The Troops are concerned about gays serving openly.

[bodecea]

No ravi, my son hasn't resigned. Unlike you he isn't a sexual deviant. Have a nice day.

So...he is just all talk.

 

[yota5]

Good morning maggots. I think that I'm going to have a great time with you too. Hoo Rah! There is one thing that is clear. You're gay. Like the old adage goes if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck, it's a duck. Nuff said about that.

To those of you claiming to have served with a self declared gay I have only one thing to say. Horse Hockey! When I served DADT didn't exist. So I can only say that I knowingly served with two gays. One night on BN. Staff Duty, I caught two rump rangers honking on each other (you know like seawtch says, you got to eat your meat to get to the pudding) while doing HQ CO bed check. These two individuals were taken into custody, and were out processed the next day.

The same thing would happen today under DADT. If you declare sexual deviation through action or statement you're gone. Gays can't openly serve in the US Military. It's that simple. People who have served would know that.

The statement that you served with openly declared gays would suggest that you're a liar, or didn't serve. I think that the assumption that you're a liar is evident. Your service to this country is in question, but is not readily verifiable with out seeing your DD 214. When I served we still had a volunteer/ drafted force. So all units had their fair share of maggots to deal with. Some folks just didn't belong in the military. So the fact that you may have served is a possibility.

For those of you with reading comprehension issues let me reiterate myun thesis. Deviants shouldn't be allowed to openly serve in our military.

I, for one, welcome you to the board. We will have a lot of fun with you. There are quite a few like you on the board and you are fun to play with
Those with a mindset in the 80s are easy prey

Have fun posting

Thank you Rightwinger. I appreciate the kind words, and the invite. I want you to know that I'm having a lot of fun with you guys too.

The mindset of the 80s? Did the concepts of Morality, Honor, Integrity, Duty, Respect, Loyalty, selfless service, and personal courage really make it that far? I had thought that these core American values were thrown out in the 60s. Interesting? I've got to admit though that I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard.

Have fun posting to you too.

 

[bodecea]

Good morning maggots. I think that I'm going to have a great time with you too. Hoo Rah! There is one thing that is clear. You're gay. Like the old adage goes if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck, it's a duck. Nuff said about that.

To those of you claiming to have served with a self declared gay I have only one thing to say. Horse Hockey! When I served DADT didn't exist. So I can only say that I knowingly served with two gays. One night on BN. Staff Duty, I caught two rump rangers honking on each other (you know like seawtch says, you got to eat your meat to get to the pudding) while doing HQ CO bed check. These two individuals were taken into custody, and were out processed the next day.

The same thing would happen today under DADT. If you declare sexual deviation through action or statement you're gone. Gays can't openly serve in the US Military. It's that simple. People who have served would know that.

The statement that you served with openly declared gays would suggest that you're a liar, or didn't serve. I think that the assumption that you're a liar is evident. Your service to this country is in question, but is not readily verifiable with out seeing your DD 214. When I served we still had a volunteer/ drafted force. So all units had their fair share of maggots to deal with. Some folks just didn't belong in the military. So the fact that you may have served is a possibility.

For those of you with reading comprehension issues let me reiterate myun thesis. Deviants shouldn't be allowed to openly serve in our military.

I, for one, welcome you to the board. We will have a lot of fun with you. There are quite a few like you on the board and you are fun to play with
Those with a mindset in the 80s are easy prey

Have fun posting

Thank you Rightwinger. I appreciate the kind words, and the invite. I want you to know that I'm having a lot of fun with you guys too.

The mindset of the 80s? Did the concepts of Morality, Honor, Integrity, Duty, Respect, Loyalty, selfless service, and personal courage really make it that far? I had thought that these core American values were thrown out in the 60s. Interesting? I've got to admit though that I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard.

Have fun posting to you too.

And what gives you THAT impression? Please explain.

 

[Brewbrother]

I had a conversation with my oldest son yesterday. He is career military. He just finished his fourth sensitivity training class about gays serving openly in the military. The troops can't comment on this issue or make disparaging remarks about the CinC. They've been advised that this is the way it will be; live with it.

In all of the classes they've been given one thing has been left out. The danger of HIV infection through direct contact with blood. Blood is the biggest bio-hazard on any accident scene. Civilians will say put on surgical gloves. A soldier would say that when you're wearing your buddies brains all over your face that wont do any good.

