- Oct 31, 2012
- 54,579
- 53,789
- 3,605
No it hasn't.
I have to give you full credit here.
You have your arse handed to you repeatedly on these forums but you still keep coming back for more.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
TheHawk asked me to start a thread on the origin of life in the ocean on Earth.
- Thread starter AFrench2
- Start date
I have to give you full credit here.
You have your arse handed to you repeatedly on these forums but you still keep coming back for more.
It says so right here:You didn't read it obviously.So uh...here you go, bro.
How lightning strikes could explain the origin of life—on Earth and elsewhere
A new study suggests that lightning helps make an essential element available to organisms in habitable environments.www.technologyreview.com
So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.Mar 17, 2021
Day 2 (Tomorrow): The Earth is not 5000 years old.
Well you’re article isn’t even claiming that lightning created single-cell organism as you claimed in the other thread. It says lightning may have been responsible for creating phosphorus which is not a living substance that would be available for organisms that already exist.
You should really learn to read before regurgitating information incorrectly.
“So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.”
- Dec 29, 2008
- 36,418
- 19,337
- 1,905
This isnt a fact. Its just some dudes theory.So uh...here you go, bro.
How lightning strikes could explain the origin of life—on Earth and elsewhere
A new study suggests that lightning helps make an essential element available to organisms in habitable environments.
So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.Mar 17, 2021
Day 2 (Tomorrow): The Earth is not 5000 years old.
AFrench2
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #24
When hydrated, phosphides such as the mineral schreibersite, (Fe,Ni)3P, allow for the synthesis of important phosphorus-bearing organic compoundsIt says so right here:You didn't read it obviously.So uh...here you go, bro.
How lightning strikes could explain the origin of life—on Earth and elsewhere
A new study suggests that lightning helps make an essential element available to organisms in habitable environments.
So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.Mar 17, 2021
Day 2 (Tomorrow): The Earth is not 5000 years old.
Well you’re article isn’t even claiming that lightning created single-cell organism as you claimed in the other thread. It says lightning may have been responsible for creating phosphorus which is not a living substance that would be available for organisms that already exist.
You should really learn to read before regurgitating information incorrectly.
“So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.”
"Organic" means living.
No it hasn't.
I have to give you full credit here.
You have your arse handed to you repeatedly on these forums but you still keep coming back for more.
There is so much to explore on the ocean floor. At some point maybe there will be larger submarines designed for just that purpose and can go deeper then today.When hydrated, phosphides such as the mineral schreibersite, (Fe,Ni)3P, allow for the synthesis of important phosphorus-bearing organic compoundsIt says so right here:You didn't read it obviously.So uh...here you go, bro.
How lightning strikes could explain the origin of life—on Earth and elsewhere
A new study suggests that lightning helps make an essential element available to organisms in habitable environments.
So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.Mar 17, 2021
Day 2 (Tomorrow): The Earth is not 5000 years old.
Well you’re article isn’t even claiming that lightning created single-cell organism as you claimed in the other thread. It says lightning may have been responsible for creating phosphorus which is not a living substance that would be available for organisms that already exist.
You should really learn to read before regurgitating information incorrectly.
“So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.”
"Organic" means living.
- Mar 9, 2011
- 70,508
- 84,523
- 3,635
I will explain an atheist's version of how life started on this planet:
Seeing as how the sun's gravitational pull is over the eons, drawing the planets closer and closer, it only makes sense that the planet Venus was once in the proximity to the sun, where we are now. The earth was in an orbit around the sun, at a distance where Mars currently is.
There was more than likely life on Venus, as it was at a distance to the sun which could support life. Venusians became so advanced that they developed space probes to study the planet earth, as we have with Mars.
Embedded within the microscopic crevasses of those unmanned space Venusian probes, were single-celled organisms that survived the journey. Once they reached the earth, they managed to thrive.
Meanwhile over hundreds of millions of years, the sun's gravitational pull drew Venus closer and closer, until it became a burned-out planet, incapable of sustaining life. During the same time, the planet earth was eventually drawn into the "sweet spot" which was at a proximity to the sun that was conducive to life.
Of course, we also sent unmanned probes to Mars. There is the possibility is that single-celled life-forms embedded within our Martian probes survived the trip, and are now thriving.
At some point hundreds of millions of years from now, the earth will by the gravitational pull of the sun, be where Venus now, and Mars will be approximately where we are. Perhaps those lifeforms we accidentally implanted on Mars will thrive, evolve, and become intelligent beings. Perhaps they will create unmanned probes and pass life on to the next planet.
Of course I don't really believe this. I prefer to believe by faith, that God created the heavens and the earth in six days, and on the seventh, He rested.
Seeing as how the sun's gravitational pull is over the eons, drawing the planets closer and closer, it only makes sense that the planet Venus was once in the proximity to the sun, where we are now. The earth was in an orbit around the sun, at a distance where Mars currently is.
There was more than likely life on Venus, as it was at a distance to the sun which could support life. Venusians became so advanced that they developed space probes to study the planet earth, as we have with Mars.
Embedded within the microscopic crevasses of those unmanned space Venusian probes, were single-celled organisms that survived the journey. Once they reached the earth, they managed to thrive.
Meanwhile over hundreds of millions of years, the sun's gravitational pull drew Venus closer and closer, until it became a burned-out planet, incapable of sustaining life. During the same time, the planet earth was eventually drawn into the "sweet spot" which was at a proximity to the sun that was conducive to life.
Of course, we also sent unmanned probes to Mars. There is the possibility is that single-celled life-forms embedded within our Martian probes survived the trip, and are now thriving.
