There Are Two Sexes. Male and Female. Period.

[Penelope]

new school...let nature decide...allow the child to develop and choice...

Again this is NEVER what we're talking about.

We are discussing a TROUBLED 60 year old MAN who wants to feel "PRETTY" so he dresses up as a woman and calls himself "Caitlin" and demands everyone else ignore reality and pretend he's a woman.

Democrats like grooming little boys to wear short dresses.

 

[Weatherman2020]

new school...let nature decide...allow the child to develop and choice...

Again this is NEVER what we're talking about.

We are discussing a TROUBLED 60 year old MAN who wants to feel "PRETTY" so he dresses up as a woman and calls himself "Caitlin" and demands everyone else ignore reality and pretend he's a woman.

Democrats like grooming little boys to wear short dresses.

View attachment 452394

I double dog dare you to call a Scott a transvestite to their face.

 

[Penelope]

new school...let nature decide...allow the child to develop and choice...

Again this is NEVER what we're talking about.

We are discussing a TROUBLED 60 year old MAN who wants to feel "PRETTY" so he dresses up as a woman and calls himself "Caitlin" and demands everyone else ignore reality and pretend he's a woman.

Democrats like grooming little boys to wear short dresses.

View attachment 452394

I double dog dare you to call a Scott a transvestite to their face.

Historian Jo Paoletti says that before the World Wars, children were dressed in white dresses like these with white diapers (cloth or other material wrapped around a baby’s or young child’s bottom for going to the bathroom) for convenience. It was easier to change children’s diapers when they were wearing a dress, and the color white allowed for bleaching (the use of a chemical to make fabric white if it gets dirty or stained).

Both the wearing of the white dresses and the long hair were typical (normal) until age six or seven, when children had their first haircut. Believe it or not, this outfit (set of clothing and accessories) was considered gender-neutral (not indicating whether a person is male or female).

Why is President Franklin D. Roosevelt Wearing a Dress? | by New Age Cinematics | Medium
------------------------------------------------

I double dog dare you to call a Scott a transvestite to their face.

some probably are!!

 

[AMart]

Y'all do know people are born with both sex organs

Very rare.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I identify as a swedish american. I was born here in the US but my dna is my dna. Dna is who who we are.

DNA is part of who we are. Culture and life experience are the other part. My sister just got the results from her DNA ancestry test. We are 75% British, 20% Scandinavian, and the other 5% is DNA "noise", the random trace elements that show up on everyone's DNA. But culturally, we are neither British nor Scandinavian; we are American, specifically Southern American. We've been here too long for "British" to have any meaning to us whatsoever, except that we all need to wear heavy-duty sunblock when we go outside.

The DNA part, however, is still irrefutable. I can make cultural differentiations between myself and a person who actually lives in Great Britain all day long - and have them be quite valid - but I can't decide that, because I don't "feel" British and Scandinavian, I am really black or Asian or Native American. Likewise, a man who is "transgender" can differentiate all day long between himself and men who are comfortable and happy being men - and maybe even be quite valid - but that still doesn't make him correct in declaring that he's "really" a woman.

 

[Cecilie1200]

No plethora of genders or sexes.

Correct. 2 genders.

Boy, the rabbid left is going to destroy you!

The fact that this is a topic that is actually being debates bodes ill for the world.

The fact that you think debate "bodes ill for the world" bodes ill for the world.

 

[candycorn]

No plethora of genders or sexes.

Correct. 2 genders.

Boy, the rabbid left is going to destroy you!

The fact that this is a topic that is actually being debates bodes ill for the world.

The fact that you think debate "bodes ill for the world" bodes ill for the world.

There is a debate about how many genders there are, Smoky? Those 4,000 chemicals you inhale in every puff have made you dumber.

 

[Cecilie1200]

It's the parents job to raise their kids not mine. Out of my control, NOT my responsibility. So yes not on my priority list. I worry about my own. It's called personal responsibility.

There's a big difference between personal responsibility and having the mistaken notion that you are some sort of island, totally divorced from the society around you and absolved of any need to do the right thing unless you personally benefit. THAT attitude is called "being a sociopath".

Pick an issue you actually DO worry about, because it personally affects you, and then ask yourself if you have a hope in hell of protecting your rights on that issue all by yourself, without the support of people who - fortunately for you - don't take the self-absorbed, navel-gazing attitude you do.

 

[Cecilie1200]

No plethora of genders or sexes.

Correct. 2 genders.

