There Is No ‘Income Inequality’

[beagle9]

The fundamental problem with all democratic "solutions" is that they still preserve the economic structures that created the inequality to begin with. That is a fancy way of saying they ain't rocking Wall Street's boat.

Bs. For example, back before corporations had the option to move their plants to Mexico, labor could organize and demand a fair wage.

A middle class emerged. But the rich caught back. Slowly from the late 70s to now the rich have been getting richer with their economic policies and the middle class has disappeared

Nafta, invented by bush and fully supported by republicans

Jobs Americans won’t do saved the rich billions and cost the middle class billions

Buying cheap shit from China.

Tax breaks for the rich

Rising healthcare costs

Cuts to social programs.

The rich are doing great. Maga

Not even going to dignify that drivel with a response.
Other than this..For a twelve millionth time....Unions or organized labor, killed itself
Unionists exist in a time that has past.
They think in terms of "we still need typewriters"....They exist in old inefficient smoke stack plants.
Union leaders failed to adjust to technology which allowed productivity by technology to increase while requiring fewer people to produce the work.
Unions in a way are responsible for technological advancements in manufacturing and unions are also partly responsible for the existence of global competition.

Hmmm, who fights the ground wars when not enough troops are home grown for we this United States of America ??? Yes we need good strong men and women who are nurtured and trained to endure great suffering if need be. The Chinese just might have that army, the Ruskies also. Are we this United States of America going to depend on NATO or the United Nations to totally protect our interest in the world now, especially the one where we don't want to be attacked in the future by anyone thinking that we are finally weak enough to do so ? Yes we are courting technology for everything now, but is this going to save us in the future ???

A healthy balance must be kept, and the promotion of our human strength in numbers or in adequate numbers coupled with technology should be kept in every way possible. It can't be just about the bottom line in this country, but the way things are being set up it just might end up that way (thinking only of the bottom lines).

Is this a fair observation or analysis maybe ??

 

[georgephillip]

1.As any observant individual has found, Liberals/Democrats think with their heart, not with their head. Soooo… an effective propaganda tool to win unthinking individuals over, is to simply point out that not everyone has the same income, wealth, material assets.

Boo hoo!

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.




2. But the always perceptive and articulate Bill O’Reilly has a somewhat different….and insightful….take on the issue of income inequality.
Getting right to the heart of the matter, O’Reilly nails it: any inequality in outcome, in terms of wealth, can be traced back to the real problem: parental inequality.




3. “Bad parenting, not capitalism, is the main cause of “income inequality” in America. The left, including liberal educators, media, and politicians will never admit that, but it’s absolutely true.

…begin with education. If a young child is not exposed to learning by age two, that innocent, helpless person is already at risk in a competitive society. If there are no books in the home, no awareness-building games, no fun dialogue with the parents, the child may not develop a curiosity about life.

As the child gets older, parents must participate in the learning process - emphasizing the tremendous importance of academic discipline and monitor school work on a daily basis.

Millions of American parents simply refuse to do that.” Bill O'Reilly: Bill's Weekly Column Archive




4. An example of how fiercely Liberals/Democrats fight this idea: Reading to your children is racist and unfair for all of the other minority children - leftist science.

“Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so.

In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes:

“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,” he said.”
Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others | National Review




What is the result of this sort of Leftist bilge, vis-à-vis the struggle to give every child the same start for success???


Next.

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.

If the bigger house or newer car was obtained by using government to redistribute wealth from the productive many to the parasitic few, you will find many bodies in the gutter on your way to work assuming you're not afraid to look.

"It's Hard To Be Optimistic" - Homeless Population Jumps In L.A. County To Nearly 59,000

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

1.As any observant individual has found, Liberals/Democrats think with their heart, not with their head. Soooo… an effective propaganda tool to win unthinking individuals over, is to simply point out that not everyone has the same income, wealth, material assets.

Boo hoo!

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.




2. But the always perceptive and articulate Bill O’Reilly has a somewhat different….and insightful….take on the issue of income inequality.
Getting right to the heart of the matter, O’Reilly nails it: any inequality in outcome, in terms of wealth, can be traced back to the real problem: parental inequality.