As a soldier I could count on my buddies doing everything in their power to bring me or my body back home. My buddies could count on the same thing from me. An openly gay soldier on the battlefield will lay where they fall. This is a very real degradation of military core values. Yet the troops feel that touching the openly gay soldiers blood would expose them to the very really threat of AIDS. That is a death sentence that will be resisted.

Morale is already being affected in a very negative way. The troops feel like they're being kicked in the stomach, and that they're being put into a life threatening situation. Once again people who've never served a second in uniform are making life threatening decisions that will carry dire consequences for the young men and women that this country sends into harms way. I think that congress, and the president need sensitivity training.

I didn't know sexual orientation effected rifle accuracy.

 

[bodecea]

I had a conversation with my oldest son yesterday. He is career military. He just finished his fourth sensitivity training class about gays serving openly in the military. The troops can't comment on this issue or make disparaging remarks about the CinC. They've been advised that this is the way it will be; live with it.

In all of the classes they've been given one thing has been left out. The danger of HIV infection through direct contact with blood. Blood is the biggest bio-hazard on any accident scene. Civilians will say put on surgical gloves. A soldier would say that when you're wearing your buddies brains all over your face that wont do any good.

As a soldier I could count on my buddies doing everything in their power to bring me or my body back home. My buddies could count on the same thing from me. An openly gay soldier on the battlefield will lay where they fall. This is a very real degradation of military core values. Yet the troops feel that touching the openly gay soldiers blood would expose them to the very really threat of AIDS. That is a death sentence that will be resisted.

Morale is already being affected in a very negative way. The troops feel like they're being kicked in the stomach, and that they're being put into a life threatening situation. Once again people who've never served a second in uniform are making life threatening decisions that will carry dire consequences for the young men and women that this country sends into harms way. I think that congress, and the president need sensitivity training.

I didn't know sexual orientation effected rifle accuracy.

If you continue to read the thread, you will find the OP to be a smoke screen....

 

[yota5]

Boudica (play /ˈbuːdɪkə/; alternative spelling: Boudicca), also known as Boadicea /boʊdɪˈsiːə/ and known in Welsh as "Buddug" [ˈbɨ̞ðɨ̞ɡ][1] (d. AD 60 or 61) was queen of the Iceni tribe who led an uprising against the occupying forces of the Roman Empire.

Boudica's husband Prasutagus, ruler of the Iceni tribe who had ruled as a nominally independent ally of Rome, left his kingdom jointly to his daughters and the Roman Emperor in his will. However, when he died, his will was ignored. The kingdom was annexed as if conquered, Boudica was flogged and her daughters raped, and Roman financiers called in their loans.

In AD 60 or 61, while the Roman governor, Gaius Suetonius Paulinus, was leading a campaign on the island of Anglesey in north Wales, Boudica led the Iceni people, along with the Trinovantes and others, in revolt. They destroyed Camulodunum (modern Colchester), formerly the capital of the Trinovantes, but now a colonia (a settlement for discharged Roman soldiers) and the site of a temple to the former emperor Claudius, which was built and maintained at local expense. They also routed a Roman legion, the IX Hispana, sent to relieve the settlement.

Boudica - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Boadicea, the warrior queen. She would spin in her grave.

 

[bodecea]

Boudica (play /ˈbuːdɪkə/; alternative spelling: Boudicca), also known as Boadicea /boʊdɪˈsiːə/ and known in Welsh as "Buddug" [ˈbɨ̞ðɨ̞ɡ][1] (d. AD 60 or 61) was queen of the Iceni tribe who led an uprising against the occupying forces of the Roman Empire.

Boudica's husband Prasutagus, ruler of the Iceni tribe who had ruled as a nominally independent ally of Rome, left his kingdom jointly to his daughters and the Roman Emperor in his will. However, when he died, his will was ignored. The kingdom was annexed as if conquered, Boudica was flogged and her daughters raped, and Roman financiers called in their loans.

In AD 60 or 61, while the Roman governor, Gaius Suetonius Paulinus, was leading a campaign on the island of Anglesey in north Wales, Boudica led the Iceni people, along with the Trinovantes and others, in revolt. They destroyed Camulodunum (modern Colchester), formerly the capital of the Trinovantes, but now a colonia (a settlement for discharged Roman soldiers) and the site of a temple to the former emperor Claudius, which was built and maintained at local expense. They also routed a Roman legion, the IX Hispana, sent to relieve the settlement.