Boy, the rabbid left is going to destroy you!

The fact that this is a topic that is actually being debates bodes ill for the world.

The fact that you think debate "bodes ill for the world" bodes ill for the world.

There is a debate about how many genders there are, Smoky? Those 4,000 chemicals you inhale in every puff have made you dumber.

There is a debate about how many genders there are, Cornball, because anencephalic dimwits like you insist you can invent them simply by wishing really hard. There shouldn't be, but unfortunately, fools like you have been encouraged to be proud of your stupidity, rather than justifiably ashamed and humiliated.

And everyone's laughing at YOU trying to denigrate my intelligence and pass moral judgements, just so you know. Yeah, vaping is SOOO bad and makes people dumber . . . coming from the vacuum-skulled vagina on legs who wants to tell us that biological science changes according to people's emotions.

Maybe you should START vaping, and see if it can bring you up to my IQ range.

 

[candycorn]

No plethora of genders or sexes.

Correct. 2 genders.

Boy, the rabbid left is going to destroy you!

The fact that this is a topic that is actually being debates bodes ill for the world.

The fact that you think debate "bodes ill for the world" bodes ill for the world.

There is a debate about how many genders there are, Smoky? Those 4,000 chemicals you inhale in every puff have made you dumber.

There is a debate about how many genders there are, Cornball, because anencephalic dimwits like you insist you can invent them simply by wishing really hard. There shouldn't be, but unfortunately, fools like you have been encouraged to be proud of your stupidity, rather than justifiably ashamed and humiliated.

And everyone's laughing at YOU trying to denigrate my intelligence and pass moral judgements, just so you know. Yeah, vaping is SOOO bad and makes people dumber . . . coming from the vacuum-skulled vagina on legs who wants to tell us that biological science changes according to people's emotions.

Maybe you should START vaping, and see if it can bring you up to my IQ range.

Wow, you daft *****...I am the one saying there are 2 genders shit brains. **** off.

 

[zaangalewa]

... If an autopsy is done on a dead body, the report will list one of two sexes on the report. Based upon Chromosomes ...

Not necessarily. In some cases the second chromosome is missed. The result is able to be in this case XX (female), XY (male) and X_ (intersexual).

 

[zaangalewa]

Y'all do know people are born with both sex organs

Those are genetic defects. That's not what we're talking about

I guess you try to discuss about that it exists only a female sex and a male sex (and no sex). Biologically realized is in this case both: male+female.

 

[zaangalewa]

I identify as a swedish american. I was born here in the US but my dna is my dna. Dna is who who we are.

DNA is part of who we are. Culture and life experience are the other part. My sister just got the results from her DNA ancestry test. We are 75% British, 20% Scandinavian, and the other 5% is DNA "noise", the random trace elements that show up on everyone's DNA. But culturally, we are neither British nor Scandinavian; we are American, specifically Southern American. We've been here too long for "British" to have any meaning to us whatsoever, except that we all need to wear heavy-duty sunblock when we go outside.

And where did your ancestors come from? Germany?

The DNA part, however, is still irrefutable. I can make cultural differentiations between myself and a person who actually lives in Great Britain all day long - and have them be quite valid - but I can't decide that, because I don't "feel" British and Scandinavian, I am really black or Asian or Native American.

You are able to become a "native American" - some Germans for example became "native Americans", this has nothing to do with genetics - ... and okay ... in a similar way this could work also with Asians and Negroes. You could be a reborn Negroe in the body of a Scando-Brit in America for example.

Likewise, a man who is "transgender" can differentiate all day long between himself and men who are comfortable and happy being men - and maybe even be quite valid - but that still doesn't make him correct in declaring that he's "really" a woman.

And what if someone is really a reborn woman for example in the body of a man?

 

[Cecilie1200]

I identify as a swedish american. I was born here in the US but my dna is my dna. Dna is who who we are.

DNA is part of who we are. Culture and life experience are the other part. My sister just got the results from her DNA ancestry test. We are 75% British, 20% Scandinavian, and the other 5% is DNA "noise", the random trace elements that show up on everyone's DNA. But culturally, we are neither British nor Scandinavian; we are American, specifically Southern American. We've been here too long for "British" to have any meaning to us whatsoever, except that we all need to wear heavy-duty sunblock when we go outside.

And where did your ancestors come from? Germany?

The DNA part, however, is still irrefutable. I can make cultural differentiations between myself and a person who actually lives in Great Britain all day long - and have them be quite valid - but I can't decide that, because I don't "feel" British and Scandinavian, I am really black or Asian or Native American.