3. “Bad parenting, not capitalism, is the main cause of “income inequality” in America. The left, including liberal educators, media, and politicians will never admit that, but it’s absolutely true.

…begin with education. If a young child is not exposed to learning by age two, that innocent, helpless person is already at risk in a competitive society. If there are no books in the home, no awareness-building games, no fun dialogue with the parents, the child may not develop a curiosity about life.

As the child gets older, parents must participate in the learning process - emphasizing the tremendous importance of academic discipline and monitor school work on a daily basis.

Millions of American parents simply refuse to do that.” Bill O'Reilly: Bill's Weekly Column Archive




4. An example of how fiercely Liberals/Democrats fight this idea: Reading to your children is racist and unfair for all of the other minority children - leftist science.

“Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so.

In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes:

“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,” he said.”
Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others | National Review




What is the result of this sort of Leftist bilge, vis-à-vis the struggle to give every child the same start for success???


Next.

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.

If the bigger house or newer car was obtained by using government to redistribute wealth from the productive many to the parasitic few, you will find many bodies in the gutter on your way to work assuming you're not afraid to look.

"It's Hard To Be Optimistic" - Homeless Population Jumps In L.A. County To Nearly 59,000

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

 

[sealybobo]

1.As any observant individual has found, Liberals/Democrats think with their heart, not with their head. Soooo… an effective propaganda tool to win unthinking individuals over, is to simply point out that not everyone has the same income, wealth, material assets.

Boo hoo!

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.




2. But the always perceptive and articulate Bill O’Reilly has a somewhat different….and insightful….take on the issue of income inequality.
Getting right to the heart of the matter, O’Reilly nails it: any inequality in outcome, in terms of wealth, can be traced back to the real problem: parental inequality.




3. “Bad parenting, not capitalism, is the main cause of “income inequality” in America. The left, including liberal educators, media, and politicians will never admit that, but it’s absolutely true.

…begin with education. If a young child is not exposed to learning by age two, that innocent, helpless person is already at risk in a competitive society. If there are no books in the home, no awareness-building games, no fun dialogue with the parents, the child may not develop a curiosity about life.

As the child gets older, parents must participate in the learning process - emphasizing the tremendous importance of academic discipline and monitor school work on a daily basis.

Millions of American parents simply refuse to do that.” Bill O'Reilly: Bill's Weekly Column Archive




4. An example of how fiercely Liberals/Democrats fight this idea: Reading to your children is racist and unfair for all of the other minority children - leftist science.

“Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so.

In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes:

“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,” he said.”
Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others | National Review




What is the result of this sort of Leftist bilge, vis-à-vis the struggle to give every child the same start for success???


Next.

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.

If the bigger house or newer car was obtained by using government to redistribute wealth from the productive many to the parasitic few, you will find many bodies in the gutter on your way to work assuming you're not afraid to look.

"It's Hard To Be Optimistic" - Homeless Population Jumps In L.A. County To Nearly 59,000

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Yea but millions are not fleeing socialism. Look at Canada, England, Germany, Australia

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

1.As any observant individual has found, Liberals/Democrats think with their heart, not with their head. Soooo… an effective propaganda tool to win unthinking individuals over, is to simply point out that not everyone has the same income, wealth, material assets.

Boo hoo!

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.




2. But the always perceptive and articulate Bill O’Reilly has a somewhat different….and insightful….take on the issue of income inequality.
Getting right to the heart of the matter, O’Reilly nails it: any inequality in outcome, in terms of wealth, can be traced back to the real problem: parental inequality.




3. “Bad parenting, not capitalism, is the main cause of “income inequality” in America. The left, including liberal educators, media, and politicians will never admit that, but it’s absolutely true.

…begin with education. If a young child is not exposed to learning by age two, that innocent, helpless person is already at risk in a competitive society. If there are no books in the home, no awareness-building games, no fun dialogue with the parents, the child may not develop a curiosity about life.