Boudica - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Boadicea, the warrior queen. She would spin in her grave.

Your lovely historical deflection is noted.....now, could you kindly explain this comment of yours?

I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard.

If you are able, of course.

 

[rightwinger]

Good morning maggots. I think that I'm going to have a great time with you too. Hoo Rah! There is one thing that is clear. You're gay. Like the old adage goes if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck, it's a duck. Nuff said about that.

To those of you claiming to have served with a self declared gay I have only one thing to say. Horse Hockey! When I served DADT didn't exist. So I can only say that I knowingly served with two gays. One night on BN. Staff Duty, I caught two rump rangers honking on each other (you know like seawtch says, you got to eat your meat to get to the pudding) while doing HQ CO bed check. These two individuals were taken into custody, and were out processed the next day.

The same thing would happen today under DADT. If you declare sexual deviation through action or statement you're gone. Gays can't openly serve in the US Military. It's that simple. People who have served would know that.

The statement that you served with openly declared gays would suggest that you're a liar, or didn't serve. I think that the assumption that you're a liar is evident. Your service to this country is in question, but is not readily verifiable with out seeing your DD 214. When I served we still had a volunteer/ drafted force. So all units had their fair share of maggots to deal with. Some folks just didn't belong in the military. So the fact that you may have served is a possibility.

For those of you with reading comprehension issues let me reiterate myun thesis. Deviants shouldn't be allowed to openly serve in our military.

I, for one, welcome you to the board. We will have a lot of fun with you. There are quite a few like you on the board and you are fun to play with
Those with a mindset in the 80s are easy prey

Have fun posting

Thank you Rightwinger. I appreciate the kind words, and the invite. I want you to know that I'm having a lot of fun with you guys too.

The mindset of the 80s? Did the concepts of Morality, Honor, Integrity, Duty, Respect, Loyalty, selfless service, and personal courage really make it that far? I had thought that these core American values were thrown out in the 60s. Interesting? I've got to admit though that I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard.

Have fun posting to you too.

Sorry,

But I lived through the 60s and they were not very moral. Open hatred over a persons race, religion or sexuality. An unwillingness to accept the role women are capable of serve to this country. Not very moral

Blacks were beaten and lynched, gays openly beaten without protection, women beaten by their husbands and the law would d nothing about it

Those were not moral times

 

[bodecea]

I, for one, welcome you to the board. We will have a lot of fun with you. There are quite a few like you on the board and you are fun to play with
Those with a mindset in the 80s are easy prey

Have fun posting

Thank you Rightwinger. I appreciate the kind words, and the invite. I want you to know that I'm having a lot of fun with you guys too.

The mindset of the 80s? Did the concepts of Morality, Honor, Integrity, Duty, Respect, Loyalty, selfless service, and personal courage really make it that far? I had thought that these core American values were thrown out in the 60s. Interesting? I've got to admit though that I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard.

Have fun posting to you too.

Sorry,

But I lived through the 60s and they were not very moral. Open hatred over a persons race, religion or sexuality. An unwillingness to accept the role women are capable of serve to this country. Not very moral

Blacks were beaten and lynched, gays openly beaten without protection, women beaten by their husbands and the law would d nothing about it

Those were not moral times

C'mon, RW. There's moral and then there's "moral".

 

[Mr. Shaman]

As a soldier I could count on my buddies doing everything in their power to bring me or my body back home. My buddies could count on the same thing from me. An openly gay soldier on the battlefield will lay where they fall. This is a very real degradation of military core values. Yet the troops feel that touching the openly gay soldiers blood would expose them to the very really threat of AIDS. That is a death sentence that will be resisted.

Morale is already being affected in a very negative way. The troops feel like they're being kicked in the stomach, and that they're being put into a life threatening situation. Once again people who've never served a second in uniform are making life threatening decisions that will carry dire consequences for the young men and women that this country sends into harms way.

Yeah....especially when harms way includes.....

....The BRASS!!!!!

