The Truth About 'No-Go Zones.'

[Sunni Man]

"In 2011, Britain's Muslims began demanding that Sharia replace British common law and become the only law in towns with large Muslim populations, including Birmingham, Bradford, Derby, Dewsbury, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, Luton, Manchester, Sheffield, Waltham Forest and Tower Hamlets, an East London Muslim enclave whose streets are already plastered with posters declaring, "You are entering a Sharia controlled zone: Islamic rules enforced" (below) and where Muslim imams now issue death threats to women who refuse to wear the Muslim veil."

Have you personally ever been to any of these locations to confirm the validity of these accusations? .....

 

[PoliticalChic]

.................^^ A supposed poll of American muslims conducted by a Islamophobic tabloid. ....

What's next? ......a poll by the cheesy rag the Enquirer?? ....

I'd be happy to entertain a poll you can provide, from an equally well known source, that offers an alternative conclusion.

In the meantime.....would you agree that the numbers in the poll are......worrisome.

 

[Sunni Man]

In the meantime.....would you agree that the numbers in the poll are......worrisome.

Why would the numbers in a fraudulent hate poll be worrisome? ....

 

[PoliticalChic]

In the meantime.....would you agree that the numbers in the poll are......worrisome.

Why would the numbers in a fraudulent hate poll be worrisome? ....

You're ignoring the fact that you are unable to show them to be fraudulent.
Remember...you can't beat something with nothing.

And....I know for a fact that you are an ardent supporter of the Constitution, and the data in the poll is, in fact, worrisome to you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Judeo-Christian beliefs do not cause conflicts with the Constitution, as Sharia does.
If one sees the jurisprudence of the Q'ran as predominant to the Constitution.....well, that is a problem in becoming part of America.




7. America, under the regimen of the Founders, and with Judeo-Christianity as it's guide, was very different, nor was it ever expected to be monolithic.


David Hackett Fischer has even specified four variations on the theme, from four distinctly different immigrant groups coming from four different English regions during the seventeenth century.

a. New England developed an “ordered freedom,” stressing obligation and discipline in a religious context.

b. Virginia translated the aristocratic traditions of its founder into a “hegemonic freedom” and stressed notions of collective honor and dignity, along the lines of Jefferson’s natural aristocracy.

c. The Pennsylvania Quakers insisted on “reciprocal freedom” very similar to modern libertarianism, and

d. The back country frontiersmen were advocates of “natural freedom,” and produced the lion’s share of the great explorers and mountain men, …think Daniel Boone.
Fischer, “Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America (America: a Cultural History)

 

[PoliticalChic]

Without liberty and individual freedoms....America would cease to be America.

To remain so, the Constitution must be the law of the land.


8. In America, the spirit of religion nourished the spirit of liberty. “Liberty…regards religion as the safeguard of morality, and morality as the best security of law and the surest pledge of the duration of freedom…”
Tocqueville, “Democracy in America,” vol. I. p. 44.




9. Although Christianity in its many varieties was the religion of the original colonies, Christianity does not preach operational dominance over the body politic in America.

Tocqueville compared this aspect to Islam:


“Mohammed professed to derive from Heaven, and has inserted in the Koran, not only religious doctrines, but political maxims, civil and criminal laws, and theories of science. The Gospel, on the contrary, speaks only of the general relations of men to God and to each other, beyond which it inculcates and imposes no point of faith. This alone, besides a thousand other reasons, would suffice to prove that the former of these religions will never long predominate in a cultivated and democratic age, while the latter is destined to retain its sway at these as at all other periods.” Tocqueville, “Democracy in America,” vol.2, p. 23.


a. [A]t such times above all, religions should be most careful to confine themselves to their proper sphere, for if they wish to extend their power beyond spiritual matters they run the risk of not being believed at all," he wrote in his classic, "Democracy in America"

 

[Coyote]

The difference between 'hoods' in America and Muslim communities a.k.a "No go zones" in Europe is that the 'hoods' are not part of a plan to ultimately impose a foreign set of laws on a host nation.