As the child gets older, parents must participate in the learning process - emphasizing the tremendous importance of academic discipline and monitor school work on a daily basis.

Millions of American parents simply refuse to do that.” Bill O'Reilly: Bill's Weekly Column Archive




4. An example of how fiercely Liberals/Democrats fight this idea: Reading to your children is racist and unfair for all of the other minority children - leftist science.

“Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so.

In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes:

“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,” he said.”
Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others | National Review




What is the result of this sort of Leftist bilge, vis-à-vis the struggle to give every child the same start for success???


Next.

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.

If the bigger house or newer car was obtained by using government to redistribute wealth from the productive many to the parasitic few, you will find many bodies in the gutter on your way to work assuming you're not afraid to look.

"It's Hard To Be Optimistic" - Homeless Population Jumps In L.A. County To Nearly 59,000

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Yea but millions are not fleeing socialism. Look at Canada, England, Germany, Australia

No socialism in Venezuela?

 

[sealybobo]

If the bigger house or newer car was obtained by using government to redistribute wealth from the productive many to the parasitic few, you will find many bodies in the gutter on your way to work assuming you're not afraid to look.

"It's Hard To Be Optimistic" - Homeless Population Jumps In L.A. County To Nearly 59,000

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Yea but millions are not fleeing socialism. Look at Canada, England, Germany, Australia

No socialism in Venezuela?

Yea but what about Canada, England, Germany, Australia?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Yea but millions are not fleeing socialism. Look at Canada, England, Germany, Australia

No socialism in Venezuela?

Yea but what about Canada, England, Germany, Australia?

What about them?

 

[sealybobo]

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Yea but millions are not fleeing socialism. Look at Canada, England, Germany, Australia

No socialism in Venezuela?

Yea but what about Canada, England, Germany, Australia?

What about them?

You said millions still fleeing Commie countries. I said Yea but millions are not fleeing socialism. Look at Canada, England, Germany, Australia

You came back with No socialism in Venezuela?

And I said yea but what about Canada, England, Germany, Australia?

No one is fleeing those socialist countries. Does that mean socialism is good? I admit some socialism is good like public schools and social security and medicare.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Yea but millions are not fleeing socialism. Look at Canada, England, Germany, Australia

No socialism in Venezuela?

Yea but what about Canada, England, Germany, Australia?

What about them?

You said millions still fleeing Commie countries. I said Yea but millions are not fleeing socialism. Look at Canada, England, Germany, Australia

You came back with No socialism in Venezuela?

And I said yea but what about Canada, England, Germany, Australia?

No one is fleeing those socialist countries. Does that mean socialism is good? I admit some socialism is good like public schools and social security and medicare.

You said millions still fleeing Commie countries.

In response to the moron's post about Venezuela, the latest Commie success story.

I said Yea but millions are not fleeing socialism.

So what?

No one is fleeing those socialist countries.

Remember when the Beatles all left England? That was cool!

 

[georgephillip]

1.As any observant individual has found, Liberals/Democrats think with their heart, not with their head. Soooo… an effective propaganda tool to win unthinking individuals over, is to simply point out that not everyone has the same income, wealth, material assets.

Boo hoo!

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.




2. But the always perceptive and articulate Bill O’Reilly has a somewhat different….and insightful….take on the issue of income inequality.
Getting right to the heart of the matter, O’Reilly nails it: any inequality in outcome, in terms of wealth, can be traced back to the real problem: parental inequality.




3. “Bad parenting, not capitalism, is the main cause of “income inequality” in America. The left, including liberal educators, media, and politicians will never admit that, but it’s absolutely true.

…begin with education. If a young child is not exposed to learning by age two, that innocent, helpless person is already at risk in a competitive society. If there are no books in the home, no awareness-building games, no fun dialogue with the parents, the child may not develop a curiosity about life.

As the child gets older, parents must participate in the learning process - emphasizing the tremendous importance of academic discipline and monitor school work on a daily basis.

