Madeline
Rookie
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
We are in a new phase of a very old war against religious dogma and radical Islam and the Obvious elephant in the room is that the majority of incitement to racial hatred and violence is coming from the Islamic world, yet it is those who are brave enough to point that fact out, to point out the fact that the West is engaged in a conflict with theocratic totalitarian and fascist ideologies and regimes, who are then targeted for ‘spreading hatred’ for those regimes and violent ideas.
John F Kennedy once said “we are not afraid to entrust the people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies and competitive values for a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its own people.”
'Legal Jihad': How Islamist 'lawfare' is stifling Western free speech on Radical Islam - The Henry Jackson Society
The article talks about "lawfare" against people critical of "radical Islam, Islamic terrorism and its sources of financing". I have yet to hear of any such effort and I have certainly never spoken in favor of tolerating terrorism or permitting anyone in the US to finance it.
Islamist states, organizations and individuals with financial means have launched a "legal jihad," filing a series of malicious lawsuits, in North American and European courts, designed to punish and silence anyone who engages in discourse about Islam. The lawsuits are often predatory and undertaken as a means to intimidate, demoralize and bankrupt defendants. Claims are based on charges ranging from defamation to “Islamophobia,” and have resulted in books being banned and pulped, in thousands of dollars worth of fines and in publishing houses and newspapers rejecting important works on counter-terrorism out of fear of being the next target.
News to me. But if a lawsuit is meritorious, the motives, emotions and religion of the plaintiff cannot make it otherwise, chanel.
One of the major proponents of Islamist lawfare in the US is the Washington-based Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator in a terror financing case and self-described representative of the American Muslim population.
Never heard of this group, and though I am not setting myself up as some arbitrar of what's known, I think after all the Islamophobia of the past few months, I would have. Three lawsuits that never survived the discovery stage are hardly evidence of any "lawfare".
Even though such lawsuits often fail in the US, the victims targeted still lose in time and money spent defending their rights and the cumulative effect of these suits, combined with the looming threat of future lawsuits, has created a detrimental chilling effect on the exercise of free speech within the US, and has raised the cost of public dialogue about the war on terrorism. Islamist lawfare has also sparked a wave of self-censorship, with publishing houses going as far as hiring security experts to assess the potential for violent reactions in the Muslim community to printed words.
If this board is any measure, there is no chill on free speech regarding Islam. Are you suggesting/advocating that no Muslim or Muslim group have the right to sue for defamation?
I'm sorry, chanel; I do not see the article as persuasive at all.