The Supreme Court Of The United States Is Guilty Of Subornation Of Perjury

[pknopp]

I've never understood why one would have to actually be harmed to bring a lawsuit. The actual threat of a legal harm is already there.

Doing some reading into this, you can legally bring a case like this without actual harm. The legal argument is the state has said they would prosecute and they have prosecuted in similar instances in the past.

That then noted, what kind of Christian would bring a lawsuit based upon a lie if indeed this is true and it was?

 

[PeterPilot]

A right wing extremist, Lorie Smith, was thinking about creating websites. Lorie Smith also wanted her 15 minutes of fame, so she created a company called 303 Creative and then filed a lawsuit claiming that a gay couple known as Stewart and Mike had demanded she create a web site for them. This lawsuit ended up at the Supreme Court, and it overturned years of legal precedent which made discrimination illegal. There was just one problem with Lorie Smith’s lawsuit — The so-called email demanding that she create a web site for the gay couple was sent ONE DAY AFTER HER LAWSUIT WAS FILED. In addition, Lorie Smith and her company had never created ANY web site for ANY individual or company. So why was the company formed in the first place? We all know why. Eventually, Stewart was reached, and he not only said he never sent that email, but that he was a heterosexual who has been happily married to a woman for the last 15 years. By submitting false information to the courts, Lorie Smith committed perjury. And, as a result, Lorie Smith had no standing at all to file this lawsuit.

And, because the justices at the Supreme Court knew of the perjury before they began deliberations, they suborned the perjury. In addition, several justices committed perjury during their Senate confirmations by stating that they would abide by precedent, known as Stare Decisis, and then did the opposite. This week, The Supreme Court of the United States officially became a corrupt criminal enterprise

The Supreme Court of the United States is guilty of subornation of perjury

A right wing extremist, Lorie Smith, was thinking about creating websites. Lorie Smith also wanted her 15 minutes of fame, so she created a company called 303 Creative and then filed a lawsuit claiming that a gay couple known as Stewart and Mike had...

www.dailykos.com

The most corrupt, and illegitimate court in the nations history.

SCOTUS is as corrupt as Congress and the Executive. Before this case of Lorie Smith showed it, the court's treatment of the Brunson case demonstrated that corruption.

Before that was the sophistry offered by Justice Roberts regarding the Obamacare case.

 

[scruffy]

A right wing extremist, Lorie Smith, was thinking about creating websites. Lorie Smith also wanted her 15 minutes of fame, so she created a company called 303 Creative and then filed a lawsuit claiming that a gay couple known as Stewart and Mike had demanded she create a web site for them. This lawsuit ended up at the Supreme Court, and it overturned years of legal precedent which made discrimination illegal. There was just one problem with Lorie Smith’s lawsuit — The so-called email demanding that she create a web site for the gay couple was sent ONE DAY AFTER HER LAWSUIT WAS FILED. In addition, Lorie Smith and her company had never created ANY web site for ANY individual or company. So why was the company formed in the first place? We all know why. Eventually, Stewart was reached, and he not only said he never sent that email, but that he was a heterosexual who has been happily married to a woman for the last 15 years. By submitting false information to the courts, Lorie Smith committed perjury. And, as a result, Lorie Smith had no standing at all to file this lawsuit.

And, because the justices at the Supreme Court knew of the perjury before they began deliberations, they suborned the perjury. In addition, several justices committed perjury during their Senate confirmations by stating that they would abide by precedent, known as Stare Decisis, and then did the opposite. This week, The Supreme Court of the United States officially became a corrupt criminal enterprise

The Supreme Court of the United States is guilty of subornation of perjury

A right wing extremist, Lorie Smith, was thinking about creating websites. Lorie Smith also wanted her 15 minutes of fame, so she created a company called 303 Creative and then filed a lawsuit claiming that a gay couple known as Stewart and Mike had...

www.dailykos.com

The most corrupt, and illegitimate court in the nations history.

lol

Butthurt leftards. I love it.

Tell ya what bird rain, why dont you just LEAVE, if you hate it so much here.

 

[scruffy]

Well regardless of whether there was a conspiracy to cause the overturn, the point is still that the SCOTUS illegally overturned consumer protection against illegal discrimination.

BULLSHIT.

No one can be coerced to work.

PERIOD

There is no harm for any religious person do to web sites for gays.

HORSESHIT.

Similarly, bakers cannot be allowed to decide to not allow some people to buy their cakes.

THAT DEPENDS IF THEY'RE CUSTOM ORDERS OR NOT.

You really don't understand this ruling do you

While some claim no harm is done because the offended customer can just move on to another provider, but that does not work when it is a minority being discriminated by a majority.

Sure it does.

There may be no other alternative source for their needs.

Well that's just too damn bad, ain't it.

Here's something I learned a long time ago: if one person tells you you're an asshole, you can tell him to fuck off. If three people tell you you:re an asshole, it might be a good idea to listen.

This is not at all ambiguous.
This is a question of whether or not the Krystal Nacht is going to be allowed or not?

Oh please.

And I thought it was unanimous since before the Holocaust, that arbitrary discrimination was inherently illegal.
What possible reason could there be to withhold service to customers due to something private, like their sexual orientation?

NOT private, idiot. They're using a public service, duh.

Some people seem to have lost track of what discrimination really means.

Oct 24, 1871

Google is your friend