Millions of American parents simply refuse to do that.” Bill O'Reilly: Bill's Weekly Column Archive




4. An example of how fiercely Liberals/Democrats fight this idea: Reading to your children is racist and unfair for all of the other minority children - leftist science.

“Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so.

In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes:

“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,” he said.”
Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others | National Review




What is the result of this sort of Leftist bilge, vis-à-vis the struggle to give every child the same start for success???


Next.

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.

If the bigger house or newer car was obtained by using government to redistribute wealth from the productive many to the parasitic few, you will find many bodies in the gutter on your way to work assuming you're not afraid to look.

"It's Hard To Be Optimistic" - Homeless Population Jumps In L.A. County To Nearly 59,000

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Where's Juan, Pussy-Grabber?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

"Reuters correctly notes that 'the 35-year old (Guaido) had risen to prominence three months before,' though a little more background information would have been helpful.

"For instance, Guaido was unknown to 81% of Venezuelans a little more than a week before he got a telephone call from US Vice President Pence telling him to declare himself interim president of Venezuela, which Guaido dutifully did the following morning at a street rally flanked with US and Israeli flags.

"A member of a marginal far-right Venezuelan political party, Guaidó was not even in the top leadership of his own grouplet"

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

1.As any observant individual has found, Liberals/Democrats think with their heart, not with their head. Soooo… an effective propaganda tool to win unthinking individuals over, is to simply point out that not everyone has the same income, wealth, material assets.

Boo hoo!

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.




2. But the always perceptive and articulate Bill O’Reilly has a somewhat different….and insightful….take on the issue of income inequality.
Getting right to the heart of the matter, O’Reilly nails it: any inequality in outcome, in terms of wealth, can be traced back to the real problem: parental inequality.




3. “Bad parenting, not capitalism, is the main cause of “income inequality” in America. The left, including liberal educators, media, and politicians will never admit that, but it’s absolutely true.

…begin with education. If a young child is not exposed to learning by age two, that innocent, helpless person is already at risk in a competitive society. If there are no books in the home, no awareness-building games, no fun dialogue with the parents, the child may not develop a curiosity about life.

As the child gets older, parents must participate in the learning process - emphasizing the tremendous importance of academic discipline and monitor school work on a daily basis.

Millions of American parents simply refuse to do that.” Bill O'Reilly: Bill's Weekly Column Archive




4. An example of how fiercely Liberals/Democrats fight this idea: Reading to your children is racist and unfair for all of the other minority children - leftist science.

“Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others According to a professor at the University of Warwick in England, parents who read to their kids should be thinking about how they’re “unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children” by doing so.

In an interview with ABC Radio last week, philosopher and professor Adam Swift said that since “bedtime stories activities . . . do indeed foster and produce . . . [desired] familial relationship goods,” he wouldn’t want to ban them, but that parents who “engage in bedtime-stories activities” should definitely at least feel kinda bad about it sometimes:

“I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally,” he said.”
Professor: If You Read To Your Kids, You’re ‘Unfairly Disadvantaging’ Others | National Review




What is the result of this sort of Leftist bilge, vis-à-vis the struggle to give every child the same start for success???


Next.

My usual perspective, is ‘so what’??? There is no real poverty, that is poverty in the Dickensian sense in America….you’ve never had to step over bodies in the gutter on your way to work….if another’s home is bigger or their car is newer, that is no one else’s business, and certainly not government’s.

If the bigger house or newer car was obtained by using government to redistribute wealth from the productive many to the parasitic few, you will find many bodies in the gutter on your way to work assuming you're not afraid to look.

"It's Hard To Be Optimistic" - Homeless Population Jumps In L.A. County To Nearly 59,000

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Where's Juan, Pussy-Grabber?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

"Reuters correctly notes that 'the 35-year old (Guaido) had risen to prominence three months before,' though a little more background information would have been helpful.

"For instance, Guaido was unknown to 81% of Venezuelans a little more than a week before he got a telephone call from US Vice President Pence telling him to declare himself interim president of Venezuela, which Guaido dutifully did the following morning at a street rally flanked with US and Israeli flags.

