes you sound smart?
...it's an airtight OP
And the OP is an excellent argument for disbanding and defunding Police. Billions of interactions take place between men and women. Millions of consensual sexual encounters. Only a tiny fraction of those encounters are non consensual. So Rape is a statistically insignificant crime. We do not need special units within the police to investigate these statistically insignificant criminal activity.
hundreds of millions of people interact with their banks. Millions do so every day. A Bank Robbery is such a rare occurrence that when compared with the total number of bank visitors it is insignificant. Obviously we do not have a bank robbery problem.
Your statistical model essentially demonstrates that no criminal activity is significant. We can close the prisons and disband the police with no real repercussions. Even if crime doubled. It would still be insignificant. Statistically speaking.
woooooohooooooooo
...STILL--no one has proved the OP wrong = .0003
I am absolutely agreeing with you. Instead of focusing on the thousand or so people killed by police. You use the arrests as the yardstick.
That same yardstick applied to Bank Robbery means that roughly speaking it is far more likely that someone will be brutalized by police than a bank will be robbed.
Using that same technique, as I showed, it is almost unheard of that a woman be raped. Three hundred million people in this country. At least a million of them are having sex every day. Probably more with the Corona isolations. But at least a million every single day. Probably ten million are having consensual sex every day. Against that, one woman will be raped. That means that a woman has a one in ten million chance of being raped.
Those dead cops you are complaining about regularly? Why? Most die from non violent means. A mere 48 were shot and killed last year. Compared to the eight hundred thousand cops there are in the country as an average, you’re talking about minuscule percentages. So why worry about it? Who cares if the odds are something like one in five million that a cop will be killed this week?
Your statistics work. I am just going to use them for every other criminal argument. Drug dealers? No big deal. For every drug deal, there are at least ten thousand legitimate purchases. Food, whatever. So who cares if that guy is dealing drugs? His criminal activity is insignificant statistically speaking.
These are your Statistical techniques applied to other things. Why is that a problem? If your technique is good, and your results are valid, then why is it wrong to apply it to anything else?
SavannahMann
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2016
- 14,540
- 6,819
- 365
So you don't think there would be a rise in crime if the police were disbanded? You telling me that you're that much of an idiot....really?I know it doeshahhahahah
1. so if someone attacks you, and you have a pistol, you will let them beat the crap out of you???--because MBrown attacked the cop
..unarmed does not mean not a threat
2. EGarner was resisting---it's his fault
3. you provided no link --let's see it
4. blacks commit murder at 4 times the rate/rape 2 times the rate/crime higher rates--so it appears blacks are being killed at a LOWER rate regarding the crime they commit = interaction with cops
-----if you don't commit crime--guess what !!!!!??? you usually don't come into contact with the police = they CAN'T KILL YOU
5. the big one--you did not refute the OP that brutality is not a problem = 5 times the RATE--not PER YEAR
booom and booom baby!!!
''''16 black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest.''''
''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer.''''
All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides
The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Do you think that makes you sound smart?
...it's an airtight OP
And the OP is an excellent argument for disbanding and defunding Police. Billions of interactions take place between men and women. Millions of consensual sexual encounters. Only a tiny fraction of those encounters are non consensual. So Rape is a statistically insignificant crime. We do not need special units within the police to investigate these statistically insignificant criminal activity.
hundreds of millions of people interact with their banks. Millions do so every day. A Bank Robbery is such a rare occurrence that when compared with the total number of bank visitors it is insignificant. Obviously we do not have a bank robbery problem.
Your statistical model essentially demonstrates that no criminal activity is significant. We can close the prisons and disband the police with no real repercussions. Even if crime doubled. It would still be insignificant. Statistically speaking.
You certainly have removed all doubt about your lack of intellect. But, keep going...it's entertainment.
Well according to the statistical model that our hero has put forth, no it wouldn’t. Even if it doubled, it would still be statistically irrelevant.