"Greg Jeloudov was 35 and new to America when he decided to join the Army. Like most soldiers, he was driven by both patriotism for his adopted homeland and the pragmatic notion that the military could be a first step in a career that would enable him to provide for his new family. Instead, Jeloudov arrived at Fort Benning, Ga., for basic training in May 2009, in the middle of the economic crisis and rising xenophobia. The soldiers in his unit, responding to his Russian accent and New York City address, called him a “champagne socialist” and a “commie ******.” He was, he told NEWSWEEK, “in the middle of the viper’s pit.” Less than two weeks after arriving on base, he was gang-raped in the barracks by men who said they were showing him who was in charge of the United States. When he reported the attack to unit commanders, he says they told him, “It must have been your fault. You must have provoked them.”

 

[yota5]

Good morning boadicea. "I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard." (yota5) Your answer follows.

Boad, one only has to read the postings, and replies from our more socialistic inclined board members. A pattern soon emerges. The far left always takes the side that is most injures to the USA.

When the far lefts web site Home » cpusa is visited it soon becomes evident what the lefts agenda is, and who is driving it. Once on cpusa.org read the communist manifesto that is posted there. It will then become crystal clear what the lefts goals are, and how they plan to achieve them. You will not find one reference to core American values posted there.

I found this site by accident about four years ago. I was reading some replies on another web site. I thought back then that reply sounds like a communists view point. I Googled communist party expecting to find this subversive outfit headquartered in Europe. Imagine my surprise when the communist party USA web site popped up. I go there often. It is always advantageous to know what your enemy is up to.

 

[rightwinger]

Good morning boadicea. "I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard." (yota5) Your answer follows.

Boad, one only has to read the postings, and replies from our more socialistic inclined board members. A pattern soon emerges. The far left always takes the side that is most injures to the USA.

When the far lefts web site Home » cpusa is visited it soon becomes evident what the lefts agenda is, and who is driving it. Once on cpusa.org read the communist manifesto that is posted there. It will then become crystal clear what the lefts goals are, and how they plan to achieve them. You will not find one reference to core American values posted there.

I found this site by accident about four years ago. I was reading some replies on another web site. I thought back then that reply sounds like a communists view point. I Googled communist party expecting to find this subversive outfit headquartered in Europe. Imagine my surprise when the communist party USA web site popped up. I go there often. It is always advantageous to know what your enemy is up to.

LOL

Still protecting us from the red menace....I am not surprised

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Good morning boadicea. "I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard." (yota5) Your answer follows.

Boad, one only has to read the postings, and replies from our more socialistic inclined board members. A pattern soon emerges. The far left always takes the side that is most injures to the USA.

When the far lefts web site Home » cpusa is visited it soon becomes evident what the lefts agenda is, and who is driving it. Once on cpusa.org read the communist manifesto that is posted there. It will then become crystal clear what the lefts goals are, and how they plan to achieve them. You will not find one reference to core American values posted there.

I found this site by accident about four years ago. I was reading some replies on another web site. I thought back then that reply sounds like a communists view point. I Googled communist party expecting to find this subversive outfit headquartered in Europe. Imagine my surprise when the communist party USA web site popped up. I go there often. It is always advantageous to know what your enemy is up to.

Yeah.....we Progressives feel we have an obligation to keep an eye on the.....

....White Wingers....

....as well.

(You know....those folks who are worried about losing their Country. )​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Good morning boadicea. "I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard." (yota5) Your answer follows.

Boad, one only has to read the postings, and replies from our more socialistic inclined board members. A pattern soon emerges. The far left always takes the side that is most injures to the USA.

When the far lefts web site Home » cpusa is visited it soon becomes evident what the lefts agenda is, and who is driving it. Once on cpusa.org read the communist manifesto that is posted there. It will then become crystal clear what the lefts goals are, and how they plan to achieve them. You will not find one reference to core American values posted there.

I found this site by accident about four years ago. I was reading some replies on another web site. I thought back then that reply sounds like a communists view point. I Googled communist party expecting to find this subversive outfit headquartered in Europe. Imagine my surprise when the communist party USA web site popped up. I go there often. It is always advantageous to know what your enemy is up to.

LOL

Still protecting us from the red menace....I am not surprised

Hey.....you know.....

"Bend the twig and so grows the tree."

 

[konradv]

Good morning maggots. I think that I'm going to have a great time with you too. Hoo Rah! There is one thing that is clear. You're gay. Like the old adage goes if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck, it's a duck. Nuff said about that.

