The Truth About TSA Pornoscanners

Contumacious

Radical Freedom
Aug 16, 2009
20,236
2,887
280
Adjuntas, PR , USA
Prepare for a shock: the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) lied.

That’s the bureaucracy pestering passengers in airports while the Underwear Bomber waltzes past checkpoints onto his plane and sets himself afire. No matter: the TSA turned that flaming failure into an excuse to clamor more loudly for "whole-body imagers," i.e., cameras that virtually strip-search us.

Though the TSA pretends these pornographic contraptions are its answer to explosive briefs, it’s actually been lusting after them for years – even as passengers vehemently objected to exposing themselves to government agents, especially ones armed with cameras. And so the TSA’s propagandists swore its imagers could neither store nor transmit pictures.

Sadly, those papers show the agency for a bold and brazen liar: "the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in ‘test mode.’" EPIC shared its findings with CNN, usually one of the government’s most reliable and loyal cheerleaders. And even CNN had to admit that the TSA may be "misleading the public," though the network quickly qualified this scandalous allegation by adding that it’s merely what "a privacy group says."

.
 
You know that this is going to be abused to hell and back.

And the crotch bomber was not a failure of the right equipment, but a failure in operational procedures.

We were told that when the started the TSA, they would be 'professional.' I have my doubts.

Before they can have these toys, they need to prove better that they can be trusted. So far, that proof is wanting.
 
You know that this is going to be abused to hell and back. And the crotch bomber was not a failure of the right equipment, but a failure in operational procedures..

Correct.

Though the TSA pretends these pornographic contraptions are its answer to explosive briefs, it’s actually been lusting after them for years – even as passengers vehemently objected to exposing themselves to government agents, especially ones armed with cameras. And so the TSA’s propagandists swore its imagers could neither store nor transmit pictures.

.
 
This woman should take her sign to the airport:

slide_2780_38639_large.jpg
 
"the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in ‘test mode.’"

I fail to see a problem. you don't want to go through the scanner? Drive or walk.
 
Relax Confusedatious.

It's still true that NOBODY wants to see your dick. No women and no gay guys. Not even that international group of pervs you imagine: the TSA.

Do you work for TSA?

Are you going to be posting the pictures in your website for a fee? Are you going to be furiously jerking off looking a pictures of underage girls?

January 22, 2010

German TV on the Failure of Full-Body Scanners

The video is worth watching, even if you don't speak German. The scanner caught a subject's cell phone and Swiss Army knife -- and the microphone he was wearing -- but missed all the components to make a bomb that he hid on his body. Admittedly, he only faced the scanner from the front and not from the side. But he also didn't hide anything in a body cavity other than his mouth -- I didn't think about that one -- he didn't use low density or thinly sliced PETN, and he didn't hide anything in his carry-on luggage.

Full-body scanners: they're not just a dumb idea, they don't actually work.

.
 
Relax Confusedatious.

It's still true that NOBODY wants to see your dick. No women and no gay guys. Not even that international group of pervs you imagine: the TSA.

Do you work for TSA?

Are you going to be posting the pictures in your website for a fee? Are you going to be furiously jerking off looking a pictures of underage girls?

January 22, 2010

German TV on the Failure of Full-Body Scanners

The video is worth watching, even if you don't speak German. The scanner caught a subject's cell phone and Swiss Army knife -- and the microphone he was wearing -- but missed all the components to make a bomb that he hid on his body. Admittedly, he only faced the scanner from the front and not from the side. But he also didn't hide anything in a body cavity other than his mouth -- I didn't think about that one -- he didn't use low density or thinly sliced PETN, and he didn't hide anything in his carry-on luggage.

Full-body scanners: they're not just a dumb idea, they don't actually work.

.

depends on what you're using them for :cool:
 
"the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in ‘test mode.’"

I fail to see a problem. you don't want to go through the scanner? Drive or walk.

Why should I have to walk or drive? You're the one in such a self induced panic that someone will blow up your plane that you're willing to submit to a virtual strip search. Why don't you walk or drive and let the rest of us enjoy living in freedom.
 
Relax Confusedatious.