What evidence do you have to support that claim?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The difference between 'hoods' in America and Muslim communities a.k.a "No go zones" in Europe is that the 'hoods' are not part of a plan to ultimately impose a foreign set of laws on a host nation.

What evidence do you have to support that claim?

Are you serious??


Coulter identified you pretty well, here:
"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?"

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. The Left searches for every chance to assault the Right much the same way pigs search for truffles.

Steve Emerson appeared on Fox, discussing 'No-Go Zones' in Europe, where Muslims are allowed.....allowed .....to claim sovereignty in cities to which they have emigrated.

"Steve Emerson, who describes himself as an “internationally recognized expert on terrorism and national security,” has apologized for what he now admits were “totally inaccurate” statements about the Muslim community in Birmingham, England.During an appearance on Fox News’Justice with Jeanine PirroSunday, Emerson called that city a “no-go zone” that is 100% Muslim. He has now admitted that is not the case."
Steve Emerson Apologizes for Fox News Birmingham Muslim Mediaite




But this error....Birmingham is 20-something percent Muslim....has been used to cloud the real issue.

Are there 'no-go zones' throughout Europe, where the immigrant group is allowed to institutute systems both different and inimical to that of the 'host' nation?
You betcha'!
Let's revisit the issue and get a look at the big picture.




2. "...France and Britain are pocked with unofficial no-go zones —self-segregated mini-caliphates that are off-limits to non-muslims and infested with crime and radicals:

a. “Arab gangs regularly vandalize synagogues here, the North African suburbs have become no-go zones at night, and the French continue to shrug their shoulders,”reported the New York Times in 2002.

b “French police would not venture without major reinforcements into some 150 ‘no-go zones’ around the country,” stated Newsweek in 2005.

c“The word banlieue (suburb) now connotes a no-go zone of high-rise slums, drug-fueled crime, failing schools and poor, largely Muslim immigrants and their angry offspring,”commented the New Republic after the Paris terror attacks.




3. The 120-page research paper “No-Go Zones in the French Republic: Myth or Reality” records dozens of French neighborhoods “where police and gendarmerie cannot enforce the Republican order or even enter without risking confrontation, projectiles, or even fatal shootings,” according to the Gatestone Institute.

“Separate Islamic societies” are displacing French civil law,” documents the 2,200-word, 2011 French report “Banlieue de la République” (“Suburbs of the Republic”).





4. Birmingham’s Islamo-trend is as alarming:

a. A child in Birmingham, England today is more likely to be Muslim than Christian, records the 2011 census

b. A 2014 government probe into Birmingham schools discovered an Islamist Trojan Horse plot to confine pupils to an “intolerant monoculture” that halted assimilation.

c. Birmingham’s Muslim rape gangs groomed girls for sex assaults in a stomach-churning scandal that “the authorities in Britain have deliberately ignored for 25 years,” concludes the shocking 2014 report “Easy Meat: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery.”

Self-styled Muslim no-go zones are flourishing in France and Britain as troubling testaments to western political correctness, and the first fortresses of a new Euro-Islamic order.
America should take heed."
Get real Muslim 8216 no-go zones 8217 are Europe 8217 s sordid big secret 8226 Brooklyn Daily

Stop hating Muslims.

How about they stop Radical Islam first............

and respect our culture and laws first..............

YAWN.

Why would you hate a Muslim who is doing you no harm ?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The difference between 'hoods' in America and Muslim communities a.k.a "No go zones" in Europe is that the 'hoods' are not part of a plan to ultimately impose a foreign set of laws on a host nation.

What evidence do you have to support that claim?

Are you serious??


Coulter identified you pretty well, here:
"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?"

Given how rightwing propaganda relies on distorting the meaning of words, those are perfectly legitimate questions.

PS, why can't you answer them? eh?

 

[NYcarbineer]

9. Although Christianity in its many varieties was the religion of the original colonies, Christianity does not preach operational dominance over the body politic in America.

lol, where have you been?

