The War against Women Continues

[Lucy Hamilton]

If men had babies there wouldnt even be a conversation.

That is a stupid thing to say, also, you are very unoriginal because this has been said before, by other people who are also stupid.

"by other people who are also stupid."

Like Gloria Steinem for example, Militant Feminist.

The Gloria Steinem who exposed FGM to public view in 1979? That Gloria Steinem?

She still a mixed-up man hater ogo

Oh snap out of it. You're not that bad.

Thanks, neither are you

 

[Blackrook]

The fact that women can have babies and men can't is the reason why women are more important than men.

In war, we can lose millions of men and still survive. But every woman that's lost not only costs her life, but the life of every child she would have had, and all her grandchildren, and her great-grandchildren, so to the end of time.

That's why sane countries don't put women in combat, and why men naturally feel the instinct to protect women, and are gentler with women than they are with other men.

If this is no longer true, then it is the fault of women who demanded to be "equal" with men, which is a big step down.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Yes....protesting to support the right to commit murder against the unborn.......it should not be happening in a civilized nation. Thanks for the post.

Protesting against recriminalizing choice options for women.

Women have lots of choices....have sex/ don't have sex, keep the baby, give the baby up for adoption.....how is that limiting legitimate choice?

A man telling a woman what choices she can have. YOU don't get it.

Interesting, deciding for those who can't decide. It is you who don't get it. We give more reverence to the unborn offspring of animals than we do for our own unborn children.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Women's choices are less important to you than a zygote.

The woman was a zygote once.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You have a choice to. Don't take it out of your pants unless you're prepared to pay for the abortion or support the kid you create.

OR

Keep your legs closed unless you're prepared for the consequence of carrying a baby to term. You helped create the child, too. It sounds like to me you're waging a war against men. MEN.

 

[TemplarKormac]

When men are able to start carrying babies we will talk about THEIR choices.

Oh, this is brilliant.

Without the man, that child would be nothing more than an unfertilized egg. A car doesn't start unless you put the key in the ignition.

There's a reason why it takes a man and a woman to have a child, and logically, to that end, that means the man should be involved in the decision making process. His half of the baby's genome entitles him to that.

SCIENCE!

 

[TemplarKormac]

Civilized people know the difference between a baby and a fertilized egg.

Smart people recognize that what's forming in the womb will ultimately become a baby. What will that fertilized egg become? An elephant? Surely you're not dumb enough not to know what the end result of a fertilized human egg would be?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Does a man have a choice to put on a condom?

Does a woman have a choice to keep her legs closed?

 

[TemplarKormac]

No contraception is 100% fail safe.

Until the condom breaks.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Shall I show you photos of pregnant women who committed suicide because they didn't have the option to terminate a pregnancy?

So they aborted themselves then. Well, at least they had a choice.

Surely abortion rights aren't so sacrosanct that they are worth killing yourself over.

 

[TemplarKormac]

If I'm a woman......... I will tell you my body, my choice, my rights, my vagina, my business....... It is not your little penis business.

If it weren't for that "little penis" (gee, project much?) you wouldn't have the choice. Get it? There would be no baby to abort.