You are able to become a "native American" - some Germans for example became "native Americans", this has nothing to do with genetics - ... and okay ... in a similar way this could work also with Asians and Negroes. You could be a reborn Negroe in the body of a Scando-Brit in America for example.

Likewise, a man who is "transgender" can differentiate all day long between himself and men who are comfortable and happy being men - and maybe even be quite valid - but that still doesn't make him correct in declaring that he's "really" a woman.

And what if someone is really a reborn woman for example in the body of a man?

Sorry, are you deliberately misunderstanding the words here?

I am not "able to become" Native American or any other racial/ethnic group. Maybe Germans were able to be adopted into tribes 200 years ago, I have no idea, but THAT isn't even a possibility today. And even if I preferred and identified with Native American culture, that would in no way change the fact that, biologically, I'm still whiter than sour cream. Likewise, a biological male can prefer wearing makeup and dresses all he wants, but he's still gonna be a man.

There is no such thing as "a reborn woman in the body of a man". There is only a man with some unusual preferences and behaviors.

 

[zaangalewa]

I identify as a swedish american. I was born here in the US but my dna is my dna. Dna is who who we are.

DNA is part of who we are. Culture and life experience are the other part. My sister just got the results from her DNA ancestry test. We are 75% British, 20% Scandinavian, and the other 5% is DNA "noise", the random trace elements that show up on everyone's DNA. But culturally, we are neither British nor Scandinavian; we are American, specifically Southern American. We've been here too long for "British" to have any meaning to us whatsoever, except that we all need to wear heavy-duty sunblock when we go outside.

And where did your ancestors come from? Germany?

The DNA part, however, is still irrefutable. I can make cultural differentiations between myself and a person who actually lives in Great Britain all day long - and have them be quite valid - but I can't decide that, because I don't "feel" British and Scandinavian, I am really black or Asian or Native American.

You are able to become a "native American" - some Germans for example became "native Americans", this has nothing to do with genetics - ... and okay ... in a similar way this could work also with Asians and Negroes. You could be a reborn Negroe in the body of a Scando-Brit in America for example.

Likewise, a man who is "transgender" can differentiate all day long between himself and men who are comfortable and happy being men - and maybe even be quite valid - but that still doesn't make him correct in declaring that he's "really" a woman.

And what if someone is really a reborn woman for example in the body of a man?

Sorry, are you deliberately misunderstanding the words here?

I am not "able to become" Native American or any other racial/ethnic group. Maybe Germans were able to be adopted into tribes 200 years ago ...

I guess you are right - you personally are not able to become a Red Indian. But this has nothing to do with your Celtic and/or Germanic genes from the North of Europe. You don't understand foreign cultures, that's all. I know from two Germans, who became Red Indians in the 20th century. That's not a problem - it's wonderful that such things are able to happen. In the end we are all sisters and brothers.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I identify as a swedish american. I was born here in the US but my dna is my dna. Dna is who who we are.

DNA is part of who we are. Culture and life experience are the other part. My sister just got the results from her DNA ancestry test. We are 75% British, 20% Scandinavian, and the other 5% is DNA "noise", the random trace elements that show up on everyone's DNA. But culturally, we are neither British nor Scandinavian; we are American, specifically Southern American. We've been here too long for "British" to have any meaning to us whatsoever, except that we all need to wear heavy-duty sunblock when we go outside.

And where did your ancestors come from? Germany?

The DNA part, however, is still irrefutable. I can make cultural differentiations between myself and a person who actually lives in Great Britain all day long - and have them be quite valid - but I can't decide that, because I don't "feel" British and Scandinavian, I am really black or Asian or Native American.

You are able to become a "native American" - some Germans for example became "native Americans", this has nothing to do with genetics - ... and okay ... in a similar way this could work also with Asians and Negroes. You could be a reborn Negroe in the body of a Scando-Brit in America for example.

Likewise, a man who is "transgender" can differentiate all day long between himself and men who are comfortable and happy being men - and maybe even be quite valid - but that still doesn't make him correct in declaring that he's "really" a woman.

And what if someone is really a reborn woman for example in the body of a man?

Sorry, are you deliberately misunderstanding the words here?

I am not "able to become" Native American or any other racial/ethnic group. Maybe Germans were able to be adopted into tribes 200 years ago ...