Let’s say that for every ten million consensual sexual encounters, there is one rape. Even if that doubled, it would be one rape for every five million consensual encounters. Hardly worth noticing.
Because that is what the OP is doing. He is claiming that you have to view brutality as a tiny fraction of each interaction, or arrest, for the Country. Fine. Then criminal activity must be Viewed in the same standard.
A million people go in and out of banks every day. perhaps one is robbed. That means a one in a million chance of a bank robbery. Even if it doubled, it would be one in five hundred thousand. Hardly worth noticing.
I mean think about it like this. Let‘s say that you build cars. One in five hundred thousand has a problem. That would be exceptional quality control right?
I like this statistical model. I say we use it for everything.
Your hypothesis is nothing but bullshit. Get over itSo you don't think there would be a rise in crime if the police were disbanded? You telling me that you're that much of an idiot....really?I know it doeshahhahahah
1. so if someone attacks you, and you have a pistol, you will let them beat the crap out of you???--because MBrown attacked the cop
..unarmed does not mean not a threat
2. EGarner was resisting---it's his fault
3. you provided no link --let's see it
4. blacks commit murder at 4 times the rate/rape 2 times the rate/crime higher rates--so it appears blacks are being killed at a LOWER rate regarding the crime they commit = interaction with cops
-----if you don't commit crime--guess what !!!!!??? you usually don't come into contact with the police = they CAN'T KILL YOU
5. the big one--you did not refute the OP that brutality is not a problem = 5 times the RATE--not PER YEAR
booom and booom baby!!!
''''16 black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest.''''
''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer.''''
All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides
The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Do you think that makes you sound smart?
...it's an airtight OP
And the OP is an excellent argument for disbanding and defunding Police. Billions of interactions take place between men and women. Millions of consensual sexual encounters. Only a tiny fraction of those encounters are non consensual. So Rape is a statistically insignificant crime. We do not need special units within the police to investigate these statistically insignificant criminal activity.
hundreds of millions of people interact with their banks. Millions do so every day. A Bank Robbery is such a rare occurrence that when compared with the total number of bank visitors it is insignificant. Obviously we do not have a bank robbery problem.
Your statistical model essentially demonstrates that no criminal activity is significant. We can close the prisons and disband the police with no real repercussions. Even if crime doubled. It would still be insignificant. Statistically speaking.
You certainly have removed all doubt about your lack of intellect. But, keep going...it's entertainment.
Well according to the statistical model that our hero has put forth, no it wouldn’t. Even if it doubled, it would still be statistically irrelevant.
Let’s say that for every ten million consensual sexual encounters, there is one rape. Even if that doubled, it would be one rape for every five million consensual encounters. Hardly worth noticing.
Because that is what the OP is doing. He is claiming that you have to view brutality as a tiny fraction of each interaction, or arrest, for the Country. Fine. Then criminal activity must be Viewed in the same standard.
A million people go in and out of banks every day. perhaps one is robbed. That means a one in a million chance of a bank robbery. Even if it doubled, it would be one in five hundred thousand. Hardly worth noticing.
I mean think about it like this. Let‘s say that you build cars. One in five hundred thousand has a problem. That would be exceptional quality control right?
I like this statistical model. I say we use it for everything.
You stupid fuck, they would be replaced.So you don't think there would be a rise in crime if the police were disbanded? You telling me that you're that much of an idiot....really?I know it doeshahhahahah
1. so if someone attacks you, and you have a pistol, you will let them beat the crap out of you???--because MBrown attacked the cop
..unarmed does not mean not a threat
2. EGarner was resisting---it's his fault
3. you provided no link --let's see it
4. blacks commit murder at 4 times the rate/rape 2 times the rate/crime higher rates--so it appears blacks are being killed at a LOWER rate regarding the crime they commit = interaction with cops
-----if you don't commit crime--guess what !!!!!??? you usually don't come into contact with the police = they CAN'T KILL YOU
5. the big one--you did not refute the OP that brutality is not a problem = 5 times the RATE--not PER YEAR
booom and booom baby!!!