"A member of a marginal far-right Venezuelan political party, Guaidó was not even in the top leadership of his own grouplet"

I'm glad to hear that Venezuelans no longer have to eat out of the trash.

All hail Maduro!
The last fat person in Venezuela!!!

 

[georgephillip]

If the bigger house or newer car was obtained by using government to redistribute wealth from the productive many to the parasitic few, you will find many bodies in the gutter on your way to work assuming you're not afraid to look.

"It's Hard To Be Optimistic" - Homeless Population Jumps In L.A. County To Nearly 59,000

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

They don't have those problems in the Worker's Paradise of Venezuela, eh comrade?

What's your boy Juan up to these days, Kulak?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Millions still fleeing Commie prosperity?

Is Maduro still a fat fuck?

Where's Juan, Pussy-Grabber?

Reuters between the Lines: US Puppet President of Venezuela Is Toast

"Reuters correctly notes that 'the 35-year old (Guaido) had risen to prominence three months before,' though a little more background information would have been helpful.

"For instance, Guaido was unknown to 81% of Venezuelans a little more than a week before he got a telephone call from US Vice President Pence telling him to declare himself interim president of Venezuela, which Guaido dutifully did the following morning at a street rally flanked with US and Israeli flags.

"A member of a marginal far-right Venezuelan political party, Guaidó was not even in the top leadership of his own grouplet"

I'm glad to hear that Venezuelans no longer have to eat out of the trash.

All hail Maduro!
The last fat person in Venezuela!!!

I'm glad to hear that Venezuelans no longer have to eat out of the trash.

All hail Maduro!
The last fat person in Venezuela!!

Here's a fat fuck Venezuela is welcome to

When are you leaving/

 

[Dragonlady]

[Q


Income equality means that when wages go up, everybody's wages go up. If management gets a 10%, workers get a 10% raise. wage, and I don't think that I'll be patroniziing any burger joint that has robots making my burgers either.

Why?

What if management contributes more to the profitability of the company than some worker doing mundane repetitive jobs?

Let the labor market determine the worth of the hourly worker and the worth of the CEO. Keep the friggin government out of it.

I am not concerned about income equality. It is none of my business what other people make. I am not greedy and I am not envious. I don't need the friggin government to help me out by taking money away from other people and giving it to me.

There will never be income equality because some people are productive and some people are lazy.

When I was busting my ass in Engineering school studying all hours and giving up doing things I would rather be doing some of my friends were partying.

Why should the government try to equalize me and my partying friends? Shouldn't they reap reap the rewards of being sorry? Shouldn't I reap the rewards of learning something that gave me a much higher paying job?

The government isn't trying to have everyone paid the same. If your employer thinks you're more valuable, you'll be paid more. But the harsh reality is that companies budget a wage for every position, and even if your coworkers are showing up late, spending all day on the phone and doing half the work you do, they're going to get the same pay, because that's how companies roll these days. The job pays X, you don't like it leave. 10 people will line up to replace you.

We're trying to ensure that every worker who works 40 hour weeks, is paid a living wage, and that government isn't being forced to subsidize low prices by giving welfare to full time employees.

The government has to collect taxes, process applications and then pay the benefits. Increasing wages eliminates these expenses and reduces taxes.

The friggin government doesn't need to be concerned about a "living wage". That should between the employer and the employee. If the proposed pay is not enough and nobody takes the job then employer will have to pay more.

The government needs to stay out of our lives and trying to interfere with everything.

What increases wages is not government interference but productivity. As an Engineer I tried to make myself as productive as possible and got paid well for it.

We see what is happening all over the country with mandated minimum wage laws. People are losing their jobs. The government always screws up everything, doesn't it?

There are more low wage workers than jobs, so there will always be someone desperate enough to take whatever money is offered, and then try to find a second job, or a third, or get food stamps. This is no way for parents to live, and no way for their children to be raised.

Conservatives believe that children growing up healthier and stronger with a stay at home Mom taking full time care of them. Except if your family is poor. Then moms need to get out to work, and get a second job if necessary, to keep from being a parasite on society.