The True Story Behind Obama's Fundimental Change Of America

[Discombobulated]

Obama essentially wants to take away the power of your vote and give it to foreigners.

That is the fundamental change he talked about.

If you're not willing to buy into his bullshit, he'll go outside of the country and find millions who will.

It's as simple as that.

How did the Democrats completely change the demographics of California?

By flooding the state with refugees from other countries.

Start a few wars, declare those countries humanitarian disasters, and ship em to the border.

This has been his plan all along, and the rest of the Democrats almost to a man are in on it.

This is a Syrian refugee camp in Jordan.

Obama and Harry Reid see a whole camp full of new Democrat voters. The trick is getting them here without drawing attention to them.

The True Story.......very misleading title.

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama essentially wants to take away the power of your vote and give it to foreigners.

That is the fundamental change he talked about.

If you're not willing to buy into his bullshit, he'll go outside of the country and find millions who will.

It's as simple as that.

How did the Democrats completely change the demographics of California?

By flooding the state with refugees from other countries.

Start a few wars, declare those countries humanitarian disasters, and ship em to the border.

This has been his plan all along, and the rest of the Democrats almost to a man are in on it.

This is a Syrian refugee camp in Jordan.

Obama and Harry Reid see a whole camp full of new Democrat voters. The trick is getting them here without drawing attention to them.

The True Story.......very misleading title.

Is that a question?

If I read you right you just made a contradictory statement.

 

[Machaut]

How so?

Consider these two questions:

1. Has mass amnesty ever been granted before, and if so, by whom?

2. When did illegal immigration occur--did the entire illegal population of the U.S. suddenly come into being only after Obama assumed office?

And if so, in what way does that excuse Obama?

You cannot defend this simply by saying you think someone else did it before him.

That is like beating a dead horse. It's been tried too many times.

It doesn't excuse him, nor am I trying to. I'm not defending Obama, as he is part of the problem--just like many presidents of both parties before him. You, however, appear to be holding Obama to an entirely different standard than his predecessors, as well as the Democrats to a different standard than the Republicans. Both parties support illegal immigration, both parties have failed to address the issue, and the voters supporting both parties continue to enable it.

Reagan signed the Democratic sponsored amnesty Bill, but later said it was the biggest mistake he ever made.

Is it your assertion that saying "whoops lol, sry u guys" absolves him of any responsibility for his actions? If so, would you be willing to forgive Obama were he to make that declaration?

Now Obama's not only wants to do the same thing, but he goes to Hispanic countries telling them to come to America. He announced his unilateral EO granting immunity to millions of illegals and then fails to secure the borders. What do you think he expected would happen?

I must examine the same facts that you are privy to in order to accurately answer your question. Please provide the sources used for your "goes to Hispanic countries" and "EO granting immunity" claims.

No, I'm not holding him to a different standard. He already knows that what he's doing will only make the problem worse, yet he does it anyway. That is the essence of corruption. A president that refuses to defend this country and undermines it's laws simply for political purposes.

So you label any president that "undermines" U.S. law "for political purposes" and "refuses to defend this country" against a non-military threat as corrupt? I'm assuming you dislike corrupt presidents. Are you under the impression that no other president in American history has done anything like this?

 

[Katzndogz]

The same time we are receiving an assault on our borders unprecedented in our history, the Obama regime is bringing in millions of immigrants from every other third world country. The somalies are being airlifted in by the hundreds.

The purpose is to dilute and eventually overwhelm Americans. It's part of the philosophy of making us equal to those failed countries. If we had their people, we would be as much of a failure as they are. It's a fitting punishment for American superiority and arrogance.

 

[Theowl32]

Not to mention this old story that extends back to how Harry Reid fraudulently won his election in 2010. A foreign company was then put in charge of the national election in 2012, a few months before the 2012 presidential elections.

Drudge: Foreign Company Will Count Votes for US National Election | The Gaspee Gazette

Drudge: Foreign Company Will Count Votes for US National Election
If you have to ask why this is horriffic…the Matrix has you!

