Miss Cleo, ladies and gentlemen! Let's give her a big hand! She'll be here all week, pronouncing on what other people think, believe, and base their opinions one without EVER ONCE having been told by the person in question! Take a bow, honey!
Seriously, that wasn't even a good try at avoidance and diversion.

Isn't that starting to leave a bruise?
Tell me more about "peer review" and your theories on the science of evolution. I'm bored and I'm looking for a good laugh. Your theories may be unintentionally humorous, but humorous they are. What do you do for a living again? You correct scientific papers for scientists so they can be submitted to science journals? IsnÂ’t that what you said?
You should write a science paper on how Noah fit all those animals into one wooden boat. Now, where did he put the termites?
When you get around to even vaguely refuting anything I've already said about evolution beyond the inevitable "Oh, you're SO stupid, I'm so much smarter and more sophisticated than you are, you just make me laugh" that leftists always fall back on when they have nothing real to say, perhaps I'll feel the need to advance something else. Since what I've already said is still carrying the field in this battle, I see no reason to put out more troops.
Why don't YOU tell ME more about how peer review is utterly and completely objective, conducted by people who transform themselves into automatons devoid of all bias and agenda and personal opinion? I always find such naivete to be quaint and refreshingly amusing.
No, dumbfuck, I never said I "correct" scientific papers. I said that I have assisted in the preparation of papers for publication. It's not surprising that you have so much trouble conducting an Internet debate when simple English sentences like that kick your ass.