I guess you are right - you personally are not able to become a Red Indian. But this has nothing to do with your Celtic and/or Germanic genes from the North of Europe. You don't understand foreign cultures, that's all. I know from two Germans, who became Red Indians in the 20th century. That's not a problem - it's wonderful that such things are able to happen. In the end we are all sisters and brothers.

For the record, I have no Germanic genes at all. And I understand as much about foreign cultures as I can from the perspective of not being part of them . . . about the way people understand the culture of Southern Americans without actually being one.

I'm really not saying anything that's controversial or insulting. Some things are cultural, and some things are not. Femaleness is not a "culture"; it's genetic. It's not something you can join. You either are, or you are not.

 

[zaangalewa]

I identify as a swedish american. I was born here in the US but my dna is my dna. Dna is who who we are.

DNA is part of who we are. Culture and life experience are the other part. My sister just got the results from her DNA ancestry test. We are 75% British, 20% Scandinavian, and the other 5% is DNA "noise", the random trace elements that show up on everyone's DNA. But culturally, we are neither British nor Scandinavian; we are American, specifically Southern American. We've been here too long for "British" to have any meaning to us whatsoever, except that we all need to wear heavy-duty sunblock when we go outside.

And where did your ancestors come from? Germany?

The DNA part, however, is still irrefutable. I can make cultural differentiations between myself and a person who actually lives in Great Britain all day long - and have them be quite valid - but I can't decide that, because I don't "feel" British and Scandinavian, I am really black or Asian or Native American.

You are able to become a "native American" - some Germans for example became "native Americans", this has nothing to do with genetics - ... and okay ... in a similar way this could work also with Asians and Negroes. You could be a reborn Negroe in the body of a Scando-Brit in America for example.

Likewise, a man who is "transgender" can differentiate all day long between himself and men who are comfortable and happy being men - and maybe even be quite valid - but that still doesn't make him correct in declaring that he's "really" a woman.

And what if someone is really a reborn woman for example in the body of a man?

Sorry, are you deliberately misunderstanding the words here?

I am not "able to become" Native American or any other racial/ethnic group. Maybe Germans were able to be adopted into tribes 200 years ago ...

I guess you are right - you personally are not able to become a Red Indian. But this has nothing to do with your Celtic and/or Germanic genes from the North of Europe. You don't understand foreign cultures, that's all. I know from two Germans, who became Red Indians in the 20th century. That's not a problem - it's wonderful that such things are able to happen. In the end we are all sisters and brothers.

For the record, I have no Germanic genes at all. And I understand as much about foreign cultures as I can from the perspective of not being part of them . . . about the way people understand the culture of Southern Americans without actually being one.

In both cases I spoke about North America.

I'm really not saying anything that's controversial or insulting. Some things are cultural, and some things are not. Femaleness is not a "culture"; it's genetic. It's not something you can join. You either are, or you are not.

Okay. So you are genetically a Scandinavian Brit (Norman + Celt) but you have nothing to do with Germanics (Anglo-Saxons, Franconians). Your culture is exclusivelly only American - whatever this is. Everything else is strange to you. And men are men - women are women. And who has problems in this context has this problems because of genetical defects.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I identify as a swedish american. I was born here in the US but my dna is my dna. Dna is who who we are.

DNA is part of who we are. Culture and life experience are the other part. My sister just got the results from her DNA ancestry test. We are 75% British, 20% Scandinavian, and the other 5% is DNA "noise", the random trace elements that show up on everyone's DNA. But culturally, we are neither British nor Scandinavian; we are American, specifically Southern American. We've been here too long for "British" to have any meaning to us whatsoever, except that we all need to wear heavy-duty sunblock when we go outside.

And where did your ancestors come from? Germany?

The DNA part, however, is still irrefutable. I can make cultural differentiations between myself and a person who actually lives in Great Britain all day long - and have them be quite valid - but I can't decide that, because I don't "feel" British and Scandinavian, I am really black or Asian or Native American.

You are able to become a "native American" - some Germans for example became "native Americans", this has nothing to do with genetics - ... and okay ... in a similar way this could work also with Asians and Negroes. You could be a reborn Negroe in the body of a Scando-Brit in America for example.

Likewise, a man who is "transgender" can differentiate all day long between himself and men who are comfortable and happy being men - and maybe even be quite valid - but that still doesn't make him correct in declaring that he's "really" a woman.

And what if someone is really a reborn woman for example in the body of a man?

Sorry, are you deliberately misunderstanding the words here?