To those of you claiming to have served with a self declared gay I have only one thing to say. Horse Hockey! When I served DADT didn't exist. So I can only say that I knowingly served with two gays. One night on BN. Staff Duty, I caught two rump rangers honking on each other (you know like seawtch says, you got to eat your meat to get to the pudding) while doing HQ CO bed check. These two individuals were taken into custody, and were out processed the next day.

The same thing would happen today under DADT. If you declare sexual deviation through action or statement you're gone. Gays can't openly serve in the US Military. It's that simple. People who have served would know that.

The statement that you served with openly declared gays would suggest that you're a liar, or didn't serve. I think that the assumption that you're a liar is evident. Your service to this country is in question, but is not readily verifiable with out seeing your DD 214. When I served we still had a volunteer/ drafted force. So all units had their fair share of maggots to deal with. Some folks just didn't belong in the military. So the fact that you may have served is a possibility.

For those of you with reading comprehension issues let me reiterate my thesis. Deviants shouldn't be allowed to openly serve in our military.

Word to yota. We've progressed beyond your parochial views. YOU'RE the deviant now!!!

 

[yota5]

Good morning maggots. I think that I'm going to have a great time with you too. Hoo Rah! There is one thing that is clear. You're gay. Like the old adage goes if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck, it's a duck. Nuff said about that.

To those of you claiming to have served with a self declared gay I have only one thing to say. Horse Hockey! When I served DADT didn't exist. So I can only say that I knowingly served with two gays. One night on BN. Staff Duty, I caught two rump rangers honking on each other (you know like seawtch says, you got to eat your meat to get to the pudding) while doing HQ CO bed check. These two individuals were taken into custody, and were out processed the next day.

The same thing would happen today under DADT. If you declare sexual deviation through action or statement you're gone. Gays can't openly serve in the US Military. It's that simple. People who have served would know that.

The statement that you served with openly declared gays would suggest that you're a liar, or didn't serve. I think that the assumption that you're a liar is evident. Your service to this country is in question, but is not readily verifiable with out seeing your DD 214. When I served we still had a volunteer/ drafted force. So all units had their fair share of maggots to deal with. Some folks just didn't belong in the military. So the fact that you may have served is a possibility.

For those of you with reading comprehension issues let me reiterate my thesis. Deviants shouldn't be allowed to openly serve in our military.

Word to yota. We've progressed beyond your parochial views. YOU'RE the deviant now!!!

Komrad, I see that you and shaman, use the communist code word progressive. In this context progressive is synonymous with communist. That fact is widely known.

I understand why communist as enemies of the United States don't want themselves identified, or their activities known. For those board members who aren't aware of the nefarious activities of the communist party USA. I would suggest that they log on to your home page. http//cpusa.org Situational awareness requires that you always know what the enemy is up to.

A list of communist alias' follows.

1. Progressive
2. Centrist
3. Liberal
4. communist et al

A complete edification of the communist agenda can be found at http//cpusa.org .

 

[rightwinger]

Good morning maggots. I think that I'm going to have a great time with you too. Hoo Rah! There is one thing that is clear. You're gay. Like the old adage goes if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck, it's a duck. Nuff said about that.

To those of you claiming to have served with a self declared gay I have only one thing to say. Horse Hockey! When I served DADT didn't exist. So I can only say that I knowingly served with two gays. One night on BN. Staff Duty, I caught two rump rangers honking on each other (you know like seawtch says, you got to eat your meat to get to the pudding) while doing HQ CO bed check. These two individuals were taken into custody, and were out processed the next day.

The same thing would happen today under DADT. If you declare sexual deviation through action or statement you're gone. Gays can't openly serve in the US Military. It's that simple. People who have served would know that.

The statement that you served with openly declared gays would suggest that you're a liar, or didn't serve. I think that the assumption that you're a liar is evident. Your service to this country is in question, but is not readily verifiable with out seeing your DD 214. When I served we still had a volunteer/ drafted force. So all units had their fair share of maggots to deal with. Some folks just didn't belong in the military. So the fact that you may have served is a possibility.

For those of you with reading comprehension issues let me reiterate my thesis. Deviants shouldn't be allowed to openly serve in our military.

Word to yota. We've progressed beyond your parochial views. YOU'RE the deviant now!!!