It's still true that NOBODY wants to see your dick. No women and no gay guys. Not even that international group of pervs you imagine: the TSA.

Do you work for TSA?

Are you going to be posting the pictures in your website for a fee? Are you going to be furiously jerking off looking a pictures of underage girls?

January 22, 2010

German TV on the Failure of Full-Body Scanners

The video is worth watching, even if you don't speak German. The scanner caught a subject's cell phone and Swiss Army knife -- and the microphone he was wearing -- but missed all the components to make a bomb that he hid on his body. Admittedly, he only faced the scanner from the front and not from the side. But he also didn't hide anything in a body cavity other than his mouth -- I didn't think about that one -- he didn't use low density or thinly sliced PETN, and he didn't hide anything in his carry-on luggage.

Full-body scanners: they're not just a dumb idea, they don't actually work.

.

Is there a link to this? Never mind I found it
 
Last edited:
Relax Confusedatious.

It's still true that NOBODY wants to see your dick. No women and no gay guys. Not even that international group of pervs you imagine: the TSA.

Do you work for TSA?

Are you going to be posting the pictures in your website for a fee? Are you going to be furiously jerking off looking a pictures of underage girls?

January 22, 2010

German TV on the Failure of Full-Body Scanners

The video is worth watching, even if you don't speak German. The scanner caught a subject's cell phone and Swiss Army knife -- and the microphone he was wearing -- but missed all the components to make a bomb that he hid on his body. Admittedly, he only faced the scanner from the front and not from the side. But he also didn't hide anything in a body cavity other than his mouth -- I didn't think about that one -- he didn't use low density or thinly sliced PETN, and he didn't hide anything in his carry-on luggage.

Full-body scanners: they're not just a dumb idea, they don't actually work.

.

Your link to a "video" didn't link to a video.

However, it did link to a web site that had sub-links in it that showed the images which can be seen using the body scanners.

And?

BFD. It turns out women have breasts. You can't make out any of the fun parts, really. But maybe it gets you all worked up, like the bra and girdle models in new Sears catalog.

And the images of the males?

OMG! If one bothers to search, one can almost discern a vague shape that somewhat resembles the outline of a blurred image of male genitals.

What's the problem? You concerned that somebody might discover that your package is marked "extra small?"
 
Relax Confusedatious.

It's still true that NOBODY wants to see your dick. No women and no gay guys. Not even that international group of pervs you imagine: the TSA.

Yeah. I mean, it's a scanner, not a microscope. You'll be fine Confusedious.

It's a "false flag" complaint---he really doesn't want em to see what's up his ass
 
Relax Confusedatious.

It's still true that NOBODY wants to see your dick. No women and no gay guys. Not even that international group of pervs you imagine: the TSA.

Yeah. I mean, it's a scanner, not a microscope. You'll be fine Confusedious.

It's a "false flag" complaint---he really doesn't want em to see what's up his ass

Ooooooh. I get it. He keister's his contraband and his ben-wa balls. OK. I can understand that.
 
I watched the video and the scanner they used really really sucked. I looked at the other images available around the web, and big fucking deal.

Again get scanned or ride a bike.
 
I watched the video and the scanner they used really really sucked. I looked at the other images available around the web, and big fucking deal.

Again get scanned or ride a bike.

Again, how about you ride the bike instead of telling everyone else to hand more of their freedom over to the Federal government. You don't know how to respond to this, do you?
 
"the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in ‘test mode.’"

I fail to see a problem. you don't want to go through the scanner? Drive or walk.

Well most people are choosing th drive or use other means, it won't be long before fedgov does to the airlines what it did to the railroads.

You are a fucktard, Big time.

.
 
I watched the video and the scanner they used really really sucked. I looked at the other images available around the web, and big fucking deal.

Again get scanned or ride a bike.

Again, how about you ride the bike instead of telling everyone else to hand more of their freedom over to the Federal government. You don't know how to respond to this, do you?

Show me in the constitution where it says you can get on a plane without going through security.

The world changed on 9-11-01, and if we don't change a little bit with it then we are fools and we are lost.

You don't like the security at Airports? Don't fly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top