 

[eagle1462010]

Welcome to Islamberg

 

[eagle1462010]

1. The Left searches for every chance to assault the Right much the same way pigs search for truffles.

Steve Emerson appeared on Fox, discussing 'No-Go Zones' in Europe, where Muslims are allowed.....allowed .....to claim sovereignty in cities to which they have emigrated.

"Steve Emerson, who describes himself as an “internationally recognized expert on terrorism and national security,” has apologized for what he now admits were “totally inaccurate” statements about the Muslim community in Birmingham, England.During an appearance on Fox News’Justice with Jeanine PirroSunday, Emerson called that city a “no-go zone” that is 100% Muslim. He has now admitted that is not the case."
Steve Emerson Apologizes for Fox News Birmingham Muslim Mediaite




But this error....Birmingham is 20-something percent Muslim....has been used to cloud the real issue.

Are there 'no-go zones' throughout Europe, where the immigrant group is allowed to institutute systems both different and inimical to that of the 'host' nation?
You betcha'!
Let's revisit the issue and get a look at the big picture.




2. "...France and Britain are pocked with unofficial no-go zones —self-segregated mini-caliphates that are off-limits to non-muslims and infested with crime and radicals:

a. “Arab gangs regularly vandalize synagogues here, the North African suburbs have become no-go zones at night, and the French continue to shrug their shoulders,”reported the New York Times in 2002.

b “French police would not venture without major reinforcements into some 150 ‘no-go zones’ around the country,” stated Newsweek in 2005.

c“The word banlieue (suburb) now connotes a no-go zone of high-rise slums, drug-fueled crime, failing schools and poor, largely Muslim immigrants and their angry offspring,”commented the New Republic after the Paris terror attacks.




3. The 120-page research paper “No-Go Zones in the French Republic: Myth or Reality” records dozens of French neighborhoods “where police and gendarmerie cannot enforce the Republican order or even enter without risking confrontation, projectiles, or even fatal shootings,” according to the Gatestone Institute.

“Separate Islamic societies” are displacing French civil law,” documents the 2,200-word, 2011 French report “Banlieue de la République” (“Suburbs of the Republic”).





4. Birmingham’s Islamo-trend is as alarming:

a. A child in Birmingham, England today is more likely to be Muslim than Christian, records the 2011 census

b. A 2014 government probe into Birmingham schools discovered an Islamist Trojan Horse plot to confine pupils to an “intolerant monoculture” that halted assimilation.

c. Birmingham’s Muslim rape gangs groomed girls for sex assaults in a stomach-churning scandal that “the authorities in Britain have deliberately ignored for 25 years,” concludes the shocking 2014 report “Easy Meat: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery.”

Self-styled Muslim no-go zones are flourishing in France and Britain as troubling testaments to western political correctness, and the first fortresses of a new Euro-Islamic order.
America should take heed."
Get real Muslim 8216 no-go zones 8217 are Europe 8217 s sordid big secret 8226 Brooklyn Daily

Stop hating Muslims.

How about they stop Radical Islam first............

and respect our culture and laws first..............

YAWN.

Why would you hate a Muslim who is doing you no harm ?

Do you understand the difference between a RADICAL and a Peaceful Muslim............................

I was praising Egypt on threads recently for taking a stand against the Radical elements over there...............

My concern is the Radical elements..............like the ones who lived here and did 9/11..........was there a tag on their head SAYING LOOK HERE............I'M RADICAL.................

They are subversives.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The difference between 'hoods' in America and Muslim communities a.k.a "No go zones" in Europe is that the 'hoods' are not part of a plan to ultimately impose a foreign set of laws on a host nation.

What evidence do you have to support that claim?

Are you serious??


Coulter identified you pretty well, here:
"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?"

Given how rightwing propaganda relies on distorting the meaning of words, those are perfectly legitimate questions.

PS, why can't you answer them? eh?

Amusing how you pack so many lies into such a short post.

You've certainly earned your nom de plume, "NYLiar"!

 

[eagle1462010]

The difference between 'hoods' in America and Muslim communities a.k.a "No go zones" in Europe is that the 'hoods' are not part of a plan to ultimately impose a foreign set of laws on a host nation.

What evidence do you have to support that claim?

