lol! it's not because I say so it's because it's fact..
an example of your inaccuracy :you told us about how you were vaccinated in the seventies
and:
you are so ignorant on this topic, you didn't even KNOW about the 20 plus new vaccines that are recommended that you have never gotten."
both are specious ...
Saying it's specious, and proving it's specious are two different animals sir.
Fact, you did tell us that you were vaccinated in the 70's.
you'd lose your bet ...when I was in grade school (1965-1971) it was mandatory that every child was vaccinated for all know communicable diseases at that
time..
Why not mention any more recent vaccinations? We have to assume that you haven't had any unless you provide some proof otherwise. To state so now after you have been shown proof that you are not fully vaccinated is to be disingenuous, and frankly, dishonest.
You can call it a specious argument all you like. But lacking proof or even the claim that your vaccinations are indeed current, which you have not even attempted to make, belies the fact that indeed, you are just being argumentative.