The Ultimate Result of "Choice"

[Unkotare]

... we care deeply about human beings.
...

ALL evidence to the contrary.

 

[notmyfault2020]

I suspect the charge against her will be some sort of neglect of a minor, not murder since she did not really try to kill it.

right... tossing a child out into 36 degree weather in a plastic bag.. What reasonable person would say that that could kill the child?

 

[ChemEngineer]

right... tossing a child out into 36 degree weather in a plastic bag.. What reasonable person would say that that could kill the child?

Trying to talk sense to the senseless is futile.
"Go from the presence of a foolish man." - The Holy Bible
"Answer not a fool according to his folly." - Ibid

 

[notmyfault2020]

Trying to talk sense to the senseless is futile.
"Go from the presence of a foolish man." - The Holy Bible
"Answer not a fool according to his folly." - Ibid

for sure

And if the Bible didn't say it (Proverbs?)

Being on the forums will inform you -- quickly lol

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Well, no. That's one of your dumber lies. If it's born, it's a human being, and we care deeply about human beings.

Shut up, you lying piece of shit.

Birth does not convey membership in our species. Birth does not magically convey life.

It's the dehumanizing hyper-eugenic pro-life philosophy that causes disrespect for life.

You’re the bigoted dehumanizing filth.

Pro-lifers say a child is no more valuable than a zygote.

Yeah, we believe in equality, unlike you, filth.

Yes, you do have to be a special kind of evil to equate a child to a single cell.

“Equality is evil”

Sure thing, scumbag.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

You’re so full of shit. What an ugly and horrible OP. Shame on you

Yes, you pro-aborts certainly are ugly and horrible, but shame, never - you trash are shameless… sociopathic inhuman barbarians.

 

[notmyfault2020]

 

[Viktor]

right... tossing a child out into 36 degree weather in a plastic bag.. What reasonable person would say that that could kill the child?

The issue was her intent, not what might happen. That is important under criminal law. You forget that the child did not die. You are not very bright.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

The issue was her intent, not what might happen. That is important under criminal law. You forget that the child did not die. You are not very bright.

The intent was to kill the kid, as is evident by the circumstances.

She should lose all parental rights, she should go to prison for a long time, and when possible the father should be paid retroactive child support.

 

[Viktor]

The intent was to kill the kid, as is evident by the circumstances.

She should lose all parental rights, she should go to prison for a long time, and when possible the father should be paid retroactive child support.

WOW! You should put on your judge's robes and sit on your judges bench. If you are asked to serve on a jury, decline.

 

[Slade3200]

Yes, you pro-aborts certainly are ugly and horrible, but shame, never - you trash are shameless… sociopathic inhuman barbarians.

Ouch that really hurts my feelings. What can I do to get into your good graces??

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

WOW! You should put on your judge's robes and sit on your judges bench. If you are asked to serve on a jury, decline.

Why? Juries should have people of sound judgment who can listen to all the facts of the case.

In this case though, we see a baby wrapped in plastic hurled into a dumpster on video. She shouldn’t waste a jury’s time.

She should just plead guilty and beg and hope for leniency. Her guilt is not in question nor is the gravity of what she did.

 

[Viktor]

Why? Juries should have people of sound judgment who can listen to all the facts of the case.

In this case though, we see a baby wrapped in plastic hurled into a dumpster on video. She shouldn’t waste a jury’s time.

She should just plead guilty and beg and hope for leniency. Her guilt is not in question nor is the gravity of what she did.

People of sound judgement don't make legal pronouncements on subjects they know nothing about. Her guilt and the facts are up to the jury, not to you. Instruction on the law is up to the judge, not you. The Constitution guarrantees each accused a jury trial and it does not mention you at all. HAHAHAHAHAHA!

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

People of sound judgement don't make legal pronouncements on subjects they know nothing about. Her guilt and the facts are up to the jury, not to you. Instruction on the law is up to the judge, not you. The Constitution guarrantees each accused a jury trial and it does not mention you at all. HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Are you retarded?

She is caught on video doing this obscenity. There is no ambiguity here.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Are you retarded?

She is caught on video doing this obscenity. There is no ambiguity here.

"Go from the presence of a foolish man." - The Bible
Carsomy, there is an Ignore Function for good reason.
"It takes an order of magnitude more effort to refute bullshit than was required to produce it." - Brandolini's Law

 

[Ralph Norton]

The issue was her intent, not what might happen. That is important under criminal law. You forget that the child did not die. You are not very bright.

What do YOU think her intent was?

 

[ChemEngineer]

Chief Justice of California Supreme Court, Rose Bird, read the appeal by a convicted felon who shot his victim in the chest 7 times. Said the Leftist Bird, "I'm not convinced that he intended to kill the victim."

Seven shots in the chest. Not attempted murder. Like throwing a helpless baby in the dumpster.
Evil people will say and pretend anything to further their evil. That's the way evil operates. Lies.

Rose Bird was recalled by voters, along with two of her lackeys. I signed the petition and encouraged
many others to sign as well. She died as a pathetic clerk.

 

[notmyfault2020]

The issue was her intent, not what might happen. That is important under criminal law. You forget that the child did not die. You are not very bright.

I know. Those IQ tests are never correct

 

[notmyfault2020]

What do YOU think her intent was?

yeh, that was my Q

and that guy had the gall to question MY intelligence?

ha ha.. dumbass

 

[notmyfault2020]

Chief Justice of California Supreme Court, Rose Bird, read the appeal by a convicted felon who shot his victim in the chest 7 times. Said the Leftist Bird, "I'm not convinced that he intended to kill the victim."

Seven shots in the chest. Not attempted murder. Like throwing a helpless baby in the dumpster.
Evil people will say and pretend anything to further their evil. That's the way evil operates. Lies.

Rose Bird was recalled by voters, along with two of her lackeys. I signed the petition and encouraged
many others to sign as well. She died as a pathetic clerk.

I'm glad democracy worked

too bad our system does not always work out so well (and yes, I know we are not a pure democracy--thank God)