I am not "able to become" Native American or any other racial/ethnic group. Maybe Germans were able to be adopted into tribes 200 years ago ...

I guess you are right - you personally are not able to become a Red Indian. But this has nothing to do with your Celtic and/or Germanic genes from the North of Europe. You don't understand foreign cultures, that's all. I know from two Germans, who became Red Indians in the 20th century. That's not a problem - it's wonderful that such things are able to happen. In the end we are all sisters and brothers.

For the record, I have no Germanic genes at all. And I understand as much about foreign cultures as I can from the perspective of not being part of them . . . about the way people understand the culture of Southern Americans without actually being one.

I'm really not saying anything that's controversial or insulting. Some things are cultural, and some things are not. Femaleness is not a "culture"; it's genetic. It's not something you can join. You either are, or you are not.

Okay. So you are genetically a Scandinavian Brit (Norman + Anglo-Saxon + Celt) but you have nothing to do with Germanics. Your culture is exclusivelly only American - whatever this is. Everything else is strange to you. And men are men - women are women. And who has problems in this context has this problems because of genetical defects.

Nope. You went off the rails right around the time you didn't know how to spell "exclusively". My culture is Southern American, which very much is a specific and unique thing. And I never said "everything else is strange to me"; you projected that in there yourself. Everything else is NOT MINE. I can see it around me; I can appreciate and enjoy it. But I'm not actually part of it, which is perfectly okay. And even if I could become part of something culturally - which is possible in many cases - I can't become part of things biologically that I'm not already part of. I could move to Mexico, learn to speak Spanish fluently with an identical accent, get involved with the community, know the city and the history and the culture as well as anyone there - be part of the culture. But I would still be white.

And yes, men are men and women are women, because those are BIOLOGICAL.

 

[zaangalewa]

I identify as a swedish american. I was born here in the US but my dna is my dna. Dna is who who we are.

DNA is part of who we are. Culture and life experience are the other part. My sister just got the results from her DNA ancestry test. We are 75% British, 20% Scandinavian, and the other 5% is DNA "noise", the random trace elements that show up on everyone's DNA. But culturally, we are neither British nor Scandinavian; we are American, specifically Southern American. We've been here too long for "British" to have any meaning to us whatsoever, except that we all need to wear heavy-duty sunblock when we go outside.

And where did your ancestors come from? Germany?

The DNA part, however, is still irrefutable. I can make cultural differentiations between myself and a person who actually lives in Great Britain all day long - and have them be quite valid - but I can't decide that, because I don't "feel" British and Scandinavian, I am really black or Asian or Native American.

You are able to become a "native American" - some Germans for example became "native Americans", this has nothing to do with genetics - ... and okay ... in a similar way this could work also with Asians and Negroes. You could be a reborn Negroe in the body of a Scando-Brit in America for example.

Likewise, a man who is "transgender" can differentiate all day long between himself and men who are comfortable and happy being men - and maybe even be quite valid - but that still doesn't make him correct in declaring that he's "really" a woman.

And what if someone is really a reborn woman for example in the body of a man?

Sorry, are you deliberately misunderstanding the words here?

I am not "able to become" Native American or any other racial/ethnic group. Maybe Germans were able to be adopted into tribes 200 years ago ...

I guess you are right - you personally are not able to become a Red Indian. But this has nothing to do with your Celtic and/or Germanic genes from the North of Europe. You don't understand foreign cultures, that's all. I know from two Germans, who became Red Indians in the 20th century. That's not a problem - it's wonderful that such things are able to happen. In the end we are all sisters and brothers.

For the record, I have no Germanic genes at all. And I understand as much about foreign cultures as I can from the perspective of not being part of them . . . about the way people understand the culture of Southern Americans without actually being one.

I'm really not saying anything that's controversial or insulting. Some things are cultural, and some things are not. Femaleness is not a "culture"; it's genetic. It's not something you can join. You either are, or you are not.

Okay. So you are genetically a Scandinavian Brit (Norman + Anglo-Saxon + Celt) but you have nothing to do with Germanics. Your culture is exclusivelly only American - whatever this is. Everything else is strange to you. And men are men - women are women. And who has problems in this context has this problems because of genetical defects.

Nope. You went off the rails right around the time you didn't know how to spell "exclusively". My culture is Southern American, which very much is a specific and unique thing.

?