''''16 black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest.''''
''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer.''''
All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides
The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Do you think that makes you sound smart?
...it's an airtight OP
And the OP is an excellent argument for disbanding and defunding Police. Billions of interactions take place between men and women. Millions of consensual sexual encounters. Only a tiny fraction of those encounters are non consensual. So Rape is a statistically insignificant crime. We do not need special units within the police to investigate these statistically insignificant criminal activity.
hundreds of millions of people interact with their banks. Millions do so every day. A Bank Robbery is such a rare occurrence that when compared with the total number of bank visitors it is insignificant. Obviously we do not have a bank robbery problem.
Your statistical model essentially demonstrates that no criminal activity is significant. We can close the prisons and disband the police with no real repercussions. Even if crime doubled. It would still be insignificant. Statistically speaking.
You certainly have removed all doubt about your lack of intellect. But, keep going...it's entertainment.
You people keep proving just how fucking stupid Trump supporters rerally are.
Once again, you stupid fuck...comprehension is not your friend. I didn't cite any stats whatsoever.
But, thank you for proving my point. priceless
SavannahMann
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2016
- 14,540
- 6,819
- 365
Your hypothesis is nothing but bullshit. Get over itSo you don't think there would be a rise in crime if the police were disbanded? You telling me that you're that much of an idiot....really?I know it doeshahhahahah
1. so if someone attacks you, and you have a pistol, you will let them beat the crap out of you???--because MBrown attacked the cop
..unarmed does not mean not a threat
2. EGarner was resisting---it's his fault
3. you provided no link --let's see it
4. blacks commit murder at 4 times the rate/rape 2 times the rate/crime higher rates--so it appears blacks are being killed at a LOWER rate regarding the crime they commit = interaction with cops
-----if you don't commit crime--guess what !!!!!??? you usually don't come into contact with the police = they CAN'T KILL YOU
5. the big one--you did not refute the OP that brutality is not a problem = 5 times the RATE--not PER YEAR
booom and booom baby!!!
''''16 black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest.''''
''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer.''''
All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides
The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Do you think that makes you sound smart?
...it's an airtight OP
And the OP is an excellent argument for disbanding and defunding Police. Billions of interactions take place between men and women. Millions of consensual sexual encounters. Only a tiny fraction of those encounters are non consensual. So Rape is a statistically insignificant crime. We do not need special units within the police to investigate these statistically insignificant criminal activity.
hundreds of millions of people interact with their banks. Millions do so every day. A Bank Robbery is such a rare occurrence that when compared with the total number of bank visitors it is insignificant. Obviously we do not have a bank robbery problem.
Your statistical model essentially demonstrates that no criminal activity is significant. We can close the prisons and disband the police with no real repercussions. Even if crime doubled. It would still be insignificant. Statistically speaking.
You certainly have removed all doubt about your lack of intellect. But, keep going...it's entertainment.
Well according to the statistical model that our hero has put forth, no it wouldn’t. Even if it doubled, it would still be statistically irrelevant.
Let’s say that for every ten million consensual sexual encounters, there is one rape. Even if that doubled, it would be one rape for every five million consensual encounters. Hardly worth noticing.
Because that is what the OP is doing. He is claiming that you have to view brutality as a tiny fraction of each interaction, or arrest, for the Country. Fine. Then criminal activity must be Viewed in the same standard.
A million people go in and out of banks every day. perhaps one is robbed. That means a one in a million chance of a bank robbery. Even if it doubled, it would be one in five hundred thousand. Hardly worth noticing.
I mean think about it like this. Let‘s say that you build cars. One in five hundred thousand has a problem. That would be exceptional quality control right?
I like this statistical model. I say we use it for everything.
So it doesn’t work for regular crime. Only Police Britality?
Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,915
- 1,530
That was not the comparison.that's GENIUS--comparing going to the bank with criminalsI know it doeshahhahahah
1. so if someone attacks you, and you have a pistol, you will let them beat the crap out of you???--because MBrown attacked the cop
..unarmed does not mean not a threat
2. EGarner was resisting---it's his fault
3. you provided no link --let's see it
4. blacks commit murder at 4 times the rate/rape 2 times the rate/crime higher rates--so it appears blacks are being killed at a LOWER rate regarding the crime they commit = interaction with cops
-----if you don't commit crime--guess what !!!!!??? you usually don't come into contact with the police = they CAN'T KILL YOU
5. the big one--you did not refute the OP that brutality is not a problem = 5 times the RATE--not PER YEAR
booom and booom baby!!!
''''16 black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest.''''
''''Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from black males than black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male was to be killed by a police officer.''''
All that kneeling ignores the real cause of soaring black homicides
The FBI released its official crime tally for 2016 on Monday, and the data flies in the face of the rhetoric that professional athletes rehearsed in revived Black Lives Matter protests over the wee…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Do you think that makes you sound smart?
...it's an airtight OP
And the OP is an excellent argument for disbanding and defunding Police. Billions of interactions take place between men and women. Millions of consensual sexual encounters. Only a tiny fraction of those encounters are non consensual. So Rape is a statistically insignificant crime. We do not need special units within the police to investigate these statistically insignificant criminal activity.
hundreds of millions of people interact with their banks. Millions do so every day. A Bank Robbery is such a rare occurrence that when compared with the total number of bank visitors it is insignificant. Obviously we do not have a bank robbery problem.
Your statistical model essentially demonstrates that no criminal activity is significant. We can close the prisons and disband the police with no real repercussions. Even if crime doubled. It would still be insignificant. Statistically speaking.
woooooohooooooooo
...STILL--no one has proved the OP wrong = .0003
If you think something is irrelevant because it only happens in a very small percentage of instances then indeed many crimes should be considered irrelevant because they happen in only a very small percentage of interactions between people.
georgephillip
Diamond Member
Why are black Americans more likely to be shot by police than White Americans?
What Research Says About Race and Police Shootings
"In the U.S., African Americans are 2.5 times more likely to be killed by police than white people. For black women, the rate is 1.4 times more likely.
"That’s according to a new study conducted by Frank Edwards, of Rutgers University’s School of Criminal Justice, Hedwig Lee, of Washington University in St. Louis’s Department of Sociology, and Michael Esposito, of the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research.
"The researchers used verified data on police killings from 2013 to 2018 compiled by the website Fatal Encounters, created by Nevada-based journalist D. Brian Burghart.
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-sltrib.s3.amazonaws.com/public/LJBAR33OY5HYFF5Y5VC56AE5ZU.jpg)
"Under their models, they found that roughly 1-in-1,000 black boys and men will be killed by police in their lifetime. For white boys and men, the rate is 39 out of 100,000."
White Supremacist Infiltration of US Police Forces: Fact-Checking National Security Advisor O’Brien
harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,027
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #92
THANK YOUWhy are black Americans more likely to be shot by police than White Americans?
What Research Says About Race and Police Shootings
"In the U.S., African Americans are 2.5 times more likely to be killed by police than white people. For black women, the rate is 1.4 times more likely.
"That’s according to a new study conducted by Frank Edwards, of Rutgers University’s School of Criminal Justice, Hedwig Lee, of Washington University in St. Louis’s Department of Sociology, and Michael Esposito, of the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research.
"The researchers used verified data on police killings from 2013 to 2018 compiled by the website Fatal Encounters, created by Nevada-based journalist D. Brian Burghart.
"Under their models, they found that roughly 1-in-1,000 black boys and men will be killed by police in their lifetime. For white boys and men, the rate is 39 out of 100,000."
White Supremacist Infiltration of US Police Forces: Fact-Checking National Security Advisor O’Brien
so, the blacks murder at FOUR times the rate and rape at 2 times the rate = they are being shot at a LOWER rate than whites!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wwooooooooohooooooooooooooo
georgephillip
Diamond Member
So you believe there are too few unarmed blacks being killed by police?