FOREIGN COMPANY BUYS U.S. ELECTION RESULTS REPORTING FIRM

Neal. A “matrix” has taken over. It is the globalizing and internationalizing of leading countries’ governments (i.e. USA, China, Russia, England, etc.) by organizations such as the Bilderberg group, United Nations & Agenda 21, and George Soros & his ilk.

Bottom line is the unforgivable violation by all these entities and by Obama and his ilk of this portion of the Constitution of what used to be a fully functioning Republic of the United States of America:

FOREIGN COMPANY BUYS U.S. ELECTION RESULTS REPORTING FIRM

FOREIGN COMPANY BUYS U.S. ELECTION RESULTS REPORTING FIRM
By Bev Harris
BlackBoxVoting.org

In a major step towards global centralization of election processes, the world's dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA's dominant election results reporting company.

When you view your local or state election results on the Internet, on portals which often appear to be owned by the county elections division, in over 525 US jurisdictions you are actually redirected to a private corporate site controlled by SOE software, which operates under the name ClarityElections.com.

The good news is that this firm promptly reports precinct-level detail in downloadable spreadsheet format. As reported by BlackBoxVoting.org in 2008, the bad news is that this centralizes one middleman access point for over 525 jurisdictions in AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. And growing.

As local election results funnel through SOE's servers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the computer servers for SOE essentially get "first look" at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.

In 2004, many Americans were justifiably concerned when, days before the presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell redirected Ohio election night results through the Tennessee-based server for several national Republican Party operations.

This is worse: This redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.

A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape / photograph these poll tapes in 2008.

With the merger of SOE and SCYTL, that won't work (if SCYTL's voting system is used). When there are two truly independent sources of information, the public can perform its own "audit" by matching one number against the other.

These two independent sources, however, will now be merged into one single source: an Internet voting system controlled by SCYTL, with a results reporting system also controlled by SCYTL.

With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, chain of custody, or the count.

SCYTL is moving into or already running elections in: the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Norway, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, India and Australia.

SCYTL is based in Barcelona; its funding comes from international venture capital funds including Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker.


-------------------------------------------

The president and the democrats have been playing very dirty for decades, knowing that they have virtually a complete free run to anything they want. How much have they gotten away with in Obama's presidency? It is really too many things to even count. Hell there are literally a hundred things this president could be impeached for and the left just claps like the retarded sheep they are.

The case of Mexico systematically sending their "kids" on buses in mass numbers is the democrats way to rally the hispanic vote in this election year. This has been organized through Obama's appointee Cecilia Munoz who was a La Raza radical. In case you do not know, La Raza means "The Race" in Spanish. Obviously something the retarded monkeys in the democratic voting base does not know about or care about. They just drone on their little.......Obama is innocent of everything notion.

Anyway, they flood the country with illegals, especially in states controlled by republican governors knowing what kind of response the conservative talking heads will give. They are counting on pouncing on conservatives rightfully saying the administration is breaking yet another law.

The retarded left wing sheeple will just clap away and more importantly it will rally and edify their voting block. The poor, the illegals, the hispanic vote and they will be seen as the robin hood types and the conservatives will look like the bad guy again.

The moron left wing republicans who are liberal will try and tell us that the republicans need to court the hispanic vote. As though that would ever work. It was Reagan that granted amnesty and democrats like Mondale that went down to Texas to fight against the illegals coming into this country.

However, even back then the media, which has been left wing really since the late 50s, convinced amnesty was done through their friends in the democratic party. Each time the republicans did anything for them in order to court their vote, it backfired and they received less of the vote than they had prior.

Liberals are a joke in every way, and yes this president is by far the worst president ever. It really is not close either. His claims of change had everything to do with the notion he wanted to destroy capitalism, the American way of life and inevitably the constitution itself. The constitution pretty much does not exist in the most important ways. It may be just an old document conceived by slave owners, and that is the way the president and his retarded base sees it.

He has been surrounded and completely ingrained in the socialist/marxism ideology his entire contrived life. This is what he meant by change and he is using the Saul Alinsky playbook to do it. In his eyes, and the real dangerous assholes on the left like Axelrod, he has not been making any mistakes. He has carrying out exactly what he has promised.