The total export from China to Moscow has decreased by 27 percent since the beginning of Pootin's war against Ukraine

I don't see Russia breaking up over this, too many of those republics would be totally isolated and would not have viable economies.
STILL many new states ´d have it much better than today
Karelia
all Kuril Island under Japan
Sakha
Tataria
Eastern Prussia
etc.
 
I don't see it happening.
it has happened 2 times just in 75 years, almost in 1905 and 1856

map from 1918, WIKI :

Russia1918.png
 
Remember Pootler's grand predictions that "sanctions imposed by the West will just bring a temporary slowdown in our economy, as we broaden trade with China". Didn't work out. :lol: one for sure, China wants back outer Manchuria, Siberia and the lake Baikal , bad news for the Nigeria with snow :lol:





View attachment 641725

So China lost a shit ton of exports?

Glorious.

I hope more countries ruin China
 
The attempt was quickly put to rest.
  • November 9 - A Presidential Decree number 1874 on the dissolution of the Sverdlovsk Regional Council, and then, on November 10 - the Decree No. 1890 on the dismissal of Eduard Rossel. All their decisions regarding the Ural Republic were declared null and void.[10] Valery Trushnikov was appointed as the head of Sverdlovsk Oblast' administration.

 
The attempt was quickly put to rest.



couple interesting articles on the same subject

1)
The unwieldy Russian Federation consists of 85 “federal subjects,” of which 22 are republics representing non-Russian ethnicities, including the North Caucasus and Middle Volga, and numerous regions with distinct identities that feel increasingly estranged from Moscow.


Instead of pursuing decentralization to accommodate regional aspirations, the Kremlin is downgrading their autonomy. This is evident in the new language law designed to promote “Russification” and plans to merge and eliminate several regions.


Pressure is mounting across the country, with growing anger at local governors appointed by the Kremlin and resentment that Moscow appropriates their resources. Indeed, regions such as Sakha and Magadan in the far east, with their substantial mineral wealth, could be successful states without Moscow’s exploitation.


Emerging states will benefit from forging closer economic and political contacts with neighboring countries rather than depending on Moscow, whose federal budget is drastically shrinking. Collapsing infrastructure means that residents of Siberia and Russia’s far east will become even more separated from the center, thus encouraging demands for secession and sovereignty.


Given Russia’s ailments, an assertive Western approach would be more effective than reactive defense. Washington needs to return to core principles that accompanied the collapse of the Soviet Union by supporting democratization, pluralism, minority rights, genuine federalism, decentralization and regional self-determination among Russia’s disparate regions and ethnic groups.

2)

Tens of thousands protest in Russia's far east after Kremlin ...

https://www.wsws.org › articles › 2020/07/15 › russ-j14





15 Jul 2020 — On Saturday, up to 35,000 people protested in Khabarovsk, ... the secession of the far east from Russia was discussed as a real possibility ...
huge protested in Khabarovsk have had Belarusian flags, Ural Republic Flags, but No Muscovite flags
1652208720487.png


1652208865908.png
 
couple interesting articles on the same subject

1)
The unwieldy Russian Federation consists of 85 “federal subjects,” of which 22 are republics representing non-Russian ethnicities, including the North Caucasus and Middle Volga, and numerous regions with distinct identities that feel increasingly estranged from Moscow.


Instead of pursuing decentralization to accommodate regional aspirations, the Kremlin is downgrading their autonomy. This is evident in the new language law designed to promote “Russification” and plans to merge and eliminate several regions.


Pressure is mounting across the country, with growing anger at local governors appointed by the Kremlin and resentment that Moscow appropriates their resources. Indeed, regions such as Sakha and Magadan in the far east, with their substantial mineral wealth, could be successful states without Moscow’s exploitation.


Emerging states will benefit from forging closer economic and political contacts with neighboring countries rather than depending on Moscow, whose federal budget is drastically shrinking. Collapsing infrastructure means that residents of Siberia and Russia’s far east will become even more separated from the center, thus encouraging demands for secession and sovereignty.


Given Russia’s ailments, an assertive Western approach would be more effective than reactive defense. Washington needs to return to core principles that accompanied the collapse of the Soviet Union by supporting democratization, pluralism, minority rights, genuine federalism, decentralization and regional self-determination among Russia’s disparate regions and ethnic groups.

2)

Tens of thousands protest in Russia's far east after Kremlin ...

https://www.wsws.org › articles › 2020/07/15 › russ-j14





15 Jul 2020 — On Saturday, up to 35,000 people protested in Khabarovsk, ... the secession of the far east from Russia was discussed as a real possibility ...
huge protested in Khabarovsk have had Belarusian flags, Ural Republic Flags, but No Muscovite flags
View attachment 642815

View attachment 642816
Unfortunately Putin's history is to put down such efforts with as much force and he deems necessary to crush them.
 
Remember Pootler's grand predictions that "sanctions imposed by the West will just bring a temporary slowdown in our economy, as we broaden trade with China". Didn't work out. :lol: one for sure, China wants back outer Manchuria, Siberia and the lake Baikal , bad news for the Nigeria with snow :lol:





View attachment 641725

What is your source for trade numbers between china and russia?
 

Forum List

Back
Top