POLICE KILLING OF BLACKS: Do Black Lives Matter? - Sociology Toolbox
"Data collected by the Washington Post on the use of lethal force by police officers since 2015 indicate that, relative to the proportion of the population, Blacks are over-represented among all those killed by police.
"As is evident in the figure below, (looking at the top blue bar) according to the US Census estimates, Blacks made up 12% of the population.
"However, from 2015 – 2019 they accounted for 26.4% of those that were killed by police under all circumstances."
Can you explain how higher levels of violent crime in black neighborhoods justifies higher numbers of police shootings of unarmed blacks?
Police video of Atlanta shooting shows 'largely peaceful' encounter with fatal ending
harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,027
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #94
2% of the US population is killed by the police????!!!!!??So you believe there are too few unarmed blacks being killed by police?
POLICE KILLING OF BLACKS: Do Black Lives Matter? - Sociology Toolbox
"Data collected by the Washington Post on the use of lethal force by police officers since 2015 indicate that, relative to the proportion of the population, Blacks are over-represented among all those killed by police.
"As is evident in the figure below, (looking at the top blue bar) according to the US Census estimates, Blacks made up 12% of the population.
"However, from 2015 – 2019 they accounted for 26.4% of those that were killed by police under all circumstances."
Can you explain how higher levels of violent crime in black neighborhoods justifies higher numbers of police shootings of unarmed blacks?
Police video of Atlanta shooting shows 'largely peaceful' encounter with fatal ending
harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,027
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #95
sorry, my stats are air tightSo you believe there are too few unarmed blacks being killed by police?
POLICE KILLING OF BLACKS: Do Black Lives Matter? - Sociology Toolbox
"Data collected by the Washington Post on the use of lethal force by police officers since 2015 indicate that, relative to the proportion of the population, Blacks are over-represented among all those killed by police.
"As is evident in the figure below, (looking at the top blue bar) according to the US Census estimates, Blacks made up 12% of the population.
"However, from 2015 – 2019 they accounted for 26.4% of those that were killed by police under all circumstances."
Can you explain how higher levels of violent crime in black neighborhoods justifies higher numbers of police shootings of unarmed blacks?
Police video of Atlanta shooting shows 'largely peaceful' encounter with fatal ending
Mac1958
Diamond Member
Well, we've had "white racism no longer exists" threads, so this one is no surprise.
Everything is just peachy in the alternate universe.
Everything is just peachy in the alternate universe.
candycorn
Diamond Member
Nobody plays the victim more than conservatives in America.
Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,213
- 1,590
Norman In case you don't know it...Mac is playing you like a fiddle.I gave an honest response to the OP, and the OP agreed with me.
The fact that you're so touchy says more about you than me.
He can't play the fiddle. All he can do is follow the crowd to the cliff. Socially constructed reality...
He actually SHOULD watch more Sam Harris, even Harris sees a big problem with the whole situation. But instead Mac will probably call him far right activist.
Mac1958
Diamond Member
Sam Harris is one of my two or three favorite thinkers. I'm a big fan. I've quoted him here many times.Norman In case you don't know it...Mac is playing you like a fiddle.I gave an honest response to the OP, and the OP agreed with me.
The fact that you're so touchy says more about you than me.
He can't play the fiddle. All he can do is follow the crowd.
He actually SHOULD watch more Sam Harris, even he sees a big problem with that and the whole situation. But instead Mac will probably call him far right activist.
Go ahead and tell me his FULL position on this. We'll see how accurate and complete you can be.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
City of San Marcos, Texas Considering Pro Palestinian Resolution- Started by Contumacious
- Replies: 0
-
-
Deranged Liberal boomer threatens Trump White House officials
- Started by DonGlock26
- Replies: 14
-
Trump will not be involved in managing family business as president, company says- Started by berg80
- Replies: 15
-