At some point hundreds of millions of years from now, the earth will by the gravitational pull of the sun, be where Venus now, and Mars will be approximately where we are. Perhaps those lifeforms we accidentally implanted on Mars will thrive, evolve, and become intelligent beings. Perhaps they will create unmanned probes and pass life on to the next planet.
Of course I don't really believe this. I prefer to believe by faith, that God created the heavens and the earth in six days, and on the seventh, He rested.
“Organic” compounds do not mean “living”. Jesus Christ you don’t know a fucking thing about science do you?When hydrated, phosphides such as the mineral schreibersite, (Fe,Ni)3P, allow for the synthesis of important phosphorus-bearing organic compoundsIt says so right here:You didn't read it obviously.So uh...here you go, bro.
How lightning strikes could explain the origin of life—on Earth and elsewhere
A new study suggests that lightning helps make an essential element available to organisms in habitable environments.
So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.Mar 17, 2021
Day 2 (Tomorrow): The Earth is not 5000 years old.
Well you’re article isn’t even claiming that lightning created single-cell organism as you claimed in the other thread. It says lightning may have been responsible for creating phosphorus which is not a living substance that would be available for organisms that already exist.
You should really learn to read before regurgitating information incorrectly.
“So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.”
"Organic" means living.
Examples of organic compounds are carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen. None of those chemical compounds are “living organisms”.
CarlinAnnArbor
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 56,196
- 41,067
- 3,615
In
Current Events?So uh...here you go, bro.
How lightning strikes could explain the origin of life—on Earth and elsewhere
A new study suggests that lightning helps make an essential element available to organisms in habitable environments.
So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.Mar 17, 2021
Day 2 (Tomorrow): The Earth is not 5000 years old.
- Oct 31, 2012
- 54,579
- 53,789
- 3,605
Not to be a kill joy, but life cannot spontaneously occur
It has never been duplicated
It has never been observed
And it is statistically impossible.
Other than that, I love the idea.
Notice just how pro science and math I am.
Just kidding
Darwin done it.
CarlinAnnArbor
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 56,196
- 41,067
- 3,615
So you're saying Venusians were black kangs with super advanced technologyVenusians became so advanced that they developed space probes to study the planet earth, as we have with Mars
- Oct 31, 2012
- 54,579
- 53,789
- 3,605
Well in terms of cosmology, yes.In
Current Events?So uh...here you go, bro.
How lightning strikes could explain the origin of life—on Earth and elsewhere
A new study suggests that lightning helps make an essential element available to organisms in habitable environments.
So sometimes, life needs a spark of inspiration—or maybe several trillion of them. A new study published in Nature Communications suggests lightning may have been a key component in making phosphorus available for organisms to use when life on Earth first appeared by about 3.5 billion years ago.Mar 17, 2021
Day 2 (Tomorrow): The Earth is not 5000 years old.
CarlinAnnArbor
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 56,196
- 41,067
- 3,615
No it hasn't.
A Life created time and space
- Mar 9, 2011
- 70,508
- 84,523
- 3,635
So you're saying Venusians were black kangs with super advanced technologyVenusians became so advanced that they developed space probes to study the planet earth, as we have with Mars
No. The white ones was Kangs. The black Venusians were just dick-washers for the ancient Venusian civilizations. Just like they were here.
CarlinAnnArbor
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 56,196
- 41,067
- 3,615
Microbes cant survive the ride thru our atmosphere (THOUSANDS of degrees) even if it survived thousands of years in the vacuum of space along with the radiation from millions of sunsSince the origin of the first cellular life is unknowable it's kind of a meaningless question. I am inclined to believe life came here from somewhere else. Not aliens but stowed away on the mega tons of cometary debris that rained down on proto-earth. The sun and planets condensed from the remnant of an earlier supernova and it is not inconceivable that a few bacteria survived.
- Oct 31, 2012
- 54,579
- 53,789
- 3,605
No it hasn't.
A Life created time and space
Time measures from point A to point B.
So there must be a point A.
It was not long ago that scientists found point A, the Big Bang.
So time was created once the Big Bang occurred.
The only question becomes, who done it and from what dimension?
CarlinAnnArbor
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 56,196
- 41,067
- 3,615
Well, they developed a theory about it anywayIt was not long ago that scientists found point A, the Big Bang
occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,196
- 1,590
It's probably more likely than life spontaneously happening in an unbelieveably hostile environment in such a relatively short period of time. At no time since the beginning has life spontaneously arose anywhere else on the planet. Everything we know of that is alive shares a common origin and similar biological processes.Microbes cant survive the ride thru our atmosphere (THOUSANDS of degrees) even if it survived thousands of years in the vacuum of space along with the radiation from millions of sunsSince the origin of the first cellular life is unknowable it's kind of a meaningless question. I am inclined to believe life came here from somewhere else. Not aliens but stowed away on the mega tons of cometary debris that rained down on proto-earth. The sun and planets condensed from the remnant of an earlier supernova and it is not inconceivable that a few bacteria survived.
ReinyDays
Gold Member
This thread certainly expands the definition of "Current Events" ... "Until just recently, our Solar System was a nebula in space" ...
So you're saying Venusians were black kangs with super advanced technologyVenusians became so advanced that they developed space probes to study the planet earth, as we have with Mars
No. The white ones was Kangs. The black Venusians were just dick-washers for the ancient Venusian civilizations. Just like they were here.
Where’s Asslips to explain to us how that’s the Africans teaching whites how to be civilized?
Similar threads
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 431
- Views
- 6K
- Replies
- 191
- Views
- 794
- Replies
- 367
- Views
- 6K
- Replies
- 108
- Views
- 459
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8165
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 475
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-