And I never said "everything else is strange to me";

You said: "And I understand as much about foreign cultures as I can from the perspective of not being part of them"

you projected that in there yourself. Everything else is NOT MINE. I can see it around me; I can appreciate and enjoy it. But I'm not actually part of it, which is perfectly okay. And even if I could become part of something culturally - which is possible in many cases - I can't become part of things biologically that I'm not already part of. I could move to Mexico, learn to speak Spanish fluently with an identical accent, get involved with the community, know the city and the history and the culture as well as anyone there - be part of the culture. But I would still be white.

More concrete you think your ancestors were exclusivelly Normans and Celts - but not Anglo-Saxons or Frankonians or Romans.

And yes, men are men and women are women, because those are BIOLOGICAL.

Aha. In a scale from 1 to 10 - how good do you think is your biological knowledge?

 

[Cecilie1200]

I identify as a swedish american. I was born here in the US but my dna is my dna. Dna is who who we are.

DNA is part of who we are. Culture and life experience are the other part. My sister just got the results from her DNA ancestry test. We are 75% British, 20% Scandinavian, and the other 5% is DNA "noise", the random trace elements that show up on everyone's DNA. But culturally, we are neither British nor Scandinavian; we are American, specifically Southern American. We've been here too long for "British" to have any meaning to us whatsoever, except that we all need to wear heavy-duty sunblock when we go outside.

And where did your ancestors come from? Germany?

The DNA part, however, is still irrefutable. I can make cultural differentiations between myself and a person who actually lives in Great Britain all day long - and have them be quite valid - but I can't decide that, because I don't "feel" British and Scandinavian, I am really black or Asian or Native American.

You are able to become a "native American" - some Germans for example became "native Americans", this has nothing to do with genetics - ... and okay ... in a similar way this could work also with Asians and Negroes. You could be a reborn Negroe in the body of a Scando-Brit in America for example.

Likewise, a man who is "transgender" can differentiate all day long between himself and men who are comfortable and happy being men - and maybe even be quite valid - but that still doesn't make him correct in declaring that he's "really" a woman.

And what if someone is really a reborn woman for example in the body of a man?

Sorry, are you deliberately misunderstanding the words here?

I am not "able to become" Native American or any other racial/ethnic group. Maybe Germans were able to be adopted into tribes 200 years ago ...

I guess you are right - you personally are not able to become a Red Indian. But this has nothing to do with your Celtic and/or Germanic genes from the North of Europe. You don't understand foreign cultures, that's all. I know from two Germans, who became Red Indians in the 20th century. That's not a problem - it's wonderful that such things are able to happen. In the end we are all sisters and brothers.

For the record, I have no Germanic genes at all. And I understand as much about foreign cultures as I can from the perspective of not being part of them . . . about the way people understand the culture of Southern Americans without actually being one.

I'm really not saying anything that's controversial or insulting. Some things are cultural, and some things are not. Femaleness is not a "culture"; it's genetic. It's not something you can join. You either are, or you are not.

Okay. So you are genetically a Scandinavian Brit (Norman + Anglo-Saxon + Celt) but you have nothing to do with Germanics. Your culture is exclusivelly only American - whatever this is. Everything else is strange to you. And men are men - women are women. And who has problems in this context has this problems because of genetical defects.

Nope. You went off the rails right around the time you didn't know how to spell "exclusively". My culture is Southern American, which very much is a specific and unique thing.

?

And I never said "everything else is strange to me";

You said: "And I understand as much about foreign cultures as I can from the perspective of not being part of them"

you projected that in there yourself. Everything else is NOT MINE. I can see it around me; I can appreciate and enjoy it. But I'm not actually part of it, which is perfectly okay. And even if I could become part of something culturally - which is possible in many cases - I can't become part of things biologically that I'm not already part of. I could move to Mexico, learn to speak Spanish fluently with an identical accent, get involved with the community, know the city and the history and the culture as well as anyone there - be part of the culture. But I would still be white.

And yes, men are men and women are women, because those are BIOLOGICAL.

Aha. In a scale from 1 to 10 - how good do you think is your biological knowledge?

Yes, I did say that. Which isn't the same as "everything is strange to me". Glad you're finally catching on . . . sort of.

How good does my biological knowledge need to be to grasp the concept that homo sapien is a species which perpetuates itself by sexual reproduction and has two sexes for that purpose, which are determined by genetics? They cover that shit in middle school, for crying out loud . . . or they did when I was in middle school. God knows what they teach now.

Be that as it may, it doesn't require an advanced degree to grasp these facts. It just requires a willingness to accept that facts don't give a **** about feelings.