Komrad, I see that you and shaman, use the communist code word progressive. In this context progressive is synonymous with communist. That fact is widely known.

I understand why communist as enemies of the United States don't want themselves identified, or their activities known. For those board members who aren't aware of the nefarious activities of the communist party USA. I would suggest that they log on to your home page. http//cpusa.org Situational awareness requires that you always know what the enemy is up to.

A list of communist alias' follows.

1. Progressive
2. Centrist
3. Liberal
4. communist et al

A complete edification of the communist agenda can be found at http//cpusa.org .

Damn commies are plotting to take us over

We need brave men like yota to protect us from the commies, gays, libruls, feminists and tree huggers

The whole world hangs in the balance

 

[gautama]

WTF good is an annual test ????

What about the ALL-IMPORTANT "in-between" periods between annual testing.........which it doesn't take to much to figure out that testing the ******* queers weekly would be too onerous.....and impractical. Thus making the "annual tests" just a useless BULLSHIT exercise !!!

Face it. The Obamarrhoidal Administration, with its fucked up PC Agenda, is endangering the lives of not only the queers, but the normals in the Military.

The Military ?

There are enough high ranking military that will kiss the President's arse no matter what the issue.

Consider the Muslim "Psychiatrist" Jihadist Major Hasan: FOR MONTHS, the Military spewed out the Obamarrhoidal PC line without mentioning the word "terrrorist", Jihadist, or even Islam claiming that it was an isolated nutcase occurrence on par with the nutcase that shot the congresswoman in the head, or the Columbine shootings, etc., even though the Jihadist Arsehole Hassan howled Allahu Akbar and had numerous correspondence with Osama Bin Laden's substitute Awaki (sp).

On what basis do you pre-suppose that gay people have HIV? On what basis do you pre-suppose that straight soldiers cannot contract HIV between their yearly test? And on what basis do you find any relevance to going off on tangents such as Kathy Giffords or the Columbine shooting? It's obvious that you have nothing to say that is based on a rational view of the issue, and that you're more interested in ranting mindlessly. No, what you're saying doesn't bear repeating, because it's been so thoroughly debunked you actually sound less intelligent than the OP for saying it now.

Geekrap,

Queers are more prone than normals to get HIV, probably by a factor close to 10 to one. I don't have the stats, but I betcha that in spite of your Geekrappola you wouldn't stake your life on the fact that I'm wrong. Being a queer geek you'd naturally lie about that.

Obviously normals are able to get HIV, the Bubonic plague, Leprosy, etc., between annual tests ........ however the obvious fact is that they are a helluva lot less likely to contract HIV, than the ******* queers.

The relevance of the Kathy Gifford, Columbine shootings, etc., is that they are obviously not connected to Islamofascist Terrorism. While the jihadist Whackjob Maj Hasan's terrorism is.......yet, the Military brass are willing to abide by Presidential whims of the MONUMENTAL FRAUD Obami Salaami, whatever the issue......even to the extent of toeing the ridiculous policy of permitting the ******* queers to openly practice their perversion openly while in the military.

If you weren't an Obamarrhoidal stooge you wouldn't have made your ludicrous post. You are probably a ******* queer to boot and that would explain your mental aberration more definitively.

 

[bodecea]

Good morning boadicea. "I'm getting the impression that many of those posting to this board don't hold any of the core American values in very high regard." (yota5) Your answer follows.

Boad, one only has to read the postings, and replies from our more socialistic inclined board members. A pattern soon emerges. The far left always takes the side that is most injures to the USA.

When the far lefts web site Home » cpusa is visited it soon becomes evident what the lefts agenda is, and who is driving it. Once on cpusa.org read the communist manifesto that is posted there. It will then become crystal clear what the lefts goals are, and how they plan to achieve them. You will not find one reference to core American values posted there.

I found this site by accident about four years ago. I was reading some replies on another web site. I thought back then that reply sounds like a communists view point. I Googled communist party expecting to find this subversive outfit headquartered in Europe. Imagine my surprise when the communist party USA web site popped up. I go there often. It is always advantageous to know what your enemy is up to.

Wait....who's been talking about Communism in this thread? No one but you. Is it possible for you to STICK to a subject? Or are you unable to do so?

 

[yota5]

Rightwinger, it's hard to say it that it isn't so when the evidence is in the words of you and your komrads. http//cpusa.org