Are you serious??


Coulter identified you pretty well, here:
"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?"

Given how rightwing propaganda relies on distorting the meaning of words, those are perfectly legitimate questions.

PS, why can't you answer them? eh?

Amusing how you pack so many lies into such a short post.

You've certainly earned your nom de plume, "NYLiar"!

Perhaps he is posting from Islamberg NY.............in the neck of the woods with ties to terrorist activities in the articles I've read............

Perhaps he's in CAIR.............who had ties to the HOLY LAND org..............which was found guilty of terrorist activities as well.................

Don't suppose these posters are actually subversives..........hmmmmmm.........

 

[PoliticalChic]

The difference between 'hoods' in America and Muslim communities a.k.a "No go zones" in Europe is that the 'hoods' are not part of a plan to ultimately impose a foreign set of laws on a host nation.

What evidence do you have to support that claim?

Are you serious??


Coulter identified you pretty well, here:
"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?"

Given how rightwing propaganda relies on distorting the meaning of words, those are perfectly legitimate questions.

PS, why can't you answer them? eh?

Amusing how you pack so many lies into such a short post.

You've certainly earned your nom de plume, "NYLiar"!

Perhaps he is posting from Islamberg NY.............in the neck of the woods with ties to terrorist activities in the articles I've read............

Perhaps he's in CAIR.............who had ties to the HOLY LAND org..............which was found guilty of terrorist activities as well.................

Don't suppose these posters are actually subversives..........hmmmmmm.........

Perhaps....

....but, given his reputation, I can't imagine any group, no matter how low, that would admit him as a member.

 

[Sunni Man]

Welcome to Islamberg

So what is the problem?

It's private property. ......

 

[NYcarbineer]

The difference between 'hoods' in America and Muslim communities a.k.a "No go zones" in Europe is that the 'hoods' are not part of a plan to ultimately impose a foreign set of laws on a host nation.

What evidence do you have to support that claim?

Are you serious??


Coulter identified you pretty well, here:
"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?"

Given how rightwing propaganda relies on distorting the meaning of words, those are perfectly legitimate questions.

PS, why can't you answer them? eh?

Amusing how you pack so many lies into such a short post.

You've certainly earned your nom de plume, "NYLiar"!

What's more amusing is how ever since I proved you were a liar you've been in an obsessive compulsion to project that back on me.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The difference between 'hoods' in America and Muslim communities a.k.a "No go zones" in Europe is that the 'hoods' are not part of a plan to ultimately impose a foreign set of laws on a host nation.

What evidence do you have to support that claim?

Are you serious??


Coulter identified you pretty well, here:
"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?"

Given how rightwing propaganda relies on distorting the meaning of words, those are perfectly legitimate questions.

PS, why can't you answer them? eh?

Amusing how you pack so many lies into such a short post.

You've certainly earned your nom de plume, "NYLiar"!

Perhaps he is posting from Islamberg NY.............in the neck of the woods with ties to terrorist activities in the articles I've read............

Perhaps he's in CAIR.............who had ties to the HOLY LAND org..............which was found guilty of terrorist activities as well.................

Don't suppose these posters are actually subversives..........hmmmmmm.........

Could you tell me, with some specificity, what is the evil in defending innocent Muslims?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The difference between 'hoods' in America and Muslim communities a.k.a "No go zones" in Europe is that the 'hoods' are not part of a plan to ultimately impose a foreign set of laws on a host nation.

What evidence do you have to support that claim?

Are you serious??


Coulter identified you pretty well, here:
"Whenever liberals are in a tight spot, they adopt the scorched-earth policy of argumentation. With no answer, they start demanding that you define words: What do you mean “liberal”? What do you mean “democracy”? What do you mean “patriotism”?"

Given how rightwing propaganda relies on distorting the meaning of words, those are perfectly legitimate questions.

PS, why can't you answer them? eh?

Amusing how you pack so many lies into such a short post.

You've certainly earned your nom de plume, "NYLiar"!

What's more amusing is how ever since I proved you were a liar you've been in an obsessive compulsion to project that back on